Search

Background: The PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) trial was amended to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen of niraparib for first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: In the phase 3 PRIMA trial, patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (N = 733) were initially treated with a fixed starting dose (FSD) regimen of 300 mg every day. Subsequently, the protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD: 200 mg every day in patients with baseline body weight < 77 kg or baseline platelet count < 150,000/mu L, and 300 mg every day in all other patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed by starting dose. Results: Overall, 475 (64.8%) patients were assigned to an FSD (niraparib, n = 317; placebo, n = 158) and 258 (35.2%) were assigned to an ISD (niraparib, n = 170; placebo, n = 88). Efficacy in patients who received FSD or ISD was similar for the overall (FSD hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46-0.76] vs. ISD HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.98]) and the homologous recombination-deficient (FSD HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30-0.64] vs. ISD HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.72]) populations. In patients with low body weight/platelet count, rates of grades =3 and 4 hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events, dose interruptions, and dose reductions were lower for those who received ISD than for those who received FSD. Conclusions: In PRIMA, similar dose intensity, similar efficacy, and improved safety were observed with the ISD compared with the FSD regimen.

Objective. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if farletuzumab, an antifolate receptor-alpha monoclonal antibody, improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo when added to standard chemo-therapy regimens in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) in first relapse (platinum-free interval: 6-36 months) with low cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels. Gynecologic Oncology (2023) Methods. Eligibility included CA-125

Supplementary tables S1-S3 and Supplementary figures S1-Se

Figure S6 shows the association of circulating cytokine levels with objective clinical response.

Purpose:This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of adavosertib in combination with four chemotherapy agents commonly used in patients with primary platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.Patients and Methods:Women with histologically or cytologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer with measurable disease were enrolled between January 2015 and January 2018 in this open-label, four-arm, multicenter, phase II study. Patients received adavosertib (oral capsules, 2 days on/5 days off or 3 days on/4 days off) in six cohorts from 175 mg once daily to 225 mg twice daily combined with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, carboplatin, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The primary outcome measurement was overall response rate.Results:Three percent of patients (3/94) had confirmed complete response and 29% (27/94) had confirmed partial response. The response rate was highest with carboplatin plus weekly adavosertib, at 66.7%, with 100% disease control rate, and median progression-free survival of 12.0 months. The longest median duration of response was in the paclitaxel cohort (12.0 months). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events across all cohorts were neutropenia [45/94 (47.9%) patients], anemia [31/94 (33.0%)], thrombocytopenia [30/94 (31.9%)], and diarrhea and vomiting [10/94 (10.6%) each].Conclusions:Adavosertib showed preliminary efficacy when combined with chemotherapy. The most promising treatment combination was adavosertib 225 mg twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 plus carboplatin every 21 days. However, hematologic toxicity was more frequent than would be expected for carboplatin monotherapy, and the combination requires further study to optimize the dose, schedule, and supportive medications.

Purpose:A phase I clinical trial (GOG-9929) examined the safety and efficacy of adjuvant immune-modulation therapy with the checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab [anti–CTL antigen-4 (anti–CTLA-4)] following chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for newly diagnosed node-positive human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical cancer. To better understand the mechanism of action and to identify predictive biomarkers, immunologic and viral correlates were assessed before, during, and after treatment.Patients and Methods:Twenty-one patients who received CRT and ≥2 doses of ipilimumab and 5 patients who received CRT only were evaluable for translational endpoints. Circulating T-cell subsets were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry. Cytokines were evaluated by multiplex ELISA. HPV-specific T cells were evaluated in a subset of patients by IFNγ ELISpot.Results:Expression of the activation markers ICOS and PD-1 significantly increased on T-cell subsets following CRT and were sustained or increased following ipilimumab treatment. Combined CRT/ipilimumab treatment resulted in a significant expansion of both central and effector memory T-cell populations. Genotype-specific E6/E7-specific T-cell responses increased post-CRT in 1 of 8 HPV16+ patients and in 2 of 3 HPV18+ patients. Elevation in levels of tumor-promoting circulating cytokines (TNFα, IL6, IL8) post-CRT was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival.Conclusions:Our data indicate that CRT alone and combined with ipilimumab immunotherapy show immune-modulating activity in women with locally advanced cervical cancer and may be a promising therapeutic option for the enhancement of antitumor immune cell function after primary CRT for this population at high risk for recurrence and metastasis. Several key immune biomarkers were identified that were associated with clinical response.

Purpose: This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of adavosertib in combination with four chemotherapy agents commonly used in patients with primary platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: Women with histologically or cytologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer with measurable disease were enrolled between January 2015 and January 2018 in this open-label, four-arm, multicenter, phase II study. Patients received adavosertib (oral capsules, 2 days on/5 days off or 3 days on/4 days off) in six cohorts from 175 mg once daily to 225 mg twice daily combined with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, carboplatin, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The primary outcome measurement was overall response rate. Results: Three percent of patients (3/94) had confirmed complete response and 29% (27/94) had confirmed partial response. The response rate was highest with carboplatin plus weekly adavosertib, at 66.7%, with 100% disease control rate, and median progression-free survival of 12.0 months. The longest median duration of response was in the paclitaxel cohort (12.0 months). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events across all cohorts were neutropenia [45/94 (47.9%) patients], anemia [31/94 (33.0%)], thrombocytopenia [30/94 (31.9%)], and diarrhea and vomiting [10/94 (10.6%) each]. Conclusions: Adavosertib showed preliminary efficacy when combined with chemotherapy. The most promising treatment combination was adavosertib 225 mg twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 plus carboplatin every 21 days. However, hematologic toxicity was more frequent than would be expected for carboplatin monotherapy, and the combination requires further study to optimize the dose, schedule, and supportive medications.

Vigil® is a personalized vaccine that enhances tumor neoantigen expression. We investigated for the first time safety and efficacy of Vigil in combination with atezolizumab in relapsed ovarian cancer (OC) patients. This is a randomized, Phase 1 study of Vigil, an autologous tumor tissue transfected vaccine encoding for GMCSF and bi-shRNA-furin thereby creating enhanced immune activation and TGFβ expression control. Part 1 is a safety assessment of Vigil (1 × 10e7 cells/mL/21 days) plus atezolizumab (1200 mg/21 days). Part 2 is a randomized study of Vigil first (Vigil-1st) or atezolizumab first (Atezo-1st) for two cycles followed by the combination of both agents. The primary endpoint of the study was the determination of safety. Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study; three patients to Part 1 and 21 to Part 2. Patients in Part 1 completed combination therapy without dose-limiting toxicity justifying expansion to Part 2. Twenty-one patients were randomized (1:1) to Part 2 to Vigil-1st (n = 11) or Atezo-1st (n = 10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events of Atezo-1st vs. Vigil-1st were 17.2% vs. 5.1%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR) (Vigil-1st) vs. 10.8 months (Atezo-1st) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33). The exploratory subset analysis of BRCAwt suggested improved OS benefit [NR in Vigil-1st vs. 5.2 months in Atezo-1st, HR 0.16, p 0.027]. The Vigil-1st combination therapy with atezolizumab was safe and results in support continued investigation in BRCAwt patients.

