Search

The physical function of older patients with heart failure (HF) is likely to decline, and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is widely used for its evaluation. No study has analyzed the SPPB by using Rasch model in these patients. The aim of this study was to examine the structural validity and item response of the SPPB in older inpatients with HF.In this multicenter cross-sectional study, we investigated 106 older inpatients with HF. We evaluated the SPPB's rating scale structure, unidimensionality, and measurement accuracy (0 = poor performance to 4 = normal performance).The SPPB rating scale fulfilled the category functioning criteria. All items fit the underlying scale construct. The SPPB demonstrated adequate reliability (person reliability = 0.81) and separated persons into four strata: those with very low, low, moderate, and high physical performance. Item-difficulty measures were -0.59 to 0.96 logits, and regarding the person ability-item difficulty matching for the SPPB, the item was somewhat easy (the mean of person ability = 0.89 logits; mean of item difficulty = 0.00).The SPPB has strong measurement properties and is an appropriate scale for quantitatively evaluating physical function in older patients with HF.For older adults with heart failure (HF), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is often used to measure physical performance.Rasch analysis revealed that SPPB had strong measurement properties in older adults with HF.This result may help rehabilitation professionals use the SPPB as a physical performance scale in clinical practice to aid decision-making in intervention planning.

Objective To determine the minimal clinically important difference between the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed in acute-phase stroke patients. Design Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study. Setting Inpatient acute stroke rehabilitation. Subjects Seventy-five patients with acute stroke, mean (SD) age 71.7 (12.2) years. Intervention Inpatients with acute stroke were assessed with the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed before and after rehabilitation. Physiotherapy was conducted to improve balance and gait over a 2-week period: an average of 40 min/day on weekdays and 20 min/day on weekends and holidays. Main measures The patients’ Berg Balance Scale, comfortable walking speed, Global Rating of Change scale (patient-rated and physiotherapist-rated), and motor score of the Functional Independence Measure were obtained. Minimal clinically important differences were estimated using both anchor- (receiver operating characteristic curves and change difference) and distribution-based approaches (minimal detectable change and 0.5× the change score [SD]). Results The baseline scores were 31.2 (18.9) for the Berg Balance Scale and 0.79 (0.35) m/s for comfortable walking speed. The minimal clinically important difference in the Berg Balance Scale was 6.5–12.5 points by the anchor-based approach and 2.3–4.9 points by the distribution-based approach. The minimal clinically important difference in comfortable walking speed was 0.18–0.25 m/s by the anchor-based and 0.13–0.15 m/s by the distribution-based approach. Conclusions A change of 6.5–12.5 points in the Berg Balance Scale and 0.18–0.25 m/s in the comfortable walking speed is required in these measurements’ anchor-based minimal clinically important differences to be beyond measurement error, and to be perceptible by both patients and clinicians.

[Purpose] To clarify the relationship between lower extremity function and activities of daily living and characterize lower extremity function in hospitalized middle-aged and older adults with subacute cardiovascular disease. [Participants and Methods] The Short Physical Performance Battery, 6-minute walk distance, and functional independence measure tests were conducted in 79 inpatients with subacute cardiovascular disease (mean age, 76.7 ± 11.9 years; 34 females). Multiple regression analysis used the functional independence measure score as the dependent variable and the Short Physical Performance Battery and 6-minute walk distance scores as independent variables. Cross-tabulations were performed for each age group, and patients who performed the Short Physical Performance Battery and 6-minute walk distance tests were divided into two groups by their respective cutoff values. [Results] Only the Short Physical Performance Battery (β=0.568) and 6-minute walk distance (β=0.479) scores were adopted as significant independent variables in each multiple regression model. The age75 years group had the most patients with both good lower extremity function and aerobic capacity, whereas the age ≥75 years group had the most patients with both functions impaired. [Conclusion] Although cardiovascular disease is generally associated with decreased aerobic capacity, many older patients with cardiovascular disease in this study had decreased lower extremity function, too.

[Purpose] To compare the sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in patients with subacute cerebral infarction. [Participants and Methods] Thirty patients with subacute cerebral infarction participated in this study. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Berg Balance Scale, and ambulatory ability were assessed on admission and discharge. Sensitivity to change was calculated using the effect size, standardized response mean, and relative efficiency. Responsiveness was analyzed by comparing the ability of the difference between the scores of the balance assessments at admission and discharge in classifying the participants’ ambulatory independence. [Results] All assessments showed significant improvement from admission to discharge. The effect size of the three versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test ranged from 0.41 to 0.69. The standardized response mean ranged from 0.75 to 1.28. The cutoff score was 16.7% for the Balance Evaluation Systems Test, 5.5 points for the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, 1.5 points for the Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and 3.5 points for the Berg Balance Scale. [Conclusion] The sensitivity to change of the three versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test was high or moderate. However, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test had the highest responsiveness, as determined with the extent of ambulatory independence.

[Purpose] To present an accurate and straight-forward system of fall prediction by performing decision tree analysis using both the fall assessment sheet and Berg balance scale (BBS). [Participants and Methods] The participants in this retrospective study were inpatients from acute care units. We extracted the risk factors for falls from the fall assessment and performed a decision tree analysis using the extracted fall risk factors and BBS score. [Results] "History of more than one fall in the last 1 year", "Muscle weakness", "Use of a walking aid or wheelchair", "Requires assistance for transfer", "Use of Narcotics", "Dangerous behavior", and "High degree of self-reliance" were fall risk factors. The decision tree analysis extracted five fall risk factors, with an area under the curve of 0.7919. Patients with no history of falls and who did not require assistance for transfer or those with a BBS score ≥51 did not fall. [Conclusion] Decision tree-based fall prediction was useful and straightforward and revealed that patients with no history of falling and those who did not require assistance for transfer or had a BBS score ≥51 had a low risk of falling.

Background and purpose Hip fracture is a common injury in older adults, with a high proportion of hip fractures affecting women. After a hip fracture, the recovery of the patient's walking speed is very important; one of the key determinants of walking speed is balance. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), a clinical balance measure, categorizes balance into 6 postural control systems. However, the relationship between the walking speed level and the sections of the BESTest has not been explored for older women with hip fracture. Our objective was to establish section scores for the BESTest cutoff values for walking speed in older women with hip fracture. Methods This was an observational study involving 46 older women 65 years or older with hip fracture. The BESTest was administered to all participants upon their discharge from the hospital. Participants were divided into groups on the basis of their walking speed levels, and receiver operating characteristic curves were determined for each section of the BESTest. We calculated the cutoff value, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of each. Results Section IV-Stability in Gait showed the highest AUC (0.92) compared with the other sections, and the cutoff value determined for the fast and slow walker groups was 64.3% (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.83). The sections with moderate AUC (0.7-0.9) were I-Biomechanical Constraints (cutoff = 70.0%), III-Anticipatory Postural Adjustments (cutoff = 66.5%), IV-Postural Responses (cutoff = 69.4%), and V-Sensory Orientation (cutoff = 83.4%). The sections with the highest sensitivity (0.82) were I-Biomechanical Constraints and VI-Stability in Gait, and that with the highest specificity (0.88) was II-Stability Limits and Verticality. Conclusions Five of the BESTest sections (I-Biomechanical Constraints, III-Anticipatory Postural Adjustments, IV-Postural Responses, V-Sensory Orientation, and IV-Stability in Gait) were able to differentiate between fast and slow walkers among older women with hip fracture. Balance during gait and anticipatory postural adjustments were shown to be important components of balance, and their cutoff values were indicators of the balance required to reach fast walking levels.

This study aimed to investigate to what extent upper limb (UL) motor impairment, trunk compensation, and activity performance are related to self-perception of UL activity performance in subacute stroke.This was a prospective observational study. Twenty-four adults with subacute stroke (age: 65.4 ± 10.8 years) underwent clinical and kinematic assessments at baseline (33.9 ± 5.2 days after stroke onset) and 4 weeks after the baseline. The clinical assessment included the UL Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FMA), Simple Test for Evaluating hand Function (STEF), and the performance and satisfaction scores of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The kinematic measurement was performed using a motion capture system during a standardized reach-to-grasp task. Endpoint performance variables and trunk displacement were calculated as kinematic outcomes. An inpatient rehabilitation program of 3 h/day was provided every day for 4 weeks between the two measurement points. The relationships between COPM scores and clinical/kinematic outcomes were examined by multiple regression analysis. Significance levels of p 0.05 were used.The results of the multiple regression analysis showed that the changes in STEF (β = 0.520, p = 0.005) and trunk compensation (β = -0.398, p = 0.024) were moderately related to the change in the COPM satisfaction (RThe changes in activity performance and trunk compensation were related to improved self-perception of UL activity performance. Therapeutic management for activity performance and trunk compensation may be important for improving self-perception of UL activity performance after stroke.

