Search

Background: The ability to provide medical care during sudden increases in patient volume during a disaster or other high-consequence event is a serious concern for health-care systems. Identification of inpatients for safe early discharge (ie, reverse triage) could create additional hospital surge capacity. We sought to develop a disposition classification system that categorises inpatients according to suitability for immediate discharge on the basis of risk tolerance for a subsequent consequential medical event.Methods: We did a warfare analysis laboratory exercise using evidence-based techniques, combined with a consensus process of 39 expert panellists. These panellists were asked to define the categories of a disposition classification system, assign risk tolerance of a consequential medical event to each category, identify critical interventions, and rank each (using a scale of 1-10) according to the likelihood of a resultant consequential medical event if a critical intervention is withdrawn or withheld because of discharge.Findings: The panellists unanimously agreed on a five-category disposition classification system. The upper limit of risk tolerance for a consequential medical event in the lowest risk group if discharged early was less than 4%. The next categories had upper limits of risk tolerance of about 12% (IQR 8-15%), 33% (25-50%), 60% (45-80%) and 100% (95-100%), respectively. The expert panellists identified 28 critical interventions with a likelihood of association with a consequential medical event if withdrawn, ranging from 3 to 10 on the 10-point scale.Interpretation: The disposition classification system allows conceptual classification of patients for suitable disposition, including those deemed safe for early discharge home during surges in demand. Clinical criteria allowing real-time categorisation of patients are awaited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes are best treated with rapid endovascular therapy (EVT). There are two routes that LVO stroke patients can take to EVT therapy when transported by EMS: primary transport (ambulance transports directly to an endovascular stroke center (ESC) or secondary transport (EMS transports to a non-ESC then transfers for EVT). There is no clear evidence which path to care results in better functional outcomes for LVO stroke patients. To find this answer, an analysis of a large, real-world population of LVO stroke patients must be performed., Methods: A pragmatic registry of LVO stroke patients from nine health systems across the United States. The nine health systems span urban and rural populations as well as the spectrum of socioeconomic statuses. We will use univariate and multivariate analysis to explore the relationships between type of EMS transport, socioeconomic factors, and LVO stroke outcomes. We will use geographic information systems and spatial analysis to examine the complex movements of patients in time and space. To detect an 8% difference between groups, with a 3:1 patient ratio of primary to secondary transports, 95% confidence and 80% power, we will need approximately 1600 patients. The primary outcome is the patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 at 90 days. Subgroup analyses include patients who receive intravenous thrombolysis and duration of stroke systems. Secondary analyses include socioeconomic factors associated with poor outcomes after LVO stroke., Discussion: Using the data obtained from the OPUS-REACH registry, we will develop evidence based algorithms for prehospital transport of LVO stroke patients. Unlike prior research, the OPUS-REACH registry contains patient-level data spanning from EMS dispatch to ninety day functional outcomes. We expect that we will find modifiable factors and socioeconomic disparities associated with poor outcomes in LVO stroke. OPUS-REACH with its breadth of locations, detailed patient records, and multidisciplinary researchers will design the optimal prehospital stroke system of care for LVO stroke patients., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: To investigate the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infections in an emergency department (ED) with an established screening program., Methods: Evaluation of the prevalence and risk factors for HIV from an 8-week (June 24, 2007-August 18, 2007) identity-unlinked HIV serosurvey, conducted at the same time as an ongoing opt-in rapid oral-fluid HIV screening program. Testing facilitators offering 24/7 bedside rapid testing to patients aged 18 to 64 years, with concordant collection of excess sera collected as part of routine clinical procedures. Known HIV positivity was determined by (1) medical record review or self-report from the screening program and/or (2) presence of antiretrovirals in serum specimens., Results: Among 3207 patients, 1165 (36.3%) patients were offered an HIV test. Among those offered, 567 (48.7%) consented to testing. Concordance identity-unlinked study revealed that the prevalence of undiagnosed infections was as follows: 2.3% in all patients, 1.0% in those offered testing vs 3.0% in those not offered testing (P < .001); and 1.3% in those who declined testing compared with 0.4% in those who were tested (P = .077). Higher median viral loads were observed in those not offered testing (14255 copies/mL; interquartile range, 1147-64354) vs