Summary Background Gemogenovatucel-T is an autologous tumour cell vaccine manufactured from harvested tumour tissue, which specifically reduces expression of furin and downstream TGF-β1 and TGF-β2. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of gemogenovatucel-T in front-line ovarian cancer maintenance. Methods This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial involved 25 hospitals in the USA. Women aged 18 years and older with stage III/IV high-grade serous, endometrioid, or clear cell ovarian cancer in clinical complete response after a combination of surgery and five to eight cycles of chemotherapy involving carboplatin and paclitaxel, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0 or 1 were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to gemogenovatucel-T or placebo by an independent third party interactive response system after successful screening using randomly permuted block sizes of two and four and stratified by extent of surgical cytoreduction and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy. Gemogenovatucel-T (1 × 107 cells per injection) or placebo was administered intradermally (one per month) for a minimum of four and up to 12 doses. Patients, investigators, and clinical staff were masked to patient allocation until after statistical analysis. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival, analysed in the per-protocol population. All patients who received at least one dose of gemogenovatucel-T were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02346747 . Findings Between Feb 11, 2015, and March 2, 2017, 310 patients consented to the study at 22 sites. 217 were excluded. 91 patients received gemogenovatucel-T (n=47) or placebo (n=44) and were analysed for safety and efficacy. The median follow-up from first dose of gemogenovatucel-T was 40·0 months (IQR 35·0–44·8) and from first dose of placebo was 39·8 months (35·5–44·6). Recurrence-free survival was 11·5 months (95% CI 7·5–not reached) for patients assigned to gemogenovatucel-T versus 8·4 months (7·9–15·5) for patients assigned to placebo (HR 0·69, 90% CI 0·44–1·07; one-sided p=0·078). Gemogenovatucel-T resulted in no grade 3 or 4 toxic effects. Two patients in the placebo group had five grade 3 toxic events, including arthralgia, bone pain, generalised muscle weakness, syncope, and dyspnea. Seven patients (four in the placebo group and three in the gemogenovatucel-T group) had 11 serious adverse events. No treatment-related deaths were reported in either of the groups. Interpretation Front-line use of gemogenovatucel-T immunotherapy as maintenance was well tolerated but the primary endpoint was not met. Further investigation of gemogenovatucel-T in patients stratified by BRCA mutation status is warranted. Funding Gradalis.

The aim of this study was to investigate survival differences between equivalent residual disease [complete gross resection (CGR), minimal residual disease (MRD), suboptimal] at the time of primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS). The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients from 2010 to 2015 with stage IIIC/IV primary peritoneal or ovarian cancer who had residual disease recorded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to correct for differences in characteristics between the PDS and IDS groups. Of 8683 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, 4493 (52%), 2546 (29%), and 1644 (19%) had CGR, MRD, or suboptimal resection, respectively. From 2010 to 2015, the number of patients undergoing IDS increased 27% (ptrend

Purpose: A phase I clinical trial (GOG-9929) examined the safety and efficacy of adjuvant immune-modulation therapy with the checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab [anti–CTL antigen-4 (anti–CTLA-4)] following chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for newly diagnosed node-positive human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical cancer. To better understand the mechanism of action and to identify predictive biomarkers, immunologic and viral correlates were assessed before, during, and after treatment. Patients and Methods: Twenty-one patients who received CRT and ≥2 doses of ipilimumab and 5 patients who received CRT only were evaluable for translational endpoints. Circulating T-cell subsets were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry. Cytokines were evaluated by multiplex ELISA. HPV-specific T cells were evaluated in a subset of patients by IFNγ ELISpot. Results: Expression of the activation markers ICOS and PD-1 significantly increased on T-cell subsets following CRT and were sustained or increased following ipilimumab treatment. Combined CRT/ipilimumab treatment resulted in a significant expansion of both central and effector memory T-cell populations. Genotype-specific E6/E7-specific T-cell responses increased post-CRT in 1 of 8 HPV16+ patients and in 2 of 3 HPV18+ patients. Elevation in levels of tumor-promoting circulating cytokines (TNFα, IL6, IL8) post-CRT was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival. Conclusions: Our data indicate that CRT alone and combined with ipilimumab immunotherapy show immune-modulating activity in women with locally advanced cervical cancer and may be a promising therapeutic option for the enhancement of antitumor immune cell function after primary CRT for this population at high risk for recurrence and metastasis. Several key immune biomarkers were identified that were associated with clinical response.

To determine the long-term potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in subgroups of high-risk stage I mucinous ovarian cancer patients using a predictive scoring algorithm.Data were collected from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. Based on demographic and surgical characteristics, a novel 10-year survival prognostic scoring system was developed using Cox regression.There were 2041 eligible patients with stage I mucinous ovarian cancer including 1362 (67%) with stage IA/IB disease, 598 (29%) with stage IC disease, and 81 (4%) with stage I disease not otherwise specified. Median age was 52 with a range of 13-90 years old. 737 (36%) patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was more common in patients with stage IC relative to stage IA/IB disease (69% vs. 21%, P 0.001) or with poorly-differentiated relative to well-differentiated tumors (69% vs. 23%, P 0.001). Unadjusted 10-year survival was 81% relative to 79% for patients treated with vs. without chemotherapy, respectively (P = 0.46). Patients were predicted to exhibit a low- or a high-risk of death using a multivariate Cox regression model with age, stage, grade, lymphovascular space invasion and ascites. Risk of death without vs. with adjuvant chemotherapy was similar in low-risk patients (88% vs. 84%; HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.56-1.15, P = 0.23) and worse in high-risk patients (51% vs. 74%; HR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.05-2.38, P = 0.03) with stage I mucinous ovarian cancer.A predictive scoring algorithm may provide prognostic information on long-term survival and identify high-risk stage I mucinous ovarian cancer patients who might achieve a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Purpose: Platinum resistance in ovarian cancer is associated with epigenetic modifications. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have been studied as carboplatin resensitizing agents in ovarian cancer. This randomized phase II trial compared guadecitabine, a second-generation HMA, and carboplatin (G+C) against second-line chemotherapy in women with measurable or detectable platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients received either G+C (guadecitabine 30 mg/m2 s.c. once-daily for 5 days and carboplatin) or treatment of choice (TC; topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine) in 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were RECIST v1.1 and CA-125 response rate, 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 100 patients treated, 51 received G+C and 49 received TC, of which 27 crossed over to G+C. The study did not meet its primary endpoint as the median PFS was not statistically different between arms (16.3 weeks vs. 9.1 weeks in the G+C and TC groups, respectively; P = 0.07). However, the 6-month PFS rate was significantly higher in the G+C group (37% vs. 11% in TC group; P = 0.003). The incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicity was similar in G+C and TC groups (51% and 49%, respectively), with neutropenia and leukopenia being more frequent in the G+C group. Conclusions: Although this trial did not show superiority for PFS of G+C versus TC, the 6-month PFS increased in G+C treated patients. Further refinement of this strategy should focus on identification of predictive markers for patient selection.

Objective. To compare the combination of a MEK inhibitor (pimasertib) and a PI3K inhibitor (SAR245409) to pimasertib alone in recurrent unresectable borderline/low malignant potential (LMP) or low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC), determining whether combination is superior. Methods. Patients with previously treated, recurrent LMP or LGSOC with measurable disease received either combination of pimasertib (60 mg daily) + SAR245409 (SAR) (70 mg daily) or pimasertib alone (60 mg BID) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, determining whether combination was superior to pimasertib alone. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), disease control, and adverse events. Results. Sixty-five patients were randomized between September 2012 and December 2014. ORR was 9.4% (80% CI, 3.5 to 19.7) in the combination arm and 12.1% (80% CI, 5.4 to 22.8) in the pimasertib alone arm. Median PFS was 7.23 months (80% CI, 5.06 to -) and 9.99 (80% CI, 7.39 to 10.35) for pimasertib alone and pimasertib + SAR, respectively. Six-month PFS was 63.5% (80% CI, 47.2% to 75.9%) and 70.8% (80% CI, 56.9% to 80.9%). Eighteen (56.3%) patients in the combination arm and 19 (57.6%) patients in the pimasertib alone arm discontinued the trial. The study was terminated early because of low ORR and high rate of discontinuation. Conclusions. Response to pimasertib alone (ORR 12%) suggests that MEK inhibition could be used as an alternative treatment method to cytotoxic chemotherapy in this population. The MEK inhibitor alone was as effective as the combination, although the trial was limited by small numbers. Additional studies investigating the role of single agent or combination MEK and PI3K inhibition are warranted to further evaluate the utility of these treatments and describe a standard of care for LGSOC. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Determine the utility of a clinical calculator to predict the benefit of chemotherapy in stage IA uterine papillary serous cancer (UPSC).Data were collected from NCDB from years 2010-2014. Based on demographic and surgical characteristics, a clinical score was developed using the random survival forest machine learning algorithm.Of 1,751 patients with stage IA UPSC, 1,012 (58%) received chemotherapy and 739 (42%) did not. Older age (HR 1.06), comorbidities (HR 1.31), larger tumor size (HR 1.27), lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.86), positive peritoneal cytology (HR 2.62), no pelvic lymph node dissection (HR 1.51), and no chemotherapy (HR 2.16) were associated with poorer prognosis. Compared to no chemotherapy, patients who underwent chemotherapy had a 5-year overall survival of 80% vs. 67%. To better delineate those who may derive more benefit from chemotherapy, we designed a clinical calculator capable of dividing patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups with associated 5-year OS of 86%, 73%, and 53%, respectively. Using the calculator to assess the relative benefit of chemotherapy in each risk group, chemotherapy improved the 5-year OS in the high (42% to 64%; p 0.001) and moderate risk group (66% to 79%; p 0.001) but did not benefit the low risk group (84% to 87%; p = 0.29).Our results suggest a clinical calculator is useful for counseling and personalizing chemotherapy for stage IA UPSC.

