Search

Background: Anastomotic suturing is the Achilles heel of pancreatic surgery. Especially in laparoscopic and robotically assisted surgery, the pancreatic anastomosis should first be trained outside the operating room. Realistic training models are therefore needed. Methods: Models of the pancreas, small bowel, stomach, bile duct, and a realistic training torso were developed for training of anastomoses in pancreatic surgery. Pancreas models with soft and hard textures, small and large ducts were incrementally developed and evaluated. Experienced pancreatic surgeons (n = 44) evaluated haptic realism, rigidity, fragility of tissues, and realism of suturing and knot tying. Results: In the iterative development process the pancreas models showed high haptic realism and highest realism in suturing (4.6 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 0.5 on 1–5 Likert scale, soft pancreas). The small bowel model showed highest haptic realism (4.8 ± 0.4) and optimal wall thickness (0.1 ± 0.4 on −2 to +2 Likert scale) and suturing behavior (0.1 ± 0.4). The bile duct models showed optimal wall thickness (0.3 ± 0.8 and 0.4 ± 0.8 on −2 to +2 Likert scale) and optimal tissue fragility (0 ± 0.9 and 0.3 ± 0.7). Conclusion: The biotissue training models showed high haptic realism and realistic suturing behavior. They are suitable for realistic training of anastomoses in pancreatic surgery which may improve patient outcomes.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most prevalent cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with a fatality rate equal to its incidence rate. Pancreatic cancer is a rare malignancy with a global incidence and death ranking of 14th and 7th, respectively. Pancreatic cancer cases are divided into three categories without metastatic disease: resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced disease. The category is determined by the tumor's location in the pancreas and whether it is abutting or encasing the adjacent arteries and/or vein/s.The stage of disease and the location of the primary tumor determine the clinical presentation: the pancreatic head, neck, or uncinate process, the body or tail, or multifocal disease. Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and follow-up of pancreatic cancers. Various imaging modalities available for pancreatic imaging are ultrasonography (USG), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 18-fluoro-deoxy glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET).Even though surgical resection is possible in both resectable and borderline resectable non-metastatic cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy has become the standard practice for borderline resectable cases as it gives a high yield of R0 resection.

This study aimed to see the impact of FDG PET/CT with somatostatin receptor PET (SSTR PET) in directing the treatment plan in lower-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with Ki67 index ≤5%.Sixty-three NET cases with Ki67 index ≤5% with both FDG PET and SSTR PET ( 68 Ga-DOTANOC PET) were included for this retrospective observational study. FDG PET findings were classified into positive, weakly positive, and negative based on a visual scale. Clinical factors considered while referring for FDG PET scan were audited from electronic medical records. The addition of chemotherapy was considered as FDG-directed change in treatment.Sixty patients showed intense SSTR expression in the primary and metastatic sites (if present). Three patients showed no evidence of SSTR expression, in whom the scans were done after resection of the primary tumor. The FDG PET was positive in 25 (39.6%), weakly positive in 11 (17.4%), and negative in 27 (42.8%). Specific clinical reason for doing FDG PET was found in 34 patients, and in the remaining 29, there was no justification or specific indication for doing the FDG study; 73.5% of patients from the former group was either FDG positive or weakly positive, and 26.5% were negative; in the other group, 62.1% were FDG-negative, and 37.9% were positive ( P = 0.004). Treatment-naive patients with symptom duration of ≤5 months were associated with more FDG positivity than patients with5 months' symptom duration ( P = 0.006). FDG PET/CT led to change in management in 17.4% of all the patients, 9.6% of grade 1, and 25% of grade 2 patients.In lower-grade NET, FDG positivity was seen in a sizable number of the cases, and this led to change in management in 17.4% of the cases. Specific clinical features could be utilized to successfully discriminate between FDG-avid and non-FDG-avid disease in lower-grade NETs, and this had impact in management change as well.

Aim This study aimed to assess the impact of treatment sequencing on long-term survival, in distal gastric cancers (GCs) (stage IB/II/III). Methods This retrospective study included patients with distal GC undergoing D2 resection. Outcomes were compared between group 1 (surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy) and group 2 (perioperative chemotherapy with surgery). 1:1 matching for baseline characteristics (age, cT, and cN stage) was performed for outcome comparison. Results At a median follow-up of 47.5 months in the included 342 patients, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 61.1% and disease-free survival (DFS) was 50.5%. OS was comparable in the unmatched (group 1, n = 118; group 2, n = 224) (HR 0.905, 95%CI 0.64–1.33, P = 0.615) and matched groups (group 1, n = 97; group 2, n = 97) (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48–1.26, P = 0.3). Conclusion D2 resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy provides similar long-term outcomes as compared to perioperative chemotherapy approach for stage IB/II/III distal GCs.

Cancer is an increasing global public health burden. Lately, more emphasis has emerged on the importance of heredity in cancer, mostly driven by the introduction of germline genetic variants–directed therapeutics. It is true that 40% of cancer risk is attributed to modifiable environmental and lifestyle factors; still, 16% of cancers could be heritable, accounting for 2.9 of the 18.1 million cases diagnosed worldwide. At least two third of those will be diagnosed in countries with limited resources—low- and middle-income countries, especially where high rates of consanguine marriage and early age at diagnosis are already prevalent. Both are hallmarks of hereditary cancer. This creates a new opportunity for prevention, early detection, and recently therapeutic intervention. However, this opportunity is challenged by many obstacles along the path to addressing germline testing in patients with cancer in the clinic worldwide. Global collaboration and expertise exchange are important to bridge the knowledge gap and facilitate practical implementation. Adapting existing guidelines and prioritization according to local resources are essential to address the unique needs and overcome the unique barriers of each society.

