Search

Background: Excessive glenoid retroversion is a known risk factor for posterior shoulder instability and failure after soft tissue stabilization procedures. Whether excessive glenoid retroversion is a risk factor for failure after posterior glenoid bone grafting is unknown. Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical effectiveness of posterior iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG) for posterior shoulder instability with increasing glenoid retroversion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders had a posterior glenoid osteotomy allowing the glenoid retroversion to be set at 0°, 10°, and 20°. At these 3 preset angles, 4 conditions were simulated consecutively on the same specimen: (1) intact glenohumeral joint, (2) posterior Bankart lesion, (3) 20% posterior glenoid bone defect, and (4) posterior ICBG. Stability was evaluated in the jerk position (60° of glenohumeral anteflexion, 60° of internal rotation) by measuring (A) posterior humeral head (HH) translation (in mm) and (B) peak translational force (in N) necessary for translation of the HH over 25% of glenoid width. Results: At 0° of retroversion, the ICBG restored posterior HH translation and peak translational force to values comparable with those of the intact condition (P =.649 and P =.979, respectively). At 10° of retroversion, the ICBG restored the peak translational force to a value comparable with that of the intact condition (22.3 vs 24.7 N, respectively; P =.418) but showed a significant difference in posterior HH translation in comparison to the intact condition (4.5 vs 2.0 mm, respectively; P =.026). There was a significant increase in posterior HH translation and significant decrease in peak translational force with the ICBG at 20° of glenoid retroversion compared with the intact condition (posterior HH translation: 7.9 vs 2.0 mm, respectively; P <.006; peak translational force: 15.3 vs 24.7 N, respectively; P =.014). Conclusion: In this cadaveric study, posterior ICBG was able to restore stability to a level comparable to that of the native condition at 0° and to some extent at 10° of retroversion. However, posterior ICBG was not able to provide adequate stability at 20° of glenoid retroversion. Clinical Relevance: Posterior glenoid bone grafting with ICBG should be used with caution when performed in isolation in the setting of posterior instability associated with glenoid bone loss and combined glenoid retroversion of >10°. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Full‐thickness rotator cuff tears can lead to poor coaptation of the humeral head to the glenoid, disrupting muscle forces required for glenohumeral joint stability, ultimately leading to joint subluxation. The aim of this study was to evaluate muscle forces and glenohumeral joint translations during elevation in the presence of isolated and combined full‐thickness rotator cuff tears. Eight fresh‐frozen upper limbs were mounted to a computer‐controlled testing apparatus that simulated joint motion by simulated muscle force application. Scapular‐plane abduction was performed, and glenohumeral joint translations were measured using an optoelectronic system. Testing was performed in the native shoulder, a following an isolated tear to the supraspinatus, as well as combined tears involving the supraspinatus and subscapularis, as well as supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor. Rotator cuff tears significantly increased middle deltoid force at 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction relative to that in the native shoulder (p < 0.05). Significantly greater superior translations were observed relative to the intact shoulder due to combined tears to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus at 30° of abduction (mean increase: 1.6 mm, p = 0.020) and 60° of abduction (mean increase: 4.8 mm, p = 0.040). This study illustrates the infraspinatus‐teres minor complex as a major humeral head depressor and contributor to glenohumeral joint stability. An increase in deltoid force during abduction occurs in the presence of rotator cuff tears, which exacerbates superior migration of the humeral head. The findings may help in the development of clinical tests in rotator cuff tear diagnostics, in surgical planning of rotator cuff repair, and in planning of targeted rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The majority of the current literature on arthroscopic Bankart repair is retrospective, and discrepancies exist regarding clinical outcomes including recurrent instability and return to play among studies of different levels of evidence. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of the literature to compare the outcomes of prospective and retrospective studies on arthroscopic Bankart repair. A search was performed using the PubMed/Medline database for all studies that reported clinical outcomes on Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability. The search term "Bankart repair" was used, with all results being analyzed via strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Three independent investigators extracted data and scored each included study based on the 10 criteria of the Modified Coleman Methodology Score out of 100. A χ2 test was performed to assess if recurrent instability, revision, return to play, and complications are independent of prospective and retrospective studies. A total of 193 studies were included in the analysis, with 53 prospective studies and 140 retrospective in design. These studies encompassed a total of 13,979 patients and 14,019 surgical procedures for Bankart repair for shoulder instability. The rate of redislocation in the prospective studies was 8.0% vs. 5.9% in retrospective studies (P <.001). The rate of recurrent subluxation in the prospective studies was 3.4% vs. 2.4% in retrospective studies (P =.004). The rate of revision was higher in retrospective studies at 4.9% vs. 3.9% in prospective studies (P =.013). There was no significant difference in terms of overall rate to return to play between prospective and retrospective studies (90% and 91%, respectively; P =.548). The overall rate of non-instability complications in the prospective cohort was 0.27% vs. 0.78% in the retrospective studies (P =.002). The overall rates of recurrent dislocations-subluxations are higher in prospective studies than retrospective studies. However, rates of revision were reportedly higher in retrospective studies. Complications after arthroscopic Bankart repair are rare in both prospective and retrospective studies, and there was no difference in rates of return to play. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The rationale for the Latarjet procedure was described as the "triple blocking" effect. Satisfactory surgical outcomes have been reported after surgery. However, it has been reported that the "triple blocking" effect increases joint stability, but it does not fully restore it. Moreover, the procedure is nonanatomic and concerns remain regarding the effects. The study of scapulohumeral rhythm, which is a clinical parameter used for the functional evaluation of shoulder kinematics, can offer new perspectives on the rationale for the procedure. This study aimed to compare the shoulder kinematics of patients after the Latarjet procedure to the shoulders of a healthy population using magnetic and inertial measurement units with a motion analysis system. A retrospective study with prospective data collection was conducted on 28 patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder instability. At a minimum 12-month follow-up, each patient was evaluated by assessing the range of motion, the Rowe score, and the Constant-Murley score. Patients were examined using the ShowMotion 3D kinematic tracking system (NCS Lab, Modena, Italy), which uses wireless wearable noninvasive magnetic and inertial measurement units sensors to assess the three-dimensional kinematics of the shoulder. For each plane of elevation (ie, flexion and abduction), the scapulohumeral rhythm was described by three scapulothoracic rotations (ie, protraction–retraction, mediolateral rotation and posterior–anterior tilting) as a function of humeral anteflexion or humeral abduction. The mean time from first shoulder dislocation to surgery was 6.6 ± 3 years (range, 1-12 years). No intraoperative complications occurred, and computed tomography (CT) performed 3 months after surgery showed graft union in all patients. After a mean follow-up time of 32.4 ± 20 months (range, 12-96), the mean Constant-Murley score and Rowe scores were 94.5 ± 4.8 (range, 84-100) and 96.7 ± 3.5 (range, 90-100), respectively. All patients showed no signs of glenohumeral arthritis on X-ray examination. Scapular posterior tilt and scapular internal rotation were significantly greater in the patient group than in the healthy population for the flexion–extension and abduction–adduction movements along the whole shoulder range of motion (all P <.05); no differences were found in upward/downward scapular rotation. A greater scapular posterior tilt and scapular internal rotation were observed after the Latarjet procedure. The modified position of the scapula was maintained during the entire range of motion, suggesting a shoulder-stabilizing kinematic effect in addition to the bony, sling and bumper effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The indications for bone block augmentation of the glenoid following recurrent anterior shoulder instability are expanding. Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AAGR) is an evolving technique with similar clinical results to the Latarjet procedure and other open bone block procedures. Multiple types of bone grafts and fixation techniques have been described, with varying results on bony integration, resorption, articular congruity, and recurrence rates. This review focuses on biomechanics, patient workup, indications, current evidence, and the authors' preferred surgical technique for AAGR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Overhead athletes with anterior, posterior, and multidirectional shoulder instability present with a wide range of symptoms, especially considering the injury mechanism and affected supportive structures. As such, the management of shoulder instability is widely variable and relies on rehabilitation, operative management, and sport-specific considerations, such as positional and seasonal demands on the athlete. Biomechanical analysis may further aid in the recovery process or serve as a predictive tool to identify an increased risk for injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anterior glenohumeral instability is one of the most common injuries suffered from sport. Despite padding and conditioning, the shoulder joint remains particularly vulnerable to injury, especially in the setting of contact. The overall rate of anterior instability is reported to be 0.12 injuries per 1000 athlete exposures, although this is increased up to 0.40 to 0.51 in the contact athlete. Successful treatment requires consideration of restoring stability while minimizing loss of glenohumeral motion. Common treatment strategies involve addressing the pathology that results from anterior shoulder