Search

Autologous islet transplantation after total pancreatectomy is an excellent treatment for painful chronic pancreatitis. Traditionally, islets have been isolated without purification; however, purification is applied when the tissue volume is large. Nevertheless, the impact of tissue volume and islet purification on clinical outcomes of autologous islet transplantation has not been well examined. We analyzed 27 cases of autologous islet transplantation performed from October 2006 to January 2011. After examining the relationship between tissue volume and portal pressure at various time points, we compared islet characteristics and clinical outcomes between cases with complications (complication group) and without (noncomplication group), as well as cases with purification (purification group) and without (nonpurification group). Tissue volume significantly correlated with maximum ( R = 0.61), final ( R = 0.53), and delta (i.e., difference between base and maximum; R = 0.71) portal pressure. The complication group had a significantly higher body mass index, tissue volume, islet yield, and portal pressure (maximum, final, delta), suggesting that complications were associated with high tissue volume and high portal pressure. Only one of four patients (25%) in the complication group became insulin free, whereas 11 of 23 patients (49%) in the noncomplication group became insulin free with smaller islet yields. The purification group had a higher islet yield and insulin independence rate but had similar final tissue volume, portal pressure, and complication rates compared with the nonpurification group. In conclusion, high tissue volume was associated with high portal pressure and complications in autologous islet transplantation. Islet purification effectively reduced tissue volume and had no negative impact on islet characteristics. Therefore, islet purification can reduce the risk of complications and may improve clinical outcome for autologous islet transplantation when tissue volume is large.

Islet transplantation is one of the most promising treatments for an unstable form of type 1 diabetes. However, islet transplantation still has some obstacles, such as low success rate of islet isolation, difficulty to obtain long-term insulin freedom, and adverse events related to transplant protocol. We describe the adverse events of current clinical islet transplantation at our institute in this report. Nine type 1 diabetic patients received 17 islet infusions from March 2005 to October 2008. The islet infusion procedure and immunosuppression regimen were based on a modified Edmonton protocol. Severe adverse events (SAEs) were defined as events that were more than grade 3 according to the Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Trials of Adult Pancreatic Islet Transplantation, version 4.1 (Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry, CITR). Sixteen events were reported as SAEs and among them 12 events were probably or definitely related to transplant protocols; all occurred within 1 year after infusion except for one. Five adverse events (31%) occurred within 10 days after transplantation and were related to infusion procedures. Seven events (44%) occurred after 50 days and were related to immunosuppressive therapy. SAEs related to the protocol included three events of elevated liver enzymes, two of hemorrhage into gall bladder or peritoneal cavity, two of neutropenia, two of infection, one of vomiting, one of diarrhea, and one of renal dysfunction. All events were grade 3, except for one case that was grade 4 of neutropenia. All SAEs resolved with no sequelae. Neoplasms and deaths were not observed in our study. The present study suggests need to improve both infusion procedure and immunosuppressive strategy from the view of preventing SAEs.

Porcine islets are considered to be a promising resource for xenotransplantation. However, it is difficult to isolate porcine islets because of the marked fragility and rapid dissociation. Endogenous trypsin is one of the main factors to damage islets during the isolation procedure. Recent studies have suggested that trypsin inhibitors during the preservation of pancreas or the collagenase digestion can improve the result of islet isolation. In this study, we examined whether a 1-antitrypsin (Aralast™), which inhibits several endogenous proteases and has immunomodulatory properties, can protect islets from the proteases and improve the results of porcine islet isolation. Twelve porcine pancreata were divided into three groups: without Aralast group (standard, n = 5), preserved with Aralast using the ductal injection (DI) method (DI, n = 3), and with Aralast using the DI method and in the collagenase solution (DI+C, n = 4). Efficacy of islet isolation was assessed by islet yields, purity, and viability. The trypsin activity of the preservation and the digestion solution during the isolation procedure was measured. During islet isolation, the trypsin activity in DI+C group was significantly inhibited compared to the standard group, whereas DI group showed less effect than DI+C group. The average of postpurification islet equivalents (IEQ) per pancreas weight in the DI+C group was significantly higher than the standard group (standard: 3516 ± 497 IEQ/g, DI: 4607 ± 1090 IEQ/g, DI+C: 7097 ± 995 IEQ/g; p = 0.017 between standard and DI+C). In the DI+C group, stimulation index was higher than in other groups, although there was no significant difference. The presence of Aralast in both DI solution and collagenase solution markedly inhibited trypsin activity during pancreas digestion procedure and improved the porcine islet isolation. Inhibition of trypsin activity by Aralast could improve porcine islet isolation.

