Search

Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a potentially injurious parasomnia lacking an established treatment. Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with 5-HTYoung healthy adult men (ages 19-35) were randomized to double-blind, cross-over treatment (after 7-day wash-out) with single doses of ulotaront (50 mg or 10 mg) versus placebo followed by polysomnography (PSG) on each of the nights following treatment. Quantitative RSWA was analyzed in a blinded fashion using established visual and automated methods.Subjects received 50 mg (n = 11) or 10 mg (n = 9) of ulotaront. Treatment with ulotaront 50 mg was associated with lower RSWA (p 0.05), with greatest RSWA reduction (vs. placebo) observed in subjects with RSWA levels above the mean on the baseline night. RSWA levels were similar between treatment with ulotaront 10 mg and placebo.Treatment with ulotaront 50 mg (but not 10 mg) was associated with reductions in RSWA levels in healthy subjects, especially in subjects with higher baseline RSWA levels, providing proof-of-concept for ulotaront efficacy in reducing RSWA levels. However, whether ulotaront might have efficacy as a treatment for human RBD awaits double-blind trials with ulotaront in clinical RBD populations.

Schizophrenia is a chronic, heterogeneous, severe psychiatric disorder characterized by a spectrum of symptomology and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. For the last 70 years, available treatments have shared blockade of dopamine D2 receptors as their primary mechanism of action (MOA), the efficacy of which has been limited by incomplete resolution of all symptoms as well as treatment non-response in a select subset of patients. In addition, antipsychotics are associated with class-related side effects attributed to this primary MOA, including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The need for non-D2 treatment options for patients which offer a novel risk/benefit profile is therefore apparent. There has been substantial investment in the research and development of non-D2 drug candidates. However, none of these programs have received successful regulatory approval by the FDA (as of Oct 2022). In this article, the scale of industry-sponsored clinical trials for D2-based investigational pharmacological treatments in schizophrenia was quantified and compared with investigational compounds with non-D2 MOAs. In a dataset of 545 clinical trials identified in ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2002 to July 2022, total enrollments in trials of non-D2-based compounds for the treatment of schizophrenia summed to approximately 34,000 patients, compared with 27,144 patients for D2-based compounds. These data indicate that there remains substantial and ongoing investment in the development of novel non-D2 options for schizophrenia, with a success rate measured by regulatory approval that is well-below recent benchmarks for the broader category of CNS drugs. Improved trial design, conduct, endpoints, and analyses/methods may influence signal detection and reliability to support development and registration of non-D2 compounds.

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 document was revised in 2015 to allow concentration-corrected QT interval (C-QTc) analysis to be applied to data from early clinical pharmacology studies to exclude a small drug-induced effect on QTc. Provided sufficiently high concentrations of the drug are obtained in the first-in-human (FIH) study, this approach can be used to obviate the need for a designated thorough QT (TQT) study. The E14 revision has resulted in a steady reduction in the number of TQT studies and an increased use of FIH studies to evaluate electrocardiogram (ECG) effects of drugs in development. In this review, five examples from different sponsors are shared in which C-QTc analysis was performed on data from FIH studies. Case 1 illustrates a clearly negative C-QTc evaluation, despite observations of QTc prolongation at high concentrations in nonclinical studies. In case 2 C-QTc analysis of FIH data was performed prior to full pharmacokinetic characterization in patients, and the role of nonclinical assays in an integrated risk assessment is discussed. Case 3 illustrates a positive clinical C-QTc relationship, despite negative nonclinical assays. Case 4 demonstrates a strategy for characterizing the C-QTc relationship for a nonracemic therapy and formulation optimization, and case 5 highlights an approach to perform a preliminary C-QTc analysis early in development and postpone the definitive analysis until proof of efficacy is demonstrated. The strategy of collecting and storing ECG data from FIH studies to enable an informed decision on whether and when to apply C-QTc analysis to obviate the need for a TQT study is described.

Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist in Phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ulotaront was discovered through a unique, target-agnostic approach optimized to identify drug candidates lacking D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonism, while demonstrating an antipsychotic-like phenotypic profile in vivo. The mechanism of action (MOA) of ulotaront is thought to be mediated by agonism at TAAR1 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors. Ulotaront has completed two Phase 2 trials (4-week acute study and 26-week open-label extension) which led to Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled, acute study, ulotaront was associated with significant (p 40). The open-label extension demonstrated further improvement across schizophrenia symptoms and confirmed the tolerability of ulotaront, with a 6-month completion rate of 67%. Based on current data, ulotaront shows potential to be a first-in-class TAAR1 agonist for the treatment of schizophrenia with a safety and efficacy profile distinct from current antipsychotics.

BACKGROUND Non-racemic amisulpride (SEP-4199) is an 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride:esamisulpride with a 5-HT7 and D2 receptor binding profile optimized for the treatment of bipolar depression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEP-4199 for the treatment of bipolar depression. METHODS Patients meeting DSM-5 criteria for bipolar I depression were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with SEP-4199 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d. The primary endpoint was change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 6. The primary efficacy analysis population consisted of patients in Europe and US (n = 289); the secondary efficacy analysis population (ITT; n = 337) included patients in Japan. RESULTS Endpoint improvement in MADRS total score was observed on both the primary analysis for SEP-4199 200 mg/d (P = 0.054; effect size [ES], 0.31) and 400 mg/d (P = 0.054; ES, 0.29), and on the secondary (full ITT) analysis for SEP-4199 200 mg/d (P = 0.016; ES, 0.34) and 400 mg/d (P = 0.024; ES, 0.31). Study completion rates were 81% on SEP-4199 200 mg/d, 88% on 400 mg/d, and 86% on placebo. SEP-4199 had low rates of individual adverse events (

Background and Objectives In clinical trials, the safety of drugs is summarized by the incidence of adverse events, while post-marketing reporting systems use disproportionate reporting of adverse drug reactions. Here, we propose a method to evaluate the novelty of a safety profile of a drug in a new class (in clinical trials), against that of those already on the market (using pharmacovigilance data). Methods Through Bayesian disproportionality analyses of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data, we identified and ranked Preferred Terms for a pool of 30 antipsychotics. Adverse event rates in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled schizophrenia clinical trials were summarized by their class specificity. One study (N = 245) of the trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist ulotaront (SEP-363856) was compared with five studies of dopamine D2 receptor-based antipsychotics lurasidone (N = 1041), quetiapine (N = 119), olanzapine (N = 122), and placebo (N = 504). Results In clinical trials of antipsychotics, cumulative rates for adverse events at and above a threshold of disproportional reporting (Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean 50 > 3 in FAERS) were 52%, 42%, and 60% for lurasidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine, respectively, indicating that over half of the adverse events reported in clinical trials of an atypical antipsychotic are class-specific risks. In contrast, in the clinical trial of ulotaront, the cumulative rate was 23%, indicating a lower rate of antipsychotic class-specific risk. Conclusions These results demonstrate a novel approach to summarize adverse events in clinical trials, where the cumulative burden of class-specific risks describes the emerging safety profile of a new drug in clinical development, relative to reactions anticipated for drugs in an established pharmacological class. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers NCT0296938, NCT00088634, NCT00549718, NCT00615433, NCT00790192. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01094-7.