dislocation including labral detachment as well as bony defects to the humeral head and glenoid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the evaluation of shoulder instability, recognition of relevant pathology on imaging is critical to planning a surgical treatment that minimizes the risk for recurrent instability. The purpose of this review is to (1) discuss the use of radiography, computed tomography, and MRI in evaluating shoulder instability and (2) demonstrate how various imaging modalities are useful in identifying critical pathologies in the shoulder that are relevant for treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shoulder glenohumeral joint dislocations and subluxations are a relatively common injury among athletic populations. Evaluating the patient both on the field initially and through early recovery helps to determine the best treatment strategies and predict the natural history of each unique injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative infection after the Latarjet procedure, ranging from 1% to 6%, can compromise the functional outcome of young athletes. Cutibacterium acnes is a main pathogen as a consequence of an intraoperative contamination. Purpose: To evaluate intraoperative contamination with C. acnes and the effectiveness of the local application of vancomycin during the Latarjet procedure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This was a single-center study including 75 patients (mean age, 26 years; range, 15-55 years) operated on for anterior shoulder instability with the primary open Latarjet procedure; they underwent the same protocol of skin preparation and preoperative prophylactic antibiotics. Three groups of 25 patients were created and divided sequentially, without the results of each group being known before the end of the study: group A (5 mg/mL of vancomycin), group B (20 mg/mL of vancomycin), and group C (control group with no vancomycin). Swab samples of the coracoid were taken before sectioning the coracoid process (time 1) and after its preparation (time 2). The coracoid was then wrapped in gauze impregnated with different concentrations of vancomycin, except for group C. A final sample (time 3) was taken before screwing the bone block onto the glenoid. All samples were cultured for 21 days, and patients underwent clinical and radiological follow-up for 6 months. Results: The C. acnes contamination rates at times 1, 2, and 3 were 25%, 44%, and 45%, respectively, without significant difference. There was no significant difference between groups A and B with respect to the number of positive cultures at each time point. Of 9 positive cultures at time 1, all were still positive at time 3 in group A, whereas 3 of 5 were negative in group B (P =.027). The rate of C. acnes at time 3 in the control group was higher than that in the 2 other groups (68% vs 44% for group A and 20% for group B; P =.003). Body mass index was the only prognostic factor for a C. acnes –positive culture (26.05 ± 3.39 vs 23.34 ± 2.33; P =.018). No clinical infection was reported at the 6-month postoperative follow-up. Conclusion: The rate of C. acnes contamination ranged from 25% to 68% during the open Latarjet procedure in young athletes. Vancomycin reduced the bacterial contamination when it was used at high concentrations in a gauze wrap on the coracoid. The type of C. acnes detected and its clinical implications remain to be studied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and recurrence of instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) in patients with anterior shoulder instability, with and without a GLAD lesion, while distinguishing between primary and recurrent instability. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent isolated ABR between January 2012 and December 2021 were included. Patients with a concomitant GLAD lesion were matched in with patients without a GLAD lesion according to the following criteria: age, sex, BMI, follow-up time, and primary versus recurrent instability. At minimum two-year follow-up, the clinical outcome (Rowe score, redislocation rate) and the functional outcome, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), satisfaction (1–10 scale, 0 = unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), were compared between groups. Results: In total, 28 patients (14 GLAD vs. 14 Bankart; age: 32.5 ± 13.0 years; sex: 92.9% male; BMI: 24.6 ± 2.2) were included 6.9 ± 2.8 (2–11) years after isolated ABR (follow-up rate 63.6%). Clinical and functional outcome did not differ significantly between patients with versus without GLAD lesions (ASES score: 100 [96.5–100] vs. 97.5 [93.3–100], p = 0.27); WOSI (%): 9.0 [3.7–24.5] vs. 3.8 [0.8–8.9], p = 0.22; Rowe score: 90.0 [75.0–100] vs. 95.0 [78.8–100], p = 0.57; OSIS: 46 [44.7–48] vs. 46 [43.0–48], p = 0.54; satisfaction: 8.9 ± 1.4 vs. 8.0 ± 1.4, p = 0.78; VAS 0 [0–1.3] vs. 0 [0–1.0]. In both groups, two patients (14.3%) reported a redislocation during the observation period. Conclusions: At short- to mid-term follow-up, ABR showed favorable outcomes, low dislocation rates, and high patient satisfaction, regardless of the presence of a GLAD lesion or primary versus recurrent instability. However, follow-up time was heterogeneous, and the follow-up rate was marginal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of the present systematic review is to collect all the available evidence regarding the clinical and radiological results of revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) of modular anatomic shoulder prostheses (TSA) using a convertible metal-backed glenoid (MBG). Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies investigating revision of TSA to RSA utilizing a convertible MBG and reporting clinical and radiological outcomes were identified. Results: A total of five studies on the use of convertible modular glenoid component in the setting of TSA revision to RSA were finally included in the present systematic review. A total of 60 procedures were reported. Mean operative times was 65 min. Intraoperative complications included 3 cases of glenoid loosening. Only one case of dislocation was reported as postoperative complication. At mean follow-up of 32.3 months post-revision, no glenoid loosening was reported, VAS score decreased from 7.7 to 1.5, Constant Score increased from 24.8 to 57.6. Conclusions: Revision to RSA after failed TSA using a convertible modular glenoid component was associated with a low rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, low surgical time and led to good results in term of pain relieve and functional outcomes. Given the complexity and risk associated with revision of anatomic shoulder prosthesis having a convertible glenoid may help to simplify the procedure and improve clinical results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The extent of measurement errors of statistical shape models that predict native glenoid width based on glenoid height to subsequently determine the amount of anterior glenoid bone loss is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to (1) create a statistical shape model based on glenoid height and width measured on 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) and determine the accuracy through measurement errors and (2) determine measurement errors of existing 3D-CT statistical shape models. A retrospective cross-sectional study included all consecutive patients who underwent CT imaging before undergoing primary surgical treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation between 2007 and 2022 at the Tohoku University Hospital and affiliated hospitals. Patients were included when instability was unilateral and CT scans of both the injured and contralateral uninjured shoulder were available. 3D segmentations were created and glenoid height and width of the injured and contralateral uninjured side (gold standard) were measured. Accuracy was determined through measurement errors, which were defined as a percentage error deviation from native glenoid width (contralateral uninjured glenoid), calculated as follows: measurement error = [(estimated glenoid width with a statistical shape model – native glenoid width) / native glenoid width] × 100%. A linear regression analysis was performed to create a statistical shape model based on glenoid height according to the formula: native glenoid width = a × glenoid height + b. The diagnosis and procedure codes identified 105 patients, of which 69 (66%) were eligible for inclusion. Glenoid height demonstrated a very strong correlation (r = 0.80) with native glenoid width. The linear regression formula based on this cohort was as follows: native glenoid width = 0.75 × glenoid height – 0.61, and it demonstrated an absolute average measurement error of 5% ± 4%. The formulas by Giles et al, Chen et al and Rayes et al demonstrated absolute average measurement errors of 10% ± 7%, 6% ± 5%, and 9% ± 6%, respectively. Statistical shape models that estimate native glenoid width based on glenoid height demonstrate unacceptable measurement errors, despite a high correlation. Therefore, great caution is advised when using these models to determine glenoid bone loss percentage. To minimize errors caused by morphologic differences, preference goes to methods that use the contralateral side as reference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Management of glenohumeral instability in the adolescent population can be both challenging and controversial. There are no current guidelines for optimal management of glenohumeral instability in this population (unidirectional or multidirectional), and the cutoff ages for transition to adult treatment are not known. Purpose: To develop consensus-based guidelines for the management of glenohumeral instability in adolescents. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: A 26-question, multiple-choice survey was developed after 2 rounds of iterations and was submitted to the orthopaedic surgeons of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Society. The survey comprised 3 sections—demographics, practice setting, and decision-making—and included cutoff ages and management in 5 specific case scenarios. Consensus-based guidelines were generated with 66% response agreement. An indication score was then applied to each response related to more aggressive management to determine if variables related to consensus (or lack thereof) could be identified. Results: A total of 54 responses were returned. Of the respondents, 59% were from academic practice, 84% were pediatric orthopaedic fellowship trained, and 46% performed >25 shoulder instability cases per year. In the setting of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation, nonoperative treatment was preferred for boys aged <14 years and girls aged <13 years. Besides age, proximal humerus physeal status, injury mechanism, sport, and presence of bony injury affected treatment selection. The presence of a Bankart lesion was an indication for stabilization in first-time dislocations for contact athletes with a closing or closed physis, but not in patients with an open physis or noncontact injury mechanisms. For recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, stabilization was preferred irrespective of physis status. Initial nonoperative treatment was preferred for multidirectional instability. Conclusion: In the setting of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in patients with open physes, nonoperative treatment was preferred for boys <14 years and girls <13 years. Future multicenter prospective studies focusing on outcomes would help to validate current practice patterns, especially in scenarios for which no consensus was reached. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hill-Sachs lesions are common after shoulder instability, and treatment options vary but include remplissage or implantation of structural bone graft. Large Hill-Sachs lesions not addressed by remplissage are challenging to manage and may frequently require an open surgical approach for bone filling treatment options. The optimal approach to maximize visualization of the humeral head during these procedures remains unclear. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the area of the humeral head accessed using a modified posterior deltoid split approach versus a standard deltopectoral approach without surgical dislocation, with particular attention to access of engaging Hill-Sachs lesions for the purpose of bone grafting in the setting of anterior shoulder instability. It was hypothesized that both approaches would provide equal access to a simulated Hill-Sachs lesion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Four human cadaveric shoulders were mounted in the beach-chair position. The modified posterior deltoid split approach and nonextensile deltopectoral approaches were performed. A typical Hill-Sachs lesion was simulated on the humeri. The percentage of the total surface area of the humeral head that was accessed, including access to the simulated Hill-Sachs lesion, was mapped using 3-dimensional digitizing software. Results: The deltopectoral approach provided 45% ± 15.2% access (range, 24% to 58%) to the humeral head versus 22.2% ± 6.1% (range, 17% to 30%) for the modified posterior deltoid split approach (P =.057). The modified posterior deltoid split approach enabled 100% access of the simulated Hill-Sachs lesion compared with 0% for the nonextensile deltopectoral approach. The angle of access to the articular surface was direct and perpendicular with the modified posterior deltoid split approach. Conclusion: The overall surface area of the humeral head accessed via the modified posterior deltoid split approach was less compared with the deltopectoral approach; however, the entire area of a typical Hill-Sachs lesion was able to be accessed from the modified posterior deltoid split approach, whereas this area was not well visualized from the standard deltopectoral approach. Clinical Relevance: The modified posterior deltoid split approach provided sufficient access to the humeral head for the purposes of grafting an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion in the setting of anterior shoulder instability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Chinese unique inlay Bristow (Cuistow) procedure is a modified Bristow surgery in which an inlay (mortise-and-tenon) structure is added to the contact surface between the coracoid tip and the glenoid. Patients who have undergone the Cuistow procedure have had satisfying clinical performance and excellent postoperative bone healing rates (96.1%). Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after the arthroscopic Cuistow procedure and the arthroscopic Bristow procedure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 91 patients who underwent either the Cuistow or Bristow procedure between January 2017 and March 2018 were selected, and 69 patients (70 shoulders; 35 in the Cuistow group and 35 in the Bristow group) were included. Clinical assessment at minimum 24 months postoperatively, including the visual analog scale for pain and instability, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Rowe score, subjective shoulder value score, and active range of motion, was completed by independent observers and compared with values collected preoperatively. Assessment with 3-dimensional computed tomography scans was performed preoperatively; immediately after the operation; at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively; and at the final follow-up. Results: A total of 69 patients (70 shoulders) were included, with a mean follow-up duration of 34.41 ± 5.99 months (range, 24-50 months). Both groups saw significant improvement in visual analog scale for pain and instability, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Rowe, and subjective shoulder value scores at the final follow-up compared with the preoperative values (P <.001 for all), with no significant between-group differences on any clinical outcomes at the final follow-up. The 3-month postoperative graft union rate on computed tomography was significantly higher in the Cuistow group compared with the Bristow group (82.9% vs 51.4%, respectively, P =.003), although the graft union rate at the final follow-up was not significantly different (94.3% vs 85.7%, respectively; P =.449). Conclusion: Patients receiving the Cuistow procedure had equivalent clinical outcomes and a significantly higher bone union rate at 3 months postoperatively than those in the Bristow group. The inlay structure used in the Cuistow procedure was found to be associated with accelerated bone union. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The management of shoulder instability in throwing athletes remains a challenge given the delicate balance between physiologic shoulder laxity facilitating performance and the inherent need for shoulder stability. This review will discuss the evaluation and management of a throwing athlete with suspected instability with a focus on recent findings and developments. Recent Findings: The vast majority of throwing athletes with shoulder instability experience subtle microinstability as a result of repetitive microtrauma rather than episodes of gross instability. These athletes may present with arm pain, dead arms or reduced throwing velocity. Recent literature reinforces the fact that there is no "silver bullet" for the management of these athletes and an individualized, tailored approach to treatment is required. While initial nonoperative management remains the hallmark for treatment, the results of rehabilitation protocols are mixed, and some patients will ultimately undergo surgical stabilization. In these cases, it is imperative that the surgeon be judicious with the extent of surgical stabilization as overtightening of the glenohumeral joint is possible, which can adversely affect athlete performance. Summary: Managing shoulder instability in throwing athletes requires a thorough understanding of its physiologic and biomechanical underpinnings. Inconsistent results seen with surgical stabilization has led to a focus on nonoperative management for these athletes with surgery reserved for cases that fail to improve non-surgically. Overall, more high quality studies into the management of this challenging condition are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The Bankart and Latarjet procedures are two of the most common surgical techniques to treat anterior shoulder instability with satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. However, the outcomes in the adolescent population remain unclear, and there is no information regarding the arthroscopic Latarjet in this population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the arthroscopic Bankart and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures in the management of anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. Methods: We present a retrospective, matched-pair study of teenagers with anterior glenohumeral instability treated with an arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) or an arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) procedure with a minimum two-year follow-up. Preoperative demographic and clinical features, factors associated with dislocation, and complications were collected. Recurrence, defined as dislocation or subluxation, was established as the primary outcome. Clinical and functional outcomes were analyzed using objective (Rowe), and subjective (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)) scores. Additionally, the rate of return to sport was assessed. Results: A total of 51 adolescents were included, of whom 46 (92%) were male, with 17 (33%) in the Latarjet group and 34 (66%) in the Bankart group. The mean age at time of surgery was 18 years (15 to 19). There were no intraoperative complications. At a median follow-up of nine years (IQR 2 to 18), recurrence was observed in 12 patients in the Bankart group (35.3%) and one patient in the Latarjet group (5.9%) (p = 0.023). Satisfactory postoperative outcomes were obtained, with mean Rowe, WOSI, and SANE scores noted at 95 (10 to 100), 325 (25 to 1,975), and 87.5 (10 to 100), respectively. Most patients (29 in the Bankart group (85.3%) and 16 in the Latarjet group (94.1%)) were able to return to sport (p = 0.452). Conclusion: The ABR and AL procedures both obtain satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes in the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability in adolescents with a low complication rate. However, the ABR is associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):1041–1048.

Background: Joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) are connective tissue disorders characterized by increased joint laxity, affecting musculoskeletal health and quality of life. In this study, we explored recent trends in surgical treatment of shoulder instability among patients with these disorders. Methods: We searched the PearlDiver Mariner database, which includes deidentified US all-payer claims data from 2010 to 2020. We used procedure and diagnostic codes for EDS and JHS to select patients. The primary outcome was the yearly trend in relative utilization of the following 4 shoulder instability procedures: arthroscopic stabilization, Latarjet coracoid transfer, open capsulolabral repair, and open capsulolabral shift. Results: Among 109,274 patients with EDS and 453,885 with JHS, 3.4% and 0.8% underwent shoulder instability procedures, respectively. Arthroscopic stabilization was the predominant treatment, with a mean utilization rate of 78% for EDS and 83% for JHS. Notably, the age at surgery increased for EDS patients but decreased for JHS patients. Female patients represented large proportions of those undergoing procedures in both the EDS group (83%) and the JHS group (77%). Conclusions: Our findings indicate a consistent preference for arthroscopic stabilization in treating shoulder instability in patients with EDS and JHS. The trends in age suggest shifts in treatment strategies, possibly influenced by advancements in nonoperative interventions or varying symptom severity. The higher proportion of female patients aligns with the known prevalence of connective tissue disorders in women. Future research should explore outcomes, complications, and specific EDS subtypes to guide optimal treatment strategies for these challenging connective tissue disorders.