Introduction/Background* Dostarlimab is a humanised programmed death (PD-1) receptor monoclonal antibody approved for patients with mismatch mutation repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer (EC) that progressed on or after a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. GARNET is a phase 1 study assessing the antitumour activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. Methodology GARNET is a multicentre, open-label, single-arm study. Here we report on 2 independent expansion cohorts of patients with recurrent or advanced EC that progressed on or after a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients were assigned to cohort A1 (dMMR/MSI-H EC) or cohort A2 (mismatch mutation repair-proficient/microsatellite-stable [MMRp/MSS] EC) based on immunohistochemistry testing. Patients received 500 mg of dostarlimab intravenously once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg once every 6 weeks until disease progression, discontinuation or withdrawal. The primary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response by blinded independent central review using RECIST version 1.1. Result(s)* In total, 129 dMMR/MSI-H and 161 MMRp/MSS patients were enrolled and dosed. Of these, 108 dMMR/MSI-H and 156 MMRp/MSS patients who had measurable disease at baseline and ≥6 months of follow-up were included for efficacy analyses. ORR and disease control rate (DCR) for dMMR/MSI-H EC was 43.5% and 55.6%, respectively; ORR and DCR for MMRp/MSS EC was 14.1% and 34.6%, respectively (table 1). Overall, 16 patients (5.5%) discontinued treatment due to a treatment-related adverse event (5 dMMR/MSI-H, 11 MMRp/MSS). Table 2 shows safety by cohort and overall. No deaths were attributed to dostarlimab. Conclusion* Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumour activity in both dMMR/MSI-H and MMRp/MSS advanced/recurrent EC. dMMR/MSI-H status was associated with a higher response rate. DCR achieved in MMRp/MSS EC was noteworthy, considering MMRp/MSS tumours are historically associated with a poor prognosis. The dostarlimab safety profile was manageable. Clinical trial registration NCT02715284

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal neoplasms with 22,000 new cases and 14,000 deaths per year. Aggressive cytoreduction and chemotherapy have response rates as high as 80%. Most women are diagnosed with stage 3 disease or later and over 70% of women recur within 18 months. There is need for a test to determine prognosis of remission patients to allow for intervention and prolonged survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women at Augusta University with ovarian cancer were enrolled between 2005 and 2015 (n=71). Blood was drawn at enrollment and follow-up visits. Patient serum collected at remission was analyzed using the SOMAscan array (n=35) to measure concentrations of 1129 proteins. The best 26 proteins were confirmed using Luminex assays in the same 35 patients and an additional 36 patients (n(total)=71) as orthogonal validation. The data from these proteins was combined with clinical factors using an elastic net multivariate model to find an optimized combination predictive of progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Platelet Derived Growth Factor molecules were significant for predicting PFS on univariate and multivariate analyses. The 26 proteins were combined with clinical factors using the elastic net algorithm. Ten components were determined to predict PFS (HR of 6.55, p-value 1.12 × 10(−6), CI 2.57 – 16.71). This model was named the Serous High Grade Ovarian Cancer (SHOC) Score. CONCLUSION: The SHOC score can predict patient prognosis in remission and will hopefully lead to early intervention and consolidation therapy strategies in remission patients destined to recur.

LBA5500 Background: While PARP inhibitors have shown efficacy as first-line (1L) maintenance treatment for patients (pts) with ovarian cancer (OC), questions remain about the pt population that may benefit from their use. ATHENA (NCT03522246) was designed to test if rucaparib may be effective as 1L maintenance treatment in a broad pt population, including those without BRCA mutations or other evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or high-risk clinical characteristics such as residual disease. Here we report results from the ATHENA–MONO comparison of rucaparib vs placebo. Methods: Pts with stage III–IV high-grade OC who had completed cytoreductive surgery (R0 permitted) and 4–8 cycles of 1L platinum-doublet (bevacizumab allowed with chemotherapy) with a response were randomized 4:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg BID or placebo. Pts were stratified by HRD status (as determined by FoundationOne CDx), residual disease status after chemotherapy, and timing of surgery. The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed PFS per RECIST was assessed in a step-down procedure first in the HRD population (BRCA mutant or BRCA wild-type/loss of heterozygosity [LOH] high carcinoma) and then in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Blinded independent central review (BICR)–assessed PFS was a stand-alone, secondary endpoint. PFS in BRCA mutant and HRD-negative pts (BRCA wild-type/LOH low) were exploratory endpoints. Results: As of Mar 23, 2022 (visit cutoff), 427 and 111 pts were randomized to rucaparib monotherapy or placebo (median time on treatment, 14.7 and 9.9 mo). PFS data are shown in the Table. Most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia (rucaparib, 28.7% vs placebo, 0%), neutropenia (14.6% vs 0.9%), and ALT/AST increased (10.6% vs 0.9%). Rucaparib dose reduction, interruption, and discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in 49.4%, 60.7%, and 11.8% of pts. Conclusions: Rucaparib monotherapy is effective as 1L maintenance with significant benefit vs placebo observed in the ITT and HRD populations, as well as the non-nested subgroup of pts without known HRD. Clinical trial information: NCT03522246. [Table: see text]

5528 Background: Until the recent FDA approval of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab, there have been limited treatment options that address the underlying biology for pts with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic (P/R/M) or locally advanced (LA) cervical cancer. Persistent HPV infection is associated with 99% of cervical cancers and is linked to upregulation of TGF-β. Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1, has shown promising clinical activity and manageable safety in pts with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. We report data from a phase 1 trial evaluating safety of first-line bintrafusp alfa plus chemotherapy ± bevacizumab for pts with P/R/M cervical cancer or bintrafusp alfa plus chemoradiotherapy for pts with LA cervical cancer (INTR@PID 046; NCT04551950). Methods: Pts with P/R/M cervical cancer who had not received prior systemic therapy received bintrafusp alfa 2400 mg Q3W plus cisplatin/carboplatin and paclitaxel with (cohort 1A) or without (cohort 1B) bevacizumab. Pts with LA cervical cancer received bintrafusp alfa 2400 mg Q3W plus concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with bintrafusp alfa (cohort 2). Pts were treated until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of bintrafusp alfa in combination with current standard-of-care therapies in pts with P/R/M or LA cervical cancer. Results: As of November 25, 2021, 8 pts in cohort 1A, 9 in cohort 1B, and 8 in cohort 2 had received bintrafusp alfa for a median of 11.6, 10.0, and 5.6 cycles, respectively. At the time of this analysis, 11 of 25 pts remained on bintrafusp alfa therapy. Any-grade bintrafusp alfa–related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 75.0%, 100.0%, and 75.0% of pts in cohorts 1A, 1B, and 2, respectively (Table). The most-common grade ≥3 AEs were anemia and hematuria (25.0% each) in cohort 1A and vaginal hemorrhage (22.2%) in cohort 1B. One pt had grade 4 anemia and vaginal hemorrhage in cohort 1B. No treatment-related deaths occurred. AEs led to permanent discontinuation of bintrafusp alfa in 37.5%, 33.3%, and 12.5% of pts in cohorts 1A, 1B, and 2, respectively; the most common any-grade AE was vaginal hemorrhage (22.2%). Conclusions: No new safety signals were observed with first-line bintrafusp alfa plus chemotherapy ± bevacizumab or chemoradiotherapy in pts with P/R/M or LA cervical cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04551950. [Table: see text]

