Search

Hybrid males that inherit haploid set of chromosomes along with Hybrid male rescue, (Hmr+) gene from D. melanogaster mother and an autosomal set with Lethal hybrid rescue, (Lhr+) gene from D. simulans father, die at the larval/pupal transition phase due to insufficient growth of imaginal disc tissues. Comparable pattern reminiscent of hybrid F1female lethality was noted when D. melanogaster compound females were crossed with D. simulans males. The lethality is suppressed when the hybrids inherit one mutant allele of hybrid incompatibility gene (either Lhr−, or Hmr−) from either of the parent. In order to better understand the cause of lethality of F1 hybrids at larval stage, the imaginal discs development of lethal hybrids were examined and compared with those of ‘rescued’ hybrids with Lhr− and parental species. The study revealed the following major findings: (a) when hybrid male and female larvae carry only D. melanogaster X chromosome(s) in presence of both Lhr+ and Hmr+ genes, broad-ranging cell death reaction was induced in the disc tissues and eventually death of the hybrid larvae, (b) when hybrid females carry the X chromosome of both species in the background of maternal cytoplasm of D. melanogaster, the frequency of cell death in the discs was reduced significantly and discs were able to metamorphose, (c) when hybrid males and females inherit one set of autosome from Lhr null strain of D. simulans, the frequency of non-apoptotic cell death in the discs was suppressed significantly and discs development were restored, although the discs displayed fluctuating asymmetric of development. To understand the defects in the chromosomal organization associated with abnormal development of the ‘rescued’ hybrids, the functional organization of the polytene chromosomes of the ‘rescued’ hybrids were examined. It was noted that incomplete pairing of the autosomes of two species along with abnormal X chromosomal telomeric structure may have some bearing on developmental defects of the ‘rescued’ hybrids. From the results it is suggested that (1) cell death reaction in the imaginal discs of the larval lethal hybrids may be the result of divergent lineage of maternal and paternal sets of chromosomes in zygote in presences of two species specific mediator genes, Lhr+, and Hmr+, (2) suppression of larval lethality, in absence of Lhr function, indicated that the non-apoptotic type of cell death factor in the disc cells was controlled genetically by the two mediator genes in the disc cells, (3) re-specification of compartmental organization of paternal segment polarity genes in ‘rescued’ hybrid discs might cause non-random tissue damages and eventually the apoptotic type of cell death resulting into asymmetric development of the appendages in hybrids. In sum, our data revealed that cell death reaction in imaginal discs, associated with larval lethality in hybrids was a developmentally controlled program, through incompatible interactions between species specific mediator genes, Lhr+, Hmr+ and D. melanogaster X chromosome and the pattern of cell death reaction in the discs was different from apoptosis.

Background While many developmentally relevant enhancers act in a modular fashion, there is growing evidence for nonadditive interactions between distinct cis-regulatory enhancers. We investigated if nonautonomous enhancer interactions underlie transcription regulation of the Drosophila segment polarity gene, wingless. Results We identified two wg enhancers active at the blastoderm stage: wg 3613u, located from -3.6 to -1.3 kb upstream of the wg transcription start site (TSS) and 3046d, located in intron two of the wg gene, from 3.0 to 4.6 kb downstream of the TSS. Genetic experiments confirm that Even Skipped (Eve), Fushi-tarazu (Ftz), Runt, Odd-paired (Opa), Odd-skipped (Odd), and Paired (Prd) contribute to spatially regulated wg expression. Interestingly, there are enhancer specific differences in response to the gain or loss of function of pair-rule gene activity. Although each element recapitulates aspects of wg expression, a composite reporter containing both enhancers more faithfully recapitulates wg regulation than would be predicted from the sum of their individual responses. Conclusion These results suggest that the regulation of wg by pair-rule genes involves nonadditive interactions between distinct cis-regulatory enhancers.