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) and S-BESTest and to evaluate which is more suitable for use in clinical settings for individuals with stroke. Methods This multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study investigated 115 individuals with stroke (mean age, 70.8 y [SD = 11.2 y]) who were able to stand without physical assistance. All individuals were examined with the BESTest and with the Mini-BESTest and S-BESTest scored based on the BESTest results. The data were analyzed using a Rasch analysis (partial credit model). Results The Mini-BESTest results revealed a correctly functioning rating scale, good fit of the data to the model (apart from 1 overfit item), good reliability for both persons and items (6 statistically detectable levels of balance ability), local dependence between 1 item pair, and essential unidimensionality. The S-BESTest results demonstrated disordered rating scale thresholds (1 response option required collapsing), good fit of the data to the model (apart from 1 underfit item), good reliability for both persons and items (5 statistically detectable levels of balance ability), local dependence between 2 item pairs, and essential unidimensionality. Conclusion The analyses confirmed that the reliability of the S-BESTest was good and unidimensional and that the test provides several improved points, such as item redundancy and local independence of items. Nevertheless, the Mini-BESTest results supported previous findings as a whole and were better than those from the S-BESTest. Impact Rasch analysis demonstrated that the Mini-BESTest was a better balance assessment scale than the S-BESTest for individuals with stroke based on its psychometric properties. The Mini-BESTest may serve as a useful scale for assessing balance in individuals with stroke, and a keyform plot and strata may help clinical decision-making in terms of interpreting scores and goal setting.

Conditions underlying balance impairment should be identified to improve knowledge regarding clinical interventions for frail older adults. This study aims to explore the relationship between balance functions and frailty by using the brief balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), which can assess biomechanical constraints, stability limits/verticality, anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), reactive postural responses, sensory orientation and stability in gait. A total of 75 community-dwelling older women were included in this cross-sectional study. We evaluated frailty by using the Kihon checklist and assessed the participants' balance functions by using the Brief BESTest. We performed the Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to compare each balance function between frail and nonfrail participants. Twenty-two of the 75 (29.3%) participants were included in the frailty group. We noted significant differences between the frailty and nonfrailty groups with regard to stability limit, APAs, sensory orientation, and stability in gait (P = 0.010, 0.001, 0.008 and

[Purpose] We aimed to examine the accuracy of heart rate monitors worn on the wrist by patients with stroke. The wrist worn heart rate monitor could improve the quality of rehabilitation by monitoring exercise intensity during physical therapy. [Participants and Methods] Thirty inpatients with subacute hemiparetic stroke wore heart rate monitors on both (non-paretic and paretic) wrists, as well as a chest heart rate monitor. We recorded the heart rate values measured at the wrist and chest every minute during physical therapy sessions. The wrist monitors were an optical heart rate measurement device based on photoplethysmography, and the chest monitor was a traditional chest device based on electrocardiography. The relative and absolute reliabilities between the heart rate measurements from the wrist and chest monitors were calculated. [Results] The intraclass correlation coefficients for model 2.1 ranged from 0.75 to 0.79. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a very slight fixed bias; however, no significant proportional bias was observed. For the non-paretic and paretic sides, the lower and upper limits of agreement ranged from -21.8 to 23.8 beats/min and from -20.8 to 21.6 beats/min, and the mean absolute percentage errors were 6.7% and 5.9%, respectively. The Cohen's d value was small. [Conclusion] The relative reliability of the wrist heart rate monitors was substantial. The absolute reliability as bias in wrist heart rate and chest heart rate was small, but heart rates estimated from wrist monitors were not particularly accurate.