In a previous study, dasotraline demonstrated efficacy at a dose of 8 mg/day in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasotraline in doses of 4 and 6 mg/day. Adults meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition criteria for ADHD were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind, once-daily, fixed-dose treatment with dasotraline 4 mg/day, 6 mg/day, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was changed in the ADHD Rating Scale, Version IV (ADHD RS-IV) total score. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the Clinical Global Impression, Severity (CGI-S) Scale. Least squares mean reduction at week 8 in the ADHD RS-IV HV total score was not significantly greater (vs. placebo) in the dasotraline 4 mg/day group (-15.0 vs. -13.9; n.s.; or in the dasotraline 6 mg/day group (-16.5 vs. -13.9; P = 0.074; Hochberg correction). Treatment with dasotraline 6 mg/day was significant at week 8 (uncorrected) on the ADHD RS-IV total score (P = 0.037) and the CGI-S score (P = 0.011). Treatment with the 4 mg/day dose of dasotraline was NS. Treatment with dasotraline was generally well tolerated. The results provide additional evidence that supports the potential efficacy of dasotraline, in doses of 6 mg/day, in adults with ADHD.

Rationale Drugs that rapidly increase dopamine levels have an increased risk of abuse. Dasotraline (DAS) is a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor characterized by slow oral absorption with low potential for abuse. However, it remains unclear whether intravenous (i.v.) administration would facilitate the rapid elevation of dopamine levels associated with stimulant drugs. Objective To assess the kinetics of DAS across the blood-brain barrier and time to onset of dopamine transporters (DAT) inhibition. Methods We compared the onset of DAT occupancy and the associated elevation of synaptic dopamine levels in rhesus monkey following i.v. administration of DAS or methylphenidate (MPH) using positron emission tomography (PET). Brain entry times were estimated by reductions in [18F]-FE-PE2I binding to DAT in rhesus monkeys. Elevations of synaptic dopamine were estimated by reductions in [11C]-Raclopride binding to D2 receptors. Results Intravenous administration of DAS (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) resulted in striatal DAT occupancies of 54% and 68%, respectively; i.v. administered MPH (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg) achieved occupancies of 69% and 88% respectively. Brain entry times of DAS (22 and 15 min, respectively) were longer than for MPH (3 and 2 min). Elevations in synaptic dopamine were similar for both DAS and MPH however the time for half-maximal displacement by MPH (t = 23 min) was 4-fold more rapid than for DAS (t = 88 min). Conclusions These results demonstrate that the pharmacodynamics effects of DAS on DAT occupancy and synaptic dopamine levels are more gradual in onset than those of MPH even with i.v. administration that is favored by recreational drug abusers.

Patients with schizophrenia show increased striatal dopamine synthesis capacity in imaging studies. The mechanism underlying this is unclear but may be due to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction and parvalbumin (PV) neuronal dysfunction leading to disinhibition of mesostriatal dopamine neurons. Here, we develop a translational mouse model of the dopamine pathophysiology seen in schizophrenia and test approaches to reverse the dopamine changes. Mice were treated with sub-chronic ketamine (30 mg/kg) or saline and then received in vivo positron emission tomography of striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, analogous to measures used in patients. Locomotor activity was measured using the open-field test. In vivo cell-type-specific chemogenetic approaches and pharmacological interventions were used to manipulate neuronal excitability. Immunohistochemistry and RNA sequencing were used to investigate molecular mechanisms. Sub-chronic ketamine increased striatal dopamine synthesis capacity (Cohen’s d = 2.5) and locomotor activity. These effects were countered by inhibition of midbrain dopamine neurons, and by activation of PV interneurons in pre-limbic cortex and ventral subiculum of the hippocampus. Sub-chronic ketamine reduced PV expression in these cortical and hippocampal regions. Pharmacological intervention with SEP-363856, a novel psychotropic agent with agonism at trace amine receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-HT1A receptors but no appreciable action at dopamine D2 receptors, significantly reduced the ketamine-induced increase in dopamine synthesis capacity. These results show that sub-chronic ketamine treatment in mice mimics the dopaminergic alterations in patients with psychosis, that this requires activation of midbrain dopamine neurons, and can be ameliorated by activating PV interneurons and by a TAAR1/5-HT1A agonist. This identifies novel therapeutic approaches for targeting presynaptic dopamine dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia and effects of ketamine relevant to its therapeutic use for treating major depression.

An oral compound, SEP-363856, that does not act on dopamine D2 receptors but has agonist activity at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A (5-HTWe performed a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEP-363856 in adults with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily treatment with SEP-363856 (50 mg or 75 mg) or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the total score on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS; range, 30 to 210; higher scores indicate more severe psychotic symptoms) at week 4. There were eight secondary end points, including the changes from baseline in the scores on the Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) scale and the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS).A total of 120 patients were assigned to the SEP-363856 group and 125 to the placebo group. The mean total score on the PANSS at baseline was 101.4 in the SEP-363856 group and 99.7 in the placebo group, and the mean change at week 4 was -17.2 points and -9.7 points, respectively (least-squares mean difference, -7.5 points; 95% confidence interval, -11.9 to -3.0; P = 0.001). The reductions in the CGI-S and BNSS scores at week 4 were generally in the same direction as those for the primary outcome, but the results were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Adverse events with SEP-363856 included somnolence and gastrointestinal symptoms; one sudden cardiac death occurred in the SEP-363856 group. The incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and changes in the levels of lipids, glycated hemoglobin, and prolactin were similar in the trial groups.In this 4-week trial involving patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, SEP-363856, a non-D2-receptor-binding antipsychotic drug, resulted in a greater reduction from baseline in the PANSS total score than placebo. Longer and larger trials are necessary to confirm the effects and side effects of SEP-363856, as well as its efficacy relative to existing drug treatments for patients with schizophrenia. (Funded by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02969382.).

IntroductionTrace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) are a family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) first identified in 2001. TAAR1 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target due to its ability to modulate monoaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission. Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with serotonin 5-HT1A agonist activity that has received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we provide a brief review of the discovery of ulotaront and preclinical research suggesting efficacy in schizophrenia, leading to the first clinical trial of ulotaront resulting in FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation.MethodsUlotaront was discovered through a target-agnostic approach optimized to identify drug candidates that demonstrate an antipsychotic-like profile in vivo but lack D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonism. Ulotaront was further characterized by in vitro pharmacology, electrophysiology, behavioral, and imaging studies.ResultsUlotaront demonstrated an antipsychotic-like profile in a high-throughput, phenotypic behavior screening platform, as well as efficacy in preclinical models of schizophrenia, including phencyclidine (PCP)-induced hyperactivity, prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle, and subchronic PCP-induced deficits in social interaction. Although not fully elucidated, ulotaront’s mechanism of action appears to be mediated by agonism at trace amine-associated 1 (TAAR1) and 5-HT1A receptors. This was further corroborated with whole cell patch clamp recordings, demonstrating inhibition of dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) neuronal firing via 5-HT1A and TAAR1 receptors. Furthermore, ulotaront attenuated the ketamine-induced increase in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, suggesting that it may modulate presynaptic dopamine dysfunction which is hypothesized to contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.ConclusionsPreclinical studies have identified ulotaront as a TAAR1 agonist with antipsychotic-like activity. Ulotaront’s unique receptor profile led to its designation as a member of the new “-taront” class of TAAR1 agonists, distinct in pharmacology from the D2/5-HT2A class of antipsychotics. A companion poster will summarize the efficacy and safety of ulotaront based on initial clinical trials in schizophrenia.FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