The gene regulatory network for segmentation in arthropods offers valuable insights into how networks evolve owing to the breadth of species examined and the extremely detailed knowledge gained in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster. These studies have shown that Drosophila's network represents a derived state that acquired changes to accelerate segment patterning, whereas most insects specify segments gradually as the embryo elongates. Such heterochronic shifts in segmentation have potentially emerged multiple times within holometabolous insects, resulting in many mechanistic variants and difficulties in isolating underlying commonalities that permit such shifts. Recent studies identified regulatory genes that work as timing factors, coordinating gene expression transitions during segmentation. These studies predict that changes in timing factor deployment explain shifts in segment patterning relative to other developmental events. Here, we test this hypothesis by characterizing the temporal and spatial expression of the pair-rule patterning genes in the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles stephensi. This insect is a Dipteran (fly), like Drosophila, but represents an ancient divergence within this clade, offering a useful counterpart for evo-devo studies. In mosquito embryos, we observe anterior to posterior sequential addition of stripes for many pair-rule genes and a wave of broad timer gene expression across this axis. Segment polarity gene stripes are added sequentially in the wake of the timer gene wave and the full pattern is not complete until the embryo is fully elongated. This "progressive segmentation" mode in Anopheles displays commonalities with both Drosophila's rapid segmentation mechanism and sequential modes used by more distantly related insects.

The three anterior-most segments in arthropods contain the ganglia that make up the arthropod brain. These segments, the pre-gnathal segments (PGS), are known to exhibit many developmental differences to other segments, believed to reflect their divergent morphology. We have analyzed the expression and function of the genes involved in the conserved segment-polarity network, including genes from the Wnt and Hedgehog pathways, in the PGS, compared with the trunk segments, in the hemimetabolous insect Oncopeltus fasciatus. Gene function was tested by manipulating expression through RNA interference against components of the two pathways. We show that there are fundamental differences in the expression patterns of the segment polarity genes, in the timing of their expression and in the interactions among them in the process of pre-gnathal segment generation, relative to all other segments. We argue that given these differences, the PGS should not be considered serially homologous to trunk segments. This realization raises important questions about the differing evolutionary ancestry of different regions of the arthropod head.

Laboratory practical sessions are critical to scientific training in biology but usually fail to promote logical and hypothesis-driven reasoning and rely heavily on the teacher's instructions. This paper describes a 2-day laboratory practicum in which students prepare and analyze larval cuticle preparations of Drosophila segmentation gene mutant strains. Embryonic segmentation involves three major classes of genes according to their loss-of-function phenotypes: the establishment of broad regions by gap genes, the specification of the segments by the pair-rule genes, and the compartments within segments by the segment polarity genes. Students are asked to sort undefined segmentation mutants into gap, pair-rule, or segment polarity categories based on their knowledge of the Drosophila segmentation process and the microscopic anatomical traits they are capable of finding in the sample preparations. This technically simple practicum prompts students to pay attention to detailed observation to detect anatomic markers of intrasegmental compartments and thorax versus abdomen cuticle, and promote their logical reasoning in hypothesizing to which segmentation type a given mutant fits best.

Insects have a segmented body plan that is established during embryogenesis when the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis is divided into repeated units by a cascade of gene expression. The cascade is initiated by protein gradients created by translation of maternally provided mRNAs, localized at the anterior and posterior poles of the embryo. Particular combinations of these proteins activate specific gap genes to divide the embryo into distinct regions along the A-P axis. Gap genes then activate pair-rule genes, which are usually expressed in part of every other segment. The pair-rule genes, in turn, activate expression of segment polarity genes in a portion of each segment. The segmentation genes are generally conserved among insects, although there is considerable variation in how they are deployed. We annotated 24 segmentation gene homologs in the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. We identified most of the genes that were expected to be present based on known phylogenetic distribution. Two exceptions were eagle and invected, which are present in at least some hemipterans, but were not identified in D. citri. Many of these genes are likely to be essential for D. citri development and thus may be useful targets for pest control methods.

The Drosophila blastoderm gene regulatory network is one of the best studied networks in biology. It is composed of a series of tiered sub-networks that act sequentially to generate a primary segmental pattern. Many of these sub-networks have been studied in other arthropods, allowing us to reconstruct how each of them evolved over the transition from the arthropod ancestor to the situation seen in Drosophila today. I trace the evolution of each of these networks, showing how some of them have been modified significantly in Drosophila relative to the ancestral state while others are largely conserved across evolutionary timescales. I compare the putative ancestral arthropod segmentation network with that found in Drosophila and discuss how and why it has been modified throughout evolution, and to what extent this modification is unusual.