Objective: To clarify and compare the structural validity of 3 Balance Evaluation Systems Tests (BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest) in older adults with femoral or vertebral fractures. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: Ninety-four older adults (age ?65 years) with femoral or vertebral fractures, who could walk without physical assistance. Methods: Four BESTest models (BESTest, one-factor Mini-BESTest, four-factor Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest) were examined using confirmatory factor analysis, and the models goodness-of-fit was assessed. Unidimensionality of the best-fitting model was confirmed by Rasch principal component analysis on the residuals. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor Mini-BESTest model (comparative fit index?=?0.952; Tucker-Lewis index?=?0.937; root-mean square error of approximation?=?0.060; standardized root-mean-square residual?=?0.062) has a better structure than other models. The principal component analysis of standardized residuals showed that the variance attributable to Rasch factor was good, with eigenvalues

[Purpose] We aimed to compare the effects of cognitive load and task prioritization on dual task strategies in patients with stroke and healthy adults in order to clarify the characteristics of cognitive-motor interference. [Participants and Methods] In total, 26 patients with stroke and 26 age-matched healthy adults (controls) performed the Timed Up and Go Test while performing a serial subtraction task from random numbers between 90 and 100. Dual task was measured under four conditions in which two difficulty levels of "3 subtraction" and "7 subtraction" were multiplied by two prioritizing tasks that involved "paying equal attention to both walking and subtraction tasks" (no priority) and "paying attention while mainly focusing on subtraction tasks" (cognitive priority). [Results] Increasing cognitive load and prioritizing cognitive tasks affected motor performance in terms of the amount of time and number of steps required to complete the Timed Up and Go Test in both the patients and controls. However, cognitive load and task prioritization did not affect cognitive performance. [Conclusion] When cognitive load increases and instructions are given to prioritize increases in cognitive load, patients with stroke use the "posture first" strategy to stabilize their gait as effectively as healthy adults do.

Objectives Although the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is known to be a reliable and valid measure of balance in individuals with stroke, the utility of this tool in relation to subacute stroke walking speed and the recovery of gait ability has not been explored. Here, we compared the measurement properties and their relationship to gait speed on the Mini-BESTest and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in middle and older ambulatory individuals with subacute stroke, and we investigated which balance assessment tool is more likely to capture the status of the recovery of gait speed. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 88 individuals 50 years or older with stroke who had been evaluated using the Mini-BESTest by using the BBS and by assessing their comfortable walking speed (CWS). The proportion of subjects who showed improvement was calculated for 34 stroke survivors from data obtained at admission to and discharge from the hospital. Results Compared with the BBS, the Mini-BESTest showed a better distribution of total scores without a ceiling effect. The two scales showed correlations with gait speed (Mini-BESTest: r=0.702; BBS: r=0.592) and discrimination between fast and slow walkers. The responsiveness of the Mini-BESTest was excellent, with an area under the curve of 0.894, thus discriminating between gait speed improvement versus non-improvement. Conclusions These results indicate that the Mini-BESTest is more useful than the BBS in terms of its measurement properties and ability to measure gait recovery in middle and older ambulatory individuals with subacute stroke.

[Purpose] The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a comprehensive assessment tool, although it is not confined for use in stroke patients. This study aimed to determine the structural validity of the BESTest in self-ambulatory patients with stroke using both factor and Rasch analyses. [Participants and Methods] This retrospective study included 140 self-ambulatory patients with stroke. The structural validity of the BESTest was analyzed according to principal component, exploratory factor, Rasch, confirmatory factor, and correlation analyses. [Results] The analytical results supported a four-factor model comprising 25 items. The four factors included dynamic postural control with gait, static postural control, stepping reaction, and stability limits in sitting. Evidence of high structural validity and reliable internal consistency suggested that the 25-item BESTest is valid and reliable. Each factor was significantly correlated with lower extremity motor function and walking ability. [Conclusion] Eleven items in the BESTest were poorly correlated, and the remaining 25 items were grouped into four factors that demonstrated good structural validity for patients with stroke. Further studies should validate the applicability of the 25-item BESTest four-factor model in a larger sample of patients with stroke in a clinical setting.

[Purpose] Fluidity in the sit-to-walk task has been quantitatively measured with three-dimensional motion analysis system. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of an accelerometer-based method for estimating fluidity in community-dwelling elderly individuals. [Subjects and Methods] Seventeen community-dwelling elderly females performed a sit-to-walk task. The motion was recorded by an accelerometer, a three-dimensional motion analysis system and a foot pressure sensor simultaneously. The timings of events determined from the acceleration waveform were compared to the timings determined from the three-dimensional motion analysis data (task onset, maximum trunk inclination) or foot pressure sensor data (first heel strike). Regression analysis was used to estimate the fluidity index from the duration between events. [Results] The characteristics of the acceleration waveform were similar to those previously reported in younger adults. Comparisons of event timings from accelerometer and motion analysis system data indicated no systematic bias. Regression analysis showed that the duration from maximum trunk inclination to the first heel strike was the best predictor of fluidity index. [Conclusion] An accelerometer-based method using the duration between characteristic events may be used to precisely and conveniently assess fluidity in a sit-to-walk task in a community setting.