IntroductionPreclinical evidence has identified the trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) as a novel regulator of metabolic control. Ulotaront is a TAAR1 and 5-HT1A agonist currently in Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we summarize preclinical results assessing the effects of ulotaront on weight and metabolic parameters.MethodsEffects of ulotaront administration were evaluated on oral glucose tolerance (oGTT), gastric emptying, and in rodent models of weight gain (high-fat diet [HFD]-, corticosterone-, and olanzapine-induced).ResultsFollowing 15-day oral administration of ulotaront, rats on HFD showed dose-dependent reduction in body weight, food intake, and liver triglyceride content compared to controls. In addition, a more rapid reversal of olanzapine-induced weight gain and food intake was observed in rats switched to ulotaront (vs. vehicle). Consistent with weight-lowering effects in rats, chronic ulotaront treatment normalized corticosterone-induced weight gain in mice. Assessment of oGTT showed a dose-dependent reduction of glucose excursion in response to acute ulotaront administration in naive and diabetic db/db mice. Ulotaront administration also delayed gastric emptying in mice—a likely mechanism driving reductions in glucose excursions during the oGTT. Whole-brain c-fos imaging of ulotaront-treated mice revealed increased neuronal activity in several brain regions associated with regulation of food intake and metabolic signals.ConclusionsThe data indicate that ulotaront not only lacks metabolic liabilities typically associated with antipsychotics but can reduce body weight and improve glucose tolerance in rodent models. The underlying mechanisms may include TAAR1-mediated peripheral effects on glucose homeostasis and/or direct modulation of homeostatic and hedonic neurocircuits regulating energy balance. The beneficial metabolic effects of ulotaront may suggest a substantially improved risk-benefit profile compared to established antipsychotics.FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

IntroductionUlotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with serotonin 5-HT1A agonist activity that has received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we summarize ongoing clinical research characterizing the efficacy and safety of ulotaront as a member of the novel trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist class.MethodsSummarized are results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulotaront (50 mg or 75 mg) in an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, and a 6-month, open-label follow-up study. Also summarized are post-hoc analyses evaluating negative symptom efficacy, and key safety and adverse event (AE) outcomes.ResultsIn the short-term study, treatment with ulotaront was associated with significant (p40. Ulotaront was associated with lower risk for antipsychotic class-related AEs (extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, somnolence, nausea/vomiting, increased weight/metabolic labs, prolactinemia). The 6-month study demonstrated further improvement, with a completion rate (67%) that was higher than reported for current dopamine D2 antipsychotics.ConclusionsThe emerging profile of ulotaront is characterized by significant improvement in positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The safety and tolerability profile of ulotaront is markedly different with respect to antipsychotic class-related AEs. The benefit-risk profile of ulotaront, as a member of a novel TAAR1 agonist class, is distinguished from antipsychotics by lack of AEs related to D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor blockade.FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

Drug trials for negative symptoms in schizophrenia select patients based on the severity and stability of negative symptoms, using criteria that are not suitable for trials of acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Here we present a method to prognostically enrich subjects having a predefined factor structure in PANSS and apply it to the measurement of negative symptoms specifically in trials of acute schizophrenia. A vector of 1335 elements based on between- and within-item variances, covariances, and differences of PANSS items was created to calculate an index of heterogeneity and to enrich for a predetermined symptom construct in PANSS. Using prerandomization PANSS scores across N = 4876 subjects in 13 trials of acute schizophrenia, we demonstrate an ability to select for a subpopulation having the greatest amount of variance explained across the 7-items of the Marder PANSS negative symptom (MPNS) construct. Network analyses on subjects enriched for MPNS construct confirm that negative symptoms were most influential in overall psychopathology, distinct from subjects without the MPNS construct. As expected for D2 antagonists, drug-placebo differences on negative symptoms with lurasidone were not specific to the subpopulation having the MPNS construct. In contrast, the novel TAAR1 agonist ulotaront demonstrated specific improvements in negative symptoms which were greatest in the MPNS subpopulation. These results demonstrate the utility of a novel prognostic enrichment strategy that can address heterogeneity in clinical trials, where patients can be selected on the basis of a greater likelihood of having the measured symptom construct (negative symptoms) related to the disorder (schizophrenia). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT0296938, NCT00088634, NCT00549718, NCT00615433, NCT00790192

Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A (5-HT1A) agonist activity that is currently in Phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Unlike available antipsychotics, the efficacy of ulotaront is not mediated by blockade of dopamine D2 or serotonin 5-HT2A receptors. In a short-term randomized clinical trial, ulotaront has demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of adults with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Given ulotaront's novel mechanism of action a series of preclinical studies were performed to evaluate its potential abuse liability.A battery of studies were conducted in male and female rats to evaluate whether ulotaront produces behavioral changes suggestive of human abuse potential. In addition, studies were undertaken to probe the potential for ulotaront to block reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in male rats.Ulotaront was not self-administered by rats trained to self-administer amphetamine, cocaine, or heroin. The subjective qualities of ulotaront were distinct from those produced by amphetamine in a drug discrimination procedure. Ulotaront, and buspirone, a non-scheduled anxiolytic with 5-HT1A agonism, partially generalized to the interoceptive cue elicited by 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). In addition, ulotaront demonstrated a trend to reduce cocaine-primed induced reinstatement, and dose-dependently reduced cue-reinstated responding.The current results suggest that the TAAR1/5-HT1A agonist ulotaront is not likely to pose a risk for recreational abuse in humans and may have potential therapeutic utility as a treatment of substance use disorders.

Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a trace-amine associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity in Phase 3 clinical development, with FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation, for the treatment of schizophrenia. TAAR1 is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is expressed in cortical, limbic, and midbrain monoaminergic regions. It is activated by endogenous trace amines, and is believed to play an important role in modulating dopaminergic, serotonergic, and glutamatergic circuitry. TAAR1 agonism data are reported herein for ulotaront and its analogues in comparison to endogenous TAAR1 agonists. In addition, a human TAAR1 homology model was built around ulotaront to identify key interactions and attempt to better understand the scaffold-specific TAAR1 agonism structure–activity relationships.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasotraline for treatment of ADHD in children. Method: Children (ages 6-12 years; N = 112) with ADHD were randomized, double-blind, to 14 days of once-daily evening doses of dasotraline 4 mg or placebo. ADHD symptom severity was measured at baseline and Day 15 in seven, 30-min classroom sessions using the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) and the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) math test. Results: Significant improvement was observed for dasotraline versus placebo in the SKAMP-combined score (−3.2 vs. +2.0; p < .001; effect size = 0.85) and SKAMP and PERMP subscale scores. The three most common adverse events for dasotraline (vs. placebo) were insomnia (19.6% vs. 3.6%), headache (10.7% vs. 8.9%), and decreased appetite (10.7% vs. 3.6%). Conclusion: In this laboratory classroom study, dasotraline 4 mg was found to be an efficacious and generally well-tolerated treatment for ADHD in children aged 6 to 12 years.

