Search

Pyramidal cells in cortical Layers 5 and 6 are the only cells in the cerebral cortex with axons that leave the cortex to influence the thalamus. Layer 6 cells provide modulatory feedback input to all thalamic nuclei. Layer 5 cells provide driving input to higher-order thalamic nuclei and do not innervate first-order nuclei, which get their driving inputs from subcortical sources. Higher-order nuclei innervated by Layer 5 cells thus seem to be involved with cortico-thalamo-cortical communication. The Layer 5 axons branch to also target additional subcortical structures that mediate interactions with the external environment. These corticofugal pathways represent the only means by which the cortex influences the rest of the neuraxis and thus are essential for proper cortical function and species survival. Here we review current understanding of the corticofugal pathways from Layers 5 and 6 and speculate on their functional contributions to neural processing and behavior.

The basal ganglia play pivotal roles in motor control and cognitive functioning. These nuclei are embedded in an anatomical loop: cortex to basal ganglia to thalamus back to cortex. We focus here on an essential synapse for descending control, from cortical layer 5 (L5) onto the GABAergic spiny projection neurons (SPNs) of the caudoputamen (CP). We employed genetic labeling to distinguish L5 neurons from somatosensory (S1) and motor (M1) cortices in large volume serial electron microscopy and electrophysiology datasets to better detail these inputs. First, M1 and S1 synapses showed a strong preference to innervate the spines of SPNs and rarely contacted aspiny cells, which are likely to be interneurons. Second, L5 inputs commonly converge from both areas onto single SPNs. Third, compared to unlabeled terminals in CP, those labeled from M1 and S1 show ultrastructural hallmarks of strong driver synapses: They innervate larger spines that were more likely to contain a spine apparatus, more often had embedded mitochondria, and more often contacted multiple targets. Finally, these inputs also demonstrated driver‐like functional properties: SPNs responded to optogenetic activation from S1 and M1 with large EPSP/Cs that depressed and were dependent on ionotropic but not metabotropic receptors. Together, our findings suggest that individual SPNs integrate driver input from multiple cortical areas with implications for how the basal ganglia relay cortical input to provide inhibitory innervation of motor thalamus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The cerebral cortex contains multiple, distinct areas that individually perform specific computations. A particular strength of the cortex is the communication of signals between cortical areas that allows the outputs of these compartmentalized computations to influence and build on each other, thereby dramatically increasing the processing power of the cortex and its role in sensation, action, and cognition. Determining how the cortex communicates signals between individual areas is, therefore, critical for understanding cortical function. Historically, corticocortical communication was thought to occur exclusively by direct anatomical connections between areas that often sequentially linked cortical areas in a hierarchical fashion. More recently, anatomical, physiological, and behavioral evidence is accumulating indicating a role for the higher-order thalamus in corticocortical communication. Specifically, the transthalamic pathway involves projections from one area of the cortex to neurons in the higher-order thalamus that, in turn, project to another area of the cortex. Here, we consider the evidence for and implications of having two routes for corticocortical communication with an emphasis on unique processing available in the transthalamic pathway and the consequences of disorders and diseases that affect transthalamic communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 1998, Jones suggested a classification of thalamocortical projections into core and matrix divisions (Jones, 1998). In this classification, core projections are specific, topographical, innervate middle cortical layers, and serve to transmit specific information to the cortex for further analysis; matrix projections, in contrast, are diffuse, much less topographic, innervate upper layers, especially Layer 1, and serve a more global, modulatory function, such as affecting levels of arousal. This classification has proven especially influential in studies of thalamocortical relationships. Whereas it may be the case that a clear subset of thalamocortical connections fit the core motif, since they are specific, topographic, and innervate middle layers, we argue that there is no clear evidence for any single class that encompasses the remainder of thalamocortical connections as is claimed for matrix. Instead, there is great morphological variation in connections made by thalamocortical projections fitting neither a core nor matrix classification. We thus conclude that the core/matrix classification should be abandoned, because its application is not helpful in providing insights into thalamocortical interactions and can even be misleading. As one example of the latter, recent suggestions indicate that core projections are equivalent to first-order thalamic relays (i.e., those that relay subcortical information to the cortex) and matrix to higher-order relays (i.e., those that relay information from one cortical area to another), but available evidence does not support this relationship. All of this points to a need to replace the core/matrix grouping with a more complete classification of thalamocortical projections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mammalian olfactory system is unique in that sensory receptors synapse directly into the olfactory bulb of the forebrain without the thalamic relay that is common to all other sensory pathways. We argue that the olfactory bulb has an equivalent role to the thalamus, because the two regions have very similar structures and functions. Both the thalamus and the olfactory bulb are the final stage in sensory processing before reaching target cortical regions, at which there is a massive increase in neuron and synapse numbers. Thus, both structures act as a bottleneck that is a target for various modulatory inputs, and this arrangement enables efficient control of information flow before cortical processing occurs.

The thalamus is strategically placed to control the flow of information to cortex and thus conscious perception. A key player in this control is a local GABAergic interneuron that inhibits relay cells. This interneuron is especially interesting because, in addition to a conventional axonal output, most of its output is via distal dendrites. The latter seem to be electrotonically and thus functionally isolated from the soma and axon, and they enter into complex synaptic arrangements. It is proposed that, because of special synaptic properties of its dendritic outputs, this local GABAergic interneuron of the thalamus provides gain control for the relay cell and thereby keeps relay of information to cortex within a fairly linear regime.