Porcine islets are a promising resource for xenotransplantation. However, low efficacy of islet isolation because of their marked fragility remains a problem. Recently we found that the standard purification method using COBE 2991 cell processor (COBE) with Ficoll density gradient solution damaged islets mechanically by high shearing force. In this study, we evaluated our new purification method using large plastic bottles for the efficacy of islet purification. Ten porcine pancreata were used. The average warm ischemic time was over 40 min; therefore, these pancreata were considered to be in a marginal condition. After digestion, the digested tissue was divided into three groups. Each group was purified using either top loading method with bottle (top group) or bottom loading method with bottle (bottom group) or standard COBE method (COBE group). Islet yield per pancreas weight (IEQ/g) and the rate of postpurification recovery in the top group were significantly higher than the COBE group (top: 8060 ± 1652 IEQ/g, bottom: 4572 ± 614 IE/g, COBE: 3900 ± 734 IE/g. p < 0.02 in top vs. COBE; top percentage of recovery: 99.3 ± 12.3%, bottom: 62.6 ± 8.8%, COBE: 49.5 ± 6.7%, p < 0.02 in top vs. bottom and COBE). The average sizes of purified islets in the top and bottom groups were significantly larger than COBE group (Average diameter top: 156 ± 8 μm, bottom: 147 ± 6 μm, COBE: 119 ± 6 μm, p < 0.01 in top vs. COBE and in bottom vs. COBE), which indicated that bottle method can reduce shear force during purification. Our new purification using top loading bottle method enabled us to obtain a high yield of porcine islets from marginal pancreata.

Total or partial pancreatectomy followed by autologous islet transplantation is a therapeutic option for the treatment of refractory chronic pancreatitis (CP). Maximization of islet yields from fibrotic and inflamed organs is crucial for prevention of posttransplant diabetes. We adapted technical advancements developed for islet allotransplantation toward islet autotransplantation. Eight patients (two men, six women; ages 24–58 years) underwent total ( n = 7) or partial ( n = 1) pancreatectomy for the treatment of CP refractory to maximal medical management. Pancreata were preserved in UW solution (UW group) in initial three cases and the last five pancreata were preserved with pancreatic ductal injection followed by ET-Kyoto/oxygenated PFC solutions (DI+TLM group). Islets were isolated by modified Ricordi method and were purified only in one case. All islet infusions were performed under general anesthesia via direct vein injection into the portal venous system with pressure monitoring. Total islet yields (129,314 ± 51,627 vs. 572,841 ± 116,934 IEQ, p < 0.04), islet yield/pancreas weight (1,233 ± 359 vs. 6,848 ± 847 IEQ/g, p < 0.003), and islet yield/patient body weight (1,951 ± 762 vs. 7,305 ± 1,531 IEQ/kg, p < 0.05) were significantly higher in the DI+TLM group when compared to the UW group. Pellet size was also higher (5.3 ± 0.3 vs. 13.5 ± 3.4 ml) in the DI+TLM group, suggesting that this method of preservation effectively protected pancreatic tissue against autolysis. First month posttransplant basal C-peptide and the secretory unit of islet transplant objects (SUITO) index were also higher in the DI+TLM group when compared to the UW group (2.0 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.4 ng/ml and 42.6 ± 12.7 vs. 14.6 ± 5.6, respectively). There were no technical complications related to the infusion. Our results suggest that higher islet yields can be achieved even from chronically inflamed and fibrotic organs using DI+TLM. The techniques applied for islet isolations from normal pancreata are showing promise for fibrotic pancreata from CP patients.

