Search

Rationale: Uncertainty remains regarding the risks associated with single-dose use of etomidate. Objectives: To assess the use of etomidate in critically ill patients and compare outcomes for patients who received etomidate versus ketamine. Methods: We assessed patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and were admitted to an ICU in the Premier Healthcare Database between 2008 and 2021. The exposure was receipt of etomidate on the day of IMV initiation, and the main outcome was hospital mortality. Using multivariable regression, we compared patients who received IMV within the first 2 days of hospitalization who received etomidate with propensity score–matched patients who received ketamine. We also assessed whether receipt of corticosteroids in the days after intubation modified the association between etomidate and mortality. Measurements and Main Results: Of 1,689,945 patients who received IMV, nearly half (738,855; 43.7%) received etomidate. Among those who received IMV in the first 2 days of hospitalization, we established 22,273 matched pairs administered either etomidate or ketamine. In the primary analysis, receipt of etomidate was associated with greater hospital mortality relative to ketamine (21.6% vs. 18.7%; absolute risk difference, 2.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.1%, 3.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28, 95% confidence interval, 1.21,1.34). This was consistent across subgroups and sensitivity analyses. We found no attenuation of the association with mortality with receipt of corticosteroids in the days after etomidate use. Conclusions: Use of etomidate on the day of IMV initiation is common and associated with a higher odds of hospital mortality than use of ketamine. This finding is independent of subsequent treatment with corticosteroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Guidelines recommend systemic corticosteroids and inhaled β-agonists for patients with severe asthma exacerbation who are admitted to intensive care units. The benefits and utilization of adjunct treatments after guideline-recommended first-line treatments have been initiated are unclear. Objectives: Examine practice patterns of adjunct interventions in US intensive care units (ICUs) and their associations with outcomes for adults with severe asthma exacerbations. Methods: Using the multicenter PINC AI Healthcare Database of Premier Inc. (2016–2022), we sought to explore the use of adjunct interventions (medications [e.g., magnesium, leukotriene inhibitors, terbutaline, heliox] and procedures [e.g., invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation]) for adult patients admitted to U.S. ICUs with acute asthma exacerbations. We used hierarchical generalized linear models to calculate risk-adjusted rates of adjunct interventions and quantified between-hospital variation in adjunct interventions using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; higher values correspond to higher between-hospital variation). We then used K-means clustering to identify groups of hospitals with similar risk-adjusted practice profiles of all adjunct treatments and examined associations between identified hospital clusters and patient outcomes. Results: We identified 62,392 patients from 961 hospitals for inclusion. Adjunct interventions with the highest between-hospital variation after risk adjustment were heliox (ICC, 91%), inhaled steroids (ICC, 23%), invasive mechanical ventilation (ICC, 21%), terbutaline (ICC, 22%), paralytics (ICC, 16%), and noninvasive ventilation (ICC, 15%). K-means clustering identified two distinct hospital clusters: Patients who were admitted to Cluster 1 hospitals (399 hospitals) had higher risk-adjusted rates of noninvasive ventilation (51% vs. 33%), compared with patients who were admitted to Cluster 2 hospitals (234 hospitals), which had higher risk-adjusted rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (63% vs. 30%). Cluster 2 was associated with fewer hospital-free days (β = −0.75 d; 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.95, −0.55) and increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI = 1.17, 1.40). Conclusions: The use of adjunct interventions for patients with severe asthma exacerbations vary widely across U.S. hospitals; however, hospitals generally fall into two clusters differentiated primarily by the use of invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. The cluster favoring noninvasive mechanical ventilation was associated with improved outcomes. Our results help to inform usual-care arms of future comparative effectiveness studies and efforts to standardize asthma practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In children admitted for asthma exacerbation, multiple evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines exist to identify readiness for discharge. At many institutions, weaning of albuterol is part of the discharge process, though presently there is limited evidence to guide best practice. We sought to determine how many children required escalation of care once placed on every 4-h dosing of albuterol. We performed a consecutive case series of pediatric patients between 5 and 18 years of age admitted to a single tertiary care center's pediatric hospitalist service between April 2015 and April 2018 with a discharge diagnosis of asthma. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (PICU) or a subspecialty service were excluded, as has been done previously. Time between albuterol administrations was tracked. "Treatment escalation" was defined as when a patient required more frequent albuterol more dosing after previously tolerating albuterol doses separated by more than 3.5 h. A total of 331 patients met inclusion criteria; 136 were female (41.1%), and the average age was 8.8 years. Twenty-six of the 331 patients (7.8%) required escalation of albuterol therapy. Eleven patients returned to the emergency department (ED) following discharge, 2 of which had experienced treatment escalation while admitted. Our case series showed that most patients were safe to discharge after spacing albuterol treatments to 4 h, with few returns to the ED and readmissions. Albuterol spacing to every 4 h once appears to be a reasonable discharge criterion, but future studies are needed to determine if this is a safe and efficient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]