1519 Background: Reproductive health (RH) needs of women newly diagnosed with cancer have been poorly addressed. RH management must be aligned with cancer treatment to optimize cancer survivorship. The primary objective of the EROS trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing RH programming to improve RH care among reproductive aged women with cancer. Methods: E1Q11 used a cluster randomized design with 17 NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Sites randomized to intervention (n = 8) or usual care (n = 9). Intervention sites received study-specific training delivered via webinar and tools to support RH care implementation. Pre-menopausal women aged 15-55 years newly diagnosed with cancer and pre-initiation of treatment were eligible. The primary endpoint was defined as the delivery of RH goal-concordant management within the first 3 months since enrollment. Data were obtained through patient completed questionnaires and medical record abstraction forms at baseline and 3 months. The management rate was analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEEs) method. Results: From 7/2016 - 4/2021, 434 women enrolled (156 intervention, 278 usual care) and 392 were analyzable. The median age was 41 years. Patients self-identified as White 67.5%; Black 21.1%; Hispanic 15.9%. Most patients had breast cancer (83.5%) and local/regional disease (69.5%). A higher proportion of patients at intervention sites (77.1%, 108/140, 90% CI: 0.71-0.83) received goal-concordant RH care compared to patients enrolled from usual care sites (61.5%; 155/252, 90% CI: 0.56, 0.67). A total of 263/392 (67.1%) patients received goal-concordant RH care within the first 3 months of enrollment. The GEE analysis demonstrated patients enrolled from intervention sites were approximately twice more likely to receive goal- concordant RH care than patients at usual care sites (odds ratio, OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.30, 3.44, p = 0.003). Younger age (< / = 35 years vs. > 35 years) and better ECOG performance status (PS 0 vs. PS 1-3) were statistically associated with the adoption of RH goal-concordant management (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.59, 5.12, p = 0.0004 and OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.04, 3.63, p = 0.04, respectively). The intervention effect on the primary endpoint remained after age and PS were adjusted in the model (adjusted OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.30, 3.84, p = 0.004). Conclusions: The EROS trial demonstrated significant improvement of goal-concordant reproductive health management amongst racially diverse women newly diagnosed with cancer treated in community oncology practices. Sites randomized to intervention more frequently delivered reproductive care compared to usual care sites. Findings support wider implementation of this intervention to improve reproductive health care delivery, improving cancer care quality for pre-menopausal women diagnosed with cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01806129.

Introduction/Background Dostarlimab is a humanised programmed death (PD)-1 receptor monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction with the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and –L2. GARNET is a phase 1 study assessing antitumour activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. Methodology This multicentre, open-label, single-arm study is being conducted in 2 parts, dose escalation and expansion. Here we report on 2 independent expansion cohorts of patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer (EC) that progressed on or after a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Assignment to cohort A1 (mismatch mutation repair deficient [dMMR] EC) or cohort A2 (mismatch mutation repair proficient [MMRp] EC) was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing. Patients received 500 mg dostarlimab intravenously once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg once every 6 weeks until disease progression, discontinuation or withdrawal. The primary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by blinded independent central review using RECIST version 1.1. Results In total, 126 dMMR and 145 MMRp pts identified by IHC were enrolled and dosed. Of these, 103 dMMR and 142 MMRp pts had measurable disease as baseline and sufficient follow-up time (6 months) for efficacy analyses, respectively. Patients that progressed prior to 6 months were included in the evaluable population. ORR for dMMR EC was 44.7%; ORR for MMRp EC was 13.4% (table 1). Median DOR and OS were not reached in either cohort. Overall, 15 pts (5.5%) discontinued treatment due a TRAE (5 dMMR, 10 MMRp). Safety by cohort and overall are shown in table 2. There were no deaths attributed to dostarlimab. Conclusion Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumour activity in both dMMR and MMRp advanced/recurrent EC. dMMR status by IHC was associated with a higher response rate. Dostarlimab demonstrated a notable disease control rate (35.2%; 2.1% complete response, 11.3% partial response, 21.8% stable disease) in patients with MMRp EC, which comprised a higher percentage of patients with Type II EC and is historically associated with a worse prognosis. No new safety signals were detected. These cohorts are the largest prospective evaluation of a PD-(L)1 therapy in EC to date. Disclosures Clinical trial registration: NCT02715284 This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, MA, USA. Dr. Oaknin reports consulting and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Clovis, PharmaMar, and Roche. Dr. Gilbert reports honoraria from Meck, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. Dr. Tinker reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca. Dr. Sabatier reports grants from EISAI and AstraZeneca; personal fees from Roche, Pfizer, Tesaro, Novartis and AstraZeneca; and non-financial support from Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Amgen. Dr. O’Malley reports personal fees from Immunogen, Eisai, Agenus, GSK : Consultant/Advisory Board for Clovis, Ambry, Abbvie, Janssen/JJ Steering committee for Genentech/Roche and Merck; Institutional funding from Ajinomoto Inc, Ludwig Cancer Research, Stemcentrx, Inc, CERULEAN PHARMA, GOG Foundation, BMS, Serono Inc, TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Yale University, New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance, INC Research, Inc., Inventiv Health Clinical, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc, and PRA International. Dr. Ghamande reports consulting fees from Seattle Genetics; speakers’ bureau fees from GSK; and institutional grants from GSK, Merck, Roche, Genentech, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Advaxis, BMS, Clovis, Abbvie, and Tesaro. Dr. Pothuri reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from GSK; Advisory Board fees from AstraZeneca and Clovis Oncology. Dr. Boni has nothing to disclose. Drs. Guo and Im are employees of GlaxoSmithKline.

