Search

Purpose: To describe a case of retinal arterial macroaneurysm (RAM) in a patient with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC)/Lynch syndrome. Methods: A case and its findings were analyzed. Results: A 68-year-old woman presented with a recent history of decreased near vision in the left eye. Both eyes had a visual acuity of 20/20 with normal intraocular pressure. The right retina was normal. The left retina had a focal dilation of the retinal arteriole with a surrounding hemorrhage and lipid in the inferonasal quadrant. The patient was diagnosed with RAM and was subsequently treated with focal laser photocoagulation. The patient had a medical history of stage 1 colon cancer associated with HNPCC/Lynch syndrome. Conclusions: Increased vascular network complexity has been reported in HNPCC/Lynch syndrome. This is the first report of a RAM in a patient with this genetic profile. Given the atypical presentation, there may be an association between HNPCC/Lynch syndrome and RAMs.

IMPORTANCE: The study team investigated costs associated with the ranibizumab port delivery system (PDS) for neovascular age-related macular (nAMD), an alternative to conventional intravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. OBJECTIVE: To investigate costs of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections vs ranibizumab PDS for patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cost analysis used trial data and Medicare reimbursement rates and included patients with nAMD who were receiving ranibizumab, aflibercept, bevacizumab injections, or ranibizumab PDS. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab injections to break even with costs of ranibizumab PDS. Total direct medical costs over 1 year and 5 years for the ranibizumab PDS arm with refills at fixed 6-month intervals compared with monthly or bimonthly injections were calculated using Medicare rates. Scenario and sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty and variation. RESULTS: The mean (SD) number of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab injections to break even with the cost of ranibizumab PDS with 1 refill was 10.8 (1.3), 9.3 (1.1), and 34.5 (4.2), respectively. Ranibizumab PDS with fixed 6-month refills over 1 year cost $21 016 ($2102). Comparatively, monthly intravitreal ranibizumab cost $1943 (95% CI, −$3047 to $6932; P = .34) more, aflibercept cost $5702 (95% CI, $253-$11 151; P = .04) more, and bevacizumab cost $16 732 (95% CI, −$20 170 to −$13 294, P

Objective To estimate the prevalence of perinatal cannabis use (ie, before and/or during pregnancy); document the frequency, modes, and motivations for use; and identify predictors of perinatal cannabis use. Methods Six states in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a state-specific, population-based surveillance system, administered a supplemental questionnaire on perinatal cannabis use in 2016-2018. Women with live births were surveyed 2-6 months postpartum about behaviors ≤3 months preconception and during pregnancy. Demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral characteristics were examined in relation to perinatal cannabis use using multinomial regression models. Those who: (1) never used cannabis, (2) only used in preconception period, and (3) used in both preconception and prenatal periods were compared. Results Among 6428 respondents, 379 (5.8%) used cannabis preconceptionally only and 466 (4.4%) used in both the preconception and prenatal periods. Among those using prenatally, most reported smoking as their single mode (87.1%), with the two most common reasons being stress (83.8%) and nausea/vomiting (79.2%). Marital status, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, parity, and cigarette and alcohol use were significantly associated with perinatal cannabis use. Single (vs partnered) women were more likely to use cannabis prenatally (odds ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.5, 3.9) and non-Hispanic Black (vs White) women were less likely to use prenatally (odds ratio = 0.4, 95% confidence interval: 0.2, 0.8). Conclusions Using a population-based sample of US births in six states, several demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral characteristics were identified in relation to perinatal cannabis use. These data are valuable for counseling in prenatal care and investigations of health effects.

Purpose To investigate the costs and effects of implanting trabecular meshwork bypass stents during cataract surgery from a societal perspective in the United States. Design Cost-utility analysis using Markov models and efficacy/safety data from published pivotal or randomized control trials (RCTs) of devices investigated. Participants Patients aged 65 years and older with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma with or without visually significant cataract. Methods With the use of Markov models, glaucoma progression through 4 glaucoma states (mild, moderate, advanced, severe/blind) and death were simulated over 35 years. The cohort with cataract entered the model and received cataract surgery with or without device implantation. We included a medication management only reference group to calculate total costs and outcomes for those without cataract. Intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions from RCTs were converted to glaucoma state transition probabilities using visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) decline rates from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Progressive thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) on OCT imaging related to IOP control warranted further intervention, including adding medication, selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), or incisional glaucoma surgery. We estimated whole costs at Medicare rates and obtained utility values for glaucoma states from previous studies. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained were evaluated at a QALY threshold of $50 000. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis, scenario analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed parameter uncertainty and demonstrated model robustness. Main Outcome Measures Total costs, QALY, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results Over 35 years in the base case, the Hydrus (Ivantis, Inc.) implanted with cataract surgery arm cost $48 026.13 and gained 12.26 QALYs. The iStent inject (Glaukos Corp.) implanted with cataract surgery arm cost $49 599.86 and gained 12.21 QALYs. Cataract surgery alone cost $54 409.25 and gained 12.04 QALYs. Initial nonsurgical management cost $57 931.22 and gained 11.74 QALY. The device arms dominated or were cost-effective compared with cataract surgery alone within 5 years and throughout sensitivity analyses. The iStent inject arm was cost-effective in 94.19% of iterations in probabilistic sensitivity analyses, whereas the Hydrus arm was cost-effective in 94.69% of iterations. Conclusions Implanting the Hydrus Microstent or iStent inject during cataract surgery is cost-effective at a conservative QALY threshold.

Purpose The purpose was to establish the position of the fovea centralis to the optic nerve via en-face, near-infrared spectral domain optical coherence tomography (NIR-OCT) in healthy patients. This may shed light on physiological variability and be used for studying subtle cases of foveal ectopia in macular pathology and after retinal detachment. Methods SD-OCT data of 890 healthy eyes were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria included axial myopia causing tilting of the optic disc, peripapillary atrophy >1/3 the width of the disc, macular images excluding greater than half of the optic disc, and patients unable to maintain vertical head positioning. Two independent reviewers measured the horizontal and vertical distance from the fovea to the optic disc center and optic disc diameter via cross-sectional and en-face scanning laser ophthalmoloscopy OCT imaging. Results 890 eyes were included in the study. The right and left eyes differed in the horizontal distance from the fovea to the disc center (4359 vs. 4248 µm, P < 0.001) and vertical distance from the fovea to the disc center (464 µm vs. 647, P < 0.001). This corresponded to a smaller angle between the right and left eyes (6.07° vs. 8.67°, P < 0.001). Older age was associated with a larger horizontal (P = 0.008) and vertical distance (0.025). These differences persisted after correcting for axial length in the 487 patients with axial-length data. Conclusions This study compares the position of the fovea centralis among individuals without macular pathology on a micron level basis. The significant variability between right and left eyes indicates that contralateral eye evaluation cannot be reliably used. Rather, true foveal ectopia requires assessments of preoperative and postoperative NIR-OCT scans. This finding is relevant to retinal detachment cases and evaluation of subtle foveal ectopia. Translational Relevance This finding is relevant to retinal detachment cases and evaluation of subtle foveal ectopia.