[Purpose] This study evaluated effects of a high-intensity linear polarized near-infrared ray irradiation for mitigation of muscle hypertonia. [Subjects] The subjects were 20 patients with cerebrovascular disease. [Methods] Subjects were randomly allocated to an intervention or control group. The intervention group received irradiation of the triceps surae. Passive range of motion and passive resistive joint torque of ankle dorsiflexion were measured before and after the intervention in knee extended and flexed positions. [Results] In the knee extended position, the mean changes in passive range of motion were 2.70° and -0.50° in the intervention and control groups, respectively, and the mean changes in passive resistive joint torque were -1.42 and -0.26 N·m in the intervention and control groups, respectively. In the knee flexed position, the mean changes in passive range of motion were 3.70° and 0.70° in the intervention and control groups, respectively, and the mean changes in passive resistive joint torque were -2.38 and -0.31 N·m in the intervention and control groups, respectively. In both knee positions, the mean changes in the two indices were greater in the intervention group than in the control group. [Conclusion] High-intensity linear polarized near-infrared ray irradiation increases passive range of motion and decreases passive resistive joint torque.

Trunk control plays an important role in movement control and postural balance during functional activities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of trunk control early after stroke with mobility performance and quantitative gait characteristics derived from trunk accelerations. Fifteen patients with hemiparesis following stroke (median age, 61 years [range, 56-78 years]; median time since stroke, 9 days [range, 7-15 days]) participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Subjects were evaluated using the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), the short-form of the Berg Balance Scale (SF-BBS), an isometric knee extension strength test, the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and a timed walking test. The linear acceleration of the lower trunk was recorded along the 3 axes during walking and quantified using the autocorrelation coefficient and harmonic ratio to assess the variability and smoothness of upper-body movement. The TIS total score had a significant correlation with TUG time. The coordination subscale score of the TIS was significantly correlated with TUG time, walking speed, and accelerometry variables in univariate analysis. The TIS coordination subscale score was significantly related to accelerometry variables in the partial correlation analysis adjusted for SF-BBS score and knee extension strength on the paretic and nonparetic side. These results indicate that trunk motor impairment after stroke is closely associated with poor mobility performance and trunk instability in gait. These findings support intensive rehabilitation treatment targeting trunk control to regain better mobility and stable gait in patients early after stroke.

[Purpose] To develop a clinical assessment test of 180-degree standing turn strategy (CAT-STS) and quantify its reliability and construct validity. [Subjects] Outpatients with stroke that occurred at least 6 months previously (N = 27) who could walk 10 m without physical assistance were included. [Methods] The CAT-STS was based on the literature and discussion with four physical therapists. The final version of the CAT-STS includes seven items: direction, use of space, foot movement, initiation, termination, instability, and non-fluidity. Patients were videotaped performing a 180-degree turn while standing. The Motricity Index, gait speed and Functional Ambulation Category were also evaluated. Two raters evaluated the turn on two occasions, and inter- and intra-rater reliability were calculated. Construct validity was also calculated. [Results] Inter-rater reliability was fair or moderate for many items (kappa = 0.221-0.746). Intra-rater reliability was good-to-excellent for all items (kappa = 0.681-0.846) except direction and termination. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the total CAT-STS score were substantial and excellent, respectively (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.725 and 0.865, respectively). The total CAT-STS score was associated with walking ability and the time and number of steps taken to turn. [Conclusion] The total CAT-STS score is a reliable and valid measure.