One of the conserved traits of arthropod embryonic development is striped expression of homologs of Drosophila segment polarity genes, including hedgehog (hh). Although a diversity of stripe-forming processes is recognized among arthropod embryos, such varied stripe-forming processes have not been well characterized from cellular and quantitative perspectives. The spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum embryo, which has a hh-dependent mechanism of axis formation, offers a cell-based field where the stripes of Pt-hh (a hh homolog) expression dynamically develop in accordance with axis formation and growth, with the patterning processes varying among the regions of the field. In this study, using cell labeling, we mapped the future body subdivisions to the germ disc in the spider embryo and provided substantial evidence for the occurrence of kinetic waves of Pt-hh expression in the presumptive head and opisthosomal (or abdominal) regions of the embryonic field. Notably, combined with cell tracking, we showed that surface cells at and near the center of the germ disc persist in the posterior portion of the field from where Pt-hh stripes sequentially arise, suggesting the operation of ordered oscillations of Pt-hh expression. We then conducted a quantitative analysis of forming/formed Pt-hh stripes using serially timed fixation of sibling embryos. By utilizing length measurements that reflect the axis growth of the embryonic field, we reconstructed the pattern dynamics, which captured repeated splitting of Pt-hh stripes and oscillations of Pt-hh expression in the presumptive head and opisthosomal regions, respectively. In the intermediate thoracic region, three stripes of Pt-hh expression showed a late appearance, with the segmental units specified much earlier by another mechanism. Analyses provided quantitative estimates related to axis growth and stripe-splitting and oscillation events, including the periods of the patterning cycles. This work characterizes the diversity of stripe-forming processes in a cell-based field in a common spatiotemporal framework and highlights the contrasting dynamics of splitting versus oscillation. The cellular and quantitative data presented here provide the foundation for experimental, theoretical and evolutionary studies of cell-based pattern formation, especially body axis segmentation in arthropods.

The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, is regarded as a severe pest of fruit production in Asia. Despite its economic importance, only limited information regarding the molecular and developmental biology of this insect is known to date. We provide a detailed analysis of B. dorsalis embryology, as well as the expression patterns of a number of segmentation genes known to act during patterning of Drosophila and compare these to the patterns of other insect families. An anterior shift of the expression of gap genes was detected when compared to Drosophila. This shift was largely restored during the step where the gap genes control expression of the pair-rule genes. We analyzed and compared the shapes of the embryos of insects of different families, B. dorsalis and the blow fly Lucilia sericata with that of the well-characterized Drosophila melanogaster. We found distinct shapes as well as differences in the ratios of the length of the anterior-posterior axis and the dorsal-ventral axis. These features were integrated into a profile of how the expression patterns of the gap gene Krüppel and the pair-rule gene even-skipped were observed along the A-P axis in three insects families. Since significant differences were observed, we discuss how Krüppel controls the even-skipped stripes. Furthermore, we discuss how the position and angles of the segmentation gene stripes differed from other insects. Finally, we analyzed the outcome of the expression patterns of the late acting segment polarity genes in relation to the anlagen of the naked-cuticle and denticle belt area of the B. dorsalis larva.

The segment-polarity gene engrailed is required for segmentation in the early Drosophila embryo. Loss of Engrailed function results in segmentation defects that vary in severity from pair-rule phenotypes to a lawn phenotype lacking in obvious of segmentation. During segmentation, Engrailed is expressed in stripes with a single segmental periodicity in Drosophila, which is conserved in all arthropods examined so far. To define segments, the segmental stripes of Engrailed induce the segmental stripes of wingless at each parasegmental boundary. However, segmentation functions of orthologs of engrailed in non-Drosophila arthropods have yet to be reported. Here, we analyzed functions of the Tribolium ortholog of engrailed (Tc-engrailed) during embryonic segmentation. Larval cuticles with Tc-engrailed being knocked down had segmentation phenotypes including incomplete segment formation and loss of a group of segments. In agreement with the cuticle segmentation defects, segments developed incompletely and irregularly or did not form in Tribolium germbands where Tc-engrailed was knocked down. Furthermore, knock-down of Tc-engrailed did not properly express the segmental stripes of wingless in Tribolium germbands. Taken together with the conserved expression patterns of Engrailed in arthropod segmentation, our data suggest that Tc-engrailed is required for embryonic segmentation in Tribolium, and the genetic mechanism of Engrailed inducing wingless expression is conserved at least between Drosophila and Tribolium.