Purpose: We present a novel surgical strategy with a “Top-Down approach”, followed by “Retro mesenteric caudocranial SMA 1st approach” in posteriorly placed locally advanced pancreatic head cancer with combined SMA/SMV (Superior mesenteric vein) involvement along with invasion of Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) (Case details in Video 1). Methods & Results: The surgical strategy included Cattell Braasch manoeuvre followed by early pancreatic neck transection. In cases with combined SMA and SMV involvement, often SMV resection and anastomosis is required first before dealing with SMA involvement, depending on the extent and location of vascular involvement. The purpose is dual; to minimize the venous clamp duration and to get a good access for SMA dissection and clearance of the triangle area. Then the SMA is approached from retro mesenteric area and caudocranial SMA divestment was performed, as the SMA wall was uninvolved. Finally, the involved anterior wall of IVC was resected en bloc and the IVC defect was reconstructed by peritoneal patch. Unlike the conventional methods, retro mesenteric approach allows dissection from the dorsal and peripheral sides of the SMA, allowing direct access to the jejunal branches and inferior pancreaticoduodenal arteries from the caudal aspect of SMA. It also allows adequate dissection of peripancreatic and para-aortic nodes along with peripancreatic nerve plexus resection and peri-arterial divestment of SMA in locally advanced tumours. This approach also provides optimal access to the retroperitoneum allowing for posterior mesopancreatic dissection. (2-4) Conclusion: The sequential approach addresses the multilevel vascular involvement in sequential manner and allows for a margin negative resection, minimal tumour handling and less blood loss in a difficult scenario. (Videos 1 & 2)

Localized mesothelioma is a rare disease with very few reports of presentation in visceral organs. We report a case of localized gastric mesothelioma with lymph node metastasis in a 32-year-old man without asbestos exposure. A failed attempt at resection was made before presentation at another center. He was given perioperative chemotherapy that was followed by a D2 radical subtotal gastrectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Histopathology showed epithelioid mesothelioma with nodal metastasis but without visceral peritoneal involvement. Cytoreductive surgery and regional chemotherapy are standard in diffuse mesothelioma. Management of localized mesothelioma is anecdotal; however aggressive surgery plays a central role with selective use of perioperative chemotherapy.

Standard pancreatic resections (SPRs) might have long-term deleterious effects on pancreatic function, without added oncological advantage in low malignant potential (LMP) or benign neoplasms. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes following organ-preserving pancreatic resections (OPPARs) and SPRs.Post hoc analysis of patients undergoing OPPAR or SPR for benign or LMP pancreatic tumors from January 2011 to January 2020 at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai.Thirty-six and 114 patients were identified in OPPAR and SPR groups respectively. The overall morbidity (58.3% vs 43.9%, p-0.129) was comparable. Major morbidity (41.7% vs 21.9%, p-0.020), post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (63.9% vs 35.1%, p-0.002), and clinically relevant POPF (41.7% vs 20.2%, p-0.010) were significantly higher with OPPAR. Post-operative endocrine insufficiency (14.9% vs 11.1%, p-0.567), exocrine insufficiency (19.3% vs 0%, p-0.004), and requirement of long-term pancreatic enzyme replacement (17.5% vs 0%, p-0.007) were higher in SPRs. Comparing left-sided and right-sided resections in the entire cohort, incidence of endocrine insufficiency was 17.1% vs 11.2% (p-0.299) and that of exocrine insufficiency was 8.6% vs 20% (p-0.048) respectively.OPPAR is associated with high post-operative major morbidity and pancreatic fistula rate but offers long-term benefit due to better preservation of pancreatic function than SPR. The incidence of exocrine insufficiency is higher in right sided as compared to left-sided pancreatic resections.

Frozen Sections (FS) are used to assess margins, for staging, and primary diagnosis. FS guide intraoperative treatment decisions in oncological gastro-intestinal tract surgeries and further management of the patients.To analyze the distribution, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of frozen sections in gastrointestinal pathology in our institution during the period of 3 years (2016-2018).This study was an audit to determine the accuracy of FS reports by comparing them with the paraffin section (PS) reports. The FS diagnoses and their PS diagnoses were noted in 1704 gastrointestinal surgeries during the period from 2016 to 2018. Discrepancies were noted and slides of discrepant cases were reviewed to determine the cause. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated using the standard formulae.Out of 1704 cases, correct diagnosis on frozen section was made in 1649 cases (96.77%), 20 (1.17%) were deferred cases, and 35 (2.05%) were discrepant cases. The commonest discrepancies were seen in the primary diagnosis of the gall bladder and gastrectomy margins. The commonest causes for discrepancies were interpretation errors and technical errors. Sensitivity was 91.71%, specificity was 99.69%, positive predictive value was 98.84%, negative predictive value was 97.68%, and accuracy was 97.92%.FS diagnosis is a reliable guide to surgeons for intraoperative management. Studying deep cuts and careful sampling at frozen sections will help reduce discrepancies.

