Search

Although some sex differences in stroke have been reported, differences in the effects of antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention have not been clarified.In the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study combination trial, patients with high-risk, non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke between 8 and 180 days after onset treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol and followed up for 0.5-3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcome was severe or life-threatening hemorrhage. Outcomes were analyzed by sex.A total of 1,320 male patients and 558 female patients were included. The male patients had more risk factors than the female patients. In male patients, the primary endpoint occurred at a rate of 2.0 per 100-patient years in the DAPT group and 5.1 per 100 patient-years in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-0.68). In male patients, DAPT prolonged the time to recurrent stroke by 4.02-fold (95% CI, 1.63-9.96) compared with monotherapy. In female patients, the average annual event rates were 2.7 per 100 patient-years in the DAPT group and 3.3 per 100 patient-years in the monotherapy group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.37-1.84). Safety outcomes did not differ significantly in both male and female patients.Long-term DAPT using cilostazol reduced the recurrence of ischemic stroke and prolonged the recurrence-free time in male patients, but not in female patients.

Background: The effectiveness of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to prevent recurrent strokes in patients with lacunar stroke remains unclarified. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and to elucidate the safety and effectiveness of DAPT and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in preventing recurrence in chronic lacunar stroke. Methods: CSPS.com (Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination) was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. In this prespecified subanalysis, 925 patients (mean age, 69.5 years; 69.4% men) with lacunar stroke were selected from 1884 patients with high-risk noncardioembolic stroke, enrolled in the CSPS.com trial after 8 to 180 days following stroke. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SAPT or DAPT using cilostazol and were followed for 0.5 to 3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcomes were severe or life-threatening bleeding. Results: The DAPT group receiving cilostazol and either aspirin or clopidogrel and SAPT group receiving aspirin or clopidogrel alone comprised 464 (50.2%) and 461 (49.8%) patients, respectively. Ischemic stroke occurred in 12 of 464 patients (1.84 per 100 patient-years) in the DAPT group and 31 of 461 patients (4.42 per 100 patient-years) in the SAPT group, during follow-up. After adjusting for multiple potential confounding factors, ischemic stroke risk was significantly lower in the DAPT group than in the SAPT group (hazard ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.22–0.84]). The rate of severe or life-threatening hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the groups (2 patients [0.31 per 100 patient-years] versus 6 patients [0.86 per 100 patient-years] in the DAPT and SAPT groups, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.07–1.81]). Conclusions: In patients with lacunar stroke, DAPT using cilostazol had significant benefits in reducing recurrent ischemic stroke incidence compared with SAPT without increasing the risk of severe or life-threatening bleeding. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01995370. URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr ; Unique identifier: UMIN000012180.

Patients who have had a transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke have an increased risk of cardiovascular events for the following 5 years. We aimed to assess 5-year functional outcomes in patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke and to determine the factors associated with long-term disability.We analysed data from patients in TIAregistry.org, an international, prospective, observational registry of patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke from 61 specialised centres in 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older who had a transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke within the previous 7 days between May 30, 2009, and Dec 30, 2011, with a baseline modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-1, and who had been followed up for 5 years, were eligible for inclusion in this study. We evaluated whether existing comorbidities and stroke recurrence, categorised as disabling (mRS score of1, including death) or non-disabling (mRS score of 0-1), at 5 years after baseline, were associated with poor functional outcome (defined as an mRS score of1). We used multivariable generalised equation models for factors associated with poor functional outcome at 5 years and multivariable cause-specific Cox hazard regression models in case of stroke recurrence.Between May 30, 2009, and Dec 30, 2011, 3847 eligible patients were included in the study, 3105 (80·7%) of whom had an mRS evaluation at 5 years of follow-up. Median follow-up duration was 5·00 years (IQR 4·78-5·00). 710 (22·9%) of 3105 patients had an mRS score greater than 1 at 5 years. Factors associated with poor functional outcome at 5 years were older age (per 10-year increase, odds ratio [OR] 2·18, 95% CI 1·93-2·46; p0·0001), diabetes of any type (1·45, 1·18-1·78; p=0·0001), history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack before the qualifying event (1·74, 1·37-2·22; p0·0001), hypertension (1·38, 1·00-1·92; p=0·050), atrial fibrillation or flutter (1·52, 1·04-1·94; p=0·030), congestive heart failure (1·73, 1·22-2·46; p=0·0024), valvular disease (2·47, 1·70-3·58; p0·0001), stroke as qualifying event (1·31, 1·09-1·57; p=0·0037), history of peripheral artery disease (1·98, 1·28-3·07; p=0·0023), history of coronary artery disease (1·32, 1·00-1·74; p=0·049), intracranial haemorrhage during follow up (4·94, 1·91-12·78; p=0·0013), and living alone (1·32, 1·10-1·59; p=0·0031). Regular physical activity before the index event was associated with reduced risk of poor functional outcome (OR 0·52, 95% CI 0·42-0·66; p0·0001). 345 recurrent strokes had occurred at 5 years of follow-up, 141 (40·9%) of which were disabling or fatal. Stroke recurrence increased the risk of having a disability at 5 years (OR 3·52, 95% CI 2·37-5·22; p0·0001). Recurrent disabling or fatal strokes were independently associated with older age (per 10-year increase, hazard ratio [HR] 1·61, 95% CI 1·35-1·92; p0·0001), diabetes of any type (2·23, 1·56-3·17; p0·0001), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of greater than 5 at discharge (5·11, 2·15-12·13; p=0·0013), history of coronary artery disease (1·76, 1·17-2·65; p=0·0063), history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack before the qualifying event (1·54, 1·03-2·29; p=0·035), congestive heart failure (1·86, 1·01-3·47; p=0·044), stroke as qualifying event (1·73, 1·22-2·45; p=0·0024), mRS score of greater than 1 at discharge (2·48, 1·27-4·87; p=0·0083), and intracranial haemorrhage during follow-up (17·15, 9·95-27·43; p0·0001). Regular physical activity before the index event was associated with reduced risk of recurrent disabling stroke at 5 years (HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·31-0·99; p=0·046), and 5-year disability without recurrent stroke (0·61, 0·47-0·79; p=0·0001).We found a substantial burden of disability (mRS score of1) at 5 years after transient ischaemic attack or minor ischemic stroke, and most predictors of this disability were modifiable risk factors. Patients who did regular physical exercise before the index event had a significantly reduced risk of disability at 5 years compared with patients who did no exercise.AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, SOS Attaque Cérébrale Association.