Objectives: To determine the utility of a clinical calculator to predict the benefits of chemotherapy and outcomes in women with early stage clear cell ovarian cancer. Methods: Data from 2006-2015 was abstracted from the National Cancer Database. All patients had stage I clear cell carcinoma. Using a Cox regression model based on demographic, surgico-pathologic and laboratory characteristics, a clinical score was developed. Propensity score weighting was used to reduce bias between patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy. Results: Of 1,528 patients with stage I clear cell ovarian cancer, 1309 (85.7%) did receive and 219 (14.3%) did not receive chemotherapy. Patients who underwent chemotherapy had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 85.6% vs. 84.0% in those without treatment (p=0.30). On univariate analysis, significant prognostic factors included older age (HR=1.021, 95% CI 1.002-1.021, p=0.03), malignant ascites (HR 1.608, 95% CI 1.054-2.453, p=0.03), and higher stage (1B or C) (HR 1.758, 95% CI 1.207-2.560, p=0.003). To better define those who may have an increased benefit from chemotherapy, we designed a clinical calculator capable of dividing patients into low (n=306), moderate (n=916), and high-risk (n=306) groups with associated 5-year overall survival of 90.3%, 86.8% and 76.1%, respectively (p Download : Download high-res image (121KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: Our results suggest a clinical calculator can help direct chemotherapy decision making for women with early stage clear cell ovarian cancer.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study (MORAb-003-011/ENGOT-ov27) was to determine if farletuzumab (FAR) had superior efficacy compared with placebo (PLB) in improving progression-free survival (PFS) when added to carboplatin (carbo)/paclitaxel (pacli) or carbo/PLD, in subjects with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer in first relapse (platinum-free interval: 6-36 months) with low cancer antigen 125 (CA-125). CA-125 inhibits target cell killing via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, thereby reducing the efficacy of immunotherapeutic antibodies. Subgroup analysis in a prior randomized Phase III study±FAR suggested that subjects with CA-125 levels ≤3 x upper limit of normal (ULN), showed superior PFS (hazard risk [HR] = 0.49) and overall survival (OS, HR = 0.44) compared with PLB. Methods: Eligibility included age ≥18 years old, CA-125 ≤3 x ULN (105 U/mL), high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer, and previous treatment with debulking surgery and first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Subjects received 6 cycles with either carbo/pacli every 3 weeks or carbo/PLD in combination with either FAR [5 mg/kg weekly] or PLB in a 2:1 ratio. Maintenance treatment with FAR (5 mg/kg weekly) or PLB was given until disease progression. Tumor assessments were every 6 weeks during the Combination Treatment Phase and every 9 weeks during the Maintenance Treatment Phase. The study was designed to detect a PFS HR of 0.667 (33.3% risk reduction) with FAR compared with PLB with approximately 85% power and a 1-sided type I error rate of 0.10. The comparison of PFS between treatment groups was based on the log-rank test. The HR was estimated based on Cox's proportional-hazards model. Results: A total of 214 subjects were randomized and enrolled, 142 with FAR+chemotherapy (FAR-CT) and 72 with placebo+chemotherapy (PLB-CT). The median PFS in the Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Population was not significantly different between treatment groups; 11.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.2, 13.6) versus 10.8 months (95% CI: 9.5, 13.2) for FAR-CT and PLB-CT, respectively (HR = 0.89; 80% CI: 0.71, 1.11). An interim analysis of OS showed no significant difference between treatment groups. The overall response rate (ORR) was 69.6% in 96 subjects treated with FAR-CT versus 73.5% in 50 subjects treated with PLB-CT (p=0.53). No significant differences between treatment groups were observed for any other efficacy parameters. The safety profile of the 2 treatment groups was similar except for an increase in interstitial lung disease among the FAR cohort. Interstitial lung disease occurred in 7 of 141 (5.0%) subjects treated with FAR-CT (1 with Grade 1, 4 with Grade 2, and 2 with Grade 3) and none in subjects treated with PLB-CT. Download : Download high-res image (71KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: The combination of FAR-CT did not show signals of superior efficacy compared with PLB-CT in improving PFS or other efficacy parameters in subjects with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer in first relapse who had low CA-125 levels. No new safety concerns were identified with the combination of FAR-CT. Since FAR binds to the folate receptor alpha, a novel antibody-drug conjugate has been developed and clinical studies are ongoing to assess the safety/efficacy of this modification. Clinical Trial Registry: NCT02289950.

Objectives: To determine the utility of a clinical calculator to predict the benefits of chemotherapy and outcomes in women with early stage high risk ovarian cancer. Methods: Data from 2006-2015 was abstracted from the National Cancer Database. All patients had stage I, grade 3; stage IC, stage II, or clear cell carcinoma. Using a Cox regression model, based on demographic, surgico-pathologic, and laboratory characteristics, a clinical score was developed. Propensity score matching was used to reduce bias between patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy. The clinical calculator was validated by both bootstrapping and in an independent validation set. Results: Of 8,289 patients with early stage high risk ovarian cancer, 6,990 (84%) did and 1,299 (16%) did not receive chemotherapy. Patients who underwent chemotherapy had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 85% vs 80% in those without treatment (p Download : Download high-res image (40KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: Our results suggest a clinical calculator can help direct chemotherapy decision making for women with high risk early stage ovarian cancer.

Practice changing standardization of lower extremity lymphedema quantitative measurements with integrated patient reported outcomes will likely refine and redefine the optimal risk-reduction strategies to diminish the devastating limb-related dysfunction and morbidity associated with treatment of gynecologic cancers. The National Cancer Institute (NCI), Division of Cancer Prevention brought together a diverse group of cancer treatment, therapy and patient reported outcomes experts to discuss the current state-of-the-science in lymphedema evaluation with the potential goal of incorporating new strategies for optimal evaluation of lymphedema in future developing gynecologic clinical trials.

Introduction Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved for maintenance treatment of patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent OC that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy and treatment in heavily-pretreated recurrent OC. Here we report efficacy in patients receiving the FSD and ISD in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). Methods This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study randomized 733 patients to receive niraparib or placebo for 36 months or until disease progression/toxicity. A protocol amendment introduced ISD: 200 mg in patients with body weight Results BICR and IA PFS were highly concordant in the overall population. Efficacy of niraparib based on IA PFS in FSD vs ISD subgroups for each data cut were similar (table 1). Dose interruptions, modifications, and hematologic toxicity were lower with the ISD. Exposure–response data supported the clinical data. Conclusions The 200- or 300-mg ISD by baseline body weight and platelet counts demonstrated comparable efficacy while improving the safety profile of niraparib. Use of this regimen for first-line maintenance of advanced OC patients is approved by the US FDA. Funded by: GlaxoSmithKline NCT: NCT02655016

Vigil® is a personalized vaccine that enhances tumor neoantigen expression. We investigated for the first time safety and efficacy of Vigil in combination with atezolizumab in relapsed ovarian cancer (OC) patients. This is a randomized, Phase 1 study of Vigil, an autologous tumor tissue transfected vaccine encoding for GMCSF and bi-shRNA-furin thereby creating enhanced immune activation and TGFβ expression control. Part 1 is a safety assessment of Vigil (1 × 10e7 cells/mL/21 days) plus atezolizumab (1200 mg/21 days). Part 2 is a randomized study of Vigil first (Vigil-1st) or atezolizumab first (Atezo-1st) for two cycles followed by the combination of both agents. The primary endpoint of the study was the determination of safety. Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study; three patients to Part 1 and 21 to Part 2. Patients in Part 1 completed combination therapy without dose-limiting toxicity justifying expansion to Part 2. Twenty-one patients were randomized (1:1) to Part 2 to Vigil-1st (n = 11) or Atezo-1st (n = 10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events of Atezo-1st vs. Vigil-1st were 17.2% vs. 5.1%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR) (Vigil-1st) vs. 10.8 months (Atezo-1st) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33). The exploratory subset analysis of BRCA

Molecular biomarkers that can predict survival and therapeutic outcome are still lacking for cervical cancer. Here we measured a panel of 19 serum proteins in sera from 565 patients with stage II or III cervical cancer and identified 10 proteins that have an impact on disease specific survival (DSS) (Hazzard&rsquo, s ratio, HR = 1.51&ndash, 2.1). Surprisingly, all ten proteins are implicated in senescence-associated secreted phenotype (SASP), a hallmark of cellular senescence. Machine learning using Ridge regression of these SASP proteins can robustly stratify patients with high SASP, which is associated with poor survival, and patients with low SASP associated with good survival (HR = 3.09&ndash, 4.52). Furthermore, brachytherapy, an effective therapy for cervical cancer, greatly improves survival in SASP-high patients (HR = 3.3, p &lt, 5 &times, 10&minus, 5) but has little impact on survival of SASP-low patients (HR = 1.5, p = 0.31). These results demonstrate that cellular senescence is a major determining factor for survival and therapeutic response in cervical cancer and suggest that senescence reduction therapy may be an efficacious strategy to improve the therapeutic outcome of cervical cancer.

