Search

Background and Aims: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) or erector spinae plane (ESP) block reduces postsurgical pain in patients who underwent kidney transplantation surgeries. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of both modalities in terms of duration and quality of postoperative analgesia along with postoperative fentanyl consumption. Methods: We conducted a randomised study and analysed 60 patients posted for elective live-related kidney transplantation surgery. They were randomised into two groups. Group M patients received ITM, whereas Group E patients received ESP block. We standardised the postoperative analgesia for both groups with intravenous fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was to compare the quality of analgesia using the numerical rating scale score between the groups. The secondary outcome was to observe the effect of both modalities on the duration of analgesia, postoperative fentanyl consumption, rescue analgesics requirement, catheter-related bladder discomfort and any complications. Results: We found significantly lower pain scores at rest and while coughing in Group M at all time intervals, except at 24 h while coughing. The mean time to first analgesia requirement was significantly longer in Group M than in Group E (P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative consumption of total fentanyl (P = 0.065) and rescue analgesia in both groups. In Group M, there was significantly more nausea, vomiting and pruritus (P = 0.001). Conclusions: ITM provides long-lasting postoperative analgesia at the cost of higher side effects than ESP block. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The presence of donor‑specific antigens (human leukocyte antigen [HLA] incompatibility) leads to positive T‑cell or B‑cell crossmatch. Kidney transplant after desensitization protocols not only poses a financial burden on the patients but also there is an increased rate of infections and graft rejection. Paired kidney exchange (PKE) is cost‑effective and offers better postoperative graft outcome. Methods: We included six pairs of kidney transplant donors and recipients for 6‑way simultaneous PKE transplantation. These patients were ABO incompatible or HLA incompatible or both. Results: All patients underwent transplant in a single day without any perioperative surgical and anesthesia complications except for the need of mechanical ventilation in one patient in the postoperative care unit. The graft function was excellent in all recipients. Conclusion: This is the first 6‑way simultaneous kidney exchange transplantation in the northwestern region of India. The inclusion of multiple donors and recipients for a paired exchange kidney transplant, although challenging, increases the donor pool and decreases the waiting time and financial constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute postoperative pain management after kidney transplantation is essential for early recovery and good patient satisfaction, but no formal review or guideline is available in the literature. The aim of this review is to make recommendations based on available studies to select the best suitable strategy for pain management. Databases from search engines (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library) were thoroughly searched using keywords kidney transplant and pain management or similar. Randomized control trials and retrospective studies with pain scores as primary outcome were included in this review. Out of 1595 articles from electronic database, total 15 articles (prospective studies = 13, retrospective studies, n = 2) were included after deletion of duplicate records, screening of abstracts/titles, and excluding records based on different exclusion criteria. Based on current evidence, intrathecal morphine, epidural analgesia, and fascial plane blocks are suitable options. Paracetamol should be added as a multimodal approach for analgesia. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are best avoided due to the associated risk of renal injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Induction of anesthesia is a critical part of anesthetizing patients with end-stage renal disease, as they are at risk of wide hemodynamic fluctuation due to their pathophysiological alterations in the cardiovascular system. It is desirable to use pharmacological agents that provide hemodynamic stability with fewer adverse effects. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of propofol and etomidate by comparing hemodynamic variables such as a change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) during induction, laryngoscopy, and up to 10 min after tracheal intubation as a primary outcome and any associated adverse effect as a secondary outcome. Methods: After getting institutional ethical committee approval, 60 American Society of Anesthesiologist Grade III patients aged 20-60 years, scheduled for renal transplantation, were randomized into two groups (Group P: propofol 1% and Group E: etomidate). The dose of induction agents was targeted to achieve a bispectral index value of 40. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at induction, laryngoscopy, and up to 10 min after tracheal intubation. Adverse effects related to the study drug were recorded. Results: The decrease in MAP in Group P was statistically significant (P < 0.05) as compared to Group E, at induction of anesthesia. We observed a significant increase in HR at induction of anesthesia in Group E (P < 0.05). The incidence of myoclonus was 0 versus 73.3% in Groups P and E, respectively, while pain on injection and hypotension were more in Group P (P < 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, etomidate provides better hemodynamic stability with fewer adverse effects in patients with end-stage renal disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In situs inversus totalis (SIT), the transposition of all organs lies in the thorax and abdominal part of the body, give a mirror image. It is a congenital anomaly with an incidence of 1 in 8000-10,000 among the general population. SIT in association with cardiac or spinal anomalies or with syndromes such as Kartagener or cystic fibrosis presents a complex and challenging clinical situation for the treating anesthesiologist. We report a case of a 41-years-old male diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease with SIT posted for kidney transplantation surgery. Kidney transplantation in these patients may be difficult due to the presence of vascular abnormalities in these patients. Relevant experience always remains limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation poses significant challenges in achieving successful outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various interventions and techniques on improving the success rates of ABOi kidney transplantation., Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of patients who underwent ABOi kidney transplantation from November 2012 to March 2023. The study included a total of 105 patients. We collected and analyzed data on patient demographics, preoperative assessments, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes., Results: The mean ages of the donors and recipients were 50.52±10.32 and 36.63±11.61 years, respectively. The majority of recipients were male (81.9%), while most donors were female (89.5%). The most common blood group among recipients was O (69.5%), and among donors, it was B (46.7%). The median durations of chronic kidney disease and dialysis were 12 months (interquartile range [IQR], 7-28 months) and 6 months (IQR, 2-12 months), respectively. Baseline antibody titers (anti-A and anti-B) ranged from 64.0 to 256.0, while on the day of surgery, they were ≤8. Perioperative complications included hypotension (10.5%), acute tubular necrosis (5.7%), delayed graft function (3.8%), and reexploration (3.8%) due to hematoma., Conclusions: ABOi kidney transplantation is a viable option for recipients lacking available donors with an ABO-compatible match. Perioperative concerns, including hypoalbuminemia, heightened risk of infections, coagulopathies, aseptic precautions, and immunological surveillance, must be carefully addressed.