There is limited real-world data on the efficacy of 2-weekly cycles of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FLOT) compared to epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOX) as perioperative therapy in esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EGAC).The data of 611 patients with EGAC treated with perioperative chemotherapy and planned for curative resection between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrieved. Patients receiving EOX and a dose-modified version of FLOT (mFLOT) were evaluated. A 1:1 matching, using age, tumour location, signet ring histology, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, without replacement was performed by using nearest neighbour matching method. The primary endpoint of the study was 3-year event-free survival (EFS).A total of 593 patients (261 with EOX and 332 with mFLOT) were matched. One hundred and nighty-eight patients (76%) and 285 patients (86%) in the EOX and mFLOT cohorts underwent curative resection, respectively (p = 0.002). With a median follow-up of 35 and 53 months, respectively, the primary outcome of 3-year EFS was statistically superior in patients receiving mFLOT as compared to the EOX regimen (60% vs. 39%; p 0.001). There was a greater incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia (neoadjuvant: 18% vs. 2%; p 0.001, adjuvant: 18% vs. 1%; p = 0.001) and febrile neutropenia (neoadjuvant: 8% vs. 1.1%; p 0.001, adjuvant: 6% vs. 0; p = 0.001) with mFLOT.mFLOT is associated with improved resection rates and survival in comparison to EOX as perioperative therapy in gastric adenocarcinomas in this large real-world cohort, with manageable increase in clinically relevant toxicities such as grade 3 and grade 4 febrile neutropenia and neutropenia.

Most pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (p-NETs) have a sporadic occurrence and less than 10% form a part of various familial syndromes. Broadly, they can be classified as functional and non-functional tumours, based on the presence or absence of hormone secretion. Biological aggressiveness of p-NETs is determined by their degree of differentiation and rate of proliferation, and they are graded as per the World Health Organization’s classification into three grades (G1, G2, and G3). For evaluation and accurate staging of p-NETs, functional imaging has become an integral part of work-up and also guides treatment planning. Treatment decisions largely depend on the patient’s functional status and symptoms, the histological grade and size of the lesions, and the presence or absence of metastatic disease. Treatment options for p-NETs range from curative surgery to observation with close follow-up to palliation and medical therapies, including somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), chemotherapy, and targeted treatments.

pN3 or ypN3 stage gastric cancers (GCs) are known to have aggressive clinical behaviour. This study aimed to investigate factors affecting survival and pattern of recurrences of N3 stage GCs, treated with curative intent. A total of 196 GC patients, operated on at the Tata Memorial Centre from 2003 to 2017 and reported as pN3 or ypN3 status on histopathology after D2 gastrectomy were included in this retrospective analysis. On multivariate analysis, use of NACT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and LN ratio (≤ 0.5/> 0.5) emerged as significant predictors for long-term survival. Patients who received NACT but were still harbouring N3 nodes (ypN3; n = 102) had a worse prognosis than those operated on upfront (pN3; n = 94), with a median survival of 19 months versus 24 months respectively (p = 0.003). The 5-year overall survival of the entire cohort was 16.3% (95% CI 12.8–19.8%), while 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 14.6% (95% CI 12.6–20%). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, though offered in a small number of patients (n = 38) resulted in improvement in DFS. Median DFS of adjuvant CT versus adjuvant CRT was 13 months versus 23 months (p = 0.020). The commonest site of relapse was the peritoneum (49.18%) and incidence of isolated loco-regional failure was 10.7%. In GCs with N3 stage determined after radical D2 gastrectomy, LN ratio of > 0.5 and ypN3 status are predictors of poor prognosis. Considering the high incidence of peritoneal and loco-regional relapse in these patients, the role of more radical surgery, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after upfront resection and intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be evaluated in prospective randomized clinical trials.

Purpose: To understand the actual impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and frame the future strategies, we conducted a pan India survey to study the impact on the surgical management of gastrointestinal cancers.Methods: A national multicentre survey in the form of a questionnaire from 16 tertiary care gastrointestinal oncology centres across India was conducted from January 2019 to June 2021 that was divided into a 15-month pre-Covid era and a similar period of active Covid pandemic era.Results: There was significant disruption of services; 13 (81%) centres worked as dedicated Covid care centres and 43% reported suspension of essential care for more than 6 months. In active Covid phase there was a 14.5% decrease in registrations and proportion of decrease was highest in the centres from South zone (22%). There was decrease in resections across all organ systems; maximum reduction was noted in hepatic resections (33%) followed by esophageal and gastric resections (31 and 25% respectively). There was minimal decrease in colorectal resections (5%). A total of 584 (7.1%) patients had either active Covid-19 infection or developed infection in the post-operative period or had recovered from Covid-19 infection. Only 3(18%) centres reported higher morbidity, while rest of the centres reported similar or lower morbidity rates when compared to pre-Covid phase; however 6 (37%) centres reported slightly higher mortality in the active Covid phase.Conclusion: Covid -19 pandemic resulted in significant reduction is new cancer registrations and elective gastrointestinal cancer surgeries. Perioperative morbidity remained similar despite 7.1% perioperative Covid -19 exposure.

