Search

Sleep disturbance and delirium are common problems experienced by critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). These interrelated issues increase the length of stay in the ICU but might also negatively affect long-term health outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify the nonpharmacological interventions provided to improve sleep or prevent delirium in ICU patients or both and integrate their effect sizes.This study was a registered systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from their inception until December 2021. We included randomised controlled trials and nonrandomised controlled trials-(RCT) that provided nonpharmacological interventions and reported sleep or delirium as outcome variables. Studies not published in English or whose full text was not available were excluded. The quality of the evidence was assessed with version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I).The systematic review included 118 studies, and the meta-analysis included 100 studies. Overall nonpharmacological interventions had significant effects on subjective sleep quality (standardised mean difference = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05 to 0.56), delirium incidence (odds ratio = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.73), and delirium duration (standardised mean difference = -0.68, 95% CI = -0.93 to -0.43). In individual interventions, aromatherapy, music, and massage effectively improved sleep. Exercise, family participation, information giving, cognitive stimulation, bright light therapy, architectural intervention, and bundles/protocols effectively reduced delirium. Light/noise blocking was the only intervention that ensured both sleep improvement and delirium prevention.Our results suggest nonpharmacological interventions improve sleep and prevent delirium in ICU patients. We recommend that ICU nurses use nonpharmacological interventions that promote person-environment compatibility in their clinical practice. The results of our review can guide nurses in adopting interventions related to sleep and delirium.CRD42021230815.

The aim of this study was to investigate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and related factors in intensive care unit survivors one-12 months after discharge.This cross-sectional survey included survivors who had been admitted to an intensive care unit for ≥48 hours.HRQOL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L profile, which evaluates five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) on five levels (no, slight, moderate, severe, and extreme problems), EQ-VAS (score range 0-100, 100 indicating best health) and EQ values (score range -0.066-1, 1 indicating best health). The factors influencing HRQOL were analyzed by Tobit regression.Survivors treated in an intensive care unit at six institutions in Korea.Only 7.9% of the 534 participants had self-reported profiles of no health problems in all five dimensions. The proportion of participants with slight problems was highest in pain/discomfort with 85.0%. The proportion with severe problems was highest in usual activities with 21.7%, followed by mobility with 21.0%. The median and interquartile range of the EQ-VAS and EQ values were 60.00 (45.00 to 75.00) and 0.72 (0.52 to 0.80), respectively. Negative impact factors on HRQOL included older age, women, residing in a long term care facility, unemployment, emergency intensive care admission, and intensive care stay ≥ 7 days.HRQOL among Korean intensive care survivors is low. The level of problems in physical dimensions is more severe than that in mental health dimensions. Early rehabilitation in the intensive care unit should be provided to facilitate long-term recovery.

Purpose We aimed to classify nonpharmacological interventions used for preventing delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU), and estimate their effect size. Materials and methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the literature was searched and studies were selected based on the PRISMA flow chart. Data sources included MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINHAHL, PsyInfo, and EMBASE. We used Cochrane's Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) criteria in study design and quality assessment of the meta-analysis. Results This systematic review and meta-analysis included 35 and 15 studies, respectively. Studies were grouped into nine intervention types: multicomponent (16 studies), physical environment (9), daily interruption of sedation (2), exercise (2), patient education (2), automatic warning system (1), cerebral hemodynamics improving (1), family participation (1), and sedation reducing protocol (1). The effect size of preventive nonpharmacological interventions had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50–0.86) for delirium occurrence, and an OR of 0.31 (95% CI, 0.10–0.94) for delirium duration. Although relevant studies by interventions were lacking, a partial subgroup analysis by intervention was performed. Conclusions Nonpharmacological interventions were effective in reducing the duration and occurrence of delirium. Consistent application and development of nonpharmacological interventions for use in the ICU are important.