The larval segment formation and secondary loss in echiurans is a special phenomenon, which is considered to be one of the important characteristics in the evolutionary relationship between the Echiura and Annelida. To better understand the molecular mechanism of this phenomenon, we revealed the larval transcriptome profile of the echiuran worm Urechis unicinctus using RNA-Seq technology. Twelve cDNA libraries of U. unicinctus larvae, late-trochophore (LT), early-segmentation larva (ES), segmentation larva (SL), and worm-shaped larva (WL) were constructed. Totally 243,381 unigenes were assembled with an average length of 1125 bp and N50 of 1836 bp, and 149,488 unigenes (61.42%) were annotated. We obtained 70,517 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by pairwise comparison of the larval transcriptome data at different developmental stages and clustered them into 20 gene expression profiles using STEM software. Based on the typical profiles during the larval segment formation and secondary loss, eight signaling pathways were enriched, and five of which, mTOR, PI3K-AKT, TGF-&beta, MAPK, and Dorso-ventral axis formation signaling pathway, were proposed for the first time to be involved in the segment formation. Furthermore, we identified 119 unigenes related to the segment formation of annelids, arthropods, and chordates, in which 101 genes were identified in Drosophila and annelids. The function of most segment polarity gene homologs (hedgehog, wingless, engrailed, etc.) was conserved in echiurans, annelids, and arthropods based on their expression profiles, while the gap and pair-rule gene homologs were not. Finally, we verified that strong positive signals of Hedgehog were indeed located on the boundary of larval segments using immunofluorescence. Data in this study provide molecular evidence for the understanding of larval segment development in echiurans and may serve as a blueprint for segmented ancestors in future research.

Delta/Notch (Dl/N) signalling is involved in the gene regulatory network underlying the segmentation process in vertebrates and possibly also in annelids and arthropods, leading to the hypothesis that segmentation may have evolved in the last common ancestor of bilaterian animals. Because of seemingly contradicting results within the well-studied arthropods, however, the role and origin of Dl/N signalling in segmentation generally is still unclear. In this study, we investigate core components of Dl/N signalling by means of gene expression analysis in the onychophoran Euperipatoides kanangrensis, a close relative to the arthropods. We find that neither Delta or Notch nor any other investigated components of its signalling pathway are likely to be involved in segment addition in onychophorans. We instead suggest that Dl/N signalling may be involved in posterior elongation, another conserved function of these genes. We suggest further that the posterior elongation network, rather than classic Dl/N signalling, may be in the control of the highly conserved segment polarity gene network and the lower-level pair-rule gene network in onychophorans. Consequently, we believe that the pair-rule gene network and its interaction with Dl/N signalling may have evolved within the arthropod lineage and that Dl/N signalling has thus likely been recruited independently for segment addition in different phyla. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00427-016-0529-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bioluminescence microscopy is an area attracting considerable interest in the field of cell biology because it offers several advantages over fluorescence microscopy, including no requirement for excitation light and being phototoxicity free. This method requires brighter luciferase for imaging; however, suitable genetic resource material for this purpose is not available at present. To achieve brighter bioluminescence microscopy, we developed a new firefly luciferase. Using the brighter luciferase, a reporter strain of Drosophila Gal4-UAS (Upstream Activating Sequence) system was constructed. This system demonstrated the expression pattern of engrailed, which is a segment polarity gene, during Drosophila metamorphosis by bioluminescence microscopy, and revealed drastic spatiotemporal change in the engrailed expression pattern during head eversion in the early stage of pupation.

