Search

Background: Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described., Methods: We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies., Results: Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically., Conclusions: This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted., Competing Interests: K.L.L. is supported by the Mid-America Transplant/Jane A. Beckman Endowed Chair in Transplantation and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant R01DK120551. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pneumocystis pneumonia is a common opportunistic infection in kidney transplant recipients caused by the ascomycetous fungi Pneumocystis jirovecii. Its clinical presentation of a progressive nonproductive cough, shortness of breath, and fever is nonspecific and often delays diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Moreover, the plain radiograph may show a spectrum of findings from normal to bilateral diffuse infiltrates. Detection of serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan along with consistent clinical findings can be used as early screening tools to diagnose and initiate treatment for Pneumocystis pneumonia pending confirmation by bronchoscopy., Methods: This case series describes 6 kidney transplant recipients who were diagnosed as having Pneumocystis pneumonia. The baseline demographic variables, presenting symptoms, radiographic findings, laboratory findings including lactate dehydrogenase and serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan levels, bronchoscopy findings, and its timing in relation to a positive serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan test, and response to treatment were collected., Results: All 6 patients who completed the first 3 months of prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim were diagnosed as having Pneumocystis pneumonia between 2 to 24 years post transplant. They initiated treatment early based on a positive serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan and negative Histoplasma antigen and serum galactomannan test with a presumptive diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia, which was later confirmed with a positive polymerase chain reaction on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid., Conclusions: Pneumocystis pneumonia is a common opportunistic fungal infection in immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients, and use of serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan can be used as an initial screening test for its early diagnosis and treatment., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We present a 42-year-old male with strictured bilioenteric anastomosis after bile duct injury repair. The patient improved after percutaneous biliary drainage and balloon dilation of the stricture. Persistent bile reflux around the catheter insertion site prompted a cholangiogram that suggested an error in the enteric limb. Surgical exploration revealed that a torsed ileal loop was used for bilioenteric anastomosis. This error was repaired surgically. The patient had immediate and long-term resolution of symptoms., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Reflecting the resected portion of the proximal jejunum behind the mesenteric vessels during a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) procedure can be a challenging maneuver., Methods: We describe a simple technique employing a penrose drain that is sutured to the resected "specimen" portion of the jejunum and then pulling it behind the mesenteric vessels., Results: Seven patients underwent this procedure over a 2-month period without difficulties., Conclusions: This simple technique helps simplify one of the key maneuvers in performing a Whipple procedure.