6051 Background: Niraparib improves progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with newly diagnosed AOC after complete or partial response to first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. In the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (PRIMA) trial, pts were treated with a fixed starting dose (FSD) of 300 mg QD until a protocol amendment introduced the individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen: 200 mg QD for pts with baseline bodyweight (BW) < 77 kg and/or platelet count (PC) < 150,000/µL, or 300 mg QD for pts with baseline BW ≥77 kg and PC ≥150,000/µL. Here, we developed a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for niraparib and evaluated exposure-response relationships for pts receiving niraparib using safety and efficacy data from PRIMA. Methods: The PopPK model for niraparib was developed based on 7418 plasma samples from 1442 pts from 4 studies: PN001, NOVA, QUADRA, and PRIMA. PRIMA PK samples were collected on cycle 1, day 1 (C1D1), C2D1 pre-dose and 2 h post-dose, C4D1, and C8D1 pre-dose (or EOT if patient discontinued before C8D1). The relationship between PopPK model-based prospective exposure (average concentration [ Cave] until progression/death) and efficacy (PFS) were evaluated in pts receiving niraparib in both the homologous-recombination deficient (HRd) and overall population. The relationship between model-predicted exposure metrics and incidence of clinically relevant adverse events (AEs) was analyzed using univariate logistic regression in pts receiving niraparib. Results: Of 484 pts receiving niraparib in PRIMA, 480 had PK data and were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. The safety exposure-response showed significant associations ( p≤0.0128) between increasing niraparib exposure and increasing probability of experiencing any-grade and grade ≥3 AEs, except grade ≥3 hypertension. The incidence of AEs, including thrombocytopenia, was lower in pts who received a 200-mg ISD. Efficacy was not compromised in these pts. Conclusions: Niraparib exposure was associated with increased risk of select AEs. However, the ISD regimen decreased AE risk without compromising efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT02655016.

HER family members are interdependent and functionally compensatory. Simultaneously targeting EGFR/HER2/HER3 by antibody combinations has demonstrated superior treatment efficacy over targeting one HER receptor. However, antibody combinations have their limitations, with high immunogenicity and high cost. In this study, we have developed a three-in-one nucleic acid aptamer-small interfering RNA (siRNA) chimera, which targets EGFR/HER2/HER3 in one molecule. This inhibitory molecule was constructed such that a single EGFR siRNA is positioned between the HER2 and HER3 aptamers to create a HER2 aptamer-EGFR siRNA-HER3 aptamer chimera (H2EH3). EGFR siRNA was delivered into HER2-expressing cells by HER2/HER3 aptamer-induced internalization. HER2/HER3 aptamers act as antagonist molecules for blocking HER2 and HER3 signaling pathways and also as tumor-targeting agents for siRNA delivery. H2EH3 enables down-modulation of the expression of all three receptors, thereby triggering cell apoptosis. In breast cancer xenograft models, H2EH3 is able to bind to breast tumors with high specificity and significantly inhibits tumor growth via either systemic or intratumoral administration. Owing to low immunogenicity, ease of production, and high thermostability, H2EH3 is a promising therapeutic to supplement current single HER inhibitors and may act as a treatment for HER2+ breast cancer with intrinsic or acquired resistance to current drugs.

BackgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer (OvCa) is the most lethal of gynecological malignancies. The high mortality is related to a late diagnosis with over 75% being at an advanced stage, high recurrence rates, and ultimately resistance to chemotherapy. Previous studies have consistently demonstrated a strong association between higher tumor T cell infiltration and improved survival in OvCa patients supporting the potential clinical utility of T cell activating immunotherapy approaches. Maveropepimut-S (MVP-S, formerly named DPX-Survivac) is a T cell activating immunotherapy which is a formulation of the proprietary drug delivery platform DPX™ with immunogenic T-cell epitopes derived from the tumor-associated antigen survivin. MVP-S in combination with intermittent low-dose cyclophosphamide has been shown to induce robust and durable antigen-specific T cell responses and anti-tumor clinical activity in recurrent OvCa patients. The current study presents translational data aimed at identifying tumor tissue-based predictive biomarkers for response to treatment with MVP-S.MethodsBaseline and on-treatment tumor biopsies were collected from patients treated with MVP-S primed with immune-modulating low dose cyclophosphamide. Multiplex-immunohistochemistry (mIHC, Akoya Biosciences) and RNAseq analyses (Personalis Inc.) were used to analyze the tumor immune environment and identify potential response predictors to MVP-S.ResultsTwenty-two patients with advanced, recurrent OvCa were enrolled in this study. mIHC analysis demonstrated that higher baseline CD3+CD8+ T cell infiltration in tumor tissue was significantly associated with anti-tumor clinical activity of MVP-S defined as >10% on-treatment tumor regression. Pathway enrichment analyses using the differentially expressed genes associated with anti-tumor clinical activity confirmed these findings. In addition, we identified B cell pathway genes to be significantly upregulated in patients with >10% on-treatment tumor regression. mIHC analyses of paired biopsies available for one subject with clinical response (PR) demonstrated that MVP-S treatment induced increased T and B cell infiltration in the on-treatment biopsy compared to the baseline biopsy. These findings suggest that immunogenic tumors are more susceptible to the MVP-S treatment, in line with its mechanism of action. Pathway enrichment analyses further revealed that upregulation of genes or pathways related to immune-suppression (e.g. WNT pathway) or immune evasion/exclusion (CD276, Arg2) were significantly associated with lack of anti-tumor activity indicative of potential mechanism of primary resistance.ConclusionsCollectively, these results provide insight for possible response predictors to MVP-S based therapyTrial RegistrationNCT02785250Ethics ApprovalThe protocol and patient-informed consent form received approval by Institutional Review Boards. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. REBs: Comite d’ethique de la recherche du CHUM (Montreal, Canada); Western Institutional Review Board 20161075 (Augusta, GA, USA); FWA #00002505 (NEW YORK, NY, USA); FWA00000161, IRB00000471 (Portland, Oregon, USA); University Health Network REB (Toronto, Canada); FWA00000935, FWA00000934 (Standford, CA, USA); Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta, (Edmonton, Canada)

Importance Despite standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT), most women with lymph node (LN)–positive cervical cancer experience disease recurrence. Immunotherapy is being investigated in the up-front treatment setting. Objectives To assess the safety of sequential immunotherapy after CRT and to investigate human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype and HLA allele status on survival and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) expression before and after CRT and sequential immunotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective phase 1 trial conducted in 29 Gynecology Oncology Cooperative Group member institutions enrolled participants from December 18, 2012, to August 31, 2016, with a 14.8-month median follow-up and translational end points. Thirty-four women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2 to IVA cervical cancer with positive pelvic LNs, para-aortic LNs, or both were enrolled; 13 did not receive ipilimumab and were excluded from the analysis. Data were analyzed from January 21 to April 4, 2018. Interventions Treatment consisted of 6 weekly doses of cisplatin, 40 mg/m2, concurrent with radiotherapy. After completion of chemotherapy, sequential ipilimumab was given every 21 days for 4 doses. Two dosage levels of ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, were studied to identify the maximum tolerated dose. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was safety, and the secondary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival. Exploratory end points included HPV genotype, HLA allele status, and PD-1 expression measured in peripheral blood. Results The median age of the 32 participants included in the intent-to-treat analysis was 50 (range, 26-61) years, and 22 patients (69%) were white. Of the 21 patients who received ipilimumab, all had positive pelvic LN, and 6 (29%) had positive para-aortic LNs. All patients completed CRT, and of the 21 patients who received at least 2 cycles of ipilimumab, 18 (86%) completed 4 cycles of ipilimumab, and 3 (14%) completed 2 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was 10 mg/kg. Two of the 21 patients (9.5%) who received ipilimumab had self-limiting grade 3 toxic effects (lipase increase; dermatitis). The 12-month overall survival was 90%, and progression-free survival was 81%. Human papillomavirus genotype and HLA subtype were not associated with progression-free survival or overall survival. T cells expressing PD-1 increased after CRT, and levels were sustained with ipilimumab. Conclusions and Relevance This study’s findings suggest that the use of immunotherapy after CRT for curative-intent treatment of patients with cervical cancer is tolerable and effective. The results indicated that PD-1 was upregulated after CRT and sustained with sequential ipilimumab therapy. These immune findings may help guide future therapies to harness the activated T-cell phenotype in patients with node-positive cervical cancer.