Background One of the best studied developmental processes is the Drosophila segmentation cascade. However, this cascade is generally considered to be highly derived and unusual, with segments being patterned simultaneously, rather than the ancestral sequential segmentation mode. We present a detailed analysis of the segmentation cascade of the milkweed bug Oncopletus fasciatus, an insect with a more primitive segmentation mode, as a comparison to Drosophila, with the aim of reconstructing the evolution of insect segmentation modes. Results We document the expression of 12 genes, representing different phases in the segmentation process. Using double staining we reconstruct the spatio-temporal relationships among these genes. We then show knock-down phenotypes of representative genes in order to uncover their roles and position in the cascade. Conclusions We conclude that sequential segmentation in the Oncopeltus germband includes three slightly overlapping phases: Primary pair-rule genes generate the first segmental gene expression in the anterior growth zone. This pattern is carried anteriorly by a series of secondary pair-rule genes, expressed in the transition between the growth zone and the segmented germband. Segment polarity genes are expressed in the segmented germband with conserved relationships. Unlike most holometabolous insects, this process generates a single-segment periodicity, and does not have a double-segment pattern at any stage. We suggest that the evolutionary transition to double-segment patterning lies in mutually exclusive expression patterns of secondary pair-rule genes. The fact that many aspects of the putative Oncopeltus segmentation network are similar to those of Drosophila, is consistent with a simple transition between sequential and simultaneous segmentation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12862-018-1293-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

During animal development, complex signals determine and organize a vast number of tissues using a very small number of signal transduction pathways. These developmental signaling pathways determine cell fates through a coordinated transcriptional response that remains poorly understood. The Wnt pathway is involved in a variety of these cellular functions, and its signals are transmitted in part through a β-catenin/TCF transcriptional complex. Here we report an in vivo Drosophila assay that can be used to distinguish between activation, de-repression and repression of transcriptional responses, separating upstream and downstream pathway activation and canonical/non-canonical Wnt signals in embryos. We find specific sets of genes downstream of both β-catenin and TCF with an additional group of genes regulated by Wnt, while the non-canonical Wnt4 regulates a separate cohort of genes. We correlate transcriptional changes with phenotypic outcomes of cell differentiation and embryo size, showing our model can be used to characterize developmental signaling compartmentalization in vivo.

Comparative studies have examined the expression and function of homologues of the Drosophila melanogaster pair rule and segment polarity genes in a range of arthropods. The segment polarity gene homologues have a conserved role in the specification of the parasegment boundary, but the degree of conservation of the upstream patterning genes has proved more variable. Using genomic resources we identify a complete set of pair rule gene homologues from the centipede Strigamia maritima, and document a detailed time series of expression during trunk segmentation. We find supportive evidence for a conserved hierarchical organisation of the pair rule genes, with a division into early- and late-activated genes which parallels the functional division into primary and secondary pair rule genes described in insects. We confirm that the relative expression of sloppy-paired and paired with respect to wingless and engrailed at the parasegment boundary is conserved between myriapods and insects; suggesting that functional interactions between these genes might be an ancient feature of arthropod segment patterning. However, we find that the relative expression of a number of the primary pair rule genes is divergent between myriapods and insects. This corroborates suggestions that the evolution of upper tiers in the segmentation gene network is more flexible. Finally, we find that the expression of the Strigamia pair rule genes in periodic patterns is restricted to the ectoderm. This suggests that any direct role of these genes in segmentation is restricted to this germ layer, and that mesoderm segmentation is either dependent on the ectoderm, or occurs through an independent mechanism., Highlights • We use genomic resources to identify 17 Strigamia pair rule gene homologues. • Sixteen of these are expressed in periodic patterns before the appearance of morphological segments. • We allocate genes to primary and secondary tiers in the hierarchy based on detailed time series data. • Expression of pax3/7 and slp homologues is conserved at the parasegment boundary across arthropods. • Segmental expression is restricted to ectoderm, suggesting mesoderm segmentation is secondary.

Odontogenic keratocysts are very well documented in the literature. Multiple odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) are one of the most frequent features of nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCCS). It is linked with mutation in the PTCH gene (human homolog of the drosophila segment polarity gene, "patched",). Partial expression of the gene may result in occurrence of only multiple recurring OKC without any associated systemic findings. A rare case of multiple odontogenic keratocysts unassociated with any syndrome is reported, so as to add to the growing number of such cases in the literature. The possibility of this case being a partial expression of the Gorlin-Goltz syndrome is discussed.