those offered testing (1865 copies/mL; interquartile range, undetectable-21786), but the difference was not statistically significant., Conclusions: High undiagnosed HIV prevalence was observed in ED patients who were not offered HIV testing and those who declined testing, compared with those who were tested. This indicates that even with an intensive facilitator-based rapid HIV screening model, significant missed opportunities remain with regard to identifying undiagnosed infections in the ED., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a lack of data on the effect(s) of suboptimal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care on subsequent health care utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with HIV. Findings on their ED and inpatient care utilization patterns will provide information on service provision for those who have suboptimal access to HIV-related care., Methods: A pilot prospective study was conducted on HIV-positive patients in an ED. At enrollment, participants were interviewed regarding health care utilization. Participants were followed up for 1 year, during which time data on ED visits and hospitalizations were obtained from their patient records. Inadequate HIV care (IHC) was defined according to Infectious Diseases Society of America recommendations as less than 3 scheduled clinic visits for HIV care in the year before enrollment. Cox regression models were used to evaluate whether IHC was associated with increased hazard of health care utilization., Results: Of 107 subjects, 36% were found to have IHC. Inadequate HIV care did not predict more frequent ED visits but was significantly associated with fewer hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.61 [95% CI: 0.43-0.86]). Inadequate HIV care did not significantly increase the hazard for earlier ED visit or hospitalization. However, further stratification analysis found that IHC increased the hazard of hospitalization for subjects without comorbid diseases (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.50 [95% CI: 1.10-5.68])., Conclusions: In our setting, IHC does not appear to be associated with earlier or more frequent ED visits but may lead to earlier hospitalization, particularly among those without other chronic diseases., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objective was to describe the proportions of successful linkage to care (LTC) and identify factors associated with LTC among newly diagnosed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients, from two urban emergency department (ED) rapid HIV screening programs., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of programmatic data from two established urban ED rapid HIV screening programs between November 2005 and October 2009. Trained HIV program assistants interviewed all patients tested to gather risk behavior data using a structured data collection instrument. Reactive results were confirmed by Western blot testing. Patients were provided with scheduled appointments at HIV specialty clinics at the institutions where they tested positive within 30 days of their ED visit. "Successful" LTC was defined as attendance at the HIV outpatient clinic within 30 days after HIV diagnosis, in accordance with the ED National HIV Testing Consortium metric. "Any" LTC was defined as attendance at the outpatient HIV clinic within 1 year of initial HIV diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with any LTC or successful LTC., Results: Of the 15,640 tests administered, 108 (0.7%) were newly identified HIV-positive cases. Nearly half (47.2%) of the patients had been previously tested for HIV. Successful LTC occurred in 54% of cases; any LTC occurred in 83% of cases. In multivariate analysis, having public medical insurance and being self-pay were negatively associated with successful LTC (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12 to 0.96; OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.89, respectively); being female and having previously tested for HIV was negatively associated with any LTC (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.93; OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.77, respectively)., Conclusions: In spite of dedicated resources for arranging LTC in the ED HIV testing programs, nearly 50% of patients did not have successful LTC (i.e., LTC occurred at >30 days), although >80% of patients were LTC within 1 year of initial diagnosis. Further evaluation of the barriers associated with successful LTC for those with public insurance and self-pay is warranted., (© 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Objectives: We seek to identify and analyze, from a group of participants experienced with HIV screening, the perceived challenges and solutions to the ethical, financial, and legal considerations of emergency department (ED)-based HIV screening., Methods: We performed a qualitative analysis of the focus group discussions from the ethical, financial, and legal considerations portion of the inaugural National Emergency Department HIV Testing Consortium conference. Four groups composed of 20 to 25 consortium participants engaged in semistructured, facilitated focus group discussions. The focus group discussions were audiotaped and transcribed. A primary reader identified major themes and subthemes and representative quotes from the