1. Comparison of chloral hydrate and pentobarbital sedation for pediatric echocardiography
- Author
-
Ira A. Parness, Sherman Fong, Rajesh Shenoy, Helen Ko, Madhusudan Ganigara, Shubhika Srivastava, and Preeti Malik
- Subjects
Male ,Pentobarbital ,Pediatric echocardiography ,Sedation ,Chloral hydrate ,Conscious Sedation ,Humans ,Hypnotics and Sedatives ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Chloral Hydrate ,Child ,Adverse effect ,Depression (differential diagnoses) ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Infant ,Paradoxical reaction ,Echocardiography ,Child, Preschool ,Anesthesia ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2013, outpatient use of chloral hydrate (CH) was limited and other alternatives such as oral pentobarbital (PB) were explored to achieve conscious sedation in young children for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of the two medications. METHODS Clinical information, from a computerized database, about children who received sedation with either CH or PB for TTE at our center (2008-2015) was reviewed, and the two groups were compared for sedation effectiveness and complications. RESULTS Three thousand eight hundred fifty one pediatric patients (median age 8 months) underwent conscious sedation during TTE (mean doses CH 50 mg/kg, PB 4 mg/kg). Demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Sedation failure rate (CH 2.4%, PB 2.9%, P = NS), need for supplemental doses (CH 17.9%, PB 16.2%, P = NS), and overall adverse event rate (PB 1.4%, CH 1.9%; P = NS) were similar in the two groups. There were fewer episodes of respiratory depression with PB (0.3% vs 1.6%, P
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF