Search

Your search keyword '"Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969))"' showing total 10 results
Start Over Descriptor "Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969))"
10 results on '"Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969))"'

1. Welfare migration to capture higher benefits: fact or fiction?

Author

Talesh, Shauhin A.

Subjects
Welfare recipients -- Location, Welfare -- Laws, regulations and rules, Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969)), Saenz v. Roe (119 S. Ct. 1518 (1999)), Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
Published
2000

3. Penalizing the poor: durational residency requirements for welfare benefits.

Author

Donahue, David A.

Subjects
Domicile -- Laws, regulations and rules, Poor -- Laws, regulations and rules, Travel -- Laws, regulations and rules, Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969)), United States. Office of Family Assistance. Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program -- Laws, regulations and rules
Published
1998

5. 'Rational basis with a bite': a retreat from the constitutional right to travel.

Author

Nixon, Bryce

Subjects
Freedom of movement -- Laws, regulations and rules, Welfare recipients -- Laws, regulations and rules, Domicile in public welfare -- Laws, regulations and rules, Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969)), Saenz v. Roe (119 S. Ct. 1518 (1999)), Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
Published
2000

6. 'Unconscionable' conditions: a contractual analysis of conditions on public assistance benefits.

Author

Bogle, Charles R.

Subjects
Welfare -- Laws, regulations and rules, Contracts, Unconscionable -- Laws, regulations and rules, Welfare -- Distribution, Constitutional law -- Interpretation and construction, Sherbert v. Verner (374 U.S. 398 (1963)), Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969)), Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C. 2-302)
Abstract

The doctrine of unconscionable conditions has been too narrowly applied by the US Supreme Court to conditions placed on the receipt of public assistance benefits, and courts need to consider that governments have the power to abridge constitutional rights by withholding public funds. The Court and commentators have focused on the ability of criminal sanctions to limit the exercise of rights without considering the pervasiveness of government regulation in the economic realm. An expanded unconscionability doctrine can check such power and require compelling government interests.

Published
1994

8. More equal than others: the Burger court and the newly arrived state resident.

Author

Katz, Katheryn D.

Subjects
State government, Equality before the law, Zobel v. Williams (457 U.S. 55 (1982)), Hooper v. Bernalillo County Assessor (472 U.S. 612 (1985)), Attorney General v. Soto-Lopez (476 U.S. 898 (1986)), Edwards v. California (314 U.S. 160 (1941)), Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969)), Department of Agriculture v. Moreno (413 U.S. 528 (1973))
Published
1989

9. Legality and empathy.

Author

Henderson, Lynne N.

Subjects
Law -- Social aspects, Emotions -- Usage, Empathy -- Usage, Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (347 U.S. 483 (1954)), Shapiro v. Thompson (394 U.S. 618 (1969)), Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113 (1973)), Bowers v. Hardwick (106 S. Ct. 2841 (1986))
Published
1987

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results