Search

Overall colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have been decreasing for several decades; however, since the early 1990s CRC incidence rates have nearly doubled among adults aged under 50 years. This study pilot-tested a community-based mass-media campaign aimed at improving knowledge and awareness of early-onset CRC in this population. The campaign (#CRCandMe) was deployed from June to September 2023 in Utah and Wisconsin. To evaluate its success (reach) and inform future campaigns, key performance indicators were defined (e.g., impressions, website traffic). To evaluate change in knowledge in the target population, the knowledge and awareness of participants recruited via consumer panels was assessed at baseline (n=235) and follow-up (n=161). The number of correct answers for each of seven knowledge items was calculated at baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post-intervention). McNemar's test was employed to assess significant differences in the seven knowledge items between the two timepoints. The campaign delivered over 26.7 million impressions and nearly 43,000 clicks. A 15-second video ad received 221,985 plays, with 57,270 users watching to completion. Pre-survey results revealed that while 74% of participants were able to correctly identify CRC signs, only 18% could identify risk factors. Knowledge scores slightly improved from baseline to follow-up, with statistically significance for the question related to CRC signs (P=0.0004). This study demonstrated wide reach and may inform future larger-scale interventions and public health initiatives aimed at reducing CRC incidence and improving health outcomes for at-risk adults aged under 50 years., Competing Interests: Dr. Charles R Rogers offers scientific input to research studies through an investigator services agreement with Exact Sciences., (AJCR Copyright © 2024.)

Introduction: This study examined the association between current co-use of cannabis and cigarettes in the past 30 days, and subsequent cigarette discontinuation (past 30-day point prevalence abstinence) among U.S. adults with established cigarette use in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Additionally, we investigated the impact of co-use on the subsequent discontinuation of all combustible tobacco products., Methods: A total of 26,381 observations contributed by 8,218 adults with established cigarette use (i.e., smoked ≥ 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, and currently smoking cigarettes every day or some days) from Waves 1-5 of the PATH Study were included in the analysis. Weighted Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) models were used to evaluate the association between current co-use at baseline (Waves 1-4) with the outcomes assessed at the subsequent wave (cigarette and combustible tobacco discontinuation at Waves 2-5). Final models included: demographic characteristics (age, sex, race and ethnicity, educational attainment), behavior characteristics (intention to quit, internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, substance use problems), and wave-pair., Results: Over one-third (35.91%) of cigarette users self-reported co-use during the study period. Cannabis use among adults with established cigarette use increased over time. Co-use was associated with a decreased odds of cigarette smoking discontinuation at follow-up, after adjusting for covariates (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.93; p=0.0018). Similar effect sizes were observed for discontinuation of all combustible tobacco products (aOR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.86; p<.0001)., Conclusions: Cannabis use among adults who smoke cigarettes was inversely related to subsequent cigarette discontinuation, suggesting that co-use may reduce likelihood of successful tobacco cessation., Implications: Findings demonstrate that cannabis use may lead to lower odds of discontinuation among adults with established cigarette use; therefore, individuals that co-use cigarettes and cannabis may need additional tobacco cessation support. Notably, this study observed an increase in co-use of cigarettes and cannabis, emphasizing the need for researchers and public health programs to shift their focus towards understanding and addressing concurrent substance use among adults who smoke cigarettes., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This study investigated the effectiveness of quitline service intensity (high vs. low) on past 30-day tobacco abstinence at 7-months follow-up, using observational data from the Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline (OTH) between April 2020 and December 2021. To assess the impact of loss to follow-up and non-random treatment assignment, we fit the parameters of a marginal structural model to estimate inverse probability weights for censoring (IPCW) and treatment (IPTW) and combined (IPCTW). The Risk Ratio (RR) was estimated using modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimator. Of the 4,695 individuals included in the study, 64% received high-intensity cessation services, and 53% were lost to follow-up. Using the conventional complete case analysis (responders only), high-intensity cessation services were associated with abstinence (RR=1.18; 95 CI: 1.04, 1.34). The effect estimate was attenuated after accounting for censoring (RR=1.14; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.30). After adjusting for both baseline confounding and selection bias via IPTCW, high-intensity cessation services were associated with 1.23 times (95% CI: 1.08, 1.41) the probability of abstinence compared to low-intensity services. Despite relatively high loss to follow-up, accounting for selection bias and confounding did not notably impact quit rates or the relationship between intensity of quitline services and tobacco cessation among OTH participants., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.)

Background: The purpose of this study is to undertake a comprehensive systematic review to describe multilevel factors (barriers and facilitators) that may influence the implementation of low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening in the United States., Methods: Systematic literature searches were performed using 6 online databases and citation indexes for peer-reviewed studies, for articles published from 2013 to 2021. Studies were classified into 3 perspectives, based on the study's unit of analysis: system, health-care provider, and patient. Barriers and facilitators identified for each study included in our final review were then coded and categorized using the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains., Results: At the system level, the 2 most common constructs were external policy and incentives and executing the implementation process. At the provider level, the most common constructs were evidence strength and quality of the intervention characteristics, patient needs and resources, implementation climate, and an individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention. At the patient level, the most common constructs were patient needs and resources, individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, and engaging in the implementation process. These constructs can act as facilitators or barriers to lung cancer screening implementation., Conclusions: Applying the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains and constructs to understand and specify factors facilitating uptake of lung cancer screening as well as cataloging the lessons learned from previous efforts helps inform the development and implementation processes of lung cancer screening programs in the community setting., Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021247677., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)