1. Comparing the Sources of Sediment Retained by Beaver Dams and Beaver Dam Analogs.
- Author
-
Westbrook, Cherie J. and Cooper, David J.
- Subjects
RIVER channels ,STREAM restoration ,RIVER sediments ,COMPOSITION of sediments ,BEAVERS - Abstract
Beavers modify riverine systems by building dams that alter downstream fluxes of water and sediment. Where beavers have been lost and stream channels degraded, beaver dam analogs (BDAs) are being used to mimic the effects of beaver engineering. Central to the success of these structures in accelerating stream recovery is creating similar ecosystem responses as beaver dams including sediment retention. Unknown is the relative importance of beaver actions versus erosion in the catchment in generating the retained sediment. This study tested the viability of sediment fingerprinting to determine the source of sediment retained by beaver dams and BDAs in a watershed in Alberta, Canada. Concentrations of 29 elements were measured as potential tracers from known sediment sources: upland, terrace, stream bank, and beaver canal. Virtual mixture tests, used to compare the computed source estimates with known source mixtures, revealed that sediment fingerprinting is a robust method for identifying sources of sediment retained by beaver ponds and BDAs. The un‐mixing model results indicate that on average 56% of the sediment retained by the beaver dams originated from terraces, 23% from uplands, and 13% from beaver canals. About 89% of sediment retained by the BDAs originated from eroding stream banks. We conclude that the geomorphic effects of beavers and their dams are more diverse, resulting in more diverse sources of sediment retained by their dams. This differentiates beaver dams from BDAs. The study has implications for informing management practices that involve beavers and beaver mimicry. Plain Language Summary: Growing recognition of the importance of beaver dams in maintaining naturally functioning streams and floodplains has spurred the use of beaver mimicry structures to accelerate stream recovery where stream channels have cut downward because beavers are absent. Despite the importance of sediment trapping in determining the success of beaver mimicry structures in raising the stream bed, the source of the trapped sediment is poorly known and seldom analyzed. This study investigated whether sediment fingerprinting, a well‐known method for assessing sources of lake, estuary and floodplain sediment deposits, could reliably establish the sources of sediment retained by beaver dams and beaver mimicry structures. We tested this method in a watershed in the Canadian Rocky Mountains and found that it effectively differentiated between the sources of sediment trapped by beaver dams and beaver mimicry structures. Sediment trapped by the mimicry structures originated mainly from stream banks flooded by the structures, whereas beaver dams trapped sediment originating from a combination of riparian areas, canals dug by beavers and hillslopes. Beaver mimicry structures did not replicate the sediment trapping processes of beaver dams because the beavers were important in actively mobilizing the sediment that became trapped by their dams. Key Points: Sediment fingerprinting can effectively establish the source of sediment retained by beaver dams and beaver dam analogs (BDAs)Sediment retained by beaver dams originates from different and more diverse sources than sediment retained by BDAsBDA sediment composition does not replicate that of beaver dams as beavers contribute sediment via canal building and terrace inundation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF