Search

Background Darunavir is a potent HIV protease inhibitor with a high barrier to resistance. We conducted a nested pharmacokinetic sub-study within CHAPAS-4 to evaluate darunavir exposure in African children with HIV, taking once-daily darunavir/ritonavir for second-line treatment. Methods We used data from the CHAPAS-4 pharmacokinetic sub-study treating children with once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg if 14–24.9 kg and 800/100 mg if ≥25 kg) with either tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF)/emtricitabine (FTC), abacavir/lamivudine or zidovudine/lamivudine. Steady-state pharmacokinetic sampling was done at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after observed darunavir/ritonavir intake. Non-compartmental and population pharmacokinetic analyses were used to describe the data and identify significant covariates. Reference adult pharmacokinetic data were used for comparison. We simulated the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended 600/100 mg darunavir/ritonavir dose for the 25–34.9 kg weight band. Results Data from 59 children with median age and weight 10.9 (range 3.8–14.7) years and 26.0 (14.5–47.0) kg, respectively, were available. A two-compartment disposition model with transit absorption compartments and weight-based allometric scaling of clearance and volume best described darunavir data. Our population achieved geometric mean (%CV) darunavir AUC0–24h, 94.3(50) mg·h/L and C max, 9.1(35) mg/L, above adult reference values and C trough, 1.5(111) mg/L, like adult values. The nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor backbone was not found to affect darunavir concentrations. Simulated WHO-recommended darunavir/ritonavir doses showed exposures equivalent to adults. Higher alpha-1-acid glycoprotein increased binding to darunavir and decreased apparent clearance of darunavir. Conclusions Darunavir exposures achieved in our trial are within safe range. Darunavir/ritonavir can safely be co-administered with TAF/FTC. Both WHO-recommended 600/100 mg and CHAPAS-4 800/100 mg darunavir/ritonavir doses for the 25–34.9 kg weight band offer favourable exposures. The choice between them can depend on tablet availability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) beyond initial glucocorticoid therapy is challenging. In this retrospective single‐centre cohort study, we compared all ITP patients relapsed or non‐responsive to glucocorticoid therapy treated with either continuous TPO‐RAs (n = 35) or rituximab induction (n = 20) between 2015 and 2022. While both groups showed high initial complete response rates (CR, 68.6 vs. 80.0%, ns), the overall rate of progression to the next therapy was higher after time‐limited rituximab (75.0 vs. 42.9%), resulting in a lower relapse‐free survival (median 16.6 vs. 25.8 months, log‐rank; p < 0.05). We conclude that both treatments show similar initial efficacy and their ideal duration of therapy warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Early studies showed promise of combined anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plus anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), yet this was later rejected as toxic and ineffective in studies not selected for RAS status. We studied advanced KRAS wild-type CRC, as second-line treatment, using irinotecan-cetuximab with or without the anti-VEGF receptor antibody ramucirumab. Methods Patients with 1 prior regimen including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab, with KRAS wild-type tumors were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score, time since last chemotherapy, and progression on oxaliplatin to irinotecan-cetuximab (IC) (180 mg/m2 and 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks) vs modified ICR (irinotecan-cetuximab with ramucirumab 150 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2 plus 6 mg/kg, respectively). A total of 102 patients were compared for progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoint (85% power for 70% improvement in median PFS from 4.5 to 7.65 months). Results Of the 102 enrolled, 44 treated with irinotecan-cetuximab and 45 with modified ramucirumab were evaluable. Median PFS was 6.0 months vs 9.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.75, P = .07; statistically significant by study design for P  < .128). Response rate was 23% vs 36% (P = .27), and disease-control rate was 52% vs 73% (P  = .05). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was equivalent. Overall survival was not significantly different at approximately 19 months. Conclusion Previous phase 3 trials without RAS genotyping rejected combining anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-VEGF drugs. In this randomized multicenter phase 2 study for KRAS wild-type CRC (all previously bevacizumab treated), the addition of ramucirumab to irinotecan and cetuximab improved PFS and disease control rate, showing the combination is feasible and effective. Further, phase 3 trials with appropriate patient-selection are required. (NCT01079780) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background With the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance, real-world data on the optimal empirical second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori are still limited. Objectives To evaluate the real-world efficacy of various second-line therapies for H. pylori. Patients and methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all H. pylori -infected patients who had received the second-line treatment after the failure of primary clarithromycin triple therapy in Hong Kong between 2003 and 2018. The retreatment success rates of different second-line therapies were evaluated. Results A total of 7591 patients who received second-line treatment were included. Notably, the most commonly prescribed regimen was still clarithromycin triple therapy, but the frequency of use had decreased from 59.5% in 2003–06 to 28.7% in 2015–18. Concomitant non-bismuth quadruple therapy had emerged as the commonest regimen (from 3.3% to 43.9%). In a validation analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of retreatment-inferred second-line treatment failure were 88.