Search

Abstract Background For the treatment of coronoid process fractures, medial, lateral, anterior, anteromedial, and posterior approaches have been increasingly reported; however, there is no general consensus on the method of fixation of coronal fractures. Here, we present a highly-extensile minimally invasive approach to treat coronoid process fractures using a mini-plate that can achieve anatomic reduction, stable fixation, and anterior capsular repair. Further, the study aimed to determine the complication rate of the anterior minimally invasive approach and to evaluate functional and clinical patient-reported outcomes during follow-up. Methods Thirty-one patients diagnosed with coronoid fractures accompanied with a “terrible triad” or posteromedial rotational instability between April 2012 and October 2018 were included in the analysis. Anatomical reduction and mini-plate fixation of coronoid fractures were performed using an anterior minimally invasive approach. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, range of motion (ROM), and the visual analog score (VAS). The time of fracture healing and complications were recorded. Results The mean follow-up time was 26.7 months (range, 14–60 months). The average time to radiological union was 3.6 ± 1.3 months. During the follow-up period, the average elbow extension was 6.8 ± 2.9° while the average flexion was 129.6 ± 4.6°. According to Morrey’s criteria, 26 (81%) elbows achieved a normal desired ROM. At the last follow-up, the mean MEPI score was 98 ± 3.3 points. There were no instances of elbow instability, elbow joint stiffness, subluxation or dislocation, infection, blood vessel complications, or nerve palsy. Overall, 10 elbows (31%) experienced heterotopic ossification. Conclusion An anterior minimally invasive approach allows satisfactory fixation of coronoid fractures while reducing incision complications due to over-dissection of soft tissue injuries. In addition, this incision does not compromise the soft tissue stability of the elbow joint and allows the patient a more rapid return to rehabilitation exercises.

Abstract Background Our experience with the surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar (SFDB) approach for type AO 13C3 humeral fractures indicates that this surgical approach can be performed safely and effectively in appropriately selected patients. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the SFDB approach without olecranon osteotomy (OO) for type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 65 cases of type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures treated between April 2008 and July 2018; 33 patients were treated with the SFDB approach, and the remaining were treated with OO. Propensity score matching was used to control for sex, age, and the American Society of Anesthesiology score. Elbow pain, range of motion, stability, and function were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Clinical complications, reoperation rates, and radiographic results were compared between the groups. Results Operative time and blood loss were significantly lower in the SFDB group than in the OO group (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). At the final follow-up, the mean postoperative MEPI did not significantly differ between the groups (P = 0.628). According to Morrey's criteria, a typical functional range of elbow motion was achieved in 12 and 15 patients in the SFDB and OO groups, respectively. Conclusions The SFDB approach achieves superior exposure of the articular surface without injury to the extensor mechanism in type 13C3 articular surface fracture treatment. This approach also results in good early functional recovery and clinical outcomes, with a low risk of complications.