TheDrosophilaembryo transiently exhibits a double segment periodicity, defined by the expression of seven “pair-rule” genes, each in a pattern of seven stripes. At gastrulation, interactions between the pair-rule genes lead to frequency doubling and the patterning of fourteen parasegment boundaries. In contrast to earlier stages ofDrosophilaanteroposterior patterning, this transition is not well understood. By carefully analysing the spatiotemporal dynamics of pair-rule gene expression, we demonstrate that frequency-doubling is precipitated by multiple coordinated changes to the network of regulatory interactions between the pair-rule genes. We identify the broadly expressed but temporally patterned transcription factor, Odd-paired (Opa/Zic), as the cause of these changes, and show that the patterning of the even-numbered parasegment boundaries relies on Opa-dependent regulatory interactions. Our findings indicate that the pair-rule gene regulatory network has a temporally-modulated topology, permitting the pair-rule genes to play stage-specific patterning roles.

Brachiopods are benthic marine invertebrates that live enclosed in a bivalved shell. Despite having a reduced and unsegmented trunk in the adult stage, brachiopod larvae show putative segmented structures such as transverse ectodermal boundaries and iterated coelomic sacs. Several molecular mechanisms of segmentation have been described in animals considered to be segmented (i.e., the distantly related annelids, arthropods and vertebrates), but far less is known about the role of these "segmentation genes" in other organisms. Here we investigate the expression of the arthropod segment polarity genes engrailed, wnt1 and hedgehog in the development of brachiopods—a group more closely related to the segmented annelids. Expression of engrailed correlates with the development of an anterior nonsegmental ectodermal boundary in the embryos of Terebratalia transversa and Novocrania anomala. Surprisingly, wnt1 is expressed as a stripe adjacent to engrailed in T. transversa in the same manner as in the parasegment boundaries of insects. Expression of hedgehog, however, is restricted to the endoderm and is not compatible with a segment polarity role. In addition, the putative engrailed regulators pax6 and pax2/5/8 encircle the whole embryo and demarcate this anterior ectodermal boundary before engrailed. We conclude brachiopod larvae might have a common anterior patterning involving the expression of pax6, pax2/5/8 and engrailed. Despite key differences to other segment boundaries (e.g., hedgehog expression), we show the characteristic adjacent stripes of engrailed and wnt1 can occur in a nonsegmental ectodermal boundary. A comparison among bilaterians suggests the ancestral expression of engrailed during early development was nonsegmental and conceivably related to the embryonic head/trunk boundary. Our data implies that engrailed was independently recruited to the segment boundaries of annelids and arthropods and to other different developmental boundaries during evolution.

The Nusslein-Volhard and Wieschaus screen for mutations disrupting the segmentation of the Drosophila embryo revolutionized developmental genetics, leading the way to the identification of many of the transcription factors and signaling pathways that orchestrate development, not just in the fruit fly but across the animal kingdom. The Hedgehog signaling pathway is a case in point: yet remarkably, all but one of the genes encoding the Hedgehog pathway components-including Hedgehog itself-had previously been discovered, in some cases decades earlier. Here I review the original identification of these genes and consider why their significance remained obscure until the Nobel Prize winning screen.

The hierarchy of the segmentation cascade responsible for establishing the Drosophila body plan is composed by gap, pair-rule and segment polarity genes. However, no pair-rule stripes are formed in the anterior regions of the embryo. This lack of stripe formation, as well as other evidence from the literature that is further investigated here, led us to the hypothesis that anterior gap genes might be involved in a combinatorial mechanism responsible for repressing the cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) of hairy (h), even-skipped (eve), runt (run), and fushi-tarazu (ftz) anterior-most stripes. In this study, we investigated huckebein (hkb), which has a gap expression domain at the anterior tip of the embryo. Using genetic methods we were able to detect deviations from the wild-type patterns of the anterior-most pair-rule stripes in different genetic backgrounds, which were consistent with Hkb-mediated repression. Moreover, we developed an image processing tool that, for the most part, confirmed our assumptions. Using an hkb misexpression system, we further detected specific repression on anterior stripes. Furthermore, bioinformatics analysis predicted an increased significance of binding site clusters in the CRMs of h 1, eve 1, run 1 and ftz 1when Hkb was incorporated in the analysis, indicating that Hkb plays a direct role in these CRMs. We further discuss that Hkb and Slp1, which is the other previously identified common repressor of anterior stripes, might participate in a combinatorial repression mechanism controlling stripe CRMs in the anterior parts of the embryo and define the borders of these anterior stripes.