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The overall success rate of second-line therapies was 73.6%. Bismuth quadruple therapy had the highest success rate of 85.6%, while clarithromycin triple therapy had the lowest success rate of 63.5%. Specifically, bismuth/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, metronidazole/tetracycline triple, levofloxacin/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, rifabutin/amoxicillin triple and amoxicillin/levofloxacin triple therapies had relatively higher success rates over 80%. Age, treatment duration, baseline conditions and first-line treatment used were associated with success rate. Conclusions Bismuth quadruple therapy was the most effective second-line regimen for H. pylori in this real-world study. Despite a very low success rate, clarithromycin-containing triple therapies were still commonly used as second-line regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Inconsistent results observed in recent phase III trials assessing chimeric antigenic receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy as a second-line treatment compared to standard of care (SOC) in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) prompted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy in this setting. Methods: Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect estimates for comparison between CAR-T cell therapy and SOC. Mixed treatment comparisons were made using a frequentist network meta-analysis approach. Results: Meta-analysis of three trials with 865 patients showed significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS: HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.97; I2: 92%), progression-free survival (PFS: HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60; I2: 0%) with CAR-T cell therapy compared to SOC. Although there was a signal of potential overall survival (OS) improvement with CAR-T cell therapy, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.03; I2: 29%). Mixed treatment comparisons showed significant EFS benefitwith liso-cel (HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.22-0.61) and axi-cel (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.29-0.61) compared to tisa-cel. Discussion: CAR-T cell therapy, as a second-line treatment, appears to be effective in achieving higher response rates and delaying the disease progression compared to SOC in R/R DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology that can lead to end stage liver disease if left without treatment. Corticosteroids with or without azathioprine (AZA) are considered the recommended standard first-line treatment option for the induction and maintenance of remission. The aim of treatment is to achieve complete biochemical response (CBR), defined by normal transaminases and immunoglobulin G (IgG) within 6–12 months after treatment initiation. However, response rates to standard treatment vary widely as approximately 10–25% of cases develop intolerance, insufficient response, or rarely non-response to AZA. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective and safe alternative first-line treatment in AIH, based on its high rates of CBR among treatment-naive patients, but can also be considered as second-line drug in patients with poor response or intolerance to AZA. However, even after the administration of second line treatment there is a small proportion of patients with refractory disease that bear the highest probability of developing decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. For this difficult to treat subgroup of patients third-line treatments are warranted. Therefore, the aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on second- and third-line therapies for AIH, as well as, to set the background for future perspectives on safer and more efficient treatment strategies.

IntroductionInconsistent results observed in recent phase III trials assessing chimeric antigenic receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy as a second-line treatment compared to standard of care (SOC) in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) prompted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy in this setting.MethodsRandom-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect estimates for comparison between CAR-T cell therapy and SOC. Mixed treatment comparisons were made using a frequentist network meta-analysis approach.ResultsMeta-analysis of three trials with 865 patients showed significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS: HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.97; I2: 92%), progression-free survival (PFS: HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60; I2: 0%) with CAR-T cell therapy compared to SOC. Although there was a signal of potential overall survival (OS) improvement with CAR-T cell therapy, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.03; I2: 29%). Mixed treatment comparisons showed significant EFS benefit with liso-cel (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.61) and axi-cel (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.29-0.61) compared to tisa-cel.DiscussionCAR-T cell therapy, as a second-line treatment, appears to be effective in achieving higher response rates and delaying the disease progression compared to SOC in R/R DLBCL.

