Search

The objective of this article is to review: (a) the concepts and principles that underpin Conservation Agriculture (CA) ecologically and operationally; (b) the potential benefits that can be harnessed through CA systems in the dry Mediterranean climates; (c) current status of adoption and spread of CA in the dry Mediterranean climate countries; and (d) opportunities for CA in the Central and West Asia and North Africa (CWANA) region. CA, comprising minimum mechanical soil disturbance and no-tillage seeding, organic mulch cover, and crop diversification is now practised on some 125 million ha, corresponding to about 9% of the global arable cropped land. Globally, the area under CA is spread across all continents and all agro-ecologies, including the dryland climates in the Mediterranean basin region as well as in the Mediterranean climates elsewhere in the world. Worldwide empirical and scientific evidence is available to show that significant productivity, economic, social and environmental benefits exist that can be harnessed through the adoption of CA principles for sustainable production intensification in the dry Mediterranean climates, including those in the CWANA region. The benefits include: fundamental change for the better in the sustainability of production systems and ecosystem services; higher stable yields and incomes; climate change adaptation and reduced vulnerability to the highly erratic rainfall distribution; and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. CA has taken off globally and is now spreading in several Mediterranean climates outside the Mediterranean basin particularly in South America, South Africa and Australia. In the dry Mediterranean climates in the CWANA region, CA is perceived to be a powerful tool of land management but CA has not yet taken off. Research on CA in the CWANA region has shown that there are opportunities for CA adoption in rainfed and irrigated farming systems involving arable and perennial crops as well as livestock.

The successful use of gene technology for complex crop traits and responses to stress environments remains a challenging approach despite its potential. Stable crop yield in drought prone environmentshas been one of the most studied complex traits in recent years and transgenic crops with better performance have been repeatedly reported. We reviewed the experimental approach of contrastingcase studies that report the enhancement of drought resistance in rice using various strategies. If the overall gene technology method is very similar in the different studies analyzed, the limited number oftransgenic lines evaluated remains often a pitfall from a breeding perspective since it does not provide a robust assessment of the strategy. The protocols for plant evaluation and the parameters used toassess stress resistance are very different, which is a major limitation to literature mining. This clearly emphasizes the urgent need to define or redefine the major steps and criteria to meet better crop performance in the field, in particular for less favorable environments. We summarized some of these key parameters and we proposed some enabling solutions that can address crop breeding challenges.

International audience; Plant recovery from early season drought is related to the amount of biomass retained during stress and biomass production after the end of stress. Reduction in leaf expansion is one of the first responses to water deficit. It is assumed that the control of tissue development under water deficit contributes to traits such as early vigor, as well as maintenance of growth of reproductive organs. To dissect the underlying mechanisms controlling tissue expansion under water-limited conditions, we used a multilevel approach combining quantitative genetics and genomics. To identify orthologous genetic regions controlling tissue growth under water-limited conditions a series of QTL mapping and microarray gene expression studies were conducted in rice and maize. Results of differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments, QTLs and candidate genes related to growth in the different species are compared on consensus maps (within species) and then on synteny maps (between species), to identify common genetic regions between rice and maize.

Partial rootzone drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) are water-saving irrigation systems that have been developed to increase water-use efficiency (WUE) without significant yield reduction. In order to investigate whether a highvalue horticultural crop such as tomato responded differently to RDI and PRD, we compared the physiological and growth responses of tomato plants using a split-root system. Plants were grown in a greenhouse under controlled conditions with their roots separated equally between two soil compartments. Three irrigation treatments were imposed: (i) Control, receiving an amount of water equivalent to 100% of plant transpiration; (ii) PRD, in which one compartment was watered with 50% of the amount of water supplied to the controls, allowing one-half of the root system to be exposed to dry soil and switching irrigation between sides weekly; and (iii) RDI, in which 50% of the amount of water given to the controls was supplied, half to each side of the root system. Leaf RWC and midday leaf C decreased substantially in RDI-treated plants, while the PRD plants exhibited relatively higher C and RWC values. Both PRD and RDI treatments reduced by about 30% the total plant dry mass compared with the control. However, plant transpiration was reduced by about 50% in both PRD and RDI, allowing a significant improvement in whole-plant WUE. Stomatal conductance (Gs) and leaf growth were also significantly reduced by PRD and RDI. These results may be related to a significant increase in xylem sap pH and leaf apoplastic pH. Generally, the photosynthetic apparatus of tomato leaves had a high resistance to restricted water availability. In fact, the decreased Gs had no major negative impact on carbon assimilation. However, Vcmax, i.e. Rubisco efficiency, was significantly decreased in RDI plants with respect to control ones. This may imply that, although the differences between the PRD and RDI treatments in our study were subtle, they may become more marked with a more prolonged and severe water deficit.

1 tables 2 graph.; International audience