Background: The Trillat procedure is a surgical treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. It consists of an inferior closed-wedge osteoclasy of the coracoid process. Nowadays, it is used to treat selected cases of shoulder instability. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of clinical and functional outcomes, recurrence rate, and complications of the Trillat procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Methods: A systematic review of the literature regarding the Trillat procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability was carried out on Medline, through PubMed, and Embase. The English and French literature published before the 4th of November 2023 was analyzed. The data regarding demographics, outcome, recurrency, and complications were reported. Results: From 38 articles with the primary search, seven manuscripts were enrolled. A total of 419 patients and 443 shoulders were analyzed, with a mean age of 35.46 (range 25-61) years. The mean follow-up was 65.01 (range 24.8-132) months postoperative. The pooled data showed 91.2% of subjective satisfaction, weighted mean postoperative Rowe score of 86.25 points, Walch–Duplay of 84.6 points, and a Constant–Murley Score of 84.82 points. The recurrence rate was 10.28% for all the articles involved and 8.51% for the articles proposing the procedure for selected case of anterior instability, with low-grade glenoid bone loss. The most common complications were a loss of external rotation and the development of osteoarthritis. Conclusion: The Trillat procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability showed promising results, especially in selected cases, such as low-grade glenoid bone loss, with massive irreparable cuff tears or hyperlaxity.

Background: Glenohumeral instability is a complex clinical problem with underlying pathology in the bony, labral, and capsular tissues. The rate of specific capsular injuries varies widely in the literature and the clinical importance of these specific injury patterns remains unclear. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic review was performed of multiple databases for all primary research articles between 2008 and 2023 which included advanced imaging and included rates of capsular injury in patients with glenohumeral instability. Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. The most prevalent capsular injury seen was in the inferior glenohumeral ligament (34.1%) across all studies, followed by anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsions with 24.9% prevalence. Humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligaments lesions were the least common (6.2%) of subjects, followed closely by capsular tears (8.3%) of subjects. Conclusion: Capsular injury is commonly seen in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with anterior shoulder instability. Significant heterogeneity in language and imaging techniques was found in the existing literature. Further research is needed to explore these specific capsular lesions’ clinical implications and rehabilitation strategies.

The Trillat procedure, initially described by Albert Trillat, is historically one of the first techniques for addressing recurrent anterior shoulder instability, incorporating fascinating biomechanical mechanisms. After lowering, medializing, and fixing the coracoid process to the glenoid neck, the subcoracoid space is reduced, the subscapularis lowered, and its line of pull changed, accentuating the function of the subscapularis as a humeral head depressor centering the glenohumeral joint. Furthermore, the conjoint tendon creates a ‘seatbelt’ effect, preventing anteroinferior humeral head dislocation. Even though contemporary preferences lean towards arthroscopic Bankart repair with optional remplissage, bone augmentation, and the Latarjet procedure, enduring surgical indications remain valid for the Trillat procedure, which offers joint preservation and superior outcomes in two distinct scenarios: (i) older patients with massive irreparable cuff tears and anterior recurrent instability with an intact subscapularis tendon regardless of the extent of glenoid bone loss; (ii) younger patients with instability associated shoulder joint capsule hyperlaxity without concomitant injuries (glenoid bone loss, large Hill–Sachs lesion). Complications associated with the Trillat procedure include recurrent anterior instability, potential overtightening of the coracoid, leading to pain and a significant reduction in range of motion, risk of subcoracoid impingement, and restriction of external rotation by up to 10°, a limitation that is generally well-tolerated. The Trillat procedure may be an effective alternative technique for specific indications and should remain part of the surgical armamentarium for addressing anterior shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions are an uncommon cause of anterior glenohumeral instability and may occur in isolation or combination with other pathologies. As HAGL lesions are difficult to detect via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy, they can remain unrecognized and result in continued glenohumeral instability. PURPOSE: To compare patients with anterior shoulder instability from a large multicenter cohort with and without a diagnosis of a HAGL lesion and identify preoperative physical examination findings, patient-reported outcomes, imaging findings, and surgical management trends associated with HAGL lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients with anterior glenohumeral instability who underwent surgical management between 2012 and 2020 at 11 orthopaedic centers were enrolled. Patients with HAGL lesions identified intraoperatively were compared with patients without HAGL lesions. Preoperative characteristics, physical examinations, imaging findings, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures were collected. The Student t test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Fisher exact test, and chi-square test were used to compare groups. RESULTS: A total of 21 HAGL lesions were identified in 915 (2.3%) patients; approximately one-third (28.6%) of all lesions were visualized intraoperatively but not identified on preoperative MRI. Baseline characteristics did not differ between study cohorts. Compared with non-HAGL patients, HAGL patients were less likely to have a Hill-Sachs lesion (54.7% vs 28.6%; P = .03) or an anterior labral tear (87.2% vs 66.7%; P = .01) on preoperative MRI and demonstrated increased external rotation when their affected arm was positioned at 90° of abduction (85° vs 90°; P = .03). Additionally, HAGL lesions were independently associated with an increased risk of undergoing an open stabilization surgery (odds ratio, 74.6 [95% CI, 25.2-221.1]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of HAGL lesions were missed on preoperative MRI. HAGL patients were less likely to exhibit preoperative imaging findings associated with anterior shoulder instability, such as Hill-Sachs lesions or anterior labral pathology. These patients underwent open procedures more frequently than patients without HAGL lesions.

Background: The seated wall angel (SWA) is an intervention to improve upper quarter mobility but has not been described as a clinical test with scoring. Hypothesis/ Purpose: To explore the clinical utility of the SWA as a test with scoring. The authors hypothesized that SWA test scores would be lower on the injured than uninjured side, improve over time, and show stronger association with patient-reported shoulder function than shoulder mobility tests. Study Design: Prospective cohort. Methods: Patients diagnosed with anterior shoulder instability and referred to physical therapy participated. Testing occurred after physical therapy examination (initial) and six weeks later (follow-up). Rehabilitation was not controlled. Testing included clinical tests (SWA, passive shoulder external rotation range of motion, total arc of motion) and patient-reported outcomes including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, (ASES) and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). The SWA test was scored 0 to 3 points bilaterally based on number of body contacts with the wall (i.e., elbows and fingertips, posterior fingers, posterior forearm). Passive range of motion was measured with a standard goniometer. SWA scores were compared between sides at initial testing and compared between testing timepoints on the injured side. Associations among injured side clinical test values and patient-reported outcome scores were examined. Results: Mean (SD) SWA score on the injured side was significantly lower than the uninjured side at initial testing [1.6 (1.0) vs 2.2 (1.1), p = 0.045] and significantly increased at follow-up testing [2.4 (1.0), p = 0.041]. Only SWA test score was significantly correlated with ASES (r=0.597) and WOSI (r=-0.648) scores at initial testing, and SWA test score was significantly correlated with WOSI score at follow-up testing (r=-0.611). Conclusions: The clinical utility of the SWA test is supported by distinguishing the injured and uninjured sides and having stronger associations with patient-reported shoulder function than shoulder mobility tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shoulder proprioception, in which the anterior glenohumeral capsule plays a major role, is critical to the functioning of the shoulder. Consequently, most surgeons either do not resect or reinsert the anterior capsule in shoulder stabilization surgery. In the original open Latarjet procedure (OLP), the anterior capsule is preserved. However, in the all-arthroscopic Latarjet procedure (ALP), complete anterior capsule resection is recommended for better view and access to the coracoid. This raises the question if there is a postoperative difference in proprioception between these 2 procedures. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to assess the difference in postoperative proprioception between the operated and healthy sides after the OLP and ALP and (2) to compare the difference in postoperative proprioception on the operated side between the OLP and ALP. We conducted a retrospective analysis including all patients who underwent a proprioception test after an OLP or ALP at our center. Collected baseline characteristics included sex, age at surgery, operated side, hand dominance, presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion, and time between surgery and the proprioception test. For the test, patients were positioned 1 meter from a wall. They were blindfolded and had to point at a target with a laser pointer taped to their index finger. The laser point was marked and the errors were measured horizontally and vertically and categorized as <4 cm, 4-8 cm, 8-16 cm, and >16 cm. Between April 2022 and April 2024, a total of 91 cases were identified, of which 24 underwent an OLP and 67 underwent an ALP. No significant difference was found in error distribution between the healthy and operated side after both the OLP (P =.30 horizontally, P =.67 vertically) and ALP (P =.20 horizontally, P =.34 vertically). Moreover, there was no significant difference in error distribution between the operated sides after the OLP vs. ALP (P =.52 horizontally; P =.61 vertically). Our data suggest that postoperative proprioception is not significantly different between the operated and healthy sides after both the OLP and ALP, nor between the operated sides after the OLP vs. after the ALP. This might imply that completely resecting the anterior glenohumeral capsule does not have a detrimental effect on shoulder proprioception. However, these results are multifactorial and prospective studies are needed to better understand the regeneration potential of glenohumeral capsule mechanoreceptors and the importance of the anterior capsule for shoulder proprioception. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glenohumeral instability is a common pathology, particularly in young, active patients. A narrative review was performed to describe the history of surgical treatments for anterior shoulder instability. Open surgical techniques were first described by Bankart in 1923. Techniques include both anatomic soft tissue repairs and nonanatomic procedures to provide constraint to motion and dislocation. Osseous techniques to address glenoid bone loss include both autograft techniques, such as the Latarjet procedure, and the use of various allografts. Technologic advances, particularly arthroscopy, have continued to drive the evolution of treatments. The concept of the glenoid track has furthered our understanding of this pathology to guide appropriate treatment to reduce recurrence. Surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability continues to evolve in an effort to restore function and prevent additional injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To date, long-term results of the arthroscopic repair of glenoid rim fractures are missing. The aim of this study was, to evaluate clinical and radiographic results following arthroscopic repair of anteroinferior glenoid fractures using anchors or bioabsorbable compression screws after a mean follow-up period of 10 years. Clinical outcome measures included evaluation of recurrent instability, the Constant Score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Rowe Score (RS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Score, and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score. X-ray images were obtained for assessment of an instability arthropathy (IA). Twenty-three patients (7 female and 16 male, mean (±standard deviation) age 48 ± 15 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair of an acute substantial solitary or multifragmented anteroinferior glenoid rim fracture were enrolled. After a mean follow-up period of 10 ± 2 years, patients reached a mean Constant Score of 92 ± 10 points, Subjective Shoulder Value of 93 ± 11%, RS of 84 ± 20 points, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Score of 98 ± 2%, and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score of 91 ± 11 points. No patient suffered recurrent dislocation. Radiographic results were obtained of 18 patients. Signs of IA were noted in 9 patients (50%) with progression of IA in all cases in comparison to the preoperative status. Patients with IA were significantly older (52 vs. 38 years, P =.04). Clinical score results did not show a significant difference in patients with vs. without IA except for the RS (74 vs. 94 points, P =.02). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed, and no patient required revision endoprosthetic surgery. Arthroscopic repair of acute anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures shows good clinical long-term results. High rates of IA were observed especially in older patients. However, the presence of IA did not seem to influence the subjective shoulder score outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure are both effective surgical methods for treating repeated recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. However, there is still little consensus regarding the standard treatment for recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder. Typically, the choice of treatment has been influenced more by training and tradition rather than the existing evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare patient-reported outcomes, recurrence, and complications between the 2 procedures, among both athletic and nonathletic cohorts. Relevant clinical trials were identified through a systematic search of databases in April 2023 including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were included if they compared patient-reported outcomes or complication rates of open Latarjet procedure vs. arthroscopic Bankart repair. Continuous data, such as patient-reported outcomes were pooled as the weighted mean difference. For dichotomous data such as recurrence and revision rates, the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Twenty-one clinical studies (3 randomized controlled trials) were included in the meta-analysis involving a total of 13,176 operated shoulders. Arthroscopic Bankart showed a 3.08 times higher risk of recurrence and revision due to postoperative instability (RR = 3.08, 95% CI 2.03-4.68) compared with those who had the Latarjet approach. The Rowe score was higher in the Latarjet group by an average of 4.55 points (95% CI 2.41-6.68). This difference was more pronounced in athletes, with an increase of 5.47 points (95% CI 0.16-10.78), compared with the nonathletic population: 4.03 (95% CI 2.04-6.02). Return to sport time was shorter by 0.40 months (95% CI –0.75 to –0.05) in the Latarjet group. The total complication rate was approximately 47% lower in the Bankart group (RR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.90). Additionally, the risk of hematoma was 75% lower in patients undergoing the arthroscopic Bankart compared with the Latarjet procedure. External rotation, assessed both in abduction and adduction of the arm, as well as forward elevation, show no significant differences between the 2 groups. Our results demonstrate that the Latarjet procedure has a lower recurrence rate, excels in patient-reported outcomes, and requires less time for return to sports. Thus, it may be a superior alternative to arthroscopic Bankart repair. However, it is still associated with a higher incidence of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a well-described technique for the treatment of large, engaging Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs). Traditionally, OCAs are size-matched to the defect, which can be expensive and time-consuming, and the majority of described techniques require an open approach. Recently, an all-arthroscopic approach to Hill-Sachs OCA transplantation using premade plugs was described, eliminating the need for size-matching and graft harvest. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcomes of patients who have undergone arthroscopic treatment of HSLs using premade OCA plugs. We hypothesized that these patients would have improved pain and function without recurrent instability. A retrospective chart review was performed using operative reports for a single surgeon with search terms Hill-Sachs and allograft. Patients were excluded if an open approach was used or if graft harvest was performed. Postoperative imaging was reviewed to assess for graft incorporation and reconstitution of the HSL. Recurrent instability and reoperation were recorded. Patients completed surveys including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Five patients were identified through chart review and met inclusion criteria. All patients underwent concurrent labral repair and 2 patients underwent a concurrent open Latarjet procedure. Postoperative radiographs showed reconstitution of the HSLs in all patients. There were no complications in the postoperative period with no recurrent instability or reoperations in any patient. The average ASES score was 87% (higher score indicating better outcome) with standard deviation 9.7, and the average WOSI score was 27% (lower score indicating better outcome) with standard deviation 8.3. Favorable outcomes can be expected after arthroscopic treatment of Hill-Sachs lesions using premade OCA plugs. Further research is needed to assess larger patient cohorts and compare outcomes to size-matched approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be definitively established and merits further investigation. To assess clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision procedure for failed Bankart repair, as well as the return to athletic activity and complication rates. Between 2009 and 2020, patients with a previous failed arthroscopic Bankart repair who were treated with an arthroscopic Latarjet were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively included the Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. Dislocations, subluxations, complications, pre- and postoperative levels of activity, and degree of osteoarthritis were also assessed. A total of 77 patients, with a mean age at revision surgery of 31.2 ± 9.1 years and with either 1 (n = 59), 2 (n = 13), or 3 (n = 4) previous arthroscopic stabilizations, who underwent revision surgery using an arthroscopic Latarjet procedure were studied. Postoperatively, the mean Rowe and Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome scores increased from 41.8 ± 16 to 90.7 ± 14.3 (P <.001) and from 50.5 ± 13.8 to 90.5 ± 10.3 (P <.001), respectively. Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index decreased from 1247 ± 367.6 to 548.9 ± 363 at the final follow-up (P <.001). After a mean follow-up of 39.6 ± 23.1 months, 64 shoulders (83.1%) were subjectively graded as good to excellent using the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. Grade 1, 2, and 3 osteoarthritis, according to Ogawa et al, was found in 18 (23.4%), 6 (7.8%), and 3 (3.9%) shoulders, respectively. Six (7.8%) dislocations after revision surgery were reported. In 4 failed cases, an Eden-Hybinette procedure was conducted, and in the remaining 2 patients, an arthroscopic extra-articular anterior capsular reinforcement was performed. A significantly decreased level of athletic activity was observed postoperatively (P =.01). Arthroscopic Latarjet for the revision of failed arthroscopic Bankart repair provides satisfactory patient-reported subjective outcomes with a low rate of recurrences and complications. However, a decreased level of athletic activity is expected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss (GBL), defined in this study as 20% GBL or less, remains controversial. This study aimed to compare arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage (ABR + R) to open Latarjet for subcritical GBL in primary or revision procedures. We hypothesized that ABR + R would yield higher rates of recurrent instability and reoperation compared to Latarjet in both primary and revision settings. A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing either arthroscopic ABR + R or an open Latarjet procedure. Patients with connective tissue disorders, critical GBL (>20%), <2 year follow-up, or insufficient data were excluded. Recurrent instability and revision were the primary outcomes of interest. Additional outcomes of interest included subjective shoulder value, strength, and range of motion (ROM) One hundred eight patients (70 ABR + R, 38 Latarjet) were included with an average follow-up of 4.3 ± 2.1 years. In the primary and revision settings, similar rates of recurrent instability (Primary: P =.60; Revision: P =.28) and reoperation (Primary: P =.06; Revision: P = 1.00) were observed between Latarjet and ABR + R. Primary ABR + R exhibited better subjective shoulder value, active ROM, and internal rotation strength compared to primary open Latarjet. However, no differences were observed in the revision setting. Similar rates of recurrent instability and reoperation in addition to comparable outcomes with no differences in ROM were found for ABR + R and Latarjet in patients with subcritical GBL in both the primary and revision settings. ABR + R can be a safe and effective procedure in appropriately selected patients with less than 20% GBL for both primary and revision stabilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The risk of Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) to cause instability depends not only on the HSL but also on the glenoid size. Clinically, the only method to assess the risk of instability considering the dynamic interaction of both, the HSL together with the glenoid bone loss, is the glenoid track concept. Since it was introduced in a cadaveric study, its clinical efficacy and validity have been reported in the literature. Sometimes, the medial margin of the footprint (lateral margin of the glenoid track) is difficult to identify when a HSL is overriding the footprint. In such cases, we propose a method to draw an imaginary line connecting 2 landmarks. Although 3-dimensional computed tomography is the most accurate and widely used method to assess on/off-track lesions, our interest gradually is shifting toward magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which has no radiation concern. The current magnetic resonance method is still under way. There are various risk factors influencing the recurrent instability after surgery. The glenoid track concept deals with only 1 of these factors, that is, instability caused by bony lesions. Therefore, the following 2 issues are important: 1) how to assess the glenoid track precisely and 2) how to incorporate other risk factors into consideration. The former can be achieved by obtaining the custom-made glenoid track width using not the fixed value of 83%, but more individualized value obtained by measuring the active horizontal extension angle of the opposite shoulder in the sitting position. At the same time, the gray zone (peripheral-track lesion) needs to be clearly defined. The latter can be achieved by incorporating the risk factors other than the bony lesions. One example is the Glenoid Track Instability Management Score (GTIMS), a combination of the glenoid track concept and the instability severity index score. This new scoring system is expected to increase the predictive potential of the scoring system, and accordingly to enhance clinical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To analyze the causes of failure after a Latarjet procedure and to evaluate the results of revision surgery. Single-cohort, retrospective, observational study. Fifteen patients (13 males, mean age at revision failed Latarjet 38.9 years [range, 20-57]) with anterior glenohumeral instability who underwent a revision surgery for a failed Latarjet procedure were reviewed. Failure was defined as subluxation or dislocation. Demographic features, the reason for failure, type of lesions observed, and postoperative clinical and functional status were recorded. Functional status was assessed with the Rowe score. Subjective clinical evaluation was performed using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). Recurrence occurred in the first year following the Latarjet procedure in 11 patients (73.3%). The causes of failure were graft avulsion in 3 cases, fracture in 1, coracoid misposition in 2 cases, graft nonunion in 1, advanced osteolysis in 4 cases, and persistence of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion in 1. In 3 cases, no identifiable cause of failure but generalized severe hyperlaxity was found. Regarding revision surgery after the Latarjet procedure, 8 patients underwent an arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure and in 3 patients the graft was repositioned. In the remaining 4 patients, an extra-articular capsular reinforcement was performed. Regarding the latter, 1 patient suffered new dislocations and required an additional revision surgery consisting of an Eden-Hybinette procedure. All patients remained stable after the revision surgery at the latest follow-up, except 2 who reported subluxations after an arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette and an extra-articular capsular reinforcement, but no additional surgical procedure was required. Functional status after revision surgery was satisfactory, with a mean Rowe score of 78 (10-100), WOSI score of 829 (225-1425), and an SSV score of 67 points (40-90). The causes of failure after a Latarjet procedure were poor bone graft due to mispositioning, avulsion, fracture or resorption, generalized hyperlaxity, and incomplete restoration of the glenoid track. Our study demonstrates that when the cause of failure is identified and addressed, stability is restored, and clinical and functional scores improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Shoulder instability in pediatric and adolescent patients can be treated operatively via arthroscopic or open procedures, but there a paucity of evidence to support the incidence of these treatment modalities over time. It is hypothesized that the overall rate of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures will increase over time. Given advances in open stabilization techniques, we also hypothesized that the rate of open procedures may be increasing. Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients 19 years or younger who underwent arthroscopic or open surgery for shoulder instability and pediatric orthopedic surgeries between 2009 and 2019. Data from 37 of the 52 pediatric hospitals with Pediatric Health Information System data was included in the analysis. Annual and overall incidence rates were estimated for arthroscopic and open procedures, along with 95% confidence intervals. The yearly incidence for secondary (homolateral revisions) or primary contralateral arthroscopic and open procedures was also examined. Results: 4747 patients underwent primary arthroscopic procedures and 384 patients had primary open procedures. There were 8.2 primary open shoulder stabilization procedures per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients in 2009, which decreased by 19% to 6.7 per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients in 2019. There was an increase seen in both arthroscopic and open secondary stabilization procedures. In 2009, there were 0.97 secondary arthroscopic procedures per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients. This increased by 672% to 7.5 per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients in 2019. No secondary open procedures were recorded in 2009; however, an increase to 2.6 secondary open procedures per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients was seen by 2019. Conclusion: This study shows a rise in primary arthroscopic pediatric shoulder stabilization surgeries across the U.S. over the last decade. There was a slight decrease in the rate of primary open shoulder stabilization surgeries and an increase in both arthroscopic and open secondary (homolateral revisions or primary contralateral) shoulder stabilization surgeries, implying an increasing revision burden in this population.

Background: Anterior humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligament (aHAGL) lesions are relatively rare causes of shoulder instability that affect athletes at a higher rate than other populations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate rate of return to sport (RTS) after HAGL repair. Methods: A search of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted on April 13, 2022 with the search terms “HAGL” or “humeral avulsion glenohumeral ligament” was used to conduct the systematic review. Inclusion criteria required that lesions were limited to aHAGL, axillary pouch or central HAGL, or both anterior and posterior HAGL lesions as specified by lesion description or direction of instability. Results: Screening and full-text manuscript review identified 7/967 studies eligible for inclusion with a total of 46 aHAGL lesions in athletes. Average rate of RTS was 93.5% (standard deviation [SD] = 13.4%, n = 43/46) with rate of RTS at previous levels of play averaging 80.0% (SD = 22.1%, n = 28/35). Neither rates of concomitant procedures nor concomitant pathology were associated with variation in RTS rates overall or level of RTS. Weighted average Rowe, subjective shoulder value, and Constant scores were 87.5 (SD = 4.9), 86.0 (SD = 2.0), and 82.2 (SD = 5.1), respectively, and 78.6% (n = 22/28) of patients reported postoperative satisfaction or “good/excellent” ratings following aHAGL repair. Adverse events occurred in 18.5% of patients (n = 10/54), most frequently recurrent instability (n = 3/54). Ultimately, 6.2% of patients eventually underwent reoperation (n = 3/17). Conclusion: As with other forms of anterior shoulder instability, RTS rates after aHAGL repair are high and many patients achieve their previous level of play. The most frequent adverse event was subjective recurrent instability with reoperation in 6.2% of patients. The findings from this study provide valuable pooled data on outcomes specific to aHAGL repair, particularly in the athlete population, and contribute to further understanding of outcomes regarding operative management of this rare pathology.

This study’s relevance stems from the high incidence of injuries among junior handball athletes, particularly instability injuries, which necessitate prolonged recovery periods and extended absences from the team. Forty handball playeres included in the study (LE=20 and LC=20). Both groups underwent initial evaluations regarding pain induced by the injury, daily activity, mobility, and strength. We analyzed the functional balance and had participants complete questionnaires to assess activity limitations due to shoulder injuries and instability, as well as functional impairment. After completing the recuperative program, the control group followed a traditional rehabilitation program, while the experimental group followed the proposed program. LE made important progress analyzed to the LC in terms of functional impairment due to pain and recovery from disability caused by instability injuries, according to post-evaluation results.