The term “incidental gallbladder cancer” (IGBC) includes patients detected during or after cholecystectomy as an intraoperative or histological surprise. Overall, 0.25–3.0% of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be incidentally detected to harbor GBC. Aggressive re-resection with or without systemic therapy offers the only chance for cure. Patients should undergo thorough staging assessment prior to re-resection. All resectable patients with pTb disease and beyond should be offered revision surgery. Timing of surgery, role of minimally invasive surgery, radiotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in IGBC are still being evaluated and await further evidence. Minimally invasive surgery for IGBC is technically feasible however it is not recommended as a routine. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients with pT2 disease and beyond and node-positive status. Margin-positive patients may benefit with adjuvant radiation in addition to chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant therapy in IGBC is evolving and selective use in high-risk patients (T3, T4, N1) should be considered in the setting of a clinical study.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer and is a leading cause of death. In addition to the hypercoagulable state associated with malignancy, cancer-related surgery and subsequent immobilization further increase the risk of VTE. Guidelines suggest extended prophylaxis up to 4 weeks with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in such patients. This study is conducted to determine the proportion of patients receiving thromboprophylaxis among those undergoing surgery for malignant abdominal or pelvic tumor. This prospective, multicenter, observational study included 300 patients (217 [72.3%] were women). Mean age and duration of cancer were 53.2 and 1.2 years, respectively. A total of 162 (54%) patients received thromboprophylaxis of which only pharmacological in 78 [48.1%], only mechanical in 27 [16.7%], and both pharmacological and mechanical in 57 [35.2%] patients. LMWH (128, 79.0%) and graduated compression stockings (74, 45.7%) were the commonly used modalities. VTE prophylaxis was given in only half of the patients. Physician education to increase adherence to international guidelines is very important. Trial Registration No. CTRI/2013/05/003617. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-021-01281-0.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neoadjuvant setting in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). In addition, we also evaluated the variables associated with resectability of the primary following PRRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57 GEP-NETs with unresectable primary due to vascular involvement as defined using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria given for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), who underwent 177Lu-DOTATATE without any prior surgery were included in this study. GEP-NETs were divided into two groups: Group1-without liver metastases (n = 23 patients) and Group2- with potentially resectable liver metastases (n = 34 patients). 177Lu-DOTATATE was administered with mixed amino acid-based renal protection with dose of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per cycle. Evaluation of surgical resectability following PRRT was done by using tri-phasic computed tomography (CT) imaging. Overall PRRT response was evaluated under four broad categories. The Kaplan–Meier product-limit method was used to calculate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Associations between variables and resectable primary after PRRT were analyzed by using Chi-square test at significant P value less than 0.05. RESULTS: Following 177Lu-DOTATATE, unresectable primary became resectable in 15 out of 57 (26.3%) patients {7 patients in group-1 and 8 patients in group-2}. Response (complete response and partial response) to PRRT was seen in 48 patients (84%), 23 patients (40%), 18 patients (31%) and 23 patients (40%) on symptomatic, biochemical, molecular imaging and anatomical imaging response evaluation criteria respectively. Estimated rates of PFS were 95% and 90% at 2 years in group1 and group2 patients respectively. The 2-years OS of combined both groups was 92.1%. Higher rate of resectable primary following PRRT was found in duodenal NET, GEP-NETs with absent regional lymph node involvement, size of primary

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is increasingly performed worldwide; however, the surgical anatomy required to safely perform MIDP has not yet been fully considered. This review evaluated the literature concerning peripancreatic vascular anatomy, which is considered important to conduct safe MIDP. METHODS A database search of PubMed and Ichushi (Japanese) was conducted. Qualified studies investigating the anatomical variations of peripancreatic vessels related to MIDP were evaluated using SIGN methodology. RESULTS Of 701 articles yielded by our search strategy, 76 articles were assessed in this systematic review. The important vascular anatomy required to recognize MIDP included the pancreatic parenchymal coverage on the root and the running course of the splenic artery, branching patterns of the splenic artery, confluence positions of the left gastric vein and the inferior mesenteric vein, forms of pancreatic veins including the centro-inferior pancreatic vein, characteristics of the left renal vein, and collateral routes perfusing the spleen following Warshaw's technique. Very few articles evaluating the relationship between the anatomical variations and surgical outcomes of MIDP were found. CONCLUSIONS The precise knowledge of peripancreatic vessels is important to adequately complete MIDP. More detailed anatomic analyses and descriptions will benefit surgeons and their patients who are facing these operations.

Introduction Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an anatomic variation due to aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein. In this article, we present a case report with a systematic review of literature of patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery with associated PAP. We also intend to discuss and suggest possible surgical strategies to minimise major postoperative complications. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using the terms “circumportal,” “periportal,” “pancreas,” “annular pancreas,” “portal annular pancreas” and “pancreas anomaly.” All articles describing portal annular pancreas with surgical resection were included. Results We identified a total of 53 patients of PAP from 29 articles, who underwent pancreatic resection with a median age of 65 years. POPF (postoperative pancreatic fistula) was demonstrated in 42.55% of patients and 34% had CR (clinically relevant)-POPF. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stump was reconstructed in all patients with either pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy. Standard line of pancreatic transection, i.e., division of anteportal portion at the pancreatic neck and stapling of the retroportal process, resulted in 71% incidence of CR-POPF, whereas it was only 16% when extended resection was performed to achieve single pancreatic stump and 12.5% when retroportal portion was sutured or ligated. Amongst distal pancreatic resections, 66% had POPF and 33% developed CR-POPF. Conclusion It is of utmost importance for pancreatic surgeons to diligently look for and identify PAP in the preoperative imaging. Additional imaging in the form of MRCP helps to define abnormal pancreatic ductal anatomy. Surgeons need to be cognisant of pancreatic stump management in patients with PAP to reduce associated higher rates of POPF.