Aim To investigate the incidence of post-intensive care unit (ICU) depression and its risk factors among critical care survivors. Methods The study data were extracted from the database of the National Health Insurance Service of Korea. We retrospectively analyzed data from 161,977 adult patients who were admitted to the ICU for more than 24 hr from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 and survived for more than 1 year after discharge. Risk factors for newly diagnosed depression (Code F32) were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Results The incidence of post-ICU depression was 18.5%. The major risk factors were enteral nutrition (odds ratio [OR] = 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.19-2.36), cerebrovascular disease (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.54-1.64), and hemi/paraplegia (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.41-1.56). It was observed that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.50-0.61) and myocardial infarction (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.71-0.79) lowered depression. Conclusions The incidence of post-ICU depression was high and influenced by ICU treatment and physical impairments. Healthcare providers must pay attention to the psychological changes in survivors with major risk factors in the recovery process.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to develop a scale to measure person-centered critical care nursing and verify its reliability and validity. METHODS A total of 38 preliminary items on person-centered critical care nursing were selected using content validity analysis of and expert opinion on 72 candidate items derived through literature review and qualitative interviews. We conducted a questionnaire survey with 477 nurses who worked in intensive care units. The collected data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmative factor analysis (CFA) with SPSS and AMOS 24.0 program. RESULTS EFA was performed with principal axis factor analysis and Varimax rotation. The 15 items in 4 factors that accounted for 50.8% of the total variance were identified by deleting the items that were not meet the condition that the commonality should be .30 or more and the factor loading over .40. We named the factors as compassion, individuality, respect, and comfort, respectively. The correlation coefficient between this scale and the Caring Perception Scale was r=.57 (p

Among 5dimensions of the PECOL-K, “Pain” was the most preferred care dimension and “Decision making by health care pro-fessional” was the least preferred care dimension. The item that received the highest mean score was “I want to let natureguide my dying and I do not want my life to be artificially prolonged in any way ”, and the lowest item was “I want healthcare providers to make all decisions about my care “. As preferred care near the end of life, nurses gave lower scores to the life sustaining treatment and decision making by health care profession than physicians and general staff. Comparedto physicians and nurses, general staff preferred the decision making by health care professional and by family.

Purpose This research aimed to investigate the effects of a cognitive rehearsal program (CRP) on workplace bullying among nurses. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed. Participants were 40 nurses working in different university hospitals in B city, South Korea. The experimental group was provided with a 20-hour CRP comprising scenarios on bullying situations, standard communication, and role-playing. To evaluate effects of the CRP, we measured interpersonal relationships, workplace bullying, symptom experience, and turnover intention at preand post-intervention. Follow-up effect was measured in the experimental group only at 4 weeks after the intervention. Results After the intervention, there were significant differences in interpersonal relationships (F=6.21, p=.022) and turnover intention (F=5.55, p=.024) between experimental and wait-list groups. However, there was no significant difference in workplace bullying or symptom experience between the 2 groups. The beneficial effects on interpersonal relationships and turnover intention lasted at least up to 4 weeks after CRP. Conclusion The CRP for workplace bullying improves interpersonal relationships and decreases turnover intention. So it can be utilized as one of the personal coping strategies to reduce the the turnover among nurses. Further studies on the effects of unit- or hospital-based CRP and on the long-term effects of CRP are necessary.

Factors Affecting Prostate Cancer Screening Behavior Lee, Eun Nam · Park, Jin Hee · Kang, Sung Gum · Yun, Seonyoung · Sin, Kyung Mi · Kim Kyoung Mi Department of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan; Department of Nursing, Gimhae College, Gimhae; Department of Nursing, Youngsan University, Yangsan; Department of Nursing, Chunhae College of Health Sciences, Ulsan; Department of Nursing, Kosin University, Busan, Korea

Subjects in this study included 178 hospital nurses who attended two nationwide nursing educa-tional conferences in 2013. The data was collected using self-report questionnaires which were used to identify the subjects’ characteristics, self-esteem, perception of nursing organizational culture, and workplace bullying experience.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the chronic patients` preferences for care near the end of life. Methods: This is a descriptive survey research, with subjects of 161 outpatients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus or chronic renal failure. Results: The majority of the subjects do not want meaningless life sustaining treatment and they report thinking positively about family or health care professional to participate in their end of life decision making process. Subjects reported preferring adequate pain management and spiritual support at the end of life. In regard to advance directives (ADs), those subjects with chronic disease report thinking positively about the necessity of ADs and its institutionalization. However, the subjects report not having the detailed information on the proper time and method of writing their ADs. Conclusion: Based on these results, educational programs on end of life decision making for chronic patients need to be developed. Also, the nurse should try to reflect the opinion of chronic patients as much as possible when make an end-of-life decision.