Aims: To systematically review the predominant complication rates and changes to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for shoulder instability. Methods: This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO, involved a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Key search terms included “allograft”, “shoulder”, “humerus”, and “glenoid”. The review encompassed 37 studies with 456 patients, focusing on primary outcomes like failure rates and secondary outcomes such as PROMs and functional test results. Results: A meta-analysis of primary outcomes across 17 studies revealed a dislocation rate of 5.1% and an increase in reoperation rates from 9.3% to 13.7% post-publication bias adjustment. There was also a noted rise in conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty and incidence of osteoarthritis/osteonecrosis over longer follow-up periods. Patient-reported outcomes and functional tests generally showed improvement, albeit with notable variability across studies. A concerning observation was the consistent presence of allograft resorption, with rates ranging from 33% to 80%. Comparative studies highlighted similar efficacy between distal tibial allografts and Latarjet procedures in most respects, with some differences in specific tests. Conclusion: OCA transplantation presents a promising treatment option for shoulder instability, effectively addressing both glenoid and humeral head defects with favourable patient-reported outcomes. These findings advocate for the inclusion of OCA transplantation in treatment protocols for shoulder instability, while also emphasizing the need for further high-quality, long-term research to better understand the procedure’s efficacy profile. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):570–580.

Background: This study’s primary aim was to assess the safety and performance of second-generation all-soft suture anchors following arthroscopic labral tear repair. Methods: This prospective, multicenter study was conducted by 6 surgeons at 6 sites in Europe and the United States between November 2018 and August 2020. Patients who required shoulder arthroscopic repair, for a range of labral injuries, were treated with a second-generation all-soft suture anchor. The primary outcome was clinical success rate (percentage of patients without signs of failure and/or reintervention) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical success rate at 12 months, intraoperative anchor deployment success rate, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6 and 12 months, including visual analog scale (VAS) pain assessment, VAS satisfaction assessment, EQ-5D-5L Index Score, EQ-5D-5L VAS Health Score, Rowe Shoulder Score for Instability, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant-Murley Shoulder Score. Serious adverse events and serious adverse device effects were collected throughout the study. Results: Forty-one patients were enrolled (mean age, 28.2 years; 87.8% male, 12.2% female). Clinical success was achieved in 27/28 and 31/32 patients at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Anchor deployment had a 100% success rate. Significant improvements over baseline were reported for all PROs except Constant-Murley Shoulder (6 months) and VAS Satisfaction Score (12 months). One patient experienced 1 serious adverse event and 1 patient experienced 1 serious adverse device effect. Conclusion: Second-generation all-soft suture anchors used in this study demonstrated a high clinical success rate, a favorable safety profile, and patients exhibited significant improvement in PROs.

Abstract Background The Latarjet procedure (LP) is performed as a primary stabilization procedure (primary LP) and a salvage procedure when an earlier shoulder stabilization procedure has failed (salvage LP). However, whether primary LP or salvage LP provides better outcomes for anterior shoulder instability remains unknown. Methods Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, web of science and Cochrane Library was performed from their inception date to December 4, 2023. Inclusion criteria mainly included the comparison of postoperative outcomes between primary and salvage LP, English language, and full text availability. Two reviewers independently examined the literature, collected data, and evaluated the methodological robustness of the included studies. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of nonrandomized studies. Recurrent instability, complications, reoperations, return to sports, patient-reported outcomes, and range of motion were assessed. Statistical evaluations were conducted using Manager V.5.4.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Software Update, Oxford, UK). Results Twelve studies were included in the systematic review, with 940 shoulders undergoing primary LP and 631 shoulders undergoing salvage LP. Statistically significant differences in favor of primary LP were found in 2 of the 11 and 2 of 4 included studies in terms of recurrent instability and returning to the same sports (RTS) at preinjury level, respectively. In terms of the visual analog scale, subjective shoulder value and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, 2 of the 4, 1 of the 3 and 1 of the 3 included studies reported statistically significant differences in favor of primary LP. Differences were not noticed regarding complications, reoperations, the time to RTS, the Rowe score, the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System, and forward flexion. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that compared with primary LP, salvage LP may provide inferior postoperative outcomes in terms of recurrent instability and the rate of RTS at preinjury level. Primary and salvage LP may yield comparable efficacy in terms of complications, reoperations, the rate of RTS, the time to RTS, pain, shoulder function, and range of motion. Prospero id CRD42023492027.

Rotator cuff tears (RCT) and instability are the most common surgically treated shoulder pathologies. The concept of augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft was created to improve the results of surgical treatment of these pathologies, especially in cases of chronic and massive injuries. The popularity of using the LHBT for augmentation is evidenced by the significant number of publications on this topic published in the last 3 years; however, only one systematic review has been published regarding only LHBT augmentation for massive RCTs. Several studies comparing partial repair with partial repair and additional LHBT augmentation for RCT showed superior clinical outcomes and lower re-tear rates when LHBT augmentation was performed. There is a rising popularity of using LHBT as an autograft to perform superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in case of irreparable rotator cuff tears. In recent years, shoulder stabilization by arthroscopic Bankart repair with biceps augmentation has been promoted with very promising short-term results. The evidence provided by studies appears to be sufficient to recommend the use of LHBT for augmentation whenever necessary; however, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

Introduction: Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a hereditary and heterogeneous syndrome that affects conjunctive tissue, due to collagen production compromise. Hypermobile EDS (hEDS) is the most common subtype of this syndrome and can cause shoulder joint instability, which can lead to chronic pain and significant functional impairment.Methods: A case report of a patient with hEDS followed in our local health unit was made. The authors describe their clinical insight regarding the case, as well as the rehabilitation program the patient was submitted to.Results: Female patient, 32 years old. Functionally autonomous in every daily living activity. Clinically diagnosed with hEDS in 2013, after reporting bilateral shoulder instability. The patient presented herself in a Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine consultation, 6 months after being submitted to the third surgical intervention of the right shoulder. She presented an overall limited range of motion, decreased muscle strength and positive apprehension and drawer tests. An extensive rehabilitation program was prescribed, focusing on joint mobilization, dynamic stabilizers strengthening and proprioceptive training. After 12 weeks, the patient presented reduced shoulder pain and a better functional status.Conclusion: hEDS compromises the integrity of the static and dynamic stabilizers of the shoulder. Clinical management of these cases involves a multidisciplinary approach with early and adequate rehabilitation care treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Evidence-based care relies on robust research. The fragility index (FI) is used to assess the robustness of statistically significant findings in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While the traditional FI is limited to dichotomous outcomes, a novel tool, the continuous fragility index (CFI), allows for the assessment of the robustness of continuous outcomes. Purpose: To calculate the CFI of statistically significant continuous outcomes in RCTs evaluating interventions for managing anterior shoulder instability (ASI). Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A search was conducted across the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for RCTs assessing management strategies for ASI from inception to October 6, 2022. Studies that reported a statistically significant difference between study groups in ≥1 continuous outcome were included. The CFI was calculated and applied to all available RCTs reporting interventions for ASI. Multivariable linear regression was performed between the CFI and various study characteristics as predictors. Results: There were 27 RCTs, with a total of 1846 shoulders, included. The median sample size was 61 shoulders (IQR, 43). The median CFI across 27 RCTs was 8.2 (IQR, 17.2; 95% CI, 3.6-15.4). The median CFI was 7.9 (IQR, 21; 95% CI, 1-22) for 11 studies comparing surgical methods, 22.6 (IQR, 16; 95% CI, 8.2-30.4) for 6 studies comparing nonsurgical reduction interventions, 2.8 for 3 studies comparing immobilization methods, and 2.4 for 3 studies comparing surgical versus nonsurgical interventions. Significantly, 22 of 57 included outcomes (38.6%) from studies with completed follow-up data had a loss to follow-up exceeding their CFI. Multivariable regression demonstrated that there was a statistically significant positive correlation between a trial's sample size and the CFI of its outcomes (r = 0.23 [95% CI, 0.13-0.33]; P <.001). Conclusion: More than a third of continuous outcomes in ASI trials had a CFI less than the reported loss to follow-up. This carries the significant risk of reversing trial findings and should be considered when evaluating available RCT data. We recommend including the FI, CFI, and loss to follow-up in the abstracts of future RCTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Measurement of glenoid bone loss in the shoulder instability can be assessed by CT or MRI multiplanar imaging and is crucial for pre-operative planning. The aim of this study is to determine the intra and interobserver reliability of glenoid deficiency measurement using MRI multiplanar reconstruction with 2D assessment in the sagittal plane (MPR MRI). Methods: We reviewed MRI images of 80 patients with anterior shoulder instability with Osirix software using MPR. Six observers with basic experience measured the glenoid, erosion edge length, and bone loss twice, with at least one-week interval between measurements. We calculated reliability and repeatability using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change with 95% confidence (MDC95%). Results: Intra and Inter-observer ICC and MDC95% for glenoid width and height were excellent (ICC 0,89-0,96). For erosion edge length and area of the glenoid were acceptable/good (ICC 0,61-0,89). Bone loss and Pico Index were associated with acceptable/good ICC (0,63 -0,86)) but poor MDC95% (45 - 84 %). Intra-observer reliability improved with time, while inter-observer remained unchanged. Conclusion: The MPR MRI measurement of the anterior glenoid lesion is very good tool for linear parameters. This method is not valid for Pico index measurement, as the area of bone loss is variable. The pace of learning is individual, therefore complex calculations based on MPR MRI are not resistant to low experience as opposed to true 3D CT [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical scores and imaging outcomes of bony Bankart lesions that underwent single‐point and modified double‐pulley fixation after at least 2 years of follow‐up. