Search

Aim: Although proximal faecal diversion is standard of care to protect patients with high-risk colorectal anastomoses against septic complications of anastomotic leakage, it is associated with significant morbidity. The Colovac device (CD) is an intraluminal bypass device intended to avoid stoma creation in patients undergoing low anterior resection. A preliminary study (SAFE-1) completed in three European centres demonstrated 100% protection of colorectal anastomoses in 15 patients, as evidenced by the absence of faeces below the CD. This phase III trial (SAFE-2) aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the CD in a larger cohort of patients undergoing curative rectal cancer resection., Methods: SAFE-2 is a pivotal, multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the CD arm or the diverting loop ileostomy arm, with a recruitment target of 342 patients. The co-primary endpoints are the occurrence of major postoperative complications within 12 months of index surgery and the effectiveness of the CD in reducing stoma creation rates. Data regarding quality of life and patient's acceptance and tolerance of the device will be collected., Discussion: SAFE-2 is a multicentre randomized, control trial assessing the efficacy and the safety of the CD in protecting low colorectal anastomoses created during oncological resection relative to standard diverting loop ileostomy., Trial Registration: NCT05010850., (© 2024 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Introduction: Anastomotic margin tissue perfusion is recognized as critical to successful colorectal anastomosis creation. Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) is the most common modality used by surgeons as an adjunct to clinical assessment in confirming the adequacy of tissue perfusion. Tissue oxygenation as a surrogate for tissue perfusion has been described in a variety of surgical specialties but its use in colorectal surgery has been limited. Here, we report our experience using a handheld tissue-oxygen meter, IntraOx, for the evaluation of colorectal tissue bed oxygen saturation (StO 2 ) and compared its utility with NIR-ICG in identifying the viability of colonic tissue before anastomosis in a range of colorectal procedures., Materials and Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved multicenter trial consisting of 100 patients undergoing elective colon resections. After specimen mobilization, a clinical margin was chosen based on the oncologic, anatomic, and clinical assessment as per the clinicians' standard technique. The IntraOx device was then used to take a baseline reading of colonic tissue oxygenation on a normal segment of perfused colon. Following this, measurements were taken circumferentially at 5 cm intervals along the bowel proximally and distally to the clinical margin. A StO 2 margin was then determined based on the point at which the StO 2 dropped off by ≥10 percentage points. This was then compared with the NIR-ICG margin using the Spy-Phi system., Results: StO 2 was found to have a sensitivity and specificity of 94.8% and 93.1%, respectively, and a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 93.5% and 94.5%, respectively when compared with NIR-ICG. At the 4-week follow-up, no significant complications or leaks were reported., Conclusions: The IntraOx handheld device was found to be similar to NIR-ICG in identifying a well-perfused margin of colonic tissue while having the added benefits of high portability and reduced costs. Further studies looking at the effect of the IntraOx on preventing colonic anastomotic complications such as leak and stricture are warranted., Competing Interests: D.S. is a consultant for Vioptix. The remaining authors declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Published empirical data have increasingly suggested that using near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy markedly increases biliary anatomy visualization. The technology is rapidly evolving, and different equipment and doses may be used. We aimed to identify areas of consensus and nonconsensus in the use of incisionless near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy., Methods: A 2-round Delphi survey was conducted among 28 international experts in minimally invasive surgery and near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography in 2020, during which respondents voted on 62 statements on patient preparation and contraindications (n = 12); on indocyanine green administration (n = 14); on potential advantages and uses of near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography (n = 18); comparing near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography with intraoperative x-ray cholangiography (n = 7); and on potential disadvantages of and required training for near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography (n = 11)., Results: Expert consensus strongly supports near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography superiority over white light for the visualization of biliary structures and reduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy risks. It also offers other advantages like enhancing anatomic visualization in obese patients and those with moderate to severe inflammation. Regarding indocyanine green administration, consensus was reached that dosing should be on a milligrams/kilogram basis, rather than as an absolute dose, and that doses >0.05 mg/kg are necessary. Although there is no consensus on the optimum preoperative timing of indocyanine green injections, the majority of participants consider it important to administer indocyanine green at least 45 minutes before the procedure to decrease the light intensity of the liver., Conclusion: Near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography experts strongly agree on its effectiveness and safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and that it should be used routinely, but further research is necessary to establish optimum timing and doses for indocyanine green., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite exponentially growing evidence supporting the use of intraoperative fluorescence imaging + indocyanine green dye, considerable variability exists in how and when it is used, and no published consensus guidelines exist. We have conducted Delphi surveys of international experts in the use of intraoperative fluorescence imaging covering 6 distinct surgical scenarios: laparoscopic cholecystectomy; colorectal, lymphedema, gastric cancer, and plastic surgery; and thyroid and parathyroid resections. Although each survey asked experts to vote on field-specific consensus statements, they also had 29 shared statements to permit some analysis spanning the 6 specialties. This article summarizes these results., Methods: Data on the 29 