Idarucizumab, a dabigatran-specific reversal agent, was launched in Japan in 2016. The J-Dabigatran Surveillance 2 study was designed to assess the characteristics and outcomes of dabigatran-treated patients after the launch of idarucizumab.Patient characteristics and outcomes, including thromboembolic and bleeding events, of dabigatran-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who received dabigatran etexilate [110 mg or 150 mg twice-daily (b.i.d.)] for the prevention of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism were investigated and presented descriptively. Absolute standardized differences (ASD) in baseline characteristics compared with the first J-Dabigatran Surveillance (J-Dabi1; 2011-2013) study were included.In total, 5660 patients were enrolled and 5436 were analyzed in this study; 3516 and 1898 received 110 mg b.i.d. and 150 mg b.i.d. dabigatran, respectively; 22 received other doses. The overall duration of follow-up (mean ± standard deviation) was 287 ± 179 days. Baseline characteristics, including stroke/bleeding-risk scores, were typical of this patient population. Overall, paroxysmal, persistent, permanent, and symptomatic atrial fibrillation were observed for 53.2%, 27.1%, 13.7%, and 53.9% of patients, respectively (J-Dabi1 ASD: 0.2, 0.0, 0.3, and 0.2, respectively). Catheter ablation was selected in 27.9% of patients (J-Dabi1 ASD: 0.6). Rates of clinical outcomes were low in the study (mostly2%/year). The incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.1%/year (n = 46) and stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism was 1.7%/year (n = 71). Twelve (0.2%) patients received idarucizumab, commonly for serious bleeding events, and most recovered.Dabigatran continues to be safe and well tolerated in patients with NVAF for stroke and systemic embolism prevention and continues to be prescribed appropriately. Treatment outcomes have not changed since the availability of idarucizumab. Since the J-Dabi1 study, treatment guidelines for anticoagulation use in NVAF have been updated based on emerging clinical evidence, accounting for differences in patient characteristics, and making dabigatran a preference for distinct patient populations.

Background The present observational study aimed to clarify the association between bridging therapy with heparin before starting rivaroxaban and clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).Methods and Results:Patients with NVAF who experienced acute ischemic stroke or TIA of the middle cerebral artery territory and started rivaroxaban within 30 days after onset were enrolled and were followed up for 90 days. Outcome measures were ischemic events, major bleeding, their composite, and death or disability 90 days after onset. Ischemic events were defined as ischemic stroke, TIA, and systemic embolism. Of 1,308 analyzed patients, 638 received bridging therapy with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin with a median of 10,000 IU/day. Associations between bridging therapy and ischemic events or major bleeding were not statistically significant individually, but the association between bridging therapy and their composite was statistically significant (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.29). The association between bridging therapy and death or disability 90 days after onset was not statistically significant. Conclusions The composite of ischemic events and major bleeding was more frequent in patients with NVAF who received bridging therapy with low-dose heparin than in those who started treatment directly with rivaroxaban after ischemic stroke or TIA.