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery to treat bony Bankart injuries were included and divided into groups A and B. A total of 69 patients were included (32 in group A and 37 in group B). Patients in group A underwent arthroscopic modified double‐pulley fixation and patients in group B underwent arthroscopic single‐point fixation. Three‐dimensional computed tomography (3D‐CT) was used to assess glenoid reduction one day after surgery. Postoperative bony union was assessed using 3D‐CT and multiplanar reconstruction images 6 months after surgery. Constant–Murley, Rowe rating system, visual analogue scale and University of California at Los Angeles and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were recorded before and after surgery. Results: In terms of imaging measurements, there was no significant group difference in the preoperative size of the glenoid defect, the size of the bony fragment or the expected postoperative size of the glenoid defect. The sizes of the actual postoperative glenoid defects differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.027), as did the absolute difference between the expected and actual glenoid defect sizes (p < 0.001). At 6 months postoperatively, 50.0% of group A patients and 24.3% of group B patients exhibited complete bony union (p = 0.027); the rates of partial union were 37.5% and 56.8%, respectively. At the final follow‐up, all clinical scores were significantly better than the preoperative scores (all p < 0.05), with no significant group differences (not significant). Conclusions: The use of the modified double‐pulley technique with two anchors to treat bony Bankart injuries provides a better reduction of bone fragments than single‐point fixation with two anchors and was associated with a higher rate of early bone union. Level of Evidence: Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several studies have examined return to play (RTP) and outcomes following the Latarjet procedure in contact athletes. Purpose: To investigate clinical outcomes affecting RTP following the Latarjet procedure in contact athletes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 67 contact athletes (72 shoulders) ≤35 years old who underwent Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder instability between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022, were retrospectively identified. Demographic information, medical history, surgical history, number of dislocations before surgery, and postoperative complications up to 6 months after surgery were reviewed. Outcomes evaluated included RTP, competition level, satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes including visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Results: There were a total of 67 patients (72 shoulders) included in the study with a mean age at surgery of 19.7 years for all shoulders. Of the total cohort, 46 patients (50 shoulders; [69.4%]) were available for follow-up by phone. Of the 46 patients contacted by phone, 22/46 were football players; 30/50 [60.0% of all shoulders]) were contact athletes and 19/46 [41.3%] limited contact athletes) were interviewed with a mean follow-up of 25.5 months (range, 10-49 months). Of 72 patients, 22 (30.6% of shoulders and 32.8% of patients) patients had prior shoulder surgery, most commonly arthroscopic stabilization. Only 1 patient experienced hardware failure, but this did not require reoperation. Sixteen of 46 (35%) athletes competed at the collegiate level, and 24/46 (52%) were high school athletes at the time of surgery; 34 of 46 patients (74%) returned to play, of which 30 of the 34 (88%) returned to playing at the same competition level; 15 of 22 (68%) football players returned to play. Only 4 of 51 (8%) reported subjective recurrent instability. Postoperative mean ASES score was 92.2, DASH score was 5.6, and visual analog scale for pain score was 4 (range, 0-50). A total of 43 of 46 (93%) patients reported improvement in quality of life after undergoing the Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability. Eight of 72 (11.1%) shoulders had unresolved pain or stiffness 6 months postoperatively, and 2 of 72 (2.8%) required revisions. Conclusion: Patient RTP, outcomes, and satisfaction were high following the Latarjet procedure in young contact athletes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Latarjet procedure is increasingly being utilized for the treatment of glenoid bone loss and has a relatively high neurological complication rate. Understanding the position-dependent anatomy of the axillary nerve (AN) is crucial to preventing injuries. Purpose: To quantify the effects of changes in the shoulder position and degree of glenoid bone loss during the Latarjet procedure on the position of the AN. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 10 cadaveric shoulders were dissected, leaving the tendons of the rotator cuff and deltoid for muscle loading. The 3-dimensional position of the AN was quantified relative to the inferior glenoid under 3 conditions: (1) intact shoulder, (2) Latarjet procedure with 15% bone loss, and (3) Latarjet procedure with 30% bone loss. Measurements were obtained at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction (equivalent to 0°, 45°, and 90° of shoulder abduction) and at 0°, 45°, and 90° of humeral external rotation (ER). Results: Abduction of the shoulder to 60° resulted in a posterior (9.5 ± 1.1 mm; P <.001), superior (3.0 ± 1.2 mm; P =.013), and lateral (19.1 ± 2.3 mm; P <.001) shift of the AN, and ER to 90° resulted in anterior translation (10.0 ± 1.2 mm; P <.001). Overall, ER increased the minimum AN-glenoid distance at 30° of abduction (14.9 ± 1.3 mm [0° of ER] vs 17.3 ± 1.5 mm [90° of ER]; P =.045). The Latarjet procedure with both 15 and 30% glenoid bone loss resulted in a superior and medial shift of the AN relative to the intact state. A decreased minimum AN-glenoid distance was seen after the Latarjet procedure with 30% bone loss at 60° abduction and 90° ER (17.7 ± 1.6 mm [intact] vs 13.9 ± 1.6 mm [30% bone loss]; P =.007), but no significant differences were seen after the Latarjet procedure with 15% bone loss. Conclusion: Abduction of the shoulder induced a superior, lateral, and posterior shift of the AN, and ER caused anterior translation. Interestingly, the Latarjet procedure, when performed on shoulders with extensive glenoid bone loss, significantly reduced the minimum AN-glenoid distance during shoulder abduction and ER. These novel findings imply that patients with substantial glenoid bone loss may be at a higher risk of AN injuries during critical portions of the procedure. Consequently, it is imperative that surgeons account for alterations in nerve anatomy during revision procedures. Clinical Relevance: This study attempts to improve understanding of the position-dependent effect of shoulder position and glenoid bone loss after the Latarjet procedure on AN anatomy. Improved knowledge of AN anatomy is crucial to preventing potentially devastating AN injuries during the Latarjet procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to describe the evolution of the open labral repair with capsular shift, including the current role of this procedure in the treatment of shoulder instability. Recent Findings: Currently, a subset of patients – high-level collision/contact sport athletes, patients with significant inferior or multi-directional instability, and individuals with failed arthroscopic Bankart repair without bone loss – may experience benefit from undergoing open Bankart repair with capsular shift. Surgeons performing open stabilization can benefit from instrumentation and anchors developed to assist with arthroscopic techniques. Summary: Understanding the history and evolution behind the procedure not only allows the surgeon to appreciate principles behind an arthroscopic approach, but also permits the utilization of an open approach when required by patient pathology and risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Arthroscopic remplissage has continued to gain popularity as an adjunct to Bankart repair for patients with anterior shoulder instability. Although the original remplissage technique was described over 15 years ago, our understanding of when and how to use this procedure continues to evolve. This article provides a review of how remplissage affects shoulder biomechanics, compares clinical outcomes between remplissage and other procedures for shoulder instability, and discusses current indications for remplissage. Recent Findings: Current research focuses on the use of remplissage across a wide range of glenoid bone loss. Remplissage appears effective at preventing recurrent instability in patients with glenoid bone loss up to 15% of the glenoid width. However, once glenoid bone exceeds 15%, outcomes tend to favor bony reconstruction procedures such as Latarjet. Results of biomechanical studies examining shoulder range of motion (ROM) after remplissage are mixed, though clinical studies tend to report no significant limitations in ROM when remplissage is added to a Bankart repair. Summary: Adding a remplissage to conventional Bankart repair may improve clinical outcomes and lower rates of recurrent instability without significantly altering shoulder ROM. However, surgeons should recognize its limitations in treating patients with large amounts of glenoid bone loss and should be prepared to discuss alternative procedures on a case-by-case basis. Absolute indications and contraindications for remplissage are not well defined currently and require further scientific research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]