One endpoint of clinical islet cell transplantation for type 1 diabetic patients is the elimination or reduction of hypoglycemia. We previously developed a simple tool to evaluate islet graft function: the secretory unit of islet transplant objects (SUITO) index. The aim of this study is to clarify the association between the SUITO index and hypoglycemic episodes. Data from 310 clinical evaluations of 11 islet recipients were included in this study. Fasting plasma C-peptide and glucose levels were measured at every evaluation. The SUITO index was calculated according to the following formula: 1500 × C-peptide level (ng/ml)/[blood glucose level (mg/dl) – 63]. The number of hypoglycemic events (

Poor efficacy is one of the issues for clinical islet transplantation. Recently, we demonstrated that pancreatic ductal preservation significantly improved the success rate of islet isolation; however, two transplants were necessary to achieve insulin independence. In this study, we introduced iodixanol-based purification, thymoglobulin induction, and double blockage of IL-1β and TNF-α as well as sirolimus-free immunosuppression to improve the efficacy of clinical islet transplantation. Nine clinical-grade human pancreata were procured. Pancreatic ductal preservation was performed using ET-Kyoto solution in all cases. When the isolated islets met the clinical criteria, they were transplanted. We utilized two methods of immunosuppression and anti-inflammation. The first protocol prescribed daclizumab for induction, then sirolimus and tacrolimus to maintain immunosuppression. The second protocol used thymoglobulin for induction and tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to maintain immunosuppression. Eternacept and anakinra were administered as anti-inflammatory drugs. The total amount of insulin required, HbA1c, and the SUITO index were determined to analyze and compare the results of transplantation. All isolated islet preparations (9/9) met the criteria for clinical transplantation, and they were transplanted into six type 1 diabetic patients. All patients achieved insulin independence with normal HbA1c levels; however, the first protocol required two islet infusions ( N = 3) and the second protocol only required a single infusion ( N = 3). The average SUITO index, at 1 month after a single-donor islet transplantation, was significantly higher in the second protocol (49.6 ± 8.3 vs. 19.3 ± 6.3, p < 0.05). Pancreatic ductal preservation, iodixanol-based purification combined with thymoglobulin induction, and blockage of IL-1β and TNF-α as well as sirolimus-free immunosuppression dramatically improved the efficacy of clinical islet transplantations. This protocol enabled us to perform successful single-donor islet transplantations. Further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm these results and clarify the mechanism of each component.

Islet transplantation is an attractive therapy for type 1 diabetes, although some issues remain. One of them is the severe donor shortage in some countries. In this study, we investigated the possibility of international islet shipping beyond 10,000 km to supply islets to countries with donor shortages. Human islets were isolated from six cadaver donors and cultured until shipment. Islets were packed in either gas-permeable bags or in non-gas-permeable bags and shipped from Baylor Research Institute (Dallas, TX, USA) to Fukuoka University (Fukuoka, Japan). Pre- and postshipment islet number, purity, viability, and stimulation index (by glucose stimulation test) were assessed. Shipped 1,500 IE islets were transplanted into streptozotocin-induced diabetic nude mice for in vivo assay. The distance of our shipment was 11,148.4 km, and the mean duration of the shipments was 48.2 ± 8.2 h. The islet number recovery rate (postshipment/preshipment) was significantly higher in gas-permeable bags (56.4 ± 10.1% vs. 20.5 ± 20.6%, p < 0.01). Islet purity was significantly reduced during shipment in non-gas-permeable bags (from 47.7 ± 18.6% to 40.2 ± 28.2 in gas-permeable bags vs. from 50.4 ± 6.4% to 25.9 ± 15.6% in non-gas-permeable bags, p < 0.05). Islet viability and stimulation index did not change significantly between pre- and postshipping, in either gas-permeable bags or in non-gas-permeable bags. One of three diabetic nude mice (33.3%) converted to normoglycemia. It is feasible to ship human islet cells internationally in gas-permeable bags. This strategy would promote basic and preclinical research for countries with donor shortages, even though the research centers are remote (over 10,000 km from the islet isolation center).