This study compares the short- and long-term outcomes between the left thoraco-abdominal and trans-abdominal approaches for radical resection of adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) (Siewert types II and III) following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients from May 2008 to December 2016. Demographic variables, perioperative outcomes, and survival were compared between two approaches. Of the 792 patients, who underwent total/proximal gastrectomy during the specified time interval, 162 had Siewert’s type II/III lesions, of which 147 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were included in the study. Ninety-two and 55 patients underwent definitive surgery through trans-abdominal and left thoraco-abdominal approach respectively. On baseline endoscopy, 81.8% of patients in the left thoraco-abdominal group had lower esophageal mucosal infiltration as compared to 41.3% in the trans-abdominal group (p < 0.001). Both groups were comparable in terms of duration of surgery, blood loss, complications, severity of complications (Clavien-Dindo grade), duration of hospital stay, R0 resection rate, length of proximal margin, and lymph node yield. At a median follow-up of 24 months, there was no difference in recurrence rate and survival between the groups. Both left thoraco-abdominal and trans-abdominal are comparable surgical approaches for tumors involving the GEJ in terms of morbidity, perioperative, and long-term oncological outcomes. In patients with lower esophageal involvement, the left thoraco-abdominal approach is a feasible alternative with no added overall morbidity or mortality and can be preferred especially in cases, where a safe proximal margin and anastomosis is deemed technically challenging.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak has placed unprecedented challenges globally dismantling healthcare systems and forcing rapid transformations of healthcare services. In patients with cancer, these changes are having profound effects on vital aspects of their care. It has been advised that hospitals discontinue elective surgery and work on triage of nonemergent surgical procedures during the pandemic. The purpose of this article is to highlight the recommendations and adapted workflow from the private and public tertiary level hospitals in India advising on the best practices and views on better patient management, redesigning of SOPs for OR, surgeon, and staff safety and resumption of cancer care especially from surgical perspective. Different concerns are addressed that are necessary to optimize the quality of care provided to COVID-19 patients and to reduce the risk of viral transmission to other patients or healthcare workers.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors but are most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. They are commonly seen in the stomach (60%) and small intestine (30%). GISTs are likely derived from the interstitial cells of Cajal or their stem cell precursors. They are best characterized by computerized tomography and have a specific staining pattern on immunohistochemistry, i.e., C-Kit and DOG-1. The treatment of GIST is based on the risk assessment for relapse, and patients with localized GIST require resection with or without adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM). Advanced unresectable tumors are usually treated with IM, with a number of further options available for patients post progression on IM. There is an increasing emphasis on identifying C-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha mutations in all patients with GIST, as these are driver mutations with current and future therapeutic implications.

The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term outcome of a “sandwich chemo-PRRT (SCPRRT)” regimen with regard to therapeutic response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with both somatostatin receptor (SSTR)– and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid aggressive disease. Additionally, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scales, clinical toxicity, and association of PFS and disease control rate (DCR) with various variables were also evaluated. A total of 38 patients of the aforementioned cohort, who received SCPRRT (at least 2 cycles of each PRRT and chemotherapy) at our institute between January 2012 and December 2018, were included and analyzed in this retrospective study. Between two cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), two cycles of oral capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) were sandwiched. Therapeutic responses following SCPRRT were assessed by using pre-defined criteria. PFS and OS after first SCPRRT were determined. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and Karnofsky score were used for evaluation of HRQoL before and after SCPPRT in all 38 patients. Any adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0) of the National Cancer Institute. Associations of PFS and DCR with various variables were evaluated. Response (complete response and partial response) to SCPRRT was seen in 28 patients (73%), 15 patients (39%), and 16 patients (42%) on symptomatic, biochemical, and molecular imaging response evaluation criteria respectively. A total of 17 patients (45%) had anatomical imaging response with DCR of 84% based upon the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Pre-therapy mean ECOG and KPS was 2.0 and 68, which changed to 1.0 and 75 respectively following SCPRRT. Long-term follow-up data was available and ranged from 12 to 65 months after the first SCPRRT. Median PFS and OS were not reached at a median follow-up of 36 months. An estimated PFS rate of 72.5% and OS rate of 80.4% was found at 36 months. Longer PFS was dependent upon high SSTR uptake and number of CAPTEM cycle (≥ 7 cycles), absence of skeletal metastasis, and no previous external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) exposure with significant P value. Higher DCR was dependent upon absence of skeletal metastasis with significant P value. SCPRRT was tolerated well with none developing grade 4 hematotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of any grade. Anemia (grade 3), thrombocytopenia (grade 3), and leukopenia (grade 3) were noticed in 1 patient (2.5%), 2 patients (5%), and 1 patient (2.5%) respectively in this study. Thus, favorable response rates with effective control of symptoms and longer PFS and OS without high-grade or life-threatening toxicities were important observations in the present study following SCPRRT in NET patients with aggressive, both FDG- and SSTR-avid, metastatic progressive disease. The study results indicate the potential role of “sandwich chemo-PRRT” in future therapeutic algorithms of aggressive, both SSTR- and FDG-positive subset of neuroendocrine tumors.