For the past 50 years, the clinical efficacy of antipsychotic medications has relied on blockade of dopamine D2 receptors. Drug development of non-D2 compounds, seeking to avoid the limiting side effects of dopamine receptor blockade, has failed to date to yield new medicines for patients. In this work, we report the discovery of SEP-363856 (SEP-856), a novel psychotropic agent with a unique mechanism of action. SEP-856 was discovered in a medicinal chemistry effort utilizing a high throughput, high content, mouse-behavior phenotyping platform, in combination with in vitro screening, aimed at developing non-D2 (anti-target) compounds that could nevertheless retain efficacy across multiple animal models sensitive to D2-based pharmacological mechanisms. SEP-856 demonstrated broad efficacy in putative rodent models relating to aspects of schizophrenia, including phencyclidine (PCP)-induced hyperactivity, prepulse inhibition, and PCP-induced deficits in social interaction. In addition to its favorable pharmacokinetic properties, lack of D2 receptor occupancy, and the absence of catalepsy, SEP-856's broad profile was further highlighted by its robust suppression of rapid eye movement sleep in rats. Although the mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated, in vitro and in vivo pharmacology data as well as slice and in vivo electrophysiology recordings suggest that agonism at both trace amine-associated receptor 1 and 5-HT1A receptors is integral to its efficacy. Based on the preclinical data and its unique mechanism of action, SEP-856 is a promising new agent for the treatment of schizophrenia and represents a new pharmacological class expected to lack the side effects stemming from blockade of D2 signaling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Since the discovery of chlorpromazine in the 1950s, the clinical efficacy of antipsychotic medications has relied on blockade of dopamine D2 receptors, which is associated with substantial side effects and little to no efficacy in treating the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. In this study, we describe the discovery and pharmacology of SEP-363856, a novel psychotropic agent that does not exert its antipsychotic-like effects through direct interaction with D2 receptors. Although the mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated, our data suggest that agonism at both trace amine-associated receptor 1 and 5-HT1A receptors is integral to its efficacy. Based on its unique profile in preclinical species, SEP-363856 represents a promising candidate for the treatment of schizophrenia and potentially other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Ulotaront (SEP‐363856) is a trace amine–associated receptor 1 agonist with 5‐HT1A agonist activity in phase III development for the treatment of schizophrenia. The efficacy of ulotaront is not mediated by blockade of D2 or 5‐HT2A receptors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics (PopPKs) of ulotaront in adult subjects using pooled data from seven phase I studies, one phase II acute study, and one 6‐month extension study. Single and multiple (up to 7 days) oral doses (5–150 mg/day) were studied in both healthy adult subjects (with intensive serial plasma sampling) and adult patients with schizophrenia (some with intensive and some with sparse plasma sampling). Ulotaront was well‐absorbed and exhibited dose‐proportionality in doses ranging from 10 to 100 mg, in mean maximum concentration, area under the concentration‐time curve, and minimum concentration. Moderate interindividual variability was observed in concentration‐time profiles. The estimated median time to maximal concentration was 2.8 h and the median effective half‐life was 7 h, corresponding to an exposure accumulation ratio of 1.10 at steady‐state with daily dosing. There was no indication of time‐dependent changes in PKs after up to 12 weeks of daily dose administration. No clinically meaningful effects on ulotaront PK parameters were observed based on race, age, sex, formulation (capsule or tablet), or clinical status (healthy volunteer vs. patient with schizophrenia); body weight was the only meaningful covariate.

In contrast to the dose-occupancy relationship in the treatment of schizophrenia, the minimal effective level of dopamine receptor 2 (D2R) blockade for antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression is unknown. Lower doses aimed at reducing extrapyramidal side effects must be balanced against the need to retain the therapeutic benefit of D2R blockade on emergent cycling, mixed, manic, anxiety, and/or psychotic symptoms. Dose-reductions intended to lower D2R blockade, however, could also decrease concomitant serotonin receptor antagonism and its potential benefit on depressive symptoms. Here, we uncoupled the potential antidepressant activity in amisulpride, driven by 5-HT7 receptor (5-HT7R) antagonism, from the D2R-mediated antipsychotic activity by discovering that each enantiomer favors a different receptor. Aramisulpride was more potent at 5-HT7R relative to esamisulpride (Ki 47 vs. 1,900 nM, respectively), whereas esamisulpride was more potent at D2R (4.0 vs. 140 nM). We hypothesized that a nonracemic ratio might achieve greater 5-HT7R-mediated antidepressant effects at a lower level of D2R blockade. The dose-occupancy relationship of esamisulpride at D2R was determined by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in human volunteers. Separately the dose-relationship of aramisulpride was established in humans using suppression of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep as a marker of 5-HT7R antagonism. These results led to the discovery of an 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride to esamisulpride (SEP-4199) that maximizes the potential for antidepressant benefit of aramisulpride via 5-HT7R and reduces esamisulpride to minimize D2R-related extrapyramidal side effects while still retaining D2R-mediated effects predicted to provide benefit in bipolar depression. The antidepressant efficacy of SEP-4199 was recently confirmed in a proof-of-concept trial for the treatment of bipolar depression (NCT03543410).

SEP-363856 is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A (5-HT1A) agonist, currently in Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. Although SEP-363856 activates TAAR1 and 5-HT1A receptors in vitro, an accessible marker of time- and concentration-dependent effects of SEP-363856 in humans is lacking. In rodents, SEP-363856 has been shown to suppress rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. The aim of the current study was to translate the REM sleep effects to humans and determine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships of SEP-363856 on a measure of brain activity. The effects of SEP-363856 were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study of single oral doses (50 and 10 mg) on REM sleep in healthy male subjects (N = 12 at each dose level). Drug concentrations were sampled during sleep to interpolate individual subject’s pharmacokinetic trajectories. SEP-363856 suppressed REM sleep parameters with very large effect sizes (>3) following single doses of 50 mg and plasma concentrations ≥100 ng/mL. Below that effective concentration, the 10 mg dose elicited much smaller effects, increasing only the latency to REM sleep (effect size = 1). The PK/PD relationships demonstrated that REM sleep probability increased as drug concentrations declined below 100 ng/mL over the course of the night. SEP-363856 was generally safe and well tolerated at both doses. The REM sleep-suppressing effects of SEP-363856 provide an accessible marker of brain activity, which can aid in dose selection and help elucidate its therapeutic potential in further clinical trials.

Modeling and simulations were used to support body weight-based dose selection for eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in pediatric subjects aged 4–17 years with partial-onset seizures. A one-compartment pediatric population pharmacokinetic model with formulation-specific first-order absorption, first-order elimination, and weight-based allometric scaling of clearance and distribution volume was developed with PK data from subjects 2–18 years of age treated with ESL 5–30 mg/kg/day. Covariate analysis was performed to quantify the effects of key demographic and clinical covariates (including body weight and concomitant use of carbamazepine, levetiracetam, and phenobarbital-like antiepileptic drugs [AEDs]) on variability in PK parameters. Model evaluation performed using a simulation-based visual predictive check and a non-parametric bootstrap procedure indicated no substantial bias in the overall model and in the accuracy of estimates. The model estimated that concomitant use of carbamazepine or phenobarbital-like AEDs with ESL would decrease the exposure of eslicarbazepine, and that concomitant use of levetiracetam with ESL would increase the exposure of eslicarbazepine, although the small effect of levetiracetam may not represent a true difference. Model-based simulations were subsequently performed to apply target exposure matching of selected ESL doses for pediatric subjects (aged 4–17 years) to attain eslicarbazepine exposures associated with effective and well-tolerated ESL doses in adults. Overall, model-based exposure matching allowed for extrapolation of efficacy to support pediatric dose selection as part of the submission to obtain FDA approval for ESL (adjunctive therapy and monotherapy) in subjects aged 4–17 years, without requiring an additional clinical study.