Abstract Background Paclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab is the standard of care second-line therapy in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). As the number of taxane pretreated patients in the perioperative or first-line setting is increasing, it is unknown whether these patients benefit from re-applying a taxane in using the combination of paclitaxel and ramucirumab. Furthermore, the rates of neurotoxicity with first-line FOLFOX or FLOT range from 30%–70%, making second-line taxane‐containing therapy less suitable to a meaningful portion of patients. This patient group is likely to benefit from a taxane-free second-line chemotherapy regimen, such as FOLFIRI and ramucirumab (FOLFIRI-Ram). Therefore, the RAMIRIS phase III trial evaluates the effects of the regimen of FOLFIRI-Ram in the second-line treatment after a taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced GEA. Methods The RAMIRIS trial is a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II/III study comparing treatment of FOLFIRI-Ram (arm A) with paclitaxel and ramucirumab (arm B). The Phase II is already closed with 111 enrolled patients. In the phase III, 318 taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA will be recruited and randomized 1:1 to FOLFIRI (5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h i.v., irinotecan 180 mg/m2 i.v.; 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus; leucovorin 400 mg/m2 i.v.; on day 1 and 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm A) or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm B). The primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and objective overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate and safety and quality of life as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Discussion The already completed RAMIRIS phase II demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of FOLFIRI-Ram. Especially docetaxel-pretreated patients seemed to markedly benefit from FOLFIRI-Ram, with favorable response- and PFS rates and lower toxicity. This offers a rationale for the phase III trial. If the RAMIRIS III trial transfers and confirms the results, they will affect the current treatment guidelines, recommending the combination therapy of FOLFIRI-Ram for taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA. Trial registration NCT03081143 Date of registration: 13.11.2015

Simple Summary: Second-line treatment strategy after the first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor with aromatase inhibitor is considered by the behavior of hormone receptor positive human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Progression free survival 2 was one of the association factors for overall survival of HR+HER2− MBC. Therefore, the second-line treatment strategy was important to improve prognosis in patients with HR+/HER2− MBC. Background: We analyzed real-world practice of second-line treatment in hormone receptor (HR)+ human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)− metastatic breast cancer (MBC) following the first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor with letrozole. In addition, we evaluated the relationship between second-line treatment strategies and survival outcome. Methods: Using the clinical data warehouse, clinical information including MBC diagnosis, treatment and survival outcomes were collected. Results: In total, 305 patients were treated with the first-line palbociclib plus letrozole, and we evaluated 166 patients who were treated with second-line treatment. Of the 166 patients, 28.5% were treated with capecitabine (C), followed by exemestane with everolimus (EE) (27.3%) or cytotoxic chemotherapy other than capecitabine (T) (18.8%) and fulvestrant-based treatment or endocrine monotherapy (F) (12.7%). Eighteen patients (10.9%) were enrolled in clinical trials (CT). With regard to treatment strategies, and the median progression-free survival of second-line treatment in a metastatic setting (PFS2) was 7.4 months with C, 5.2 months with EE, 4.8 months with T, 3.6 months with F, and 3.6 months with CT (p = 0.066). In patients with visceral organ disease progression, C (31.3%) or T(31.3%) was the most common second-line treatment followed by EE (21.9%). Most of the 47 patients with bone metastasis alone were treated with EE (38.2%), followed by C (23.4%) and F (21.3%) (p = 0.008). The median overall survival of second-line treatment in a metastatic setting (OS2) was 42.3 months with C, 35.7 months with F, 30.7 months with EE, and 23.1 months with T. The median OS2 for those in CT was not reached (p = 0.064). ER driven BC, disease progression site and PFS2 were associated with OS and OS2 in HR+HER2− MBC (ps < 0.05). Conclusions: We suggested the second line treatment strategy was important to improve prognosis in patients with HR+/HER2− MBC, especially given the recent standardization of first-line treatment and the many available second-line options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Paclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab is the standard of care second-line