transcripts and summarized the discussions. Secondary and tertiary readers reviewed the themes, subthemes, and summaries for accuracy., Results: The focus group discussions centered on the following themes. Ethical considerations included appropriateness of HIV screening in the ED and ethics of key elements of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing recommendations. Financial considerations included models of payment and support, role of health care insurance, financial ethics and downstream financial burdens, and advocacy approaches. Legal considerations included the adequacy of obtaining consent, partner notification, disclosure of HIV results, difficulties in addressing special populations, failure of not performing universal screening, failure to notify a person of being tested, failure to notify someone of their test results, liability of inaccurate tests, and failure to link to care., Conclusion: This qualitative analysis provides a broadly useful foundation to the ethical, financial, and legal considerations of implementing HIV screening programs in EDs throughout the United States., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Objective: We compare the outcomes and costs of alternative staffing models for an emergency department (ED) rapid HIV testing program., Methods: A rapid oral-fluid HIV testing program was instituted in an inner-city ED in 2005. Three staffing models were compared during 24.5 months: indigenous medical staff only, exogenous staff only, or exogenous staff plus medical staff (hybrid). Personnel obtained written consent and provided brief pretest counseling, obtained kits, collected specimens, returned specimens to the ED satellite laboratory, and performed posttest counseling and referral to care. Cost analysis was performed to estimate cost per patient tested and cost per patient linked to care., Results: Overall, 44 of 2,958 (1.5%) patients tested received confirmed positive results and 30 (68%) were linked to care. The exogenous staff only model yielded the highest number tested per month (587), and indigenous medical staff only yielded the lowest (57). Significantly higher positivity rates were found in both indigenous medical staff only (2.2%) and hybrid (2.0%) models versus the exogenous staff only model (0.6%) (prevalence rate ratio: 3.7 [95% confidence interval {CI}1.5 to 9.3] versus 3.4 [95% CI 1.5 to 7.8], respectively). All patients with confirmed positive results were linked to care in the indigenous medical staff only model but only approximately 60% were linked to care in the 2 other models (linked to care rate ratio versus exogenous staff only: 1.8 [95% CI 1.1 to 4.4]; versus hybrid: 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.5]). The indigenous medical staff only model had the highest cost ($109) per patient tested, followed by the hybrid ($87) and the exogenous staff only ($39). However, the indigenous medical staff only model had the lowest cost ($4,937) per patient linked to care, followed by the hybrid ($7,213) and exogenous staff only ($11,454)., Conclusion: The exogenous staff only model tested the most patients at the least cost per patient tested. The indigenous medical staff only model identified the fewest patients with unrecognized HIV infection and had the highest cost per patient tested but the lowest cost per patient linked to care., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Objectives: The objectives were to determine attitudes and perceptions (A&P) of emergency medicine (EM) residents toward emergency department (ED) routine provider-driven rapid HIV testing services and the impact of both a focused training program (FTP) and implementation of HIV testing on A&P., Methods: A three-phase, consecutive, anonymous, identity-unlinked survey was conducted pre-FTP, post-FTP, and 6 months postimplementation. The survey was designed to assess residents' A&P using a five-point Likert scale. A preimplementation FTP provided both the rationale for the HIV testing program and the planned operational details of the intervention. The HIV testing program used only indigenous ED staff to deliver HIV testing as part of standard-of-care in an academic ED. The impact of the FTP and implementation on A&P were analyzed by multivariate regression analysis using generalized estimating equations to control for repeated measurements in the same individuals. A "favorable" A&P was operationally defined as a mean score of >3.5, "neutral" as mean score of 2.5 to 3.5, and "unfavorable" as mean score of <2.5., Results: Thirty of 36 residents (83.3%) participated in all three phases. Areas of favorable A&P found in phase I and sustained through phases II and III included "ED serving as a testing venue" (score range = 3.7-4.1) and "emergency medicine physicians offering the test" (score range = 3.9-4.1). Areas of unfavorable and neutral A&P identified in phase I were all operational barriers and included required paperwork (score = 3.2), inadequate staff support (score = 2.2), counseling and referral requirements (score range = 2.2-3.1), and time requirements (score = 2.9). Following the FTP, significant increases in favorable A&P were observed with regard to impact of the intervention on modification of patient risk behaviors, decrease in rates of HIV transmission, availability of support staff, and self-confidence in counseling