BackgroundSEP-363856 is a novel psychotropic agent without dopamine D2 receptor occupancy. Although its mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated, preclinical data suggest that agonism at trace amine receptor 1 (TAAR1) and the serotonin 5-H1A receptor contributes to its efficacy. In a double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled study, SEP−363856 demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of an exacerbation of schizophrenia (Koblan et al, NEJM 2020; 82:1497–1506). We present results of a 6-month extension study whose aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of longer-term treatment with SEP−363856.MethodPatients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia who completed a 4-week, DB, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose (50 or 75 mg) study of SEP−363856 were given the option to enroll in an extension study in which they were treated, open-label (OL), with flexible doses (25/50/75 mg/d) of SEP−363856 for 26-weeks. The primary outcomes were safety measures; effectiveness outcomes were secondary and included the PANSS total score and the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) total score.ResultsA total of 193 patients completed the 4-week DB study, and 156 (80.8%) were dosed in the OL extension study and received at least one dose of SEP−363856 (safety population). Study completer rate was 66.9%; reasons for discontinuation consisted of adverse event (11.5%), withdrawal of consent (10.2%), lack of efficacy (5.1%), and other (6.4%). 15 patients experienced an SAE: schizophrenia (n=11); acute psychosis (N=1); uterine hemorrhage and suicidal ideation (N=1 each); there were no deaths in the study. Individual AEs with an incidence =2% were schizophrenia (12.2%), headache (11.5%), insomnia (8.3%), anxiety (5.1%), somnolence (4.5%), nasopharyngitis (4.5%), nausea (3.8%), irritability (3.2%), influenza (3.2%), weight decreased (3.2%), and prolactin increased (2.6%). On movement scales, minimal mean change from OL-baseline to Week 26 occurred on the Barnes total score (−0.1), AIMS total score (0.0) and SAS score (−0.1). Mean month 6 change from DB baseline in weight was −0.3 kg. No clinically meaningful median changes were observed at week 26 in metabolic laboratory parameters (total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, hemoglobin A1c) or in prolactin levels. During 6 months of OL treatment, one patient had an increase in QTcF =60 msec; no patients had a QTcF interval =480 msec. Treatment with SEP−363856 was associated with significant improvement from OL baseline to week 26 in PANSS total score (−22.6) and BNSS total score (−11.3).ConclusionTreatment with SEP−363856 was associated with continued improvement from open-label baseline in the PANSS total (−22.6) and BNSS total (−11.3) scores. The most frequently reported adverse events (= 5%) were schizophrenia, headache, insomnia and anxiety. SEP−363856 had minimal effects on weight, lipids, glycemic indices, prolactin, and was associated with minimal risk of extrapyramidal symptom.FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Background:SEP-363856 is a novel psychotropic agent that has shown broad efficacy in animal models of schizophrenia and depression. Its antipsychotic effects appear to be mediated by agonist activity at both trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-HT1A receptors. Notably, SEP-363856 does not bind to any dopaminergic, serotonergic (except 5-HT1A), glutamatergic, or other neuroreceptors thought to mediate the effects of currently available antipsychotics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEP-363856 in acutely symptomatic patients with schizophrenia.Method:Patients aged 18-40 years meeting DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia (PANSS total score ≥80) were randomized, double-blind, to 4-weeks of flexible-dose SEP-363856 (50 or 75 mg/d) or placebo. Efficacy measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (primary), PANSS subscale scores, and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score. Change from baseline in primary and secondary measures were analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis.Results:Study treatment groups were similar at baseline: SEP-363856 (N=120; male, 64.2%; mean age, 30.0 years; PANSS total score, 101.4) and placebo (N=125; male, 63.2%; mean age, 30.6 years; PANSS total score, 99.7). Least-squares (LS) mean reduction from baseline to week 4 was significantly greater for SEP-363856 vs. placebo on the PANSS total score (-17.2 vs. -9.7; P=0.001; effect size, 0.45), PANSS positive subscale score (-5.5 vs. -3.9; P=0.019; effect size, 0.32), PANSS negative subscale score (-3.1 vs. -1.6; P=0.008; effect size, 0.37), PANSS general psychopathology subscale score (-9.0 vs. -4.7; PConclusion:In this placebo-controlled study, treatment with SEP-363856, a novel psychotropic agent, was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in schizophrenia symptoms as demonstrated by endpoint change in PANSS total and subscale scores, and CGI-Severity scores. Safety and tolerability findings for SEP-363856 were in general similar to placebo. In particular, SEP-363856 was not associated with extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, or hyperprolactinemia, consistent with its non-D2 mechanism of action.ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02969382Funding Acknowledgements:Supported by funding from Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Background SEP-363856 is a novel trace amine associated receptor-1 (TAAR1)/5-HT1A agonist with no dopamine-D2/5-HT2A antagonist activity. SEP-363856 showed significant antipsychotic efficacy in patients with schizophrenia, and a safety and tolerability profile similar to placebo and consistent with a non-D2 mechanism of action. Here, we examined measures of cognition and social functioning in schizophrenia patients receiving SEP-363856. Methods Patients aged 18–40 years with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were randomized, double-blind (DB), to 4-weeks of flexible-dose treatment with once daily SEP-363856 (N=120; 50 or 75 mg) or placebo (N=125). Patients (N=156) entering a subsequent 26-week open-label (OL) extension study were evaluated utilizing the Cogstate Brief Battery, administered at DB baseline and week 4, and OL baseline and weeks 12 and 26. Standardized z-scores were calculated for the Cogstate composite and subscale tasks (Detection task, Identification task, One Card Learning task, One Back task). The University of California San Diego Performance Based Skills Assessment (UPSA-B) scale was assessed at the same time-points, as were the following psychiatric scales: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS), the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Clinical Global Impression Scale, severity scale (CGI-S), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global score (PSQI-global). Pearson correlation analyses were performed between DB baseline to Week 26 change in Cogstate composite and subscale scores and Week 26 change in the psychiatric scale scores. Results Small improvements, from DB baseline to Week 26, were observed in standardized scores on the Cogstate composite (+0.29), Identification task (+0.19), Detection task (+0.28); One Card learning task (+0.33); and One Back task (+0.33). Improvement from OL baseline at Week 26 was also observed on the mean [SD] UPSA-B total score (+6.2 [11.6]). At DB baseline, there were no correlations between CogState composite score and individual test scores with any of the psychiatric scales. Week 26 improvement in the following Cogstate composite and subscale tasks were correlated with Week 26 improvement in the following psychiatric scale scores: Cogstate composite score (PANSS total, r=-0.26; BNSS total, r=-0.31; CGI-S, r=-0.30; MADRS total, r=-0.23; PSQI-global, r=-0.23); Identification task (PANSS total, r=-0.30; BNSS total, r=-0.30), Detection task (BNSS total, r=-0.30; CGI-S, r=-0.28; PSQI-global, r=-0.23); One Card learning task (MADRS total, r=-0.29); and One Back task (PANSS total, r=-0.26). Discussion During 6-months of open-label extension treatment with SEP-363856, improvement in overall functioning was observed on the UPSA-B scale; and small but consistent improvement in cognition was noted in the Cogstate composite and subscale task scores. Endpoint reduction in the severity of schizophrenia-related symptomatology (eg, on the PANSS, BNSS, MADRS, insomnia) were associated with modest correlations, in the range of 0.2 to 0.3, in cognitive performance as measured by the Cogstate composite and subscale task scores.

Patients with schizophrenia show increased striatal dopamine synthesis capacity in imaging studies. However, the mechanism underlying this is unclear but may be due to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction and parvalbumin (PV) neuronal dysfunction leading to disinhibition of mesostriatal dopamine neurons. Here, we test this in a translational mouse imaging study using a ketamine model. Mice were treated with sub-chronic ketamine (30mg/kg) or saline followed byin-vivopositron emission tomography of striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, analogous to measures used in patients. Locomotor activity was measured using the open field test.In-vivocell-type-specific chemogenetic approaches and pharmacological interventions were used to manipulate neuronal excitability. Immunohistochemistry and RNA sequencing were used to investigate molecular mechanisms. Sub-chronic ketamine increased striatal dopamine synthesis capacity (Cohen’s d=2.5,Pand locomotor activity. These effects were countered by inhibition of midbrain dopamine neurons, and by activation of cortical and ventral subiculum PV interneurons. Sub-chronic ketamine reduced PV expression in these neurons. Pharmacological intervention with SEP-363856, a novel psychotropic agent with agonism at trace amine receptor 1 (TAAR1), significantly reduced the ketamine-induced increase in dopamine synthesis capacity. These results show that sub-chronic ketamine treatment in mice mimics the dopaminergic alterations in patients with psychosis, and suggest an underlying neurocircuit involving PV interneuron hypofunction in frontal cortex and hippocampus as well as activation of midbrain dopamine neurons. A novel TAAR1 agonist reversed the dopaminergic alterations suggesting a therapeutic mechanism for targeting presynaptic dopamine dysfunction in patients.

OBJECTIVE Binge-eating disorder (BED) is the most prevalent eating disorder; however, few evidence-based treatments are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasotraline, a novel dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in adults with BED. METHODS Patients with a DSM-5 diagnosis of BED (intent-to-treat sample, N = 315) were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with once-daily, flexible doses (4, 6, or 8 mg/d) of dasotraline or placebo. Primary endpoint was change in diary-based assessment of number of binge-eating days per week at week 12. Key secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) and Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge-Eating (YBOCS-BE) and percentage of subjects with cessation of binge eating in the final 4 weeks. RESULTS Treatment with dasotraline was associated with a significantly greater reduction in binge-eating days per week at study endpoint (vs placebo; least squares mean [SE] difference score, -0.99 [0.17]; P < .0001; effect size [ES], 0.74). Significant endpoint improvement was observed for the 3 key secondary measures, CGI-S (P < .0001; ES, 0.95), YBOCS-BE (P < .0001; ES, 0.96), and 4-week cessation of binge eating (46.5% vs 20.6%; P < .0001). The most common adverse events in the dasotraline vs placebo groups were insomnia (44.6% vs 8.1%), dry mouth (27.4% vs 5.0%), decreased appetite (19.7% vs 6.9%), and anxiety (17.8% vs 2.5%). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 11.3% of patients on dasotraline vs 2.5% on placebo. CONCLUSIONS The results of this placebo-controlled, double-blind study found dasotraline to be an efficacious, safe, and generally well-tolerated treatment for BED. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02564588.

For the past 50 years, the clinical efficacy of antipsychotic medications has relied on blockade of dopamine D

BACKGROUND: SEP-363856 is a novel psychotropic agent with broad efficacy in animal models of schizophrenia and depression. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that SEP-363856 may have antipsychotic effects in schizophrenia mediated by its agonist activity at both trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-HT1A receptors. Notably, SEP-363856 does not bind to any dopaminergic, serotonergic (except 5-HT1A), glutamatergic, or other neuroreceptors thought to mediate the effects of available antipsychotics. The aim of this Phase 2 study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEP-363856 in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Hospitalized patients aged 18–40 years of age meeting DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia and experiencing an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms (PANSS total score ≥80; item score ≥4) were randomized, double-blind, to 4-weeks of flexible-dose SEP-363856 (50 or 75 mg) or placebo treatment given once daily in the evening. Efficacy measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (primary), PANSS subscale scores, the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score, and the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) total score. Change from baseline in primary and secondary efficacy measures were analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. RESULTS: Study treatment groups were similar at baseline: SEP-363856 (N=120; male, 64.2%; mean age, 30.0 years; PANSS total score, 101.4) and placebo (N=125; male, 63.2%; mean age, 30.6 years; PANSS total score, 99.7). Least-squares (LS) mean reduction from baseline to week 4 was significantly greater for SEP-363856 vs. placebo on the PANSS total score (-17.2 vs. -9.7; P=0.001; effect size, 0.45; primary endpoint), the PANSS positive subscale score (-5.5 vs. -3.9; P=0.019; effect size, 0.32), the PANSS negative subscale score (-3.1 vs. -1.6; P=0.008; effect size, 0.37), the PANSS general psychopathology subscale score (-9.0 vs. -4.7; P

Understanding the specificity of symptom change in schizophrenia can facilitate the evaluation antipsychotic efficacy for different symptom domains. Previous work identified a transform of PANSS using an uncorrelated PANSS score matrix (UPSM) to reduce pseudospecificity among symptom domains during clinical trials of schizophrenia. Here we used UPSM-transformed factor scores to identify 5 distinct patient types, each having elevated and specific severity among each of 5 symptom domains. Subjects from placebo-controlled clinical trials of acute schizophrenia were clustered (baseline) and classified (post-baseline) by a machine-learning algorithm. At baseline, all 5 patient types were similar in PANSS total score. Post-baseline, subjects' memberships among the 5 UPSM patient types were relatively stable over treatment duration and were relatively insensitive to overall improvements in symptoms, in contrast to other methods based on untransformed PANSS items. Using UPSM-transformed PANSS, drug treatment effect sizes versus placebo were doubly-dissociated for specificity across symptom domains and within specific patient types. This approach illustrates how broader clinical trial populations can nevertheless be utilized to characterize the specificity of new mechanisms across the dimensions of schizophrenia psychopathology.

