1. Differences between patients with type 1 diabetes with optimal and suboptimal glycaemic control: A real‐world study of more than 30 000 patients in a US electronic health record database
- Author
-
Pettus, Jeremy H, Zhou, Fang Liz, Shepherd, Leah, Mercaldi, Katie, Preblick, Ronald, Hunt, Phillip R, Paranjape, Sachin, Miller, Kellee M, and Edelman, Steven V
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Research ,Patient Safety ,Autoimmune Disease ,Health Services ,Diabetes ,Hypertension ,Obesity ,Cardiovascular ,Heart Disease ,Prevention ,Metabolic and endocrine ,Good Health and Well Being ,Adult ,Blood Glucose ,Diabetes Mellitus ,Type 1 ,Electronic Health Records ,Glycated Hemoglobin ,Humans ,Hypoglycemia ,Hypoglycemic Agents ,United States ,type 1 diabetes ,observational study ,diabetes complications ,database research ,cardiovascular disease ,diabetes complications ,database research ,cardiovascular disease ,Endocrinology & Metabolism ,Clinical sciences - Abstract
AimsTo use electronic health record data from real-world clinical practice to assess demographics, clinical characteristics and disease burden of adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States.Materials and methodsRetrospective observational study of adults with T1D for ≥24 months at their first visit with a T1D diagnosis code ("index date") between July 2014 and June 2016 in the Optum Humedica database. Demographic characteristics, acute complications (severe hypoglycaemia [SH], diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA]), microvascular complications, cardiovascular (CV) events and health care resource utilization during the 12 months before the index date ("baseline period") were compared between patients with optimal versus suboptimal glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 30 000 adults with T1D showed that individuals with suboptimal versus optimal glycaemic control differed significantly in terms of health care coverage, comorbidities, diabetes-related complications, health care utilization and CV risk factors. However, suboptimal control was not associated with increased risk of CV outcomes.
- Published
- 2020