therapy in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). As the number of taxane pretreated patients in the perioperative or first-line setting is increasing, it is unknown whether these patients benefit from re-applying a taxane in using the combination of paclitaxel and ramucirumab. Furthermore, the rates of neurotoxicity with first-line FOLFOX or FLOT range from 30%–70%, making second-line taxane‐containing therapy less suitable to a meaningful portion of patients. This patient group is likely to benefit from a taxane-free second-line chemotherapy regimen, such as FOLFIRI and ramucirumab (FOLFIRI-Ram). Therefore, the RAMIRIS phase III trial evaluates the effects of the regimen of FOLFIRI-Ram in the second-line treatment after a taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced GEA. Methods: The RAMIRIS trial is a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II/III study comparing treatment of FOLFIRI-Ram (arm A) with paclitaxel and ramucirumab (arm B). The Phase II is already closed with 111 enrolled patients. In the phase III, 318 taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA will be recruited and randomized 1:1 to FOLFIRI (5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h i.v., irinotecan 180 mg/m2 i.v.; 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus; leucovorin 400 mg/m2 i.v.; on day 1 and 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm A) or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm B). The primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and objective overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate and safety and quality of life as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Discussion: The already completed RAMIRIS phase II demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of FOLFIRI-Ram. Especially docetaxel-pretreated patients seemed to markedly benefit from FOLFIRI-Ram, with favorable response- and PFS rates and lower toxicity. This offers a rationale for the phase III trial. If the RAMIRIS III trial transfers and confirms the results, they will affect the current treatment guidelines, recommending the combination therapy of FOLFIRI-Ram for taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA. Trial registration: NCT03081143 Date of registration: 13.11.2015 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: H. pylori eradication reduces the risk of gastric malignancies and peptic ulcer disease. First-line therapies include 14-day PAC (proton pump inhibitor [PPI], amoxicillin, clarithromycin) and PBMT (PPI, bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline). Second-line therapies include 14-day PBMT and PAL (PPI, amoxicillin, levofloxacin). This clinical audit examined current treatment outcomes in Singapore.Methods: Clinical data of H. pylori-positive patientswho underwent empirical first- and second-line eradication therapies from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018 were reviewed. Treatment success was determined by 13C urea breath test performed at least 4 weeks after treatment and 2 weeks off PPI.Results: A total of 963 patients (862 PAC, 36 PMC [PPI, metronidazole, clarithromycin], 18 PBMT, 13 PBAC [PAC with bismuth], 34 others) and 98 patients (62 PMBT, 15 PAL, 21 others) received first-and second-line therapies respectively. A 14-day treatment duration was appropriately prescribed for first- and second-line therapies in 65.2% and 82.7% of patients, respectively. First-line treatment success rates were noted for PAC (seven-day: 76.9%, ten-day: 88.3%, 14-day: 92.0%), PMC (seven-day: 0, ten-day: 75.0%, 14-day: 69.8%), PBMT (ten-day: 100%, 14-day: 87.5%) and PBAC (14-day: 100%). 14-day treatment was superior to seven-day treatment (90.8% vs. 71.4%; P = 0.028). PAC was superior to PMC (P < 0.001) but similar to PBMT (P = 0.518) and PBAC (P = 0.288) in 14-day therapies. 14-day second-line PAL and PBMT had similar efficacy (90.9% vs. 82.4%; P = 0.674).Conclusion: First-line empirical treatment using PAC, PBMT and PBAC for 14 days had similar efficacy. Success rates for second-line PBMT and PAL were similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ramucirumab is a human anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2(VEGFR-2)monoclonal antibodythat acts on vascular endothelial cells to inhibit angiogenesis. Ramucirumab in monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel or FOLFIRI has proven to prolong overall survival in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric/gastrooesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. In clinical practice combination with ramucirumab showed promising efficacy with median overall survival in 9,6 months and manageable toxicities. Most common specific adverse events in ramucirumab were impaired wound healing, hypertension, bleeding and perforation. In several article describe dysphonia induced by anti-angiogenic compounds.Herein, we report on a case a high activity ramucirumab in combination with FOLFIRI. This report aims to present a long-term survivor of recurrent gastric cancer and describe dysphonia induced by ramucirumab.