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has caused substantial disruptions in routine clinical care. Emerging data show that surgery in coronavirus disease (COVID)‐positive cases can be associated with worsening of clinical outcomes and increased postoperative mortality. Hence, preoperative COVID‐19 testing for all patients before elective surgery was implemented in our institution. Materials and Methods Two hundred and sixty‐two asymptomatic cancer patients were preoperatively tested for COVID‐19 using reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction technique with nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabbing. All negative patients were operated within 72 hours, and positive patients were quarantined for a minimum 14 days before re‐swabbing. Results In our cohort, 21 of 262 (8.0%) asymptomatic preoperative patients, who were otherwise fit for surgery, tested positive. After adequate quarantine and a negative follow‐up test report, 12 of 21 (57%) had an operation. No major postoperative morbidity due to COVID‐19 was noted during the immediate postoperative period before discharge from the hospital. Conclusion Routine preoperative COVID‐19 testing was successful in identifying asymptomatic viral carriers. There was no incidence of symptomatic COVID‐19 disease in the postoperative period, and there was no incidence of morbidity attributable to COVID‐19. These data suggested a beneficial role for mandatory preoperative COVID‐19 testing.

Background: the extent of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting response has varied globally. The European and African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA), the premier representative body for practicing HPB surgeons in Europe and Africa, conducted this survey to assess the impact of COVID-19 on HPB surgery. Methods: an online survey was disseminated to all E-AHPBA members to assess the effects of the pandemic on unit capacity, management of HPB cancers, use of COVID-19 screening and other aspects of service delivery. Results: overall, 145 (25%) members responded. Most units, particularly in COVID-high countries (>100,000 cases) reported insufficient critical care capacity and reduced HPB operating sessions compared to COVID-low countries. Delayed access to cancer surgery necessitated alternatives including increased neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer and colorectal liver metastases, and locoregional treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. Other aspects of service delivery including COVID-19 screening and personal protective equipment varied between units and countries. Conclusion: this study demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound adverse impact on the delivery of HPB cancer care across the continents of Europe and Africa. The findings illustrate the need for safe resumption of cancer surgery in a “new” normal world with screening of patients and staff for COVID-19., NA

Background: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery provides globally accepted definitions for reporting of complications after pancreatic surgery. This International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project aims to provide a standardized framework for reporting of the results of operative treatment for chronic pancreatitis. Methods: An International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project circulation list was created with pre-existing and new members and including gastroenterologists in addition to surgeons. A computerized search of the literature was undertaken for articles reporting the operative treatment of chronic pancreatitis. The results of the literature search were presented at the first face-to-face meeting of this International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project group. A document outlining proposed reporting standards was produced by discussion during an initial meeting of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. An electronic questionnaire was then sent to all current members of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Responses were collated and further discussed at international meetings in North America, Europe, and at the International Association of Pancreatology World Congress in 2019. A final consensus document was produced by integration of multiple iterations. Results: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery consensus standards for reporting of surgery in chronic pancreatitis recommends 4 core domains and the necessary variables needed for reporting of results: clinical baseline before operation; the morphology of the diseased gland; a new, standardized, operative terminology; and a minimum outcome dataset. The 4 domains combine to give a comprehensive framework for reports. Conclusion: Adoption of the 4 domains of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery reporting standards for surgery for chronic pancreatitis will facilitate comparison of results between centers and help to improve the care for patients with this debilitating disease.

Background: Overburdened systems and concerns of adverse outcomes have resulted in deferred cancer surgeries with devastating consequences. In this COVID pandemic, the decision to continue elective cancer surgeries, and their subsequent outcomes, are sparsely reported from hotspots. Methods: A prospective database of the Department of Surgical Oncology was analysed from March 23rd to April 30th, 2020. Findings: Four hundred ninety-four elective surgeries were performed (377 untested and 117 tested for Covid 19 before surgery). Median age was 48 years with 13% (n = 64) above the age of 60 years. Sixty-eight percent patients were American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) grade I. As per surgical complexity grading, 71 (14·4%) cases were lower grade (I-III) and 423 (85.6%) were higher grade complex surgeries (IV – VI). Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III complications were 5.6% (n = 28) and there were no postoperative deaths. Patients >60 years documented 9.3% major complications compared to 5.2% in

Background Many postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) predictions models were developed and validated in western populations. Direct use of these models in the large Indian/Asian population, however, requires proper validation. Objective To validate the original, alternative and updated alternative fistula risk score (FRS) models. Methods A validation study was performed in consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) from January 2011 to March 2018. The area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) and calibration plots were used to assess the performance of original-FRS (o-FRS), alternative FRS (a-FRS) and updated alternative FRS (ua-FRS) models. Results This cohort consisted of 825 patients of which 66% were males with a median age of 55 years and mean body mass index of 22.6. The majority of tumors (61.8%) were of periampullary origin. Clinically relevant POPF was observed in 16.8% patients. Area under curve (AUC) of ROC for the o-FRS was 0.65, 0.69 for a-FRS and 0.70 for ua-FRS, respectively (p = 0.006). Conclusions In this large Indian cohort of predominantly periampullary tumors, the ua-FRS performed better than the a-FRS and o-FRS, although differences were small. Since the AUC value of the ua-FRS is at the accepted threshold there might be room for improvement for a FRS.

