Search

Purpose: This randomized, controlled study was designed to compare bone formation around microimplants with a sandblasted, acid-etched surface placed at the time of maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) or deproteinized bovine bone (DBB). Materials and Methods: Nine completely edentulous patients and two partially edentulous patients (six women, five men) with a mean age of 67 years (range, 50 to 79 years) requiring bilateral sinus augmentation were included in the study. The patients were randomized for augmentation with BCP (test) in one side and DBB (control) in the contralateral side. At the time of augmentation, one microimplant on each side was placed vertically from the top of the alveolar crest, penetrating the residual bone and the grafting material. After 8 months of graft healing, at the time of ordinary implant placement, all 22 microimplants were retrieved with a surrounding bone core for histologic analyses. Results: The bone-to-implant contact in the BCP group was 64.6% ± 9.0%, versus 55.0% ± 16.0% for the DBB group. The difference was not significant. The corresponding values for the area of newly formed bone in the biopsies were 41.1% ± 9.8% and 41.6% ± 14.0% for BCP and DBB, respectively. There were significantly more DBB particles in contact with newly formed bone than BCP particles (87.9 ± 18.2% versus 53.9 ± 26.1%; Wilcoxon rank sum test; P = .007). Conclusion: In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, new bone formation and bone-to-implant contact around microimplants with a sandblasted, acid-etched surface was found to be equivalent between sinuses augmented with BCP or DBB. Significantly more DBB particles than BCP particles were in contact with newly formed bone, but the clinical relevance of this has yet to be established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcome of immediately loaded implants in the partial edentulous mandible over a 4-year follow-up period using a modified surgical protocol, primary implant stability criteria, and splinting for inclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in need of implant treatment in the partial edentate mandible were consecutively included in the study. The implant sites were underprepared to obtain maximal stability. Inclusion criteria for the study were torque of a least 30 Ncm before final seating of the implant and an ISQ greater than 60. A provisional fixed partial denture was delivered within 24 hours and a definitive fixed partial denture within 3 months. The patients were monitored with clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations for up to 4 years. Stability of the implants was measured with resonance frequency analysis at placement and after 6 months. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were evaluated, and 77 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. A total of 111 fixed partial dentures supported by 257 Brånemark System implants (77 turned and 180 TiUnite implants) were delivered. Four (1.6%) of the 257 implants did not osseointegrate, giving an overall survival rate of 98.4% after 4 years. Three turned (3.9%) implants and 1 oxidized implant (0.6%) failed after 4 to 13 months. The average marginal bone resorption was 0.7 mm (SD 0.78) during the first year in function. Turned implants showed an average bone loss of 0.5 mm (SD 0.8) and oxidized implants an average of 0.7 mm (SD 0.8). Resonance frequency analysis showed a mean implant stability quotient of 72.2 (SD 7.5) at placement and 72.5 (SD 5.7) after 6 months of loading. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that immediate loading of implants with firm primary stability in partially edentulous areas of the mandible appears to be a viable procedure with predictable outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the survival rate of endosseous implants placed in the partially dentate maxilla treated with sinus inlay block bone grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients were subjected to bone augmentation procedures prior to or in conjunction with implant placement. Bone volumes were regarded as insufficient for implant treatment unless a bone grafting procedure was performed. The patients were treated with sinus inlay block bone grafts and endosseous implants in a 1- or 2-stage procedure. A total of 69 implants were placed in the patients who were followed for 29 to 101 months (mean, 53.1 months). The retrospective patient group was also prospectively followed using a standardized clinical and radiographic study design. RESULTS: The implant survival rate was 91.3% (63/69). All implants were lost during the period from abutment connection to connection of the definitive prosthesis. All bone grafts were stable. Bone grafts supported 48 implants, of which 5 failed (10.4%). In the residual bone, 21 implants were placed, of which 1 failed (4.8%). All patients received a fixed partial prosthesis, which was stable during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation revealed a satisfactory clinical outcome of implant placement in grafted partially dentate maxillae after a mean follow-up of 53.1 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The knowledge of what levels of primary stability can be obtained in different jawbone regions and of what factors influence primary stability is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate primary stability by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements of implants placed according to a surgical protocol that aimed for high primary stability. The aim was also to correlate RFA measurements with factors related to the surgical technique, the patient, and implant design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 905 Brånemark dental implants used in 267 consecutive patients were measured with RFA at the time of placement surgery. RESULTS: A mean ISQ value of 67.4 (SD 8.6) was obtained for all implants. Univariate analyses with the implant or patient as unit showed higher ISQ values in men compared with women, in mandibles compared with maxillae, in posterior compared with anterior sites, and for wide-platform implants in comparison with regular/narrow-platform implants. There was a correlation between bone quality and primary stability, with lower ISQ values obtained for implants placed in softer bone. A lower stability was seen with increased implant length. A stepwise multiple regression analysis using the patient as unit showed that jaw type and gender had independent effects on primary stability. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that factors related to bone density and implant diameter/length may affect the level of primary implant stability. Furthermore, greater stability was observed in male than in female patients. High primary implant stability was achieved in all jaw regions, although the use of thinner drills and/or tapered implants cannot fully compensate for the effect of soft bone. The research design does not permit conclusions regarding long-term treatment outcome with implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To analyze the bone graft-implant interface of titanium microimplants (MIs) placed at the time of bone grafting or after a healing period of 6 months and retrieved after another 6 to 14 months of healing. Integration of MIs placed in interpositional bone grafts (IBGs) in conjunction with a Le Fort I osteotomy was compared with the integration of those placed in onlay/inlay bone grafts (OBGs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The severely atrophied edentulous maxillae of 23 patients (14 women, 9 men) were restored with autogenous bone grafts (either IBG [n=8] or OBG [n=15]) and titanium implants. Six-month periods were allowed between grafting, implant placement, and abutment connection. The bone-implant interface was studied histologically with the use of unloaded titanium MIs. RESULTS: Sixty-eight MIs were either (1) placed simultaneously with grafting and retrieved after 6, 12, or 14 months or (2) placed after 6 months of healing and retrieved after another 6 to 8 months. Histomorphometry indicated equal degrees of osseointegration for the 2 intraoral reconstruction techniques when looking at bone-implant contact, bone area in threads, and newly formed bone (NFB) (Student t test for unpaired observations). There was a significant difference between simultaneous and delayed implant placement with respect to BIC and NFB (Student t test for paired observations). Three additional MIs placed in the nongrafted residual alveolar ridge and retrieved after 6 months showed significantly more bone in threads and NFB (Student t test for paired observations; P = .003 and P = .009, respectively) compared to MIs placed at graft placement (6 months' healing). DISCUSSION: Timing of implant placement appeared more important than healing time or surgical technique. The delayed approach resulted in better implant integration, probably because of the initial revascularization of the graft. CONCLUSIONS: Implant integration was similar in the IBG and OBG groups. Placement of MIs after an initial healing period of 6 months resulted in better integration than placement simultaneously with grafting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This study was designed to clinically and histologically evaluate the integration of titanium implants in different grafting materials used for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients and 36 maxillary sinuses were augmented with (1) autogenous particulated bone from the mandibular ramus, (2) bovine hydroxyapatite (BH) with membrane coverage, or (3) an 80/20 mixture of BH and autogenous bone. The grafts were allowed to heal for 6 to 9 months prior to placement of microimplants for histology and standard implants for prosthetic rehabilitation. After another 6 months of healing, when abutments were connected, the microimplants were retrieved for histologic and morphometric analyses. The outcome of the standard implants was clinically evaluated after 1 year of loading. RESULTS: The mean bone-implant contact was 34.6 +/- 9.5%, 54.3 +/- 33.1%, and 31.6 +/- 19.1% for autogenous bone, mixture of 20% autogenous bone/80% BH, and 100% BH, respectively. The corresponding values for the bone area parameter were 37.7 +/- 31.3%, 39.9 +/- 8%, and 41.7 +/- 26.6%. The BH area was found to be 12.3 +/- 8.5% and 11.8 +/- 3.6% for 20% autogenous bone/80% BH and 100% BH, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences for any parameter between any of the groups. After 1 year of loading, 6 of the 33 implants placed in autogenous bone grafts, 2 of the 35 implants placed in the BH/autogenous bone mixture, and 2 of 43 implants placed in BH were lost. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the groups. DISCUSSION: The histomorphometric analysis showed no differences between the 3 groups, indicating that autogenous bone graft can be substituted with bovine hydroxyapatite to 80% or 100% when used for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The effect of adding autogenous bone remains unclear but may allow for a reduction of the healing time. CONCLUSION: The results from this clinical and histologic study indicate that similar short-term results can be expected when using autogenous bone, BH, or a mixture of them for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed placement of dental implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sixty-seven patients ranging in age from 16 to 86 years were included in this 3- to 5-year retrospective report focusing on implant survival and marginal bone remodeling in relation to implant diameter. A total of 299 Branemark implants (3.75-mm diameter: 141; 4.0-mm diameter: 61; 5.0-mm diameter: 97) were placed in 16 completely and 51 partially edentulous arches. Seven of the 141 implants in the 3.75-mm-diameter group failed (5%). The corresponding value for the 4.0-mm-wide implants was 2 of 61 (3%). The highest failure rate, 18% (17/97), was seen for the 5.0-mm-diameter implants. The least favorable cumulative survival rates were seen in mandibles after 5 years and involving 4.0-mm- and 5.0-mm-diameter implants (84.8% and 73.0%, respectively). The marginal bone loss was generally low over the 5-year period. When the data were evaluated by the Cox regression analysis, a relationship was found between implant failure and implant diameter (P < .05), with a higher failure rate for the 5.0-mm-diameter implant. However, no relationship could be seen between implant failure and jaw type, or bone quality and quantity (P > .05). Neither was any relationship seen between marginal bone loss and bone quality and quantity, implant diameter, or jaw type when tested by multiple linear regression analysis (P > .05). A learning curve, poor bone quality, and changed implant design were suggested as possible reasons for the less positive outcome seen for the 5.0-mm-diameter implant. The fact that this implant was often used as a rescue implant when the standard ones were not considered suitable or did not reach initial stability was another plausible explanation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]