Since the successful demonstration of the Edmonton protocol, islet transplantation has advanced significantly on several fronts, including improved pancreas preservation systems. In this study, we evaluated two different types of organ preservation solutions for human islet isolation. Modified Celsior (Celsior solution with hydroxyethyl starch and nafamostat mesilate; HNC) solution and modified Kyoto (MK) solution were compared for pancreas preservation prior to islet isolation. Islet yield after purification was significantly higher in the MK group than in the HNC group (MK = 6186 ± 985 IE/g; HNC = 3091 ± 344 IE/g). The HNC group had a longer phase I period (digestion time), a higher volume of undigested tissue, and a higher percentage of embedded islets, suggesting that the solution may inhibit collagenase. However, there was no significant difference in ATP content in the pancreata or in the attainability of posttransplant normoglycemia in diabetic nude mice between the two groups, suggesting that the quality of islets was similar among the two groups. In conclusion, MK solution is better for pancreas preservation before islet isolation than HNC solution due to the higher percentage of islets that can be isolated from the donor pancreas. MK solution should be the solution of choice among the commercially available solutions for pancreatic islet isolation leading to transplantation.

Inconsistent islet isolation is one of the issues of clinical islet transplantation. In the current study, we applied ductal injection to improve the consistency of islet isolation. Seven islet isolations were performed with the ductal injection of ET-Kyoto solution (DI group) and eight islet isolations were performed without the ductal injection (standard group) using brain-dead donor pancreata. Isolated islets were evaluated based on the Edmonton protocol for transplantation. The DI group had significantly higher islet yields (588,566 ± 64,319 vs. 354,836 ± 89,649 IE, p < 0.01) and viability (97.3 ± 1.2% vs. 92.6 ± 1.2%, p < 0.02) compared with the standard group. All seven isolated islet preparations in the DI group (100%), versus only three out of eight isolated islet preparations (38%) in the standard group met transplantation criteria. The islets from the DI group were transplanted into three type 1 diabetic patients and all three patients became insulin independent. Ductal injection significantly improved quantity and quality of isolated islets and resulted in high success rate of clinical islet transplantation. This simple modification will reduce the risk of failure of clinical islet isolation.

The quality of donor pancreata is important for successful islet isolation. However, in some countries like Japan, the number of donor pancreata is very low; therefore, marginal donors have been used with less restrictive donor criteria. In order to use marginal donor pancreata, we established the Kyoto islet isolation method (KIIM). According to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in 2005, more than 6,000 pancreata were not clinically used in the US. In this study, we applied the KIIM for brain-dead donors and reevaluated donor usability based on the Japanese islet donor criteria. Islets were isolated with the Ricordi method using pancreata stored in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution (UW group) or by the two-layer method (TLM group) or the TLM combined with ductal injection (DI group). We implemented the KIIM (KIIM group) to confirm the effect of the KIIM on brain-dead donors. Donor charts in Texas from 2005 to 2006 were reviewed. If pancreata were not used clinically, the reason was reviewed and donors were reevaluated based on Japanese criteria. There were no significant differences of islet yield, viability, and purity between the UW and TLM groups. The DI group significantly improved islet yields and isolations were further improved in the KIIM group [UW: 251,663 ± 60,217 islet equivalent (IE); TLM: 243,738 ± 54,170 IE; DI: 498,639 ± 28,853 IE; KIIM: 678,286 ± 55,853]. The KIIM provided high-quality islets in high numbers from islet isolations from brain-dead donors. A total of 236 donor charts were reviewed and 194 pancreata (82%) were not used. Of these, 185 cases identified the reasons that the pancreata were not used. When we applied the Japanese criteria, an additional 82 cases out of 185 (44%) seem to be suitable for islet isolations. With the KIIM, more than 2,500 additional donor pancreata can be used for islet isolation in the US every year when the Japanese criteria are applied.

