1. The Effect of Prism Presentation Order on Near Vertical Fusional Vergence Ranges of Normal Young Adults
- Author
-
Gantz L, Shneor E, Shaw N, and Doron R
- Subjects
vertical fusional vergence ranges ,vertical fusional amplitudes ,vertical fusional reserves ,vertical heterophoria ,vertical prism vergence ranges ,vertical motor fusion ,Ophthalmology ,RE1-994 - Abstract
Liat Gantz, Einat Shneor, Natalie Shaw, Ravid Doron Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, IsraelCorrespondence: Liat Gantz, Email Liatg@hac.ac.ilPurpose: Fusional vergence ranges (FVR) quantify the oculomotor system’s ability to overcome heterophoria, playing a critical role in diagnosis and treatment. This study investigated the effect of prism order on near vertical FVR using the smooth and step methods.Methods: Normal participants were randomly assigned to either the smooth or step testing method and to Base-Up (BU, infravergence) first or Base Down (BD, supravergence) first prism type. After an hour, they crossed over to the alternative testing method and prism-type. The mean of two consecutive measurements of break and recovery values for one eye in each of the 16 experimental conditions were compared using the Friedman test with post-hoc Bonferroni correction, and non-parametric Bland and Altman analysis.Results: The mean break/recovery values of 27 participants (mean age: 22.5± 2.0, range: 20– 29, 20 female) when BU or BD were measured first were BU: 4.20± 1.15Δ/3.07± 1.04Δ and BD: 4.20± 1.21Δ/3.00± 0.96Δ for step, and BU: 4.31± 0.98Δ/2.97± 0.85Δ and BD: 4.15± 1.14Δ/2.70± 0.87Δ for smooth methods, respectively. When measured second, they were BU: 3.74± 1.02Δ/2.63± 0.93Δ and BD: 3.85± 1.09Δ/2.64± 1.06Δ for step, BU: 3.91± 0.99Δ/2.73± 0.93Δ and BD: 3.81± 1.04Δ/2.54± 1.04Δ for smooth, respectively. The Friedman test found a significant effect of prism order on break values of the smooth (p< 0.001) and step (p< 0.02) methods, and recovery values of the step method (p< 0.005), but post-hoc tests showed no significant differences. Mean differences were below 0.50Δ indicating clinical insignificance.Conclusion: Unlike horizontal FVR, prism order does not affect near vertical FVR using the smooth and step. This simplifies clinical assessment and suggests that horizontal and vertical fusion systems may be treated as separate entities.Plain Language Summary: This study examined whether the order in which prisms are presented affects the measurement of near vertical fusional vergence ranges—a measure of the ability of the eye’s muscles to move in order to avoid double vision. Researchers tested 27 participants using two methods (smooth and step) and presented the prisms in different orders: Base-Up (BU) first or Base-Down (BD) first. Findings show that the order of prism presentation did not significantly affect the results, meaning that the measurements remained consistent regardless of whether BU or BD was tested first. This suggests that, unlike the effect of prism order on horizontal eye muscle movements, vertical eye muscle movement measurements are not influenced by the sequence in which tests are conducted. These results are important because they simplify clinical assessments – and clinicians can confidently measure vertical fusional vergence without worrying about the order of prism presentation. Findings also imply that the systems controlling horizontal and vertical eye movements may function independently of each other.Keywords: vertical fusional vergence ranges, vertical fusional amplitudes, vertical fusional reserves, vertical heterophoria, vertical prism vergence ranges, vertical motor fusion
- Published
- 2024