COVID-19 pandemic has emerged as a global health emergency involving more than 200 countries so far. The number of affected population is on rising, so is the mortality. This crisis has overwhelmed the healthcare infrastructures in many affected countries. Due to overall rising cancer incidence and specific concerns, a cohort of cancer patients forms a distinct subset of the population in whom a correct and timely treatment has a huge impact on the outcome. During this period, oncology care is definitely affected owing to many factors like lockdowns, reduced beds and deferral of elective cases to halt the spread of the pandemic. Surgery remains the best line of defence in many solid organ tumours especially in early stage and is potentially curative. China, the source of this pandemic, has taken more than 3 months to enter the post transitional phase of this pandemic. Deferring cancer surgeries for this long period may have a direct impact on the long-term outcomes of cancer patients. Many surgical oncology associations across the globe have come up with triage guidelines for surgical care of cancer patients; however, these are based on expert opinion rather than actual data. Herein, we intend to review these guidelines with respect to the risk of disease progression in cancer patients. In the absence of actual data on cancer surgery care during this pandemic, clinical decisions should be based on careful consideration of disease-related and patient-related factors. While some of the cancer surgeries can be safely delayed for some time, how long we can delay surgeries safely cannot be answered/ explained by any means. Thorough evaluation and discussion by an expert and experienced multidisciplinary team appears to be the most effective way forward.

The volume–outcome relationship dictates that high-volume centres lead to improved patient outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). We conducted a retrospective review to fathom the situation in India for PD and whether referral to high-volume centres would make a positive impact. A systematic literature search in MEDLINE was performed, and all articles published from Indian centres from 01.03.2008 to 30.11.2019 were scrutinised. Any series with less than 20 patients, case reports, abstracts, unpublished data and personal communications were excluded. A total of 36 unique series including 6226 patients from 24 institutes across India were identified. Amongst the 24 institutes, 2 institutes reported less than 10 cases/year, 11 reported 10–25 cases/year and 11 reported ≥26 cases/year. Overall perioperative morbidity was 42.4%, 43.4% and 41% for centres doing

Surgery remains the undisputed mainstay in the management of gastric cancer, and advances in chemotherapy and radiation have improved outcomes in patients with resectable disease. A multidisciplinary approach, with active coordination across specialties dealing with management of gastric cancers provides improved quality of care and outcomes. Radical gastrectomy involves complete removal of tumor with adequate margins and appropriate lymph node dissection. Spleen preserving D2 lymphadenectomy is the present standard of care for all resectable tumors except few early tumors (T1a lesions) where endoscopic or local resections are deemed suitable. Perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to all patients with resectable tumor, having advanced T stage or node-positive disease. In patients with advanced tumors with invasion of adjacent organs, multivisceral resections can be offered selectively in the presence of good performance status and response to chemotherapy, which can lead to improvement in overall survival. The role of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy needs to be evaluated in patients with limited peritoneal disease.

BACKGROUND The prognosis of gastric cancer continues to remain poor, and epigenetic drugs like histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have been envisaged as potential therapeutic agents. Nevertheless, clinical trials are facing issues with toxicity and efficacy against solid tumors, which may be partly due to the lack of patient stratification for effective treatments. AIM To study the need of patient stratification before HDACi treatment, and the efficacy of pre-treatment of HDACi as a chemotherapeutic drug sensitizer. METHODS The expression activity of class 1 HDACs and histone acetylation was examined in human gastric cancer cells and tissues. The potential combinatorial regime of HDACi and chemotherapy drugs was defined on the basis of observed drug binding assays, chromatin remodeling and cell death. RESULTS In the present study, the data suggest that the differential increase in HDAC activity and the expression of class 1 HDACs are associated with hypo-acetylation of histone proteins in tumors compared to normal adjacent mucosa tissue samples of gastric cancer. The data highlights for the first time that pre-treatment of HDACi results in an increased amount of DNA-bound drugs associated with enhanced histone acetylation, chromatin relaxation and cell cycle arrest. Fraction-affected plots and combination index-based analysis show that pre-HDACi chemo drug combinatorial regimes, including valproic acid with cisplatin or oxaliplatin and trichostatin A with epirubicin, exhibit synergism with maximum cytotoxic potential due to higher cell death at low combined doses in gastric cancer cell lines. CONCLUSION Expression or activity of class 1 HDACs among gastric cancer patients present an effective approach for patient stratification. Furthermore, HDACi therapy in pre-treatment regimes is more effective with chemotherapy drugs, and may aid in predicting individual patient prognosis.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is associated with a mortality of up to 25% apart from significant morbid sequelae related to abdominal sepsis and post pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Numerous strategies to curtail the risk of POPF and associated morbidity have been largely unsuccessful. The pancreaticoenteric anastomosis post pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-risk pancreas represents a significant surgical and clinical challenge. In this narrative review, we present the strategies for early identification and comprehensive management of the high-risk pancreas as per the available literature and present a stepwise algorithmic approach of different fistula mitigation strategies in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and various center-specific guidelines were searched for the pancreas, pancreatic cancer, pancreatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, Whipple's operation, postoperative, complications, fistula, High-risk pancreas, risk assessment, different predictors, and scoring systems for the high-risk pancreas, current and emerging concepts in the development of POPF and mitigation strategies management and treatment in various combinations.Over the years, literature has mainly addressed the technical aspects of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis; however, the impact of different technical modifications has been at the most elusive. Recent literature has focused on other aspects like remnant ischemia, locoregional inflammation, and postoperative acute pancreatitis among others, defining their evolving role in pathophysiology of POPF. Although many pre-operative risk prediction models are available; their intra-operative implications are not clear. Furthermore, the evidence available on the mitigation strategies is limited, heterogeneous, and center specific. Fistula prediction includes numerous potentiating factors in addition to the factors described in various Fistula Risk Scores. Early identification of these high-risk scenarios allows the algorithmic application of mitigation strategies. Management of the high-risk pancreas starts in the pre-operative period by early identifications of the risk factors and then continues into the intra-operative period with strategies to decrease intraoperative blood loss, precise anastomosis, and external stenting wherever feasible; goal-directed fluid therapy as well as total pancreatectomy (TP) in certain highly selected scenarios followed by early identification of complications in the postoperative period and appropriate and early management of the same. The coherent application of these mitigation strategies provides the opportunity for the best possible outcome in this complicated scenario.At present, the zero post-operative pancreatic fistulae seem unattainable, and time has come to study the strategies outside the operation theatre. Till preventive strategies become mainstream, a strategic personalized algorithmic approach may yield best outcomes.