Dasotraline is a potent inhibitor of presynaptic dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake with a pharmacokinetic profile characterized by slow absorption and a long elimination half-life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasotraline in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Children aged 6-12 years with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of ADHD were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind once-daily treatment with dasotraline (2 or 4 mg) or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in the ADHD Rating Scale Version IV-Home Version (ADHD RS-IV HV) total score at week 6.A total of 342 patients were randomized to dasotraline or placebo (mean age 9.1 years, 66.7% male). Treatment with dasotraline was associated with significant improvement at study endpoint in the ADHD RS-IV HV total score for the 4 mg/day dose versus placebo (-17.5 vs. -11.4; p 0.001; effect size [ES], 0.48), but not for the 2 mg/day dose (-11.8 vs. -11.4; ns; ES, 0.03). A regression analysis confirmed a significant linear dose-response relationship for dasotraline. Significant improvement for dasotraline 4 mg/day dose versus placebo was also observed across the majority of secondary efficacy endpoints, including the Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity score, the Conners Parent Rating Scale-Revised scale (CPRS-R) ADHD index score, and subscale measures of hyperactivity and inattentiveness. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs) were higher in the dasotraline 4 mg/day group (12.2%) compared with the 2 mg/day group (6.3%) and placebo (1.7%). The most frequent AEs associated with dasotraline were insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased weight, and irritability. Psychosis-related symptoms were reported as AEs by 7/219 patients treated with dasotraline in this study. There were no serious AEs or clinically meaningful changes in blood pressure or heart rate on dasotraline.In this placebo-controlled study, treatment with dasotraline 4 mg/day significantly improved ADHD symptoms and behaviors, including attention and hyperactivity, in children aged 6-12 years. The most frequently reported AEs observed on dasotraline included insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased weight, and irritability.

AimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the abuse potential of dasotraline, a novel dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with slow absorption (tmax, 10–12h) and elimination (t1/2=47–77h) that is in development for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).MethodsRecreational stimulant users (N=48) who had specific experience with cocaine, and who were able to distinguish methylphenidate (60mg) versus placebo in a qualification session, were randomized, in a 6-period, double-blind, crossover design, to receive single doses of dasotraline 8mg, 16mg, and 36mg, methylphenidate (MPH) 40mg and 80mg, and placebo. The primary endpoint was the Drug Liking Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at the time of peak effect (Emax).ResultsThere were no significant differences between the 3 doses of dasotraline and placebo on the drug liking VAS at Emax, and on most secondary endpoints. Both doses of MPH had significantly higher VAS-drug liking scores at Emax relative to both placebo (P

Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score is the standard primary efficacy measure in acute treatment studies of schizophrenia. However, PANSS factors that have been derived from factor analytic approaches over the past several decades have uncertain clinical and regulatory status as they are, to varying degrees, intercorrelated. As a consequence of cross-factor correlations, the apparent improvement in key clinical domains (eg, negative symptoms, disorganized thinking/behavior) may largely be attributable to improvement in a related clinical domain, such as positive symptoms, a problem often referred to as pseudospecificity. Here, we analyzed correlations among PANSS items, at baseline and change post-baseline, in a pooled sample of 5 placebo-controlled clinical trials (N = 1710 patients), using clustering and factor analysis to identify an uncorrelated PANSS score matrix (UPSM) that minimized the degree of correlation between each resulting transformed PANSS factor. The transformed PANSS factors corresponded well with discrete symptom domains described by prior factor analyses, but between-factor change-scores correlations were markedly lower. We then used the UPSM to transform PANSS in data from 4657 unique schizophrenia patients included in 12 additional lurasidone clinical trials. The results confirmed that transformed PANSS factors retained a high degree of specificity, thus validating that low between-factor correlations are a reliable property of the USPM when transforming PANSS data from a variety of clinical trial data sets. These results provide a more robust understanding of the structure of symptom change in schizophrenia and suggest a means to evaluate the specificity of antipsychotic treatment effects.

Dasotraline is a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and the early clinical trials show a slow absorption and long elimination half‐life. To investigate the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of dasotraline in humans, a single dose of [14C]‐dasotraline was administered to eight healthy male adult volunteers. At 35 days, 90.7% of the dosed radioactivity was recovered in the urine (68.3%) and feces (22.4%). The major metabolic pathways involved were: (1) amine oxidation to form oxime M41 and sequential sulfation to form M42 or glucuronidation to form M43; (2) N‐hydroxylation and sequential glucuronidation to form M35; (3) oxidative deamination to form (S)‐tetralone; (4) mono‐oxidation of (S)‐tetralone and sequential glucuronidation to form M31A and M32; and (5) N‐acetylation to form (1R,4S)‐acetamide M102. A total of 8 metabolites were detected and structurally elucidated with 4 in plasma (M41, M42, M43, and M35), 7 in urine (M41, M42, M43, M31A, M32, M35, and (S)‐tetralone), and 3 in feces (M41, (S)‐tetralone, and (1R,4S)‐acetamide). The 2 most abundant circulating metabolites were sulfate (M42) and glucuronide (M43) conjugates of the oxime of dasotraline, accounting for 60.1% and 15.0% of the total plasma radioactivity, respectively; unchanged dasotraline accounted for 8.59%. The oxime M41 accounted for only 0.62% of the total plasma radioactivity and was detected only at early time points. M35 was a minor glucuronide metabolite, undetectable by radioactivity but identified by mass spectrometry. The results demonstrate that dasotraline was slowly absorbed, and extensively metabolized by oxidation and subsequent phase II conjugations. The findings from this study also demonstrated that metabolism of dasotraline by humans did not produce metabolites that may cause a safety concern.

ObjectivesOnce-daily dosing with dasotraline, a novel dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, achieves stable plasma concentrations over 24 hours with once-daily dosing. This study evaluated dasotraline in children aged 6–12 years (NCT02428088).MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1:1 to 6 weeks of once-daily, fixed-dose dasotraline 2 or 4 mg/day, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) at Week 6 in ADHD Rating Scale Version IV – Home Version (ADHD RS-IV HV) total score, using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score and safety endpoints.ResultsThe mean age of 342 randomized patients was 9.1 [SD: 1.9] years; 66.7% were male. Overall, 79% of patients completed the study. In the ITT population (N=336), ADHD RS-IV HV total score improved significantly with dasotraline 4 mg/day vs placebo(least squares [LS] mean [SE] CFB at Week 6: –17.53 [±1.31] vs –11.36 [±1.29], respectively, pConclusionsCompared with placebo, dasotraline 4 mg/day significantly improved ADHD symptoms in children, as assessed by ADHD RS-IV HV total score and inattentiveness and hyperactivity/impulsivity subscale scores. Dasotraline was generally well tolerated; most common AEs were insomnia, decreased appetite, weight loss and irritability.Funding AcknowledgementsStudy sponsored by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