A large number of reports have shown that the two-layer method (TLM), which employs oxygenated perfluorochemical (PFC) and University of Wisconsin (UW) solution, is superior to simple cold storage in UW in islet transplantation. However, two recent large-scale studies showed no beneficial effect of TLM compared with UW storage in human islet transplantation. We reevaluated the effect of TLM by following three groups: group 1: UW simple storage; group 2: TLM performed by multiorgan procurement teams (not specialists of islet isolation); and group 3: TLM performed by specialists of islet isolation (Noguchi and Matsumoto). There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2, whereas islet yields were significantly higher in group 3 compared with either group 1 or 2. Our data suggest that exact, complete performance of TLM could improve the outcome of islet isolation and transplantation. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of the TLM, the procedure of preoxygenated TLM, and the several possibilities for the reasons of the discrepancy.

Evaluation of engrafted islets mass is important for clinical care of patients after islet transplantation. Recently, we developed the secretory unit of islet transplant objects (SUITO) index, which reflected engrafted islet mass. In this study, we evaluated the SUITO index for the prediction of clinical outcome after single islet transplantation. Single islet transplantations were performed into six type 1 diabetic patients. Isolated islets were quantitatively assessed at the time of transplantation. The SUITO index was calculated as follows: fasting C-peptide (ng/dl)/[fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) – 63] × 1500. Islet yield/recipient's body weight and SUITO index were evaluated, along with HbA 1C , relative insulin dose (insulin dose posttransplant/pretransplant), and M-values. HbA 1C improved in all cases, irrespective of the SUITO index score or islet yield/body weight. The average SUITO index from postoperative days 3 to 30 ( R 2 = 0.728, p < 0.04), but not islet yield/body weight ( R 2 = 0.259, p = 0.303), correlated with relative insulin dose. The daily SUITO index strongly correlated with the daily relative insulin dose ( R 2 = 0.558, p < 0.0001) and weakly correlated with the daily M-values ( R 2 = 0.207, p < 0.02). A SUITO index score of less than 10 was associated with increasing insulin dose even after islet transplantation. The SUITO index seems to be a better predictor of success of islet transplantations than islet yield/body weight. SUITO index is recommended to assess clinical outcome of islet transplantation.

Recently, we demonstrated that islet transplantation from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) using the Kyoto islet isolation method (KIIM) successfully reversed patients' diabetes state. In this study, we evaluated the effects of donor- and isolation-related variables on islet isolation results from NHBDs by KIIM. Twenty-one islet preparations from the pancreata of NHBDs were isolated by KIIM. Islet preparations that met transplantation criteria and achieved improved patient diabetes control after transplantation were defined as successful isolations. Potential risk factors deemed to affect islet isolation results, such as age, gender, body mass index, hospital stay, donors' blood biochemical tests, a modified pancreata procurement method, and isolation and purification procedure-related variables, were analyzed. Seventeen out of 21 islet isolations (81%) were successful isolations. Postpurification islet yield was 447,639 ± 39,902 islet equivalents (IE) in the successful isolation group and 108,007 ± 31,532 IE in the failure group. Donor age was significantly younger in the success group (41.9 ± 4.0 years old in the success group vs. 57.5 ± 2.2 years old in the failure group, p = 0.003). Chronic pancreatitis significantly decreased islet yields (p = 0.006). Phase I time was significantly shorter (p = 0.010) and undigested tissue volume was significantly smaller (p = 0.020) in the success group. Purity was in positive correlation to postpurification islet yield, while donor age was in reverse correlation to postpurification islet yield. KIIM enables us to perform islet transplantation from NHBDs; however, the decision to use pancreata from older donors or those with chronic pancreatitis requires careful consideration.

Previous reports indicate that the two-layer method (TLM) of human pancreas preservation is superior to University of Wisconsin solution (UW) when pancreata are preserved for extended periods (i.e., >24 h) prior to islet isolation. In this study, the efficacy of using the TLM for preserving pancreata for short periods (i.e.,