Search

BackgroundCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global pandemic that has placed a significant burden on health care systems in the United States. Michigan has been one of the top states affected by COVID-19. ObjectiveWe describe the emergency center curbside testing procedure implemented at Beaumont Hospital, a large hospital in Royal Oak, MI, and aim to evaluate its safety and efficiency. MethodsAnticipating a surge in patients requiring testing, Beaumont Health implemented curbside testing, operated by a multidisciplinary team of health care workers, including physicians, advanced practice providers, residents, nurses, technicians, and registration staff. We report on the following outcomes over a period of 26 days (March 12, 2020, to April 6, 2020): time to medical decision, time spent documenting electronic medical records, overall screening time, and emergency center return evaluations. ResultsIn total, 2782 patients received curbside services. A nasopharyngeal swab was performed on 1176 patients (41%), out of whom 348 (29.6%) tested positive. The median time for the entire process (from registration to discharge) was 28 minutes (IQR 17-44). The median time to final medical decision was 15 minutes (IQR 8-27). The median time from medical decision to discharge was 9 minutes (IQR 5-16). Only 257 patients (9.2%) returned to the emergency center for an evaluation within 7 or more days, of whom 64 were admitted to the hospital, 11 remained admitted, and 4 expired. ConclusionsOur curbside testing model encourages the incorporation of this model at other high-volume facilities during an infectious disease pandemic.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare maternity leave satisfaction between physicians and nonphysicians. Currently, paid maternal leave is not guaranteed in the United States, resulting in palpable dissatisfaction among parents. Previous studies have shown associations between length of paid leave and career satisfaction and maternal happiness. Materials and Methods: A Qualtrics® electronic survey was distributed to female professionals through email and social media from April 2019 to March 2020. Inclusion criterion was ≥1 child by birth or adoption, or active pregnancy. Continuous and categorical data were analyzed using two-sample t-test and chi-square, respectively. Results: Of 808 respondents, 77% were physicians. Mean age at birth/adoption of first child was higher in physicians versus nonphysicians (32.1 years vs. 29.7 years; p < 0.001). Physicians took shorter maternity leave than nonphysicians (10.9 weeks vs. 12.0 weeks, p = 0.017) with half of that time paid by employers (5.4 weeks vs. 5.9 weeks, p = 0.2). Dissatisfaction was high among physicians (85.1%) and nonphysicians (92.4%) that correlates with maternity leave compensation dissatisfaction (49% vs. 71.3%, p < 0.001). Thirty-four percent of physicians versus 41% of nonphysicians stated that their health was negatively impacted by maternity leave length. Physicians and nonphysicians reported similar incidences of depression, and breastfeeding, delivery, and other postpartum complications. When queried, 38.8% of physicians and 57% of nonphysicians said they would desire >16 weeks of paid maternity leave (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, dissatisfaction among professional women on maternity leave duration and compensation is high in the United States. Given health implications for both mother and child, this should invite further discussion and changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lipoblastomas are benign neoplasms that arise from embryonal adipocytes. They predominantly impact the pediatric population, with most cases occurring in the first few years of life. These tumors typically present as a soft, palpable, painless mass and tend to involve the mesenchymal tissues of the extremities and trunk. Intraabdominal involvement and intraabdominal complications secondary to lipoblastoma are incredibly rare. Here, we present the case of a nine-year-old female who presented to the emergency department (ED) with one week of intermittent lower abdominal pain. The CT abdomen/pelvis demonstrated a well-circumscribed hypodense omental mass measuring 10.1 cm x 4.7 cm x 13.4 cm with minimal mass effect or bowel displacement. At that time, the patient's abdomen was soft without tenderness, distention, or rigidity. Her initial laboratory studies and vital signs were within normal limits. She was evaluated by pediatric surgery, who, given her clinical stability, planned for an anticipated elective resection. Thirteen days after her initial ED visit, the patient returned to the ED with nausea, vomiting, and diffuse abdominal pain. Repeat CT abdomen/pelvis revealed shifting of the omental mass from the left hemi-abdomen to the right hemi-abdomen with associated mesenteric 'swirl sign' and dilated loops of small bowel consistent with small bowel obstruction. Given the patient's CT findings and signs of peritonitis on a physical exam, she was emergently taken to the operating room, where the mass along with 20 cm of small bowel intimately associated with the mass was resected. The proximal end of the involved bowel was found to be twisted and necrotic, consistent with volvulus. A specimen was sent for cytogenetics and found to be positive for FLAG1, ultimately revealing a diagnosis of lipoblastoma. The majority of lipoblastoma development is underpinned by gene rearrangements in the zinc-finger transcription factor PLAG1. Although benign, these tumors can exhibit rapid proliferation and have high recurrence rates. Patients should be monitored long-term with ultrasound (US) or MRI following surgery to assess for recurrence., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Gingell et al.)