Anterior head segmentation is governed by different regulatory mechanisms than those that control trunk segmentation in Drosophila. For segment polarity genes, both initial mode of activation as well as cross-regulatory interactions among them differ from the typical genetic circuitry in the trunk and are unique for each of the procephalic segments. In order to better understand the segment-specific gene network responsible for the procephalic expression of the earliest active segment polarity genes wingless and hedgehog, we started to identify and analyze cis-regulatory DNA elements of these genes. For hedgehog, we could identify a cis-regulatory element, ic-CRE, that mediates expression specifically in the posterior part of the intercalary segment and requires promoter-specific interaction for its function. The intercalary stripe is the last part of the metameric hedgehog expression pattern that appears during embryonic development, which probably reflects the late and distinct establishment of this segment. The identification of a cis-regulatory element that is specific for one head segment supports the mutant-based observation that the expression of segment polarity genes is governed by a unique gene network in each of the procephalic segments. This provides further indication that the anterior-most head segments represent primary segments, which are set up independently, in contrast to the secondary segments of the trunk, which resemble true repetitive units. peerReviewed

The segmentation of Drosophila is a prime model to study spatial patterning during embryogenesis. The spatial expression of segment polarity genes results from a complex network of interacting proteins whose expression products are maintained after successful segmentation. This prompted us to investigate the stability and robustness of this process using a dynamical model for the segmentation network based on Boolean states. The model consists of intra-cellular as well as inter-cellular interactions between adjacent cells in one spatial dimension. We quantify the robustness of the dynamical segmentation process by a systematic analysis of mutations. Our starting point consists in a previous Boolean model for Drosophila segmentation. We define mathematically the notion of dynamical robustness and show that the proposed model exhibits limited robustness in gene expression under perturbations. We applied in silico evolution (mutation and selection) and discover two classes of modified gene networks that have a more robust spatial expression pattern. We verified that the enhanced robustness of the two new models is maintained in differential equations models. By comparing the predicted model with experiments on mutated flies, we then discuss the two types of enhanced models. Drosophila patterning can be explained by modelling the underlying network of interacting genes. Here we demonstrate that simple dynamical considerations and in silico evolution can enhance the model to robustly express the expected pattern, helping to elucidate the role of further interactions.

The insect intercalary segment represents a small and appendage-less head segment that is homologous to the second antennal segment of Crustacea and the pedipalpal segment in Chelicerata, which are generally referred to as "tritocerebral segment." In Drosophila, the gene collier (col) has an important role for the formation of the intercalary segment. Here we show that in the beetle Tribolium castaneum col is required for the activation of the segment polarity genes hedgehog (hh), engrailed (en) and wingless (wg) in the intercalary segment, and is a regulatory target of the intercalary segment specific Hox gene labial (lab). Loss of Tc col function leads to increased cell death in the intercalary segment. In the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus, the loss of col function has a more severe effect in lacking the intercalary segment and also affecting the adjacent mandibular and antennal segments. By contrast, col is not expressed early in the second antennal segment in the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis or in the pedipalpal segment of the spider Achaearanea tepidariorum. This suggests that the early expression of col in a stripe and its role in tritocerebral segment development is insect-specific and might correlate with the appendage-less morphology of the intercalary segment.

