Search

Background: Chromosomal‐microarray‐analysis (CMA) may reveal susceptibility‐loci (SL) of varied penetrance for autism‐spectrum‐disorder (ASD) and other neurodevelopmental conditions. Attitudes of women/parents to disclosure of SL during pregnancy are understudied. Methods: A multiple‐choice questionnaire was distributed to postpartum women. Data were collected on women's interest to receive prenatal genetic information with various levels of penetrance. Results: Women's (n = 941) disclosure choices were dependent on the magnitude of risk: approximately 70% supported disclosure of either full or 40% penetrance, 53% supported disclosure at a 20% risk threshold, and 40% supported disclosure at 10% or less. Although most women supported, rejected or were indecisive about disclosure consistently across all risk levels, nearly one‐quarter (24%) varied their responses based on penetrance, and this was associated with religiosity, education, parity and concern about fetal health (p‐values <0.04). Among those who varied their choices, the risk threshold was lower among secular women (20%) than among ultraorthodox women (40%). In a multivariable analysis, ultraorthodox women were much less likely to vary their choices on ASD disclosure compared with secular women (aOR = 0.37, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Women's attitudes toward disclosure are influenced by the level of risk and their individual characteristics. We therefore encourage engaging women/couples in disclosure decisions regarding uncertain and probabilistic results from prenatal genomic tests. Key points: What's already known about this topic? Disclosure policy of susceptibility‐loci (SL) ranges from full disclosure via the disclosure of SLs with 20% and above penetrance to parental choice regarding low penetrance SL.When offered a choice, women tend to request maximum information on their fetuses. What does this study add? Women's attitudes toward the disclosure of genetic information are influenced not only by the severity of the condition but also by the level of risk.Choices are associated with women's cultural characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study examined the efficacy and diagnostic yield of founder variant testing as an initial screening method for individuals with a personal or family history of cancer. The results indicate that this approach is ineffective and has a limited ability to detect significant germline variants. Given these findings, we raise doubts about the benefits of employing such testing and suggest a transition from a two-step approach to expansive genetic testing. Founder pathogenic variants (PVs) are prevalent in Israel. This study investigated the current practice of offering cancer patients two-step genetic testing, starting with targeted testing for recurring founder PVs, followed, if negative, by next-generation sequencing. A total of 2128 subjects with cancer or a positive family history underwent oncogenetic testing with a panel of 51 recurring PVs at a tertiary medical center in March 2020–January 2023. Those with a known familial PV (n = 370) were excluded from the analysis. Among the remainder, 128/1758 (7%) were heterozygous for at least one variant, and 44 (34%) carried a PV of medium-high penetrance (MHPV). Cancer was diagnosed in 1519/1758 patients (86%). The diagnostic yield of founder MHPV testing was 2% in cancer patients and 4% in healthy individuals with a positive family history. It was higher in Ashkenazi Jews than non-Ashkenazi Jews and Arabs, but not over 10% for any type of cancer, and it was significantly higher in younger (<40 years) than older (>50 years) individuals (7% vs. 1%). Eighty-four of the heterozygotes (66%), mostly Ashkenazi Jews, harbored a low-penetrance variant (LPV) not associated with the diagnosed cancer, usually APC c.3902T>A. These findings question the advantage of two-step testing. LPVs should not be included in targeted testing because this can lead to an overestimation of the yield, and their detection does not preclude further comprehensive testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Copy number variants (CNVs) associated with late-onset medical conditions are rare but important secondary findings in chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) performed during pregnancy. Here, we critically review the cases at two tertiary centres to assess the criteria which guide the disclosure of such findings and develop a disclosure decision tool (DDT) aimed at facilitating disclosure decision. Parental decisions on receiving CNVs associated with risks for late-onset conditions were also recorded. Methods Prenatal CMAs in Hadassah and Shaare Zedek Medical Centers from November 2013 to October 2021 were reviewed for CNVs associated with late-onset conditions. The DDT proposed uses a five-parameter scoring system, which considers the severity, median age of onset, penetrance, understanding of genotype-phenotype correlation and actionability of the finding. Results Out of 16 238 prenatal CMAs, 16 (0.1%) harboured CNVs associated with late-onset conditions, 15 of which were disclosed. Outcome information was available on 13 of the 16 pregnancies, all of which continued to delivery. Conclusions Our suggested DDT