Background: The “1-3-6-12-day rule” for starting direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack recommends timings that may be later than used in clinical practice. We investigated more practical optimal timing of DOAC initiation according to stroke severity. Methods: The combined data of prospective registries in Japan, Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-factor Assessment and Improvement-nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (September 2011 to March 2014) and RELAXED (February 2014 to April 2016) were used. Patients were divided into transient ischemic attack and 3 stroke subgroups by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score: mild (0–7), moderate (8–15), and severe (≥16). The early treatment group was defined as patients starting DOACs earlier than the median initiation day in each subgroup. Outcomes included a composite of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, and severe bleeding within 90 days. Six European prospective registries were used for validation. Results: In the 1797 derivation cohort patients, DOACs were started at median 2 days after transient ischemic attack and 3, 4, and 5 days after mild, moderate, and severe strokes, respectively. Stroke or systemic embolism was less common in Early Group (n=785)—initiating DOACS within 1, 2, 3, and 4 days, respectively—than Late Group (n=1012) (1.9% versus 3.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.27–0.89]), as was ischemic stroke (1.7% versus 3.2%, 0.54 [0.27–0.999]). Major bleeding was similarly common in the 2 groups (0.8% versus 1.0%). On validation, both ischemic stroke (2.4% versus 2.2%) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.2% versus 0.6%) were similarly common in Early (n=547) and Late (n=1483) Groups defined using derivation data. Conclusions: In Japanese and European populations, early DOAC initiation within 1, 2, 3, or 4 days according to stroke severity seemed to be feasible to decrease the risk of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism and no increase in major bleeding. These findings support ongoing randomized trials to better establish the optimal timing of DOAC initiation.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background and Purpose: Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel reduces the recurrence of ischemic stroke while significantly increasing the bleeding events compared with monotherapy, the CSPS.com trial (Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study combination) showed that DAPT using cilostazol was more effective without the bleeding risk. In the CSPS.com trial, aspirin or clopidogrel was used as the underlying antiplatelet drug. The effectiveness and safety of each combination were examined and clarified. Methods: In the CSPS.com trial, a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, patients with high-risk, noncardioembolic ischemic stroke 8 to 180 days after onset treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone at the discretion of the physician in charge were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either monotherapy or DAPT using cilostazol and followed for 0.5 to 3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was first recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcome was severe or life-threatening bleeding. The analysis was based on the underlying antiplatelet agents. Results: A total of 763 patients taking aspirin and 1116 taking clopidogrel were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Although the clopidogrel group had more risk factors than the aspirin group, the primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In the aspirin group, the primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome did not differ significantly between the DAPT group and the aspirin-monotherapy group. In the clopidogrel group, the primary end point occurred at a rate of 2.31 per 100 patient-years in the DAPT group and 5.19 per 100 patient-years in the clopidogrel-monotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.447 [95% CI, 0.258–0.774]). Safety outcome did not differ significantly between groups (0.51 per 100 patient-years versus 0.71 per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.730 [95% CI, 0.206–2.588]). Conclusions: The combination of cilostazol and clopidogrel significantly reduced the recurrence of ischemic stroke without increasing the bleeding risk in noncardioembolic, high-risk patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01995370. URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000012180.

Aims: We have previously reported 5-year follow-up data on the TIAregistry.org, an international prospective cohort in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. We conducted a Japanese subgroup analysis because outcomes and predictors might differ according to ethnicities and regions. In this study, we compared the baseline and 5-year follow-up data of Japanese and non-Japanese patients with TIA or minor stroke. Methods: Patients with TIA or minor ischemic stroke within 7 days after the onset were classified into two groups based on ethnicity, Japanese ( n =345) and non-Japanese ( n =3502); further, 5-year event rates were compared between the two groups. We also determined predictors of 5-year stroke for both groups. Results: Vascular death and death from any cause were identified to be less prevalent, unlike stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, which was determined to be more prevalent in Japanese than in non-Japanese patients. Five-year rate of stroke was significantly higher in Japanese patients. Cumulative stroke and major cardiovascular event rates did not decline but instead linearly increased from 1 to 5 years in both groups. Baseline risk factors for 5-year stroke were as follows: age, diabetes, history of stroke or TIA, and congestive heart failure in Japanese patients. Independent predictors of 5-year stroke were large artery atherosclerosis, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and age in Japanese patients. Conclusions: Recurrent stroke and intracranial hemorrhage were determined to be more prevalent at 5 years after TIA or minor stroke in Japanese patients than in non-Japanese patients. Strategies to mitigate the long-term risks of stroke, aside from adherence to current guidelines, should take Japanese-patient-specific residual risks into account.