Background Surgical views with high resolution and magnification have enabled us to recognize the precise anatomical structures that can be used as landmarks during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). This study aimed to validate the usefulness of anatomy-based approaches for MIDP before and during the Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (February 24, 2021). Methods Twenty-five international MIDP experts developed clinical questions regarding surgical anatomy and approaches for MIDP. Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology. Online Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted the recommendations, with the goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations in front of the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting. Results Four clinical questions were addressed, resulting in 10 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 75% consensus among experts. Conclusions The expert consensus on precision anatomy for MIDP has been presented as a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinions. These recommendations should guide experts and trainees in performing safe MIDP and foster its appropriate dissemination worldwide.

A major shift in the approach to the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) has been the recognition of the systemic nature of the disease even in clinically and radiologically limited disease stages. The recalcitrant nature of PDAC is intrinsically related to the lack of therapeutic targets and dense surrounding stroma that limits the activity of currently available chemotherapeutic options. However, research is increasingly focusing on intensifying systemic management options in PDAC, resulting in gradual improvements in survival. Currently effective chemotherapeutic regimens like modified 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-irinotecan-oxaliplatin and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel have improved outcomes in resectable and advanced PDAC. An increasing use of these regimens has also resulted in greater conversion of borderline resectable and locally advanced cancers to resection, though the most effective approach in this subgroup is yet to be identified. The current review presents an outline of the basic systemic nature of PDAC and current options of systemic therapy, predominantly chemotherapy .

Shailesh V Shrikhande,1 VG Mohan Prasad,2 J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz,3 Kevin E Weigl,4 Kushal D Sarda5 1Division of Cancer Surgery and Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; 2Department of Gastroenterology, Dr. M.G.R. Medical University and VGM Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India; 3Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 4Department of Gastroenterology, Abbott Laboratories GmbH, Hannover, Germany; 5Established Pharmaceuticals Division – Medical Affairs, Abbott India Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IndiaCorrespondence: Kushal D SardaAbbott India Ltd, Floor 16, Godrej BKC, Plot No. C – 68, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Near MCA Club, Bandra (E), Mumbai, 400051, Maharashtra, IndiaTel +91-22-38160938Fax +91 22 38162400Email kushal.sarda@abbott.comPurpose: Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) involves exogenous enzyme supplementation and is used in the treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Clinical efficacy of PERT preparations is a function of physical properties and release kinetics that vary between commercially available products. In this study, we evaluated the physical properties, in vitro dissolution, and release kinetics of commercially available pancreatic enzyme preparations available in the Indian market.Methods: Physical properties such as particle size distribution and water content of the capsules were measured by dynamic light scattering and Karl–Fischer titration method, respectively. An analytical procedure based on the European pharmacopoeia (EP) method was used to determine lipase activity, and a modified United States pharmacopoeia (USP)–based method was used for dissolution studies. Enzyme release was ascertained under gastroduodenal conditions in buffered media.Results: Considerable variations in physical properties such as particle size and water content were observed between pancreatic enzyme preparations. Some preparations failed to meet the labeled lipase content as per USP standards (> 90% label claim) and showed inconsistent release behavior (> 5% relative standard deviation).Conclusion: Differences exist between pancreatic enzyme preparations in terms of physical properties, dissolution, and release behavior that can affect their clinical efficacy. The present study suggests, therefore, that these preparations should not be used interchangeably.Keywords: pancreatic enzyme, physical properties, in vitro dissolution, lipase activity, release kinetics

Pretherapy serum neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) have been shown to predict prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the published literature is conflicting; hence, we aimed to evaluate their role in predicting survival outcomes in operated patients of PDAC.A retrospective analysis was performed in all operated cases of PDAC who underwent curative resection between 2011 and 2018. The pretherapy NLR, PLR, and LMR were calculated and analyzed with respect to pathological and survival outcomes RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four operated patients were included. The median overall survival for NLR of less than 2, 2.7, and 5 was 30.8, 27.2, and 27.5 months and for NLR of more than 2, 2.7, and 5 was 22.9, 21.6, and 21.5 months, respectively, and was statistically insignificant (p-value-0.32, 0.91, 0.34, respectively). Similarly, the PLR was not significant for a cutoff of 150 (p-value-0.27), and LMR was not significant for a cutoff of 2.8 (p-value-0.13) and 4.8 (p-value-0.11). On univariate analysis age, CA 19-9 levels, perineural invasion, margin positivity, lymph node positivity, and TNM stage were found to have a significant correlation with overall survival. However, on multivariate analysis, only TNM stage was found to be significant.The NLR, PLR, and LMR do not correlate with overall survival in operated patients with PDAC in this study. A combination of inflammatory markers or their dynamic testing might probably achieve prognostic significance.