Search

Background: Leakage of intestinal fluid is a challenging event when it appears in an open abdomen (OA) and surgical deviation does not seem possible. Intestinal contents in the abdominal cavity maintain inflammation and drainage is there for essential. We have developed a method, ChimneyVAC, to treat both deep and superficial enteroatmospheric fistulas (EAF) Aims: To describe this innovative surgical technique and our 10‐year experience. Material & Methods: This single‐center observational cohort study included all 16 consecutive patients treated with ChimneyVAC. Seven women and 9 men; median age: 47; (interquartile range [IQR]:39–63) years, 15 with a small bowel fistula and 1 with a large bowel fistula. All except of the colonic fistula were classified as a high output fistula; 14 were deep and 2 superficial. In this technique, a negative‐pressure source is applied directly above the fistula opening, in addition to negative pressure wound therapy for the OA. This controls the leakage of intestinal fluid by direct drainage into a vacuum system, thereby avoiding contamination of the abdomen. A controlled enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) then forms as the traction from the ChimneyVAC brings the fistula opening to skin level. Results: In 14 patients, an ECF formed after a median of 42 (IQR:28–55) days and 12 (IQR:7–16) dressing changes. The median length of hospitalization was 103 (IQR:58–143) days. Two patients died of multiorgan failure and 14 initially survived. Discussion: This study showed that 14 out of 16 patients survived the initial treatment for enteric leakage with the ChimneyVAC method. The outcome of ChimneyVAC treatment is a controlled ECF, which was then corrected after a median of six months. However, hospitalization is lengthy, the patients undergo several dressing changes and many needs additional parenteral nutrition until intestinal continuity is reestablished. Conclusion: ChimneyVAC is a feasible method for treatment of EAF in an OA, with favorable survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this proof-of-concept study we aim to validate a novel ultrasound Doppler monitoring device for evaluating microcirculation (earlybird) against LDF and pulsed Doppler.In ten healthy subjects, we measured microcirculatory function at rest and during different autonomic tests (forced respiration, isometric exercise, Valsalva maneuver and cold pressor). Earlybird, LDF and pulsed Doppler were recorded simultaneously. We performed a ZNCC to determine correlation.The curves for earlybird and LDF or pulsed Doppler correlates visually well. Overall median ZNCC 0.87 (interquartile range 0.77 –0.91) between the LDF and earlybird measurements, and 0.90 (0.82 – 0.95) for pulsed Doppler and earlybird. Median ZNCC for baseline and each provocation test for earlybird against LDF and pulsed Doppler were calculated; baseline: LDF 0.87 (0.73 – 0.97) pulsed Doppler 0.91 (0.81 – 0.94), forced respiration: LDF 0.87 (0.28 – 0.90) pulsed Doppler 0.90 (0.85 – 0.96), isometric exercise: LDF 0.82 (0.59 – 0.90) pulsed Doppler 0.87 (0.68 – 0.94), Valsalva maneuver: LDF 0.88 (0.82 – 0.91) pulsed Doppler 0.94 (0.92 – 0.97) and cold pressor: LDF 0.90 (0.85 – 0.95) pulsed Doppler 0.89 (0.65 – 0.94).Earlybird records vasoconstrictions in healthy subjects as well as LDF and pulsed Doppler. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite the increasing number of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) procedures, evidence on post-operative antiplatelet therapy is very limited. This study aimed to investigate the role of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) vs. double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after F/B-EVAR in 30 day and follow up outcomes., Methods: A multicentre retrospective analysis was conducted, including F/B-EVAR patients managed from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. Comparative outcomes were assessed according to post-operative antiplatelet therapy. The cohort was divided into the SAPT group (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] or clopidogrel) and DAPT group (ASA and clopidogrel). The duration of SAPT or DAPT was one to six months. Primary outcomes were 30 day death, and cardiovascular ischaemic and major haemorrhagic events. Secondary outcomes were survival and target vessel (TV) patency during follow up., Results: A total of 1 430 patients were included: 955 under SAPT and 475 under DAPT. The 30 day mortality rate was similar (SAPT 2.1% vs. DAPT 1.5%; p = .42). Cardiovascular ischaemic events were lower in the DAPT group (SAPT 11.9% vs. DAPT 8.2%; p = .040), with DAPT being an independent protector for acute mesenteric (p = .009) and lower limb ischaemia (p = .020). No difference was found in 30 day major haemorrhagic events (SAPT 7.5% vs. DAPT 6.3%; p = .40). The mean follow up was 21.8 ± 2.9 months. Cox regression showed no survival confounders, with similar rates between groups (log rank p = .71). DAPT patients enjoyed higher TV patency (SAPT 93.4%, standard error [SE] 0.7% vs. DAPT 97.0%, SE 0.6%; log rank p = .007) at thirty six months. Cox regression revealed B-EVAR as a predictor of worse TV patency (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.36 - 3.03; p < .001). DAPT was related to higher patency within B-EVAR patients (SAPT 87.2%, SE 2.1% vs. DAPT 94.9%, SE 1.9%; p < .001)., Conclusion: DAPT after F/B-EVAR was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular ischaemic events and higher TV patency, especially in B-EVAR cases. No difference in major haemorrhagic events was observed at 30 days., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Use of new technology can lead to changes in the treatment course for patients and in treatment costs for the health service. The aim of this study was to compare sickness absence and time to resumption of daily activities, as well as treatment costs, for two surgical treatments for varicose veins: endovenous steam ablation and vein stripping., Material and Method: This prospective observational study included 46 patients treated with steam ablation and 37 treated with vein stripping in the period 2015-2016. The two groups were matched with respect to age, sex, occupational status and classification. After treatment, patients were interviewed every other week until daily activities had been resumed. Detailed information on expenditure related to personnel, equipment, premises and materials was used to calculate the cost of treatment., Results: Patients treated with steam ablation resumed daily activities after a median of 0 (interquartile range 0-2) days versus 4 (2-7) days for vein stripping (p < 0.001), and sporting activities after 4 (2-9) days versus 11 (3-19) days (p < 0.004). For patients in employment, sickness absence after steam ablation was 2 (2-5) days versus 14 (6-21) for patients treated with vein stripping (p < 0.001). The estimated treatment cost for steam ablation was NOK 5 973, compared with NOK 10 109 for vein stripping., Interpretation: Steam ablation led to shorter convalescence and sickness absence for the patient, and lower costs for the hospital. Reduced sickness absence also implies lower costs for society.