Background: We previously reported that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with cilostazol was superior to aspirin or clopidogrel for the prevention of recurrent stroke and vascular events in a subgroup analysis of intracranial arterial stenosis in the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination ( CSPS.com ), a randomized controlled trial. Aims: We conducted another subgroup analysis to investigate the benefit of DAPT with cilostazol in patients with extracranial arterial stenosis (ECAS) and those without arterial stenosis. Methods: We compared the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, vascular events, and major bleeding between DAPT with cilostazol plus aspirin or clopidogrel and aspirin or clopidogrel alone in patients with ischemic stroke between 8 and 180 days before starting trial treatment and ECAS or without arterial stenosis. Results: The median follow-up period was 1.4 years. The risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (hazard ratio (HR): 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42–2.57) and vascular events (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.42–2.24) did not differ between the two groups for the 253 patients with ECAS, whereas they were lower (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18–0.74 and HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26–0.85, respectively) in the DAPT group for the 944 patients without arterial stenosis. The risk of major bleeding did not differ between the groups in patients with ECAS (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.05–6.39) or without arterial stenosis (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.27–2.26). Conclusion: DAPT with cilostazol might be beneficial for prevention of recurrent stroke and vascular events in patients without arterial stenosis but not in those with ECAS. Data access statement: We will make the deidentified participant data from this research available to the scientific community with as few restrictions as feasible, while retaining exclusive use until the publication of major output.

Aims: The efficacy of antiplatelet therapy may vary among different disease subtypes. Prasugrel is generally a more potent, consistent, and fast-acting platelet inhibitor than clopidogrel. This sub-analysis of the phase III comparison of PRAsugrel and clopidogrel in Japanese patients with ischemic STROke (PRASTRO-I) trial aimed to assess the differences in efficacy of these treatments for each stroke subtype. Methods: In the PRASTRO-I trial, a total of 3,753 patients with ischemic stroke were recruited from 224 centers throughout Japan and randomized (1:1) to prasugrel (3.75 mg/day) or clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for 96 weeks. For the sub-analysis, strokes were classified as large-artery atherosclerosis, small-artery occlusion (lacunar), stroke of other etiology, and stroke of undetermined etiology. The cumulative incidence of primary events (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from other vascular cause) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for each subgroup. Results: For patients with large-artery atherosclerosis, the primary event incidence was 3.8% in the prasugrel group and 4.8% in the clopidogrel group (HR 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–1.41). For patients with small-artery occlusion, the incidence was 3.3% in the prasugrel group and 3.9% in the clopidogrel group (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.45–1.50). For patients with stroke of undetermined etiology, the incidence was 4.6% in the prasugrel group and 3.0% in the clopidogrel group (HR 1.56; 95% CI 0.90–2.72). The incidence of bleeding was similar across subtypes. Conclusions: Although statistical significance was not reached, the efficacy of prasugrel was potentially different between stroke subtypes, warranting further studies.

We aimed to determine the association between acute platelet reactivity and clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) with large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA).In this prospective, 16-multicenter study, we enrolled AIS/TIA patients with LAA receiving clopidogrel. We assessed the association of P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) 24 hours after initiation of antiplatelets with the CYP2C19 genotype and recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days, and the difference between acute (≤ 7 days) and subacute (8-90 days) phases.Among the 230 AIS/TIA patients enrolled, 225 with complete outcome data and 194 with genetic results were analyzed. A higher PRU was significantly associated with recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days (frequency, 16%), and within 7 days (10%). Twenty-nine patients (15%) belonged to a CYP2C19 poor metabolizer group (CYP2C19Acute PRU evaluation possesses predictive value for recurrent ischemic stroke, especially within 7 days in AIS/TIA with LAA.

Background and purpose A transient ischemic attack (TIA) can occur without self‐awareness of symptoms. We aimed to investigate characteristics of patients with a tissue‐based diagnosis of TIA but having no self‐awareness of their symptoms and whose symptoms were witnessed by bystanders. Methods We used data from the multicenter registry of 1414 patients with a clinical diagnosis of TIA. For patients without evidence of ischemic lesions on imaging, clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without self‐awareness of their TIA symptoms. Results Among 896 patients (559 men, median age of 70 years), 59 (6.6%) were unaware of their TIA symptoms, but had those symptoms witnessed by bystanders. Patients without self‐awareness of symptoms were older and more frequently female, and more likely to have previous history of stroke, premorbid disability, and atrial fibrillation, but less likely to have dyslipidemia than those with self‐awareness. Patients without self‐awareness of symptoms arrive at hospitals earlier than those with self‐awareness (P, Graphical Table of Contents Among 896 patients (559 men, median age of 70 years) with diagnosis of a tissue‐based transient ischemic attack (TIA), 59 (6.6%) were unaware of their symptoms but had their symptoms witnessed by bystanders. The cumulative incidence rate of occurrence of ischemic stroke after 1 year from TIA was higher in patients without self‐awareness than those with self‐awareness (16.3% vs. 6.9%, log‐rank; P = 0.010).