Objectives To develop a transcriptomic signature capable of predicting overall survival (OS) for uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Methods RNAseq data for 58 USC patients were obtained from TCGA. Expression of 73 candidate genes was measured for 67 Augusta University (AU) samples using NanoString technology. Results Analysis of the TCGA RNAseq data identified 73 genes that individually predict prognosis for USC patients and an elastic net model with all 73 genes (USC73) distinguishes a good OS group with low USC73 score from a poor OS group with high USC73 score (5-year OS = 83.3% and 13.3% respectively, HR = 40.1; p = 3 × 10−8). This finding was validated in the independent AU cohort (HR = 4.3; p = 0.0004). The poor prognosis group with high USC73 score consists of 37.9% and 32.8% of patients in the TCGA and AU cohort respectively. USC73 score and pathologic stage independently contribute to OS and together provide the best prognostic value. Early stage, low USC73 patients have the best prognosis (5-year OS = 85.1% in the combined dataset), while advanced stage, high USC73 patients have the worst prognosis (5-year OS = 6.4%, HR = 30.5, p = 1.2 × 10−12). Consistent with the observed poor survival, primary cell cultures from high USC73 patients had higher proliferation rate and cell cycle progression; and high USC73 patients had lower rates of complete response to standard therapy. Conclusions The USC73 transcriptomic signature and stage independently predict OS of USC patients and the best prediction is achieved using USC73 and stage. USC73 may also serve as a therapeutic biomarker to guide patient care.

Background Cesarean scar dehiscence is rare in pregnancy. When it occurs late in pregnancy, management typically involves delivery of the fetus with concurrent uterine repair. However, consensus regarding management earlier in gestation is lacking. Case A 30-year-old African American woman, gravida 5 para 2113, presented with cesarean scar dehiscence confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging at 20 weeks of gestation. She desired pregnancy continuation and underwent repair of the dehiscence at 23 weeks of gestation using bovine pericardial graft. She subsequently underwent cesarean delivery at 35 weeks of a healthy neonate after going into preterm labor. Conclusion Bovine pericardial graft is a viable option for repair of cesarean scar dehiscence in the second trimester.

5502 Background: In the VITAL (NCT02346747) trial, maintenance therapy with Vigil, an autologous tumor cell vaccine transfected with a DNA plasmid encoding GMCSF and bi-shRNA-furin for TGFβ expression control, following frontline platinum-based chemotherapy led to a recurrence-free survival (RFS) benefit in patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer (HR=0.69, 90% CI 0.44–1.07, p=0.078) and significantly in BRCA-wt patients (HR=0.51, 90% CI 0.30-0.88, p=0.020) ( Rocconi et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020). Here we report post-hoc HR deficiency (HRD) subgroup analysis and identification of an additional molecular subgroup sensitive to Vigil therapy involving STRING analysis. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2b study randomized 92 patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with a complete clinical response (CR) to frontline surgery and chemotherapy. Patients received 1 x 10e7 cells/ml of Vigil or placebo intradermally once a month for up to 12 doses or disease progression. RFS was the primary endpoint assessed by blinded independent central review. HRD status was determined according to the Myriad Genetics myChoice CDx assay (HRD score < 42 for proficient). Using tumor annotated DNA polymorphism data, a protein-protein interaction network was constructed using the STRING database. Properties of this network including topological distance and the identification of hub genes were used to predict a target molecular population sensitive to Vigil. Results: In the per-protocol population (PP, n=91), 62 BRCA-wt patients were tested for HRD status. Forty-five patients were HR proficient (HRP) and 17 patients were HR deficient (HRD). No HRP patients in the Vigil group reported treatment related Grade 3 or higher adverse events. From the time of study randomization median RFS was improved with Vigil (n=25) in HRP patients compared to placebo (n=20) (Table 1). Similarly, overall survival (OS) benefit was observed in the Vigil group compared to placebo (Table 1). Improved RFS was demonstrated for a subset of patients with STRING predicted molecular profile. Conclusions: Vigil immunotherapy as frontline maintenance in Stage III/IV ovarian cancer is well tolerated and showed clinical benefit in both BRCA-wt and HRP molecular profile patients. Results suggest a unique molecular network that enhances sensitivity to Vigil therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02346747. [Table: see text]

6017 Background: Vigil is an autologous tumor cell vaccine constructed from autologous harvested tumor tissue transfected with a DNA plasmid encoding GMCSF and bi-shRNA-furin thereby creating TGFβ expression control. Methods: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of Vigil vs. placebo was performed in advanced stage frontline OC patients. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and safety were endpoints. Patients who achieved complete clinical response were randomized [1:1 to placebo (control group, CG) or Vigil (Vigil group, VG)] after completion of frontline surgery and chemotherapy. All patients received 1 x 10e7 cells/ml of Vigil or placebo intradermally once a month for up to 12 doses. Results: Ninety-two patients were randomized with 91 patients in the per-protocol population (PP), (VG n=46; CG n=45). 62 patients were tested for BRCA1/2 status. VG showed no added overall toxicity compared to CG and no grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. Grade 2/3 toxic events were observed in 18% of CG patients (most common bone pain, fatigue) compared to 8% of VG patients (most common nausea, musculoskeletal pain). From time of randomization median RFS for all 91 patients was favorable in the VG (HR 0.69, one-sided p 0.088).Stratified by BRCA status, an advantage in RFS was seen in the BRCA1/2-wt patients in VG (19.4 mo) compared to CG (8 mo) (HR 0.51, 90% CI 0.26 – 1.01, one-sided p 0.050) from time of randomization and HR of 0.49 (90% CI 0.25 – 0.97, one-sided p 0.038) from time of surgery. Median time from surgery to randomization was 208.5 days (6.9 mo) in VG vs. 200 days (6.6 mo) in CG. 37.5% BRCA1/2-wt Vigil treated patients relapsed compared to 71% of placebo at time of data snap for analysis (HR 0.51, one-sided p 0.05), (median follow-up of 34.3 mo for all n=91 subjects). Germline and somatic BRCA1/2 molecular testing via central third party is underway on all 91 patients under continued blinded conditions to validate activity in BRCA1/2-wt. Conclusions: Vigil immunotherapy as frontline maintenance in Stage III/IV ovarian cancer is well tolerated and showed RFS clinical benefit, particularly in BRCA1/2-wt disease. Clinical trial information: NCT02346747. [Table: see text]

6056 Background: A Phase I trial (NCT01116648) of cediranib (cedi) in combination with olaparib (ola) (cedi + ola) demonstrated an overall response rate of 44% in patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC), including pts without a deleterious or suspected deleterious gBRCAm (non-gBRCAm; Liu et al. Eur J Cancer 2013). The subsequent Phase II trial (NCT01116648) showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with cedi + ola versus ola monotherapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive OC pts, notably in non-gBRCAm pts (Liu et al. Lancet Oncol 2014). We report data from the Phase IIb, single-arm, open-label CONCERTO study investigating cedi + ola in non-gBRCAm pts with recurrent platinum-resistant OC who had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy for advanced OC (NCT02889900). Methods: Pts with disease progression

6050 Background: Niraparib is approved at a fixed starting dose (FSD) of 300 mg QD for maintenance treatment of patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) achieving a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy based in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA study. A post-hoc analysis of NOVA showed baseline bodyweight (BW) and platelet count (PC) were predictive for hematologic toxicities and dose reductions. Following this analysis, the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study was amended to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study randomized 733 pts with newly diagnosed advanced OC with a complete or partial response to first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy. The protocol was amended to change the dose from 300 mg FSD for all patients to an ISD regimen: 200 mg QD in pts with BW