The expression of the segment polarity genes wingless (wg) and engrailed (en) is highly conserved across arthropods, and these genes play a crucial role in patterning of the segmental body plan. Investigations of the expression and function of wg and en have focused primarily upon holometabolous insects, with the notable exception of recent detailed work in Oncopeltus (Hemiptera), Schistocerca, and Gryllus (Orthoptera). An increase in the phylogenetic breadth of our understanding of molecular patterning is crucial to ascertain the extent of conservation and divergence in molecular patterning mechanisms during insect embryogenesis. We examined the expression of wg mRNA transcripts and localization of En protein during embryogenesis in the mayfly Ephoron leukon (Ephemeroptera: Polymitarcyidae). These data represent one of the first embryonic gene expression pattern data for a mayfly, a lineage that may be the sister group to all other winged insects. Many aspects of wg and En expression are highly conserved, notably their expression in juxtaposed stripes in each parasegment, as well as expression domains in the procephalon, mouthparts, thoracic limbs, and nervous system. Future work in mayflies can be used to determine if conservation extends to other components of the segmentation hierarchy.

Despite long-standing interest, the molecular mechanisms underlying the establishment of anterior–posterior (AP) polarity remain among the unsolved mysteries in metazoans. In the planarians (a family of flatworms), canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling is required for posterior specification, as it is in many animals. However, the molecular mechanisms regulating the posterior-specific induction of Wnt genes according to the AP polarity have remained unclear. Here, we demonstrate that Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is responsible for the establishment of AP polarity via its regulation of the transcription of Wnt family genes during planarian regeneration. We found that RNAi gene knockdown of Dugesia japonica patched (Djptc) caused ectopic tail formation in the anterior blastema of body fragments, resulting in bipolar-tails regeneration. In contrast, RNAi of hedgehog (Djhh) and gli (Djgli) caused bipolar-heads regeneration. We show that Patched-mediated Hh signaling was crucial for posterior specification, which is established by regulating the transcription of Wnt genes via downstream Gli activity. Moreover, differentiated cells were responsible for the posterior specification of undifferentiated stem cells through Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Surprisingly, Djhh was expressed in neural cells all along the ventral nerve cords (along the AP axis), but not in the posterior blastema of body fragments, where the expression of Wnt genes was induced for posteriorization. We therefore propose that Hh signals direct head or tail regeneration according to the AP polarity, which is established by Hh signaling activity along the body's preexisting nervous system., 100年来の謎に迫る－体の極性を決める仕組みを解明しました. 京都大学プレスリリース. 2009-12-08.

Drosophila melanogaster has long played an important role in debates surrounding insect and arthropod head segmentation. It is surprising, therefore, that one important feature of Drosophila head segmentation has remained controversial: namely the position of the boundary between the intercalary and mandibular segments. The Drosophila embryonic head has a pair of structures lying behind the stomodeum known as the hypopharyngeal lobes. Traditionally they have been seen as part of the intercalary segment. More recent work looking at the position of the lobes relative to various marker genes has been somewhat equivocal: segment polarity gene expression has been used to argue for a mandibular affinity of these lobes, while the expression of the anterior-most hox gene labial (lab) has supported an intercalary affinity. We have addressed the question of the segmental affinity of the hypopharyngeal lobes by conducting a detailed comparison of gene expression patterns between Drosophila and the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum, in which the intercalary segment is unambiguously marked out by lab. We demonstrate that there is a large degree of conservation in gene expression patterns between Drosophila and Tribolium, and this argues against an intercalary segment affinity for the hypopharyngeal lobes. The lobes appear to be largely mandibular in origin, although some gene expression attributed to them appears to be associated with the stomodeum. We propose that the difficulties in interpreting the Drosophila head result from a topological shift in the Drosophila embryonic head, associated with the derived process of head involution.

Developmental boundaries ensure that cells fated to participate in a particular structure are brought together or maintained at the appropriate locale within developing embryos. Parasegment grooves mark the position of boundaries that separate every segment of the Drosophila embryo into anterior and posterior compartments. Here, we dissect the genetic hierarchy that controls the formation of this morphological landmark. We report that primary segment polarity genes (engrailed, hedgehog and wingless) are not involved in specifying the position of parasegment grooves. Wingless signalling plays only a permissive role by triggering the formation of grooves at cellular interfaces defined by the ON/OFF state of expression of the earlier acting pair-rule genes eve and ftz. We suggest that the transcription factors encoded by these genes activate two programmes in parallel: a cell fate programme mediated by segment polarity genes and a boundary/epithelial integrity programme mediated by unknown target genes.