shared statements from 6 two-round Delphi consensus surveys were compiled to identify areas of overall consensus and compare the different specialties. As with the individual surveys, consensus was defined as ≥70% intervoter agreement., Results: Among 140 participating experts, overall consensus was achieved on 16 statements, including strong agreement that using indocyanine green is extremely safe, that it can be used even when informed written consent cannot be provided, that it significantly enhances anatomical visualization and impacts how procedures are performed, and that it significantly reduces overall procedural risk. However, indocyanine green dosing and timing are procedure-specific, with considerable variability persisting for some applications, and the overall consensus is that further research is necessary to optimize this facet of intraoperative fluorescence imaging., Conclusion: Fluorescence imaging is gaining traction across multiple surgical specialties as an invaluable intraoperative tool. Its use in clinical practice and research seems destined to increase., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is increasingly being used in colorectal surgery to assess anastomotic perfusion, and to detect sentinel lymph nodes., Methods: In this 2-round, online, Delphi survey, 35 international experts were asked to vote on 69 statements pertaining to patient preparation and contraindications to fluorescence imaging during colorectal surgery, indications, technical aspects, potential advantages/disadvantages, and effectiveness versus limitations, and training and research. Methodological steps were adopted during survey design to minimize risk of bias., Results: More than 70% consensus was reached on 60 of 69 statements, including moderate-strong consensus regarding fluorescence imaging's value assessing anastomotic perfusion and leak risk, but not on its value mapping sentinel nodes. Similarly, although consensus was reached regarding most technical aspects of its use assessing anastomoses, little consensus was achieved for lymph-node assessments. Evaluating anastomoses, experts agreed that the optimum total indocyanine green dose and timing are 5 to 10 mg and 30 to 60 seconds pre-evaluation, indocyanine green should be dosed milligram/kilogram, lines should be flushed with saline, and indocyanine green can be readministered if bright perfusion is not achieved, although how long surgeons should wait remains unknown. The only consensus achieved for lymph-node assessments was that 2 to 4 injection points are needed. Ninety-six percent and 100% consensus were reached that fluorescence imaging will increase in practice and research over the next decade, respectively., Conclusion: Although further research remains necessary, fluorescence imaging appears to have value assessing anastomotic perfusion, but its value for lymph-node mapping remains questionable., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In recent decades, the use of near-infrared light and fluorescence-guidance during open and laparoscopic surgery has exponentially expanded across various clinical settings. However, tremendous variability exists in how it is performed., Objective: In this first published survey of international experts on fluorescence-guided surgery, we sought to identify areas of consensus and nonconsensus across 4 areas of practice: fundamentals; patient selection/preparation; technical aspects; and effectiveness and safety., Methods: A Delphi survey was conducted among 19 international experts in fluorescence-guided surgery attending a 1-day consensus meeting in Frankfurt, Germany on September 8th, 2019. Using mobile phones, experts were asked to anonymously vote over 2 rounds of voting, with 70% and 80% set as a priori thresholds for consensus and vote robustness, respectively., Results: Experts from 5 continents reached consensus on 41 of 44 statements, including strong consensus that near-infrared fluorescence-guided surgery is both effective and safe across a broad variety of clinical settings, including the localization of critical anatomical structures like vessels, detection of tumors and sentinel nodes, assessment of tissue perfusion and anastomotic leaks, delineation of segmented organs, and localization of parathyroid glands. Although the minimum and maximum safe effective dose of ICG were felt to be 1 to 2 mg and >10 mg, respectively, there was strong consensus that determining the optimum dose, concentration, route and timing of ICG administration should be an ongoing research focus., Conclusions: Although fluorescence imaging was almost unanimously perceived to be both effective and safe across a broad range of clinical settings, considerable further research remains necessary to optimize its use., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Adequate tissue oxygenation and perfusion remain fundamental to safe bowel resection surgery. Near infrared (NIR) imaging using indocyanine green has proven itself superior to clinical evaluation alone in assessing bowel perfusion, but requires expensive equipment not readily available in many centers., Methods: We studied the IntraOx device (Vioptix Inc, Newark, CA USA), a handheld, tissue oxygen saturation assessment tool, to assess whether tissue bed oxygen saturation (StO2) is comparable to NIR assessment of bowel viability. Patients undergoing elective colon resection for benign and malignant disease were included. After choosing a clinical margin (CM) and dividing the mesentery, StO2 was measured at 5-cm intervals along the colon. A tissue oxygen saturation margin (TOM) was assigned where StO2 dropped off by at least 10 percentage points. NIR perfusion was then assessed to determine NIR margin (NIRM). Intraoperative and postoperative data were collected., Results: 32 consecutive patients undergoing colectomies were analyzed. IntraOx sensitivity was 90.6%, specificity was 94.3%. The mean StO2 difference across the NIRM was 23.1%. In all but one case, the TOM matched the NIRM. In 3 cases, the TOM and NIRM concurred, but were a mean of 3.3 cm proximal to the CM and altered the surgical plan. At 4-week follow-up, no significant complications were reported., Conclusions: The IntraOx device consistently identified a margin of significant saturation "drop-off" which correlated with the findings on NIR perfusion and clinical assessment. These early data indicate that StO2 measurement may be equivalent to NIR assessment of bowel perfusion. In addition, the IntraOx device may be a more cost-effective solution for surgeons looking for adjunctive evaluation of bowel viability. More study is warranted in a larger group of patients to confirm these preliminary findings and to judge the impact of StO2 assessment on reducing anastomotic leaks., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)