Search

Purpose: This article is devoted to scientific and theoretical research of modern system of principles for ad-ministrative procedural law in updated conditions of the Ukrainian state development, based on the needs of qualitative provision and realization of legal rights, freedoms and interests of natural and legal persons, in the sphere of public and legal relations. Main content: The author analyzed the administrative law regulations, and the doctrine of administrative proce-dural law as for determining nature and significance of the basic principles, which define the nature, structure, social orientation, and basic properties of legal regulation of this branch of law, and which on the other side create appropriate organizational and functional conditions for administrative procedural activities. Methodology: Materials and methods for research were based on the analysis of documentary sources. The basis is the dialectical method of cognition of the facts of social reality, on which the formal legal and compa-rative legal approaches are largely based. Conclusions: The principles of administrative procedural law can be divided into those that directly reflect the specifics and content of this branch of law, determine its features, purpose, objectives and intention, as well as administrative procedural principles, i.e., basic principles enshrined in administrative procedural law, which do not undergo significant changes, nor determine the nature and content of the activities of all subjects of administrative procedural legal relations., Objetivo: Este artigo é dedicado à pesquisa científica e teórica do moderno sistema de princípios do direito processual administrativo em condições atualizadas do desenvolvimento do Estado ucraniano, com base nas necessidades de provisão qualitativa e realização dos direitos, liberdades e interesses legais de pessoas físi-cas e jurídicas, na esfera das relações públicas e jurídicas. Conteúdo principal: O autor analisou os regulamentos de direito administrativo, e a doutrina de direito processual administrativo quanto à determinação da natureza e significado dos princípios básicos, que definem a natureza, estrutura, orientação social e propriedades básicas da regulamentação jurídica deste ramo do direito, e que por outro lado criam condições organizacionais e funcionais apropriadas para as atividades processuais administrativas. Metodologia: Os materiais e métodos de pesquisa foram baseados na análise de fontes documentais. A base é o método dialético de conhecimento dos fatos da realidade social, no qual as abordagens jurídicas formais e jurídicas comparativas se baseiam em grande parte. Conclusões: Os princípios do direito processual administrativo podem ser divididos naqueles que refletem diretamente as especificidades e o conteúdo deste ramo do direito, determinam suas características, finalidade, objetivos e intenção, bem como os princípios procedimentais administrativos, ou seja, princípios básicos consagrados no direito processual administrativo, que não sofrem alterações significativas, nem determinam a natureza e o conteúdo das atividades de todos os sujeitos das relações jurídicas procedimentais administrativas., Objetivo: este artículo está dedicado a la investigación científica y teórica del sistema moderno de principios para el derecho procesal administrativo en las condiciones actualizadas del desarrollo del estado ucraniano, basado en las necesidades de la provisión cualitativa y la realización de los derechos legales, las libertades y los intereses de las personas físicas y jurídicas, en la esfera de las relaciones públicas y legales. Contenido principal: el autor analizó las normas de derecho administrativo, y la doctrina del derecho procesal administrativo en cuanto a la determinación de la naturaleza y el significado de los principios básicos, que definen la naturaleza, la estructura, la orientación social, y las propiedades básicas de la regulación jurídica de esta rama del derecho, y que por otro lado crean condiciones organizativas y funcionales adecuadas para las actividades de procedimiento administrativo. Metodología: los materiales y métodos de investigación se basaron en el análisis de fuentes documentales. La base es el método dialéctico de conocimiento de los hechos de la realidad social, en el que se basan en gran medida los enfoques jurídicos formales y jurídicos comparados. Conclusiones: los principios del derecho procesal administrativo pueden dividirse en aquellos que reflejan directamente las especificidades y el contenido de esta rama del derecho, determinan sus características, finalidad, objetivos e intención, así como los principios procesales administrativos, es decir, los principios bá-sicos consagrados en el derecho procesal administrativo, que no sufren cambios significativos, ni determinan la naturaleza y el contenido de las actividades de todos los sujetos de las relaciones jurídicas procesales administrativas.

Combating corruption offenses is one of the priorities of public policy not only in Ukraine but also in many foreign countries. The object of the study is the criminal law measures to combat and resistance corruption in Ukraine and some foreign countries. In carrying out this research, a comparative legal method is widely used. This method allows for a two-level analysis (empirical and theoretical) of legal systems of Ukraine and some foreign countries in terms of combating corruption by criminal law means. It also allows identify regularities of development of the criminal legislation of several countries and to establish correlation with the international standards of counteraction and prevention of a corruption criminal offense. During the conducted research it is revealed some disadvantages and advantages of Ukrainian legislation in terms of criminal law supply of effective means of preventing and combating corruption in Ukraine, it is found that modern criminal law of Ukraine meets international standards of anti-corruption policy generally, but there are some disadvantages in terms of unambiguous understanding of the elements of compositions of criminal corruption offenses, definition of terminological features, lack of a single conceptual approach within the legislative regulations at the level of criminal law and legislation.

The aim of the research is to reveal political and legal aspects at international level in the field of citizens’ participation in the fight against crime. Attention is paid to the most common forms of public participation: patrolling; provide information on criminals or criminal acts committed; participation in anti-corruption measures; assistance in the resocialization of offenders; aiding victims of crime; strengthening the security of one’s own property; participation in information on anti-criminal measures. Methodologically it is a documentary research. In conclusion, the benefits of public participation in crime prevention, based on international crime prevention, can be divided into two groups: basic and additional. The main advantages are reduction of crime and delinquency; improve security in relevant areas of cities; reducing citizens’ fear of crime; strengthening the service function of the police forces in relation to the inhabitants of territorial communities; improve police partnerships with the public., El objetivo de la investigación es revelar aspectos políticos y legales en el plano internacional en el campo de la participación de los ciudadanos en la lucha contra el delito. Se presta atención a las formas más comunes de participación pública: patrullaje; proporcionar información sobre criminales o hechos de delitos cometidos; participación en medidas anticorrupción; asistencia en la resocialización de delincuentes; brindar asistencia a las víctimas de delitos; fortalecer la seguridad de la propiedad propia; participación en la información sobre medidas anticriminales. Metodológicamente se trata de una investigación documental. A modo de conclusión, en cuanto a los beneficios de la participación pública en la prevención del delito, basada en la práctica internacional en este ámbito, se pueden dividir en dos grupos: básicos y adicionales. Las principales ventajas son: reducción del crimen y la delincuencia; mejorar la seguridad en áreas relevantes de las ciudades; reducir el miedo de los ciudadanos a la delincuencia; fortalecer la función de servicio de los cuerpos policiales en relación con los habitantes de las comunidades territoriales; mejorar las asociaciones de la policía con el público.