will help clinicians to quantitatively weigh the variables associated with CNVs of this type and arrive at a well thought out clinical decision regarding disclosure. Although the prevalence of late-onset conditions as a major finding in the prenatal setup is low, it is expected to rise with the increasing use of non-invasive CMA testing and whole exome and genome sequencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chromosomal‐microarray‐analysis (CMA) can identify variants of uncertain clinical significance, susceptibility‐loci for neurodevelopmental conditions, and risk for adult‐onset conditions. We explored choices made by couples undergoing prenatal CMA, their understanding of these findings, reasons for and against receiving them, and whether they believe parents or professionals should decide which are disclosed. Methods: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with women (n = 27) or their partners (n = 15) during the week following prenatal CMA testing and analyzed using grounded theory. Results: Over half the interviewees (55%) recalled at least two of the three types of CMA results they chose whether to receive. Sixty‐four percent found the choice simple, whereas 36% found it difficult. All participants could clearly explain their choices, which were based on the perceived actionability and psychological impact of the information. Sixty percent viewed their choice favorably, whereas ~21% would have preferred clinicians to decide for them. More women than men, and more decisive than indecisive participants supported parental choice. Conclusion: Overall, expectant parents can make informed choices about which uncertain findings about their fetuses they wish to receive, and value the opportunity to tailor results to their values and wishes. Arguments presented provide the basis for a decision‐aid tool for expecting parents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the indications for and diagnostic outcomes of fetal exome sequencing in a tertiary referral center.Methods: Between 2012 and 2017, 77 unrelated fetal samples from pregnancies referred to our center underwent exome sequencing. The cohort included 37 fetuses, 36 products of conception (from cases of pregnancy termination or intrauterine fetal death), one case with DNA from both the fetus and a previous termination of pregnancy, and three cases with DNA of unknown origin. Exome sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from amniocytes or fetal tissue and, in some cases, from parental peripheral blood. Indications, turnaround time, diagnostic rates and pregnancy outcomes were investigated. Diagnostic yield was analyzed according to consanguinity (yes or no), sample type (proband only, or trio or other) and referral indication (malformation or isolated nuchal translucency (NT)).Results: The most common indication for fetal exome sequencing was multiple malformations (21/77, 27%), followed by isolated brain malformation (15/77, 19%). Twelve (16%) fetuses were referred for isolated increased NT. Exome analysis was diagnostic for 16 fetuses (21%); when subclassified into fetal malformations vs isolated increased NT it became clear that exome analysis did not reveal any known or probable pathogenic variants in cases referred for isolated increased NT, whereas, among the remaining fetuses, a molecular diagnosis was reached in 16/65 (25%). Proband-only cases received a diagnosis more often than did cases that had trio exome sequencing.Conclusions: Exome sequencing has the potential to provide molecular diagnoses in cases in which conventional prenatal cytogenetic testing is negative. Referral bias of consanguineous cases could account for the high diagnostic rate of proband-only sequencing. Syndrome-specific prognostic information enables parents to make informed decisions, whereas challenges include time limitations and variant interpretation in the setting of non-specific fetal findings. As we report only established disease-gene associations, further segregation and functional studies in a research setting are expected to increase significantly the diagnostic yield. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study set out to explore the attitudes of a representative sample of the British public towards genetic testing in children to predict disease in the future. We sought opinions about genetic testing for adult-onset conditions for which no prevention/treatment is available during childhood, and about genetic 'carrier' status to assess future reproductive risks. The study also examined participants' level of agreement with the reasons professional organisations give in favour of deferring such testing. Participants (n=2998) completed a specially designed questionnaire, distributed by email. Nearly half of the sample (47%) agreed that parents should be able to test their child for adult-onset conditions, even if there is no treatment or prevention at time of testing. This runs contrary to professional guidance about genetic testing in children. Testing for carrier status was supported by a larger proportion (60%). A child's future ability to decide for her/himself if and when to be tested was the least supported argument in favour of deferring testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]