Background: When applying lung-protective ventilation, fluid responsiveness cannot be predicted by pulse pressure variation (PPV) or stroke volume variation (SVV). Functional hemodynamic testing may help address this limitation. This study examined whether changes in dynamic indices such as PPV and SVV, induced by tidal volume challenge (TVC), can reliably predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing renal transplantation who receive lung-protective ventilation., Methods: This nonrandomized interventional study included renal transplant recipients with end-stage renal disease. Patients received ventilation with a 6 mL/kg tidal volume (TV), and the FloTrac system was attached for continuous hemodynamic monitoring. Participants were classified as responders or nonresponders based on whether fluid challenge increased the stroke volume index by more than 10%., Results: The analysis included 36 patients, of whom 19 (52.8%) were responders and 17 (47.2%) were nonresponders. Among responders, the mean ΔPPV 6-8 (calculated as PPV at a TV of 8 mL/kg predicted body weight [PBW] minus that at 6 mL/kg PBW) was 3.32±0.75 and ΔSVV 6-8 was 2.58±0.77, compared to 0.82±0.53 and 0.70±0.92 for nonresponders, respectively. ΔPPV 6-8 exhibited an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.00; P≤0.001), with an optimal cutoff value of 1.5, sensitivity of 94.7%, and specificity of 94.1%. ΔSVV 6-8 displayed an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84-1.00; P≤0.001) at the same cutoff value of 1.5, with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 76.5%., Conclusions: TVC-induced changes in PPV and SVV are predictive of fluid responsiveness in renal transplant recipients who receive intraoperative lung-protective ventilation.

Over the past decade, the field of solid organ transplantation has undergone significant changes, with some of the most notable advancements occurring in liver transplantation. Recent years have seen substantial progress in preoperative patient optimization protocols, anesthesia monitoring, coagulation management, and fluid management, among other areas. These improvements have led to excellent perioperative outcomes for all surgical patients, including those undergoing liver transplantation. In the last few decades, there have been numerous publications in the field of liver transplantation, but controversies related to perioperative management of liver transplant recipients persist. In this review article, we address the unresolved issues surrounding the anesthetic management of patients scheduled for liver transplantation.