[Purpose] Afferent input caused by electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve or a muscle modulates corticospinal excitability. However, a long duration of stimulation is required to induce these effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of short-duration high-frequency electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) on corticospinal excitability through the measurement of motor evoked potentials (MEP) in young healthy subjects. [Subjects] Eleven healthy right-handed subjects participated in this study. [Methods] EMS was applied to the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle at 100 Hz with a pulse width of 100 μs for 120 s. The intensity of stimulation was just below the motor threshold. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied over the motor cortex, and MEP were recorded from the APB before, and immediately, 10, and 20 min after EMS. [Results] In the APB muscle, the MEP amplitude significantly decreased after EMS, and this effect lasted for 20 min. [Conclusion] The excitability of the corticospinal tract decreased after short-duration high-frequency EMS, and the effect lasted for 20 min. These results suggest that even short duration EMS can change the excitability of the corticospinal tract.

[Purpose] To quantify the influence of visual and under-foot-surface conditions on standing balance in patients with post stroke hemiplegia and examine associations of this ordinal score with somatosensory disturbance and walking ability. [Subjects] Sixty-six patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. [Methods] Standing balance was tested in 4 conditions (firm floor or foam rubber surface with eyes open or eyes closed) for 30 s per condition and scored using a 5-category ordinal scale. The accuracy of the standing balance score to distinguish patients above/below cut-offs for the timed up-and-go test (14 s) and functional ambulation category (4) was determined. [Results] Standing balance score was correlated with sensory impairments (tactile and vibration perception) and walking ability (up-and-go and functional ambulation category). The standing balance score distinguished patients with up-and-go times ≤14 and >14 s with moderate sensitivity and specificity, and distinguished patients with functional ambulation category

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stepping limb and step direction on step distance and the association of step distance and stepping laterality in step difference with walking ability and motor dysfunction. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were thirty-nine patients with chronic hemiparesis as a result of stroke, who performed the MSL (Maximum Step Length) test along with tests of motor impairment, gait speed and Functional Ambulation Category. The MSL test is a clinical test of stepping distance in which participants step to the front, side, and back. The subjects were classified into three groups according to the stepping laterality in front step distance. [Results] Step distance did not differ across stepping limbs but did differ across step directions. Front step distance was significantly longer than side and back step distance. Participants with forward paretic step length shorter than forward non-paretic step length had significantly higher walking ability than participants with symmetric forward step length or forward paretic step length longer than forward non-paretic step length [Conclusion] Patients with stroke have characteristic step distances in each direction. Adequate weight shift toward the paretic limb when stepping with the non-paretic limb is associated with walking ability.

[Purpose] The effect of turn direction and relation between turn performance and walking ability in patients with hemiparetic stroke is not clear. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of turn direction on the performance of standing turns and to examine the relations between turn performance and walking ability in patients with hemiparetic stroke. [Subject and Methods] The participants were 38 outpatients with chronic hemiparesis due to stroke. Turn performance was evaluated using the time and number of steps required to complete a 360° standing turn, and was evaluated for turns toward the paretic side and the non-paretic side. Walking ability was assessed using gait speed in the 10-m walk test, the Timed Up and Go test, and the Functional Ambulation Category. [Results] Thirty-six participants were analyzed, and the time needed for turns and number of steps were similar for turns to the paretic and non-paretic sides. The time needed for turns was correlated walking ability. A turn time of 10.0 s distinguished FAC 5 (independent ambulation in the community) from FAC ≤4 with a sensitivity of 0.94 and specificity of 0.85. [Conclusion] The performance of standing turns was not affected by the turning direction and was closely correlated with walking ability.

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationships between falls and sections of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in patients with stroke or those with a history of fracture. [Subjects and Methods] This longitudinal study included 51 self-ambulatory inpatients. Balance was assessed 1 week prior to discharge using the BESTest, and the incidence of falls within 6 months after discharge was investigated. Relationships between falling and balance components were analyzed using the t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. [Results] Five subjects were dropped out before follow-up at 6 months. Falls were reported by 10 of the remaining 46 participants. Scores for two sections (Anticipatory Postural Adjustments and Sensory Orientation) were significantly lower in fallers than in non-fallers with stroke. Four of the six sections (Biomechanical Constraints, Anticipatory Postural Adjustments, Sensory Orientation, and Stability in Gait) showed areas under the ROC curves >0.8 (0.82, 0.83, 0.84, and 0.81, respectively). In patients with a history of fractures, all sections were not significantly different between fallers and non-fallers. [Conclusion] Anticipatory Postural Adjustments and Sensory Orientation sections of the BESTest were related to future occurrence of fall after discharge in self-ambulatory stroke patients.