ObjectivesBinge eating disorder (BED) is the most common eating disorder in the US, with a lifetime prevalence of 2.8%. Disturbances in reward circuitry have been implicated in its pathogenesis. Dasotraline is a novel and potent dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with slow absorption and a long half-life resulting in stable plasma concentrations over 24 hours with once-daily dosing. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of flexibly-dosed dasotraline (4, 6, and 8 mg/day) vs placebo in adults with moderate to severe BED over a 12-week period (NCT02564588).MethodsKey inclusion criteria included moderate to severe BED based on a history of ≥2 binge eating days/week for ≥6 months prior to screening, and ≥3 binge eating days for each of2 weeks prior to randomization, as documented in participant’s binge eating diary. Patients were randomized 1:1 to flexibly-dosed dasotraline (4, 6, 8 mg/day) or placebo. Theprimary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in the number of binge eating days per week at Week 12. Key secondary endpoints were: CFB in Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) Scale at Week 12; CFB in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (YBOCS-BE) at Week 12; and the percentage ofsubjects with a 4-week cessation from binge eating prior to Week 12 or end of treatment (EOT). Except for 4-week cessation, the other three variables were analyzed using amixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).Results317 subjects (84% female) received ≥1 dose of study medication (mean age was 38.2 years; mean number of binge eating days per week, 4.25; mean CGI-S score, 4.5; mean BMI, 34.7). The MMRM analysis of CFB at Week 12 in the number of binge days/week yielded a significant mean difference of –0.99 (95% CI: –0.65 to –1.33; p2% incidence included: insomnia (44.6% vs 8.1%), dry mouth (27.4% vs 5.0%), decreased appetite (19.7% vs 6.9%), anxiety (17.8% vs 2.5%), nausea (12.7% vs 6.9%) and decreased body weight (12.1% vs 0%). Discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 11.5% of patients taking dasotraline vs 2.5% taking placebo.ConclusionsIn adults with moderate to severe BED, there were highly significant and clinically meaningful reductions with dasotraline vs placebo in the frequency of binge eating, global severity of illness, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms related to binge eating. These results suggest dasotraline may offer a novel, well-tolerated and efficacious treatmentfor BED.Funding AcknowledgementsStudy sponsored by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Background Interpretation of the efficacy of antipsychotic agents in treating schizophrenia using standard (Marder) Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) factors is confounded by moderate-to-high between-factor correlations. In previous pooled analyses of short-term, placebo-controlled lurasidone clinical trials, clustering and factor analysis identified an uncorrelated PANSS score matrix (UPSM) that generated transformed PANSS factor scores with high face validity (good correlation with standard [Marder] PANSS factors), and high specificity/orthogonality (low levels of between-factor correlation) at both baseline, and when measuring change during short-term treatment. In a validation analysis using 12 separate clinical trials, we previously confirmed that the weighted UPSM coefficients had generalizable utility, yielding transformed PANSS factors with high specificity while retaining good levels of correlation with standard PANSS factors. The aim of the current analysis was to determine whether distinct clinical subtypes of schizophrenia could be empirically derived from the transformed PANSS factor scores at baseline. Methods In a new analysis of a pooled sample of 5 placebo-controlled trials (N=1,710 patients), K-means clustering of baseline UPSM factor scores in MATLAB was used to identify whether clinical sub-groups could be empirically derived that were characterized by predominant symptom severity in one or more of the transformed PANSS factor domains. For each empirically derived domain thus identified, key demographic and clinical variables were examined, including baseline transformed PANSS factor severity scores [note: the weighted UPSM coefficient yields factor scores with numerical values that are much smaller than are observed with standard Marder factor scores]; and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Negative Symptom Assessment Scale (NSA) scores. Results Cluster analysis using the UPSM transformed PANSS Factor scores identified 5 distinct clinical subtypes defined by the severity of the UPSM Factor score relative to the mean score for all patients on the respective transformed PANSS factors. For the predominant positive cluster, the mean transformed PANSS positive factor score was 3.9 (vs. a mean score of 2.9 ± 0.9 SD for all patients); for the predominant hostile cluster, the hostility factor score was 2.6 (vs. a mean score of 1.4 ± 1.1); for the predominant disorganized cluster, the disorganized factor score was 3.0 (vs. 2.5 ± 1.0); for the affective cluster, the anxiety and depression factors, respectively, were 2.3 (vs. 1.8 ± 0.9) and 2.7 (vs. 1.7 ± 1.0); and for the predominant negative cluster, the apathy/avolition and deficit of expression factors, respectively, were 3.1 (vs. 2.5 ± 0.9) and 2.5 (vs. 1.8 ± 0.9). Patients in the predominant negative cluster had the highest NSA score (61 vs. a mean score overall of 53); and patients in the predominant affective cluster had the highest MADRS score (16 vs. a mean score overall of 11). Discussion These results provide evidence for a consistent underlying schizophrenia symptom structure and suggest the utility of UPSM transformed PANSS factors for characterizing clinical differences among clearly delineated clinical subpopulations, even within a clinical trial population of acute schizophrenia.

Typically, the dose-occupancy curves for GABA-A receptor ligands are determined using in vivo binding of [3H]flumazenil. This study describes in vivo binding experiments without the use of tracer ligands. Bound and free fractions were measured directly using a highly sensitive LC/MS/MS detection method after in vivo administration of the GABA-A ligands zolpidem, (RS)-zopiclone, L-838417 and flumazenil, to demonstrate affinity and saturation of the filter-retained, membrane-bound fraction. The in vivo binding of flumazenil and L-838417 both saturated around 200 nM, at a similar level to the specific binding of (S)-zopiclone after doses of the racemic zopiclone, using (R)-zopiclone to estimate non-specific binding. This saturable component represented an estimate of benzodiazepine binding sites available on GABA-A receptors in vivo (200 nM). Dose-occupancy curves were constructed to estimate the dose required to achieve 50% occupancy and matched estimates obtained with tracer methods. In contrast to tracer methods, this method is uniquely suitable to the demonstration of stereoselective binding of the (S)-isomer in vivo after doses of racemic zopiclone. These results demonstrate that the LC/MS/MS measurements of total drug concentrations typically used in early drug development can be adapted to provide information about receptor occupancy in vivo.

In anxiety research, the search for models with sufficient clinical predictive validity to support the translation of animal studies on anxiolytic drugs to clinical research is often challenging. This review describes the stress-induced hyperthermia (SIH) paradigm, a model that studies the activation of the autonomic nervous system in response to stress by measuring body temperature. The reproducible and robust SIH response, combined with ease of testing, make the SIH paradigm very suitable for drug screening. We will review the current knowledge on the neurobiology of the SIH response, discuss the role of GABA(A) and serotonin (5-HT) pharmacology, as well as how the SIH response relates to infectious fever. Furthermore, we will present novel data on the SIH response variance across different mice and their sensitivity to anxiolytic drugs. The SIH response is an autonomic stress response that can be successfully studied at the level of its physiology, pharmacology, neurobiology and genetics and possesses excellent animal-to-human translational properties.

Background and Objectives Dasotraline is a novel inhibitor of dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake currently being investigated in clinical studies for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Uniquely, relative to current ADHD medications, dasotraline has a slow absorption and long elimination half-life. Here we relate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dasotraline to reduction in ADHD symptoms based on simulated clinical trial outcomes. Methods Dasotraline pharmacokinetics were analyzed by population pharmacokinetic methodologies using data collected from 395 subjects after single or multiple oral dose administrations ranging from 0.2 to 36 mg (three phase I studies and one phase II ADHD study). Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models related individual dasotraline exposures to norepinephrine metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) concentrations, ADHD symptoms, and study discontinuation (probability of dropout). Results Dasotraline pharmacokinetics were described by a one-compartment model with dual (linear plus nonlinear) elimination. In an ADHD population treated with dasotraline 4 or 8 mg/day, dasotraline was characterized by a mean apparent half-life of 47 h and plasma concentrations reached steady-state by 10 days of dosing. A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of DHPG indicated clinically significant norepinephrine transporter inhibition was achieved as a function of time-matched dasotraline concentrations. Dasotraline exposure reduced ADHD symptoms in a sigmoid Emax time-course model. Clinical trial simulations described the effects of dose, duration, and sample size on clinical outcomes. Conclusion These results related dasotraline pharmacokinetics to pharmacological activity in ADHD, and support the novel concept that maintaining constant, steady-state dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition throughout a 24-h dosing interval is a novel pharmacological approach to the management of ADHD symptoms. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01692782. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40261-015-0358-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.