and referral (p < 0.05). At 6 months postimplementation, all A&P except for time requirements and lack of support staff scored favorably or neutral. During the study period, 388 patients were consented for and received HIV testing; six (1.5%) were newly confirmed HIV positive., Conclusions: Emergency medicine residents conceptually supported HIV testing services. Most A&P were favorably influenced by both the FTP and the implementation. All areas of negative A&P involved operational requirements, which may have influenced the low overall uptake of HIV testing during the study period., ((c) 2009 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Objectives: We present a four-year, cross-sectional epidemiologic description of injuries and illnesses among Baltimore Marathon participants and the evaluation, treatment, and disposition of those conditions by an on-site event medical team led by physicians and staff from an urban, academic emergency department., Methods: We analyzed data from injuries encountered during the marathon. Subjects presenting to a medical aid station along the course route or at the finish line were defined as "injured or ill" and were prospectively divided into two groups: 1) a brief-encounter group and 2) an extended-encounter group. Data collected included gender, presenting complaint(s), assessment, treatment(s), and disposition., Results: Three percent (N=1,144) of approximately 33,700 total participants over four years presented to medical aid stations during the Baltimore Marathon between 2002 and 2005. Most participants (66%) did not require a full clinical evaluation. Common complaints encountered were dehydration (32%), musculoskeletal injuries (25%), and cutaneous wounds (20%). Transport to the hospital was required for 4% of all injured participants, and 61% returned to the race., Conclusions: Most injuries/illnesses encountered at the Baltimore Marathon in 2002-2005 were minor, although some were serious enough to require transport to a hospital. The year with the highest average race-day temperature had the highest observed injury rates and the highest number of hospital transports. These results help to improve understanding of the types, severity, and distribution of injuries commonly sustained by marathon participants and may guide decisions regarding the appropriate distribution of emergency medical resources at such events.

This article explores the tenets of the responsible conduct of research. The proper treatment of human and animal subjects, recognition and avoidance of conflicts of interest, management of data to ensure privacy and confidentiality, authorship, academic freedom, and scientific misconduct are discussed. Historically significant events that have influenced the ethical climate, along with a review of guiding principles and regulations that define the conduct of ethical research are presented. Circumstances more specific to emergency medicine are examined in detail to provide meaningful guidance to practicing emergency medicine researchers.

Study Objective: We sought to (1) determine whether some emergency departments could play an important role in the national strategy of early HIV detection through the implementation of a voluntary HIV screening program and (2) describe the experience with standard and rapid HIV testing., Methods: Consenting adults were enrolled during 3 distinct phases between 1993 and 1995 for the assessment of routine testing only, routine versus rapid testing, and rapid testing only. Patients administered the rapid test were given information at the time of the visit. We assessed the cost of the program., Results: Of 3,048 patients approached, 1,448 (48%) consented, 981 to standard and 467 to rapid testing. Of these, 6.4% and 3.2%, respectively, were newly identified as being HIV seropositive. More than twice as many new infections were diagnosed among those discharged from the ED as among those admitted (55 versus 21). Even among those previously tested, 5% proved seropositive. The mean+/-SD time to obtain results for the rapid assay performed in the hospital's main laboratory was 107+/-52 minutes, with 55% leaving the ED before receiving the results. Rapid assays performed in the ED satellite laboratory required 48+/-37 minutes, and only 20% left before getting the results. Follow-up among HIV-seropositive patients was 64% for the standard protocol and 73% for the rapid protocol (P >. 20). The prearranged HIV clinic intake appointment was kept by 62%. Rapid test sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 98.9%, respectively, with 5 initial false-positives and no false-negatives. Cost per patient enrolled and counseled was $38. Cost per infection detected was $601 for the routine test and $1,124 with the rapid test; these prices are competitive with those incurred at other sites., Conclusion: Emergency department-based HIV testing was well accepted and detected a significant number of new HIV infections earlier than might have otherwise been, particularly among patients sent home. The rapid test is best performed on-site and is very sensitive. Confirmation of initial results is required because of the occurrence of occasional false-positive results. With relatively high HIV detection and return rates, it is evident that some EDs could play a major role in the national strategy of early HIV detection.