3002 Background: Recent studies have shown poor clinical outcomes and limited survival advantage to checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) in advanced stage ovarian cancer (OvC). Vigil is a personalized precision vaccine constructed from autologous tumor tissue transfected with a DNA plasmid encoding GM-CSF and bi-shRNA-furin thereby creating TGFβ expression control and enhancing immune activation. Phase 1 and 2 trials in OvC demonstrate safety, functional immune activation and clinical response benefit. Combining Vigil with CIs may broaden responsiveness of immunotherapy in OvC. Methods: This is a randomized, 3-part safety Phase 1 study of Vigil in combination with Atezolizumab in recurrent OvC patients. Part 2 is a randomized, intra-patient crossover study of Vigil first (VF) or Atezolizumab first (AF) for two cycles followed by sequence of the combination of the two agents. Vigil (1 x 106 or 1 x 107 cells/ml) or Atezolizumab (1200mg) were administered 1x every 21 days each cycle until progression or untoward adverse event. We now report the preliminary results of part 2 of the study. Results: Twenty-one patients were randomized (1:1) to VF (n = 11) or AF (n = 10), groups were similar in demographics. Grade 3/4 toxic events occurred in 17% of AF patients compared to 3% in VF patients. Median OS of VF patients (n = 11) was not reached vs. AF (n = 10) 10.8 months suggested modest advantage to VF (HR 0.33, one-sided p 0.097). However, the subset analysis of BRCA1/2 wild type (wt) demonstrated more significant overall survival benefit in VF (n = 7) median OS not reached vs. AF (n = 7) 5.2 months (HR 0.12, one-sided p 0.015). Conclusions: The combination of Vigil immunotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab in recurrent OvC demonstrated safety and suggest a lower toxicity profile and a significant OS advantage in recurrent BRCA1/2-wt OvC patients treated with Vigil first followed by the combination of Vigil and Atezolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT03073525 . [Table: see text]

IMPORTANCE: There is an unmet medical need for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, and new approaches are needed to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. OBJECTIVE: This phase 1/2 study evaluated the activity of alisertib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with breast (phase 1) and ovarian cancer (phase 1 and phase 2). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An open-label phase 1 and randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted from April 16, 2010, for phase 1 and March 28, 2012, to August 12, 2013, for phase 2 was conducted at 33 sites (United States, France, and Poland). Data are reported from a cutoff date of August 12, 2014, with a median duration of follow-up of 7.2 months in the alisertib plus paclitaxel arm and 4.6 months in the paclitaxel arm. A total of 191 women with advanced breast (phase 1 only) or recurrent ovarian cancer were enrolled, including 142 patients randomized to alisertib plus paclitaxel (n = 73) or paclitaxel alone (n = 69) in the phase 2 study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1 stratified by platinum-free interval (refractory, 0-6 months, 6-12 months) and prior weekly taxane treatment (yes, no) to receive alisertib 40 mg twice per day orally and 3 days on and 4 days off for 3 weeks, plus paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2) intravenously, days 1, 8, and 15), or weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) intravenously in 28-day cycles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary endpoint was PFS; primary efficacy analysis and safety analysis used modified intention to treat (mITT) population (all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug). RESULTS: The median age for the 191 patients enrolled in phase 1 was 59 (range, 29-75) years. The median age for the 142 patients enrolled in phase 2 was 63 (range, 30-81) years for patients receiving alisertib plus paclitaxel and 61 (range, 41-81) years for patients receiving paclitaxel. At data cutoff, 107 (75%) patients had a documented PFS event; 52 (71%) in the alisertib plus paclitaxel arm, and 55 (80%) in the paclitaxel arm. Median PFS was 6.7 months with alisertib plus paclitaxel vs 4.7 months with paclitaxel (HR, 0.75; 80% CI, 0.58-0.96; P = .14; 2-sided P value cutoff = .20 to be considered worthy of further investigation). Drug-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 63 (86%) vs 14 (20%) patients in the alisertib plus paclitaxel and paclitaxel arms, including 56 (77%) vs 7 (10%) neutropenia, 18 (25%) vs 0 stomatitis, and 10 (14%) vs 2 (3%) anemia; 54 (74%) vs 17 (25%) had adverse events leading to dose reductions. Two patients died during the study (1 in each arm); neither death was considered related to study drug. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The primary endpoint, PFS, significantly favored alisertib plus paclitaxel over paclitaxel alone. Further investigation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01091428

Purpose There is a growing demand for BRCA1/ 2 mutation ( BRCAm) testing in patients with ovarian cancer; however, the limited number of genetic counselors presents a potential barrier. To facilitate more widespread BRCAm testing in ovarian cancer, pretest counseling by the oncology team could shorten testing turnaround times and ease the pressure on genetic counselors. Patients and Methods The prospective, observational Evaluating a Streamlined Onco-genetic BRCA Testing and Counseling Model Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer (ENGAGE) study evaluated a streamlined, oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway. The analysis population comprised 700 patients with ovarian cancer at 26 sites in the United States, Italy, and Spain. The primary objectives were to assess turnaround time and, using questionnaires, to evaluate stakeholder satisfaction (patients, oncologists, and geneticists or genetic counselors) with the oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway. Results The median overall turnaround time was 9.1 weeks (range, 0.9 to 37.1 weeks), with median turnaround times in the United States, Italy, and Spain of 4.1 weeks (range, 0.9 to 37.1 weeks), 20.4 weeks (range, 2.9 to 35.4 weeks), and 12.0 weeks (range, 2.0 to 36.7 weeks), respectively. Patient satisfaction with the oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway was high, with > 99% of patients expressing satisfaction with pre- and post- BRCAm test counseling. Oncologist satisfaction with the BRCAm testing pathway was also high, with > 80% agreeing that the process for performing BRCAm testing worked well and that counseling patients on BRCAm testing was an efficient use of their time. Oncologists expressed higher levels of satisfaction with the BRCAm testing pathway than did geneticists or genetic counselors. Conclusion The results of the ENGAGE study demonstrate that an oncologist-led BRCAm testing process is feasible in ovarian cancer. Development of local BRCAm testing guidelines similar to the one used in this study could allow faster treatment decisions and better use of resources in the management of patients with ovarian cancer.

Glycan-binding proteins (GBPs) play critical roles in diverse cellular functions such as cell adhesion, signal transduction and immune response. Studies of the interaction between GBPs and glycans have been hampered by the availability of high throughput and high-content technologies. Here we report multiplex glycan bead array (MGBA) that allows simultaneous analyses of 384 samples and up to 500 glycans in a single assay. The specificity, sensitivity and reproducibility of MGBA are evaluated using 39 plant lectins, 13 recombinant anti-glycan antibodies, and mammalian GBPs. We demonstrate the utility of this platform by the analyses of natural anti-glycan IgM and IgG antibodies in 961 human serum samples and the discovery of anti-glycan antibody biomarkers for ovarian cancer. Our data indicate that the MGBA platform is particularly suited for large population-based studies that require the analyses of large numbers of samples and glycans., The low throughput or content of current methods for the analysis of glycans-glycan binding proteins (GBPs) interactions hampers their clinical applications. Here, the authors conjugate synthesized glycans to Luminex beads to detect GBPs and apply it for the discovery of ovarian cancer biomarkers.

Objective Patients with endometrial carcinoma who progress after first-line chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors are investigational treatment options in this setting. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the PI3K inhibitor pilaralisib (SAR245408; XL147) in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Methods This Phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study enrolled patients with histologically confirmed advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, who had received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients received pilaralisib 600mg capsules or 400mg tablets once daily. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), proportion of patients with progression-free survival (PFS) >6months and safety. Molecular profiling in archival tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA were performed to identify molecular markers associated with response or resistance to pilaralisib. Results 67 patients were enrolled, of which 50 and 17 patients had received one or two prior regimens, respectively. Complete or partial tumor responses occurred in two patients each (ORR 6.0%); three had tumors with normal PTEN expression and PIK3R1 mutations and one had a tumor with PTEN protein deficiency. However, there was no association between molecular alterations and clinical activity. Rate of PFS>6months was 11.9%. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were rash (40.3%), diarrhea (37.3%) and fatigue (28.4%). The most commonly reported treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs were rash (9.0%), diarrhea (4.5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (4.5%). Conclusions Pilaralisib was associated with a favorable safety profile and minimal antitumor activity in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.