Aim: Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) has different clinical features and prognosis compared with anterior circulation stroke (ACS), and whether the effect of statin therapy on stroke prevention differs according to infarction location remains unclear. This post hoc analysis of the J-STARS study aimed to compare the usefulness of statin at different infarction locations (i.e., ACS and PCS). Methods: In the J-STARS study, 1578 patients were randomly assigned to the pravastatin or control group. The subjects were divided into two subgroups (ACS and PCS groups) based on the arteries responsible for the infarction. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate whether the all stroke recurrence rate was different between the ACS and PCS groups. Results: The PCS group (n = 499) had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes than the ACS group (n = 1022) (30.7% vs. 19.8%, P < 0.001). During the follow-up (4.9 ± 1.4 years), the incidence of all stroke was significantly lower in the pravastatin group than in the control group among patients with PCS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–0.83, P = 0.009); however, the stroke recurrence rates were not significantly different between both groups among patients with ACS (adjusted HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.93–1.88, P = 0.123). A significant interaction between the ACS and PCS groups in terms of pravastatin effects was noted (P = 0.003 for interaction). Conclusions: Pravastatin significantly reduced the recurrence rate of all stroke among patients with PCS. Thus, the effect of statin on the recurrence of stroke may differ according to infarction location.

Aims To understand the different influences of statins on the incidence rate of each stroke subtype in association with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, we performed a post hoc analysis on the data from the Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke (J-STARS) study. Methods Subjects (n=1,578) were divided into three groups according to their mean postrandomized LDL cholesterol level (＜100, 100-120, and ≥ 120 mg/dL) until the last observation before the event or the end of follow-up. A Cox proportional hazard model for time to events was used for calculating adjusted hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and the trend tests. Results The event rates for atherothrombotic stroke did not decrease in accordance with the postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroups of either the control or the pravastatin group (p=0.15 and 0.33 for the trend, respectively). In the control group, however, no atherothrombotic stroke event was observed in the subgroup of the low postrandomized LDL cholesterol level (less than 100 mg/dL). The event rates for atherothrombotic stroke were lower in the middle postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroup (100-120 mg/dL) of the pravastatin group than that of the control group. The event rates for lacunar stroke decreased in the lower postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroup of the control group but not of the pravastatin group (p=0.004 and 0.06 for the trend, respectively). Conclusions Statins showed different influences on the risks of atherothromobotic and lacunar stroke according to postrandomized LDL cholesterol levels.

Background: The CSPS.com trial showed that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol was superior to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin or clopidogrel for the long-term prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke and vascular events in high-risk Japanese patients with ischemic stroke. We conducted a subgroup analysis of the CSPS.com trial in order to investigate the effects of extracranial or intracranial arterial stenosis on the benefit of cilostazol. Methods: We compared the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke and vascular events including stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death between DAPT with cilostazol and aspirin or clopidogrel and SAPT with aspirin or clopidogrel in patients with or without at least 50% stenosis of the extracranial or intracranial artery among patients recruited to the CSPS.com trial. Results: The median follow-up period was 1.4 years. The risk of recurrent stroke did not differ between DAPT and SAPT among 246 patients with extracranial arterial stenosis (8.04% vs 7.46%, HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.43-2.58), while it was lower in DAPT than in SAPT among 547 patients with intracranial arterial stenosis (5.8% vs 11.9%, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95), and among 944 patients without any arterial stenosis (2.91% vs 7.13%, HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-0.74). The risk of vascular events did not differ between DAPT and SAPT among patients with extracranial arterial stenosis (8.93% vs 8.96%, HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.42-2.24), while it was lower in DAPT than in SAPT among patients with intracranial arterial stenosis (7.70% vs 14.5%, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.96), and among patients without any arterial stenosis (3.33% vs 7.56%, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.85). The risk of major bleeding did not differ between DAPT and SAPT among any category of patients. Conclusions: DAPT using cilostazol might not be beneficial for the long-term prevention of recurrent stroke and vascular events in patients with extracranial arterial stenosis, while it might be beneficial in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis or in those without any arterial stenosis.

Background Vascular prevention trials typically use dichotomous event outcomes although this may be inefficient statistically and gives no indication of event severity. We assessed whether ordinal outcomes would be more efficient and how to best analyse them. Methods Chief investigators of vascular prevention randomised controlled trials that showed evidence of either benefit or harm, or were included in a systematic review that overall showed benefit or harm, shared individual participant data from their trials. Ordered categorical versions of vascular event outcomes (such as stroke and myocardial infarction) were analysed using 15 statistical techniques and their results then ranked, with the result with the smallest p-value given the smallest rank. Friedman and Duncan’s multiple range tests were performed to assess differences between tests by comparing the average ranks for each statistical test. Results Data from 35 trials (254,223 participants) were shared with the collaboration. 13 trials had more than two treatment arms, resulting in 59 comparisons. Analysis approaches (Mann Whitney U, ordinal logistic regression, multiple regression, bootstrapping) that used ordinal outcome data had a smaller average rank and therefore appeared to be more efficient statistically than those that analysed the original binary outcomes. Conclusions Ordinal vascular outcome measures appear to be more efficient statistically than binary outcomes and provide information on the severity of event. We suggest a potential role for using ordinal outcomes in vascular prevention trials.

Background Long‐term benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for the prevention of recurrent stroke has not been established in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. We compared the efficacy and safety of DAPT with cilostazol and clopidogrel or aspirin to those of SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis, who were recruited to the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination trial, a randomized controlled trial in high‐risk Japanese patients with ischemic stroke. Methods and Results We compared the vascular and hemorrhagic events between DAPT and SAPT in patients with ischemic stroke and symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis of at least 50% in a major intracranial artery. Patients were placed in two groups: 275 were assigned to receive DAPT and 272 patients SAPT. The risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.95); and composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26–0.91) were lower in DAPT than SAPT, whereas the risk of severe or life‐threatening bleeding (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.12–4.30) did not differ between the 2 treatment groups. Conclusions DAPT using cilostazol was superior to SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke and vascular events without increasing bleeding risk among patients with intracranial arterial stenosis after stroke. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01995370.

Background and ObjectivesLong-term treatment with the combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel showed a lower risk of stroke recurrence compared to aspirin or clopidogrel alone after high-risk noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a randomized trial. We aimed to determine whether the effect of the dual medication compared to monotherapy on risk of recurrent ischemic stroke differs according to timing of starting medication after stroke onset.MethodsIn a subanalysis of the randomized controlled trial, patients between 8 and 180 days after stroke onset were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel. They were divided into 3 groups according to the timing of starting trial treatment: between 8 and 14 days after stroke onset (8–14 days group), between 15 and 28 days after stroke onset (15–28 days group), and between 29 and 180 days after stroke onset (29–180 days group). The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic stroke. Safety outcomes included severe or life-threatening bleeding.ResultsOf 1,879 patients, 498 belonged to the 8–14 days group, 467 to the 15–28 days group, and 914 to the 29–180 days group. There was a significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction for the recurrence of ischemic stroke between trial treatment and trichotomized groups. The recurrence of ischemic stroke was less common with dual therapy than with monotherapy in the 15–28 days group (annualized rate 1.5% vs 4.9%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.12–0.95]) and the 29–180 days group (1.9% vs 4.4%, respectively; 0.27 [0.12–0.63]) and similarly common in the 8–14 days group (4.5% for both; 1.02 [0.51–2.04]). Severe or life-threatening bleeding occurred similarly between patients on dual therapy and those on monotherapy in any of the trichotomized groups (crude hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.03–1.88] in the 8–14 days group, 1.07 [0.15–7.60] in the 15–28 days group, and 0.76 [0.24–2.39] in the 29–180 days group).DiscussionLong-term dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol starting 15–180 days after stroke onset, compared to therapy started 8–14 days after onset, was more effective for secondary stroke prevention than monotherapy without increasing hemorrhage risk.Trial Registration InformationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01995370; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry 000012180.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke taking either aspirin or clopidogrel, the addition of cilostazol 15–180 days after stroke onset decreases the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke.

Background The optimal timing of initiating oral anticoagulants after reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke is unknown. Factors related to early initiation of rivaroxaban and differences in clinical outcomes of stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who underwent reperfusion therapy was investigated. Methods From data of 1,333 NVAF patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in a prospective multicenter study, patients who started rivaroxaban after intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy were included. The clinical outcomes included the composite of ischemic events (recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism) and major bleeding at 3 months. Results Among the 424 patients, the median time from index stroke to starting rivaroxaban was 3.2 days. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, infarct size (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95%CI, 0.99–1.00) was inversely and successful reperfusion (OR, 2.13; 95%CI, 1.24–3.72) was positively associated with initiation of rivaroxaban within 72 hours. 205 patients were assigned to the early group (< 72 hours) and 219 patients (≥ 72 hours) to the late group. Multivariable Cox regression models showed comparable hazard ratios between the two groups at 3 months for ischemic events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95%CI, 0.03–1.32) and major bleeding (HR, 1.80; 95%CI, 0.24–13.54). Conclusions Infarct size and results of reperfusion therapy were associated with the timing of starting rivaroxaban. There were no significant differences in the rates of ischemic events and major bleeding between patients after reperfusion therapy who started rivaroxaban < 72 hours and ≥ 72 hours after the index stroke. Clinical trial registration Unique identifier: NCT02129920; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic intracranial stenosis (ICS) was perceived to convey a high risk of recurrent stroke but trials (Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) and Vitesse Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Stroke Therapy (VISSIT)) failed to show superiority of ICS stenting over intensive medical management alone, partly due to a lower than expected risk of recurrent stroke without stenting, possibly reflecting the young age of recruits (median age

For Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), the risk of stroke and major bleeding events was assessed by using the CHADS

Background The effectiveness and safety of dabigatran etexilate (DE) have not been elucidated thoroughly in clinical practice for Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). In particular, those of DE at a reduced dose due to dose reduction recommendations (DRR) remain unknown. Methods NVAF patients who had newly initiated DE treatment for prevention of thromboembolic events between December 2011 and November 2013 were enrolled. They were followed until August 2016. Outcome events included thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death. Results The study group consisted of 6443 patients (mean age, 70.9 years; male, 66.9%; and mean CHADS2 score, 1.8). During a follow-up period of 610 days (median), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic embolism (SE) occurred at 1.4%/year for DE 110 mg twice daily (BID) (DE220, n = 4759) and 0.8% for dabigatran 150 mg BID (DE300, n = 1571, unadjusted p = 0.0317). Major bleeding occurred at 1.3 and 0.6%/year for DE220 and DE300, respectively (unadjusted p = 0.0097). All-cause death occurred at 1.5 and 0.5%/year for DE220 and DE300, respectively (unadjusted p = 0.0005). When patients were divided into four groups based on DRR and DE doses (DE300 groups meeting and not meeting DRR, and DE220 groups meeting and not meeting DRR), incidence rates of stroke/TIA/SE and major bleeding differed among the four groups (unadjusted p = 0.0026 and 0.0194 for trend, respectively); DE220 group meeting DRR had the highest rates (1.7% and 1.4%/year, respectively). However, in multivariate analysis, no differences between doses were observed regarding any outcomes. Conclusions The present results are indicative of the favorable benefit-risk profile of dabigatran in Japanese clinical practice. Dabigatran dose was not independently associated with thromboembolic and bleeding events in Japanese NVAF patients.

Background TIAregistry.org is an international cohort of patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke within 7 days before enrollment in the registry. Main analyses of 1-year follow-up data have been reported. 5 We conducted subanalysis on the baseline and 1-year follow-up data of Japanese patients. Methods The patients were classified into 2 groups based on Japanese ethnicity, Japanese (345) and non-Japanese (3238), and their baseline data and 1-year event rates were compared. We also determined risk factors and predictors of 1-year stroke. Results Current smoking, regular alcohol drinking, intracranial arterial stenosis, and small vessel occlusion; and hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and extracranial arterial stenosis were more and less common among Japanese patients, respectively. Stroke risk was higher and TIA risk was lower at 1-year follow-up among Japanese patients. The baseline risk factors for recurrent stroke were diabetes, alcohol drinking, and large artery atherosclerosis. Independent predictors of 1-year stroke risk were prior congestive heart failure and alcohol consumption. Conclusions The two populations of patients featured differences in risk factors, stroke subtypes, and outcome events. Predictors of recurrent stroke among Japanese patients included congestive heart failure and regular alcohol drinking. Strategies to attenuate residual risk of stroke aside from adherence to current guidelines should take our Japanese-patient specific findings into account.

Background and Purpose— As a prespecified post hoc analysis of the J-STARS (Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke) Echo Study, the 5-year stroke recurrence rate according to the baseline mean carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) with and without pravastatin treatment was investigated. Methods— Patients were randomly assigned to receive pravastatin 10 mg/day (pravastatin group) or control group (nonstatin treatment; 1:1) for 5 years. Baseline mean IMT of the common carotid artery was measured by ultrasonography. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate whether the stroke (any ischemic stroke, atherothrombotic brain infarction, or lacunar infarction) recurrence rate was different according to tertiles of baseline mean IMT. Results— A total of 793 patients, including 388 in the pravastatin group and 405 in the control group, were investigated. In the control group, Cox proportional hazards models showed that participants in the highest tertile IMT group (≥0.931 mm) had a higher rate of atherothrombotic brain infarction than those in the lowest tertile IMT group (P value=0.045). Conclusions— Long-term pravastatin administration may prevent the occurrence of atherothrombotic brain infarction in noncardioembolic infarction patients with the highest tertile IMT. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00361530.

Although dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel reduces early recurrence of ischaemic stroke, with long-term use this type of therapy is no longer effective and the risk of bleeding increases. Given that cilostazol prevents stroke recurrence without increasing the incidence of serious bleeding compared with aspirin, we aimed to establish whether dual antiplatelet therapy involving cilostazol is safe and appropriate for long-term use.In a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial across 292 hospitals in Japan, patients with high-risk non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke identified on MRI were randomly assigned to two groups in a 1:1 ratio to receive monotherapy with either oral aspirin (81 or 100 mg, once per day) or clopidogrel (50 or 75 mg, once per day) alone, or a combination of cilostazol (100 mg, twice per day) with aspirin or clopidogrel. Randomisation was done centrally (using block randomisation with a block size of six per each participating hospital) through a web-based registration system and was done by EPS Corporation. The patients were required to have at least 50% stenosis of a major intracranial or extracranial artery or two or more of the vascular risk factors. Trial medication was continued for half a year or longer, for a maximum of 3·5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of first recurrence of symptomatic ischaemic stroke. Safety outcomes were severe or life-threatening bleeding; any adverse events; serious adverse events; and any bleeding events. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in the as-treated population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01995370) and UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (number 000012180).Participants were recruited from Dec 13, 2013, to March 31, 2017. 932 patients assigned to the dual therapy group and 947 patients assigned to the monotherapy group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The trial was stopped after the enrolment of 1884 patients of an anticipated 4000 patients because of the delay in recruitment. Ischaemic stroke recurred in 29 (3%) of 932 patients (annualised rate 2·2%) on dual therapy including cilostazol and 64 (7%) of 947 patients (annualised rate 4·5%) on monotherapy during a median 1·4 years follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 0·49, 95% CI 0·31-0·76, p=0·0010). Severe or life-threatening bleeding occurred in eight patients (annualised rate 0·6%) on dual therapy and 13 patients (annualised rate 0·9%) on monotherapy (HR 0·66, 95% CI 0·27-1·60, p=0·35). Occurrence of any type of adverse event was similar between the groups (255 [28%] of 910 patients in the dual therapy group vs 219 [24%] of 921 patients in the monotherapy group); as was occurrence of serious adverse events (87 [10%] vs 142 [15%]) and bleeding events (38 [4%] vs 33 [4%]). Gastrointestinal bleeding, which affected nine (1%) of 910 patients in the monotherapy group and nine (1%) of 921 patients in the dual therapy group, was the most common type of bleeding.The combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel had a reduced incidence of ischaemic stroke recurrence and a similar risk of severe or life-threatening bleeding compared with treatment with aspirin or clopidogrel alone in patients at high risk for recurrent ischaemic stroke.Otsuka Pharmaceutical.

OBJECTIVE We examined whether the efficacy of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) for primary prevention of cardiovascular events is influenced by blood pressure (BP) using data from patients aged 60-85 years with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and/or diabetes, but without cardiovascular disease of the Japanese Primary Prevention Project. METHODS All patients had received aspirin (100 mg/day) or no aspirin. BP subgroups were defined as low (average SBP from the baseline to the year of the events

Background CYP2C19variants are associated with the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel against recurrent cardiovascular events. However, it remains unknown whether the elapsed time from stroke onset affects the relationship between the genetic variants and such events. To address this, we conducted a prospective cohort study to determine the effect ofCYP2C19variants on clinical outcomes in the chronic phase.Methods and Results:In total, 518 Japanese non-acute stroke patients treated with clopidogrel were registered at 14 institutions. Patients were classified into 3 clopidogrel-metabolizing groups according toCYP2C19genotype: extensive metabolizer (EM:*1/*1), intermediate metabolizer (IM:*1/*2or*1/*3), and poor metabolizer (PM:*2/*2,*2/*3, or*3/*3). Antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel were assessed by adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation. The endpoint was composite cerebrocardiovascular events (CVEs). In 501 successfully followed-up patients, the median time from index stroke to enrollment was 181 days. There were 28 cardiovascular and 2 major bleeding events. There were no significant differences in the rates of cardiovascular events among the groups. Conclusions Despite associations betweenCYP2C19variants and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity, there was no significant difference in rates of CVEs in the chronic stroke phase among the 3 clopidogrel-metabolizing groups ofCYP2C19variants.

Aims: The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II (TSQM-II) are validated treatment satisfaction patient-reported outcome (PRO) i...