Background: Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond to standard treatment with steroids and azathioprine. While the disease is usually fatal if untreated, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. Nevertheless, second-line treatment is necessary in approximately 20% of patients, due to either intolerance or insufficient response to first line treatment.While data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients intolerant to azathioprine is encouraging, MMF seems of less benefit in patients with insufficient response to first line treatment, but analyzed data on this issue is limited. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF as a second-line therapy in patients with AIH. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a monocentric database of AIH patients who received medical care from 2000 to 2022. Clinical, immunological and biochemical parameters were assessed at different time points including last follow-up. Results: Overall, 144 patients with AIH were identified. Fifty out of 144 (35%) AIH patients received MMF. Forty (80%) received MMF due to first line treatment intolerance, while ten (20%) due to insufficient response to first line treatment.Remission with MMF monotherapy was 81.5% in the intolerance group versus 30% in the insufficient response group. Patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response, more often needed additional prednisolone doses higher than 5 mg/day, a switch to third-line treatment or combination regiments, to achieve disease control. Conclusions: Patients treated with MMF because of intolerance to first line treatment show a good disease control under MMF in the majority of cases. Efficacy is considerably lower in the patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response to first line treatment.

Introduction: Ramucirumab (Ram), a human IgG 1 antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. This multicenter retrospective study aims to reviewed the results of Ram-based therapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer in a real-life setting.Methods: it was an observational, retrospective study carried out in 11 Russian hospitals. Endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR).Results: 163 patients were included. Ram was used as the second- line in 166 combined with weekly paclitaxel (PTX) in 104 patients or irinotecan-based chemotherapy (mostly FOLFIRI) in 42 patients and as monotherapy in 17 patient. In second line VEGF-related toxicity (all grades) included epistaxis (39,2%), proteinuria >1g/day (4.9%), and arterial hypertension (68%); grade 3-4 toxicity was bleeding (4.3%), perforation (2,4%), venous thrombosis (6,13%) and brain ischemia (0.6%, grade 5). 15 patients (9,2%) discontinued therapy due to toxicity.Conclusion: These real-life efficacy data of ramucirumab are in line with previous randomized trials. Ramucirumab is well tolerated in daily clinical practice.

Aim: To present the case of a patient with unresectable gastric cancer showing a remarkable effect by second-line drug treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel and conversion surgery. Case Report: A 68-year-old woman who was diagnosed with gastric cancer was referred to us. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed an ulcerated lesion with an irregular nodulated border in the lower third of the stomach, and histology of biopsied specimens indicated a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Enhanced computed tomography revealed extensive invasion of the liver, and the patients was treated using S-1 plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy. Because she developed liver metastases, the treatment regimen was changed to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as the second-line treatment. After four cycles of weekly paclitaxel with ramucirumab treatment, the liver metastases had completely disappeared. Because no other metastatic lesions in other organs were detected, we performed total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The macroscopic findings of the surgically resected specimen revealed an ulcerated lesion with an irregularly modulated lesion measuring 9.5×4.5 cm. Pathological analysis demonstrated a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in the stomach, with invasion to the liver through the serosal layer, and seven lymph node metastases. The postoperative course was unremarkable, and she received ramucirumab in combination with paclitaxel treatment. However, liver metastasis appeared at 4 months after the operation, for which she was treated with irinotecan. Although the patient continued to receive irinotecan chemotherapy for 10 months, her general condition gradually deteriorated, and she was started on best supportive care 13 months after conversion surgery. Conclusion: Conversion surgery may prolong survival not only through first-line but also second-line treatments in selected patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer; however, assessments of additional cases and further studies are required to establish this treatment strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The low efficacy of cytostatic therapy in mGC led to an active study of the role of molecular targets in the carcinogenesis of GC. Ramucirumab is the only neoangiogenesis inhibitor, which demonstrated its antitumor activity both as monotherapy and in combination with paclitaxel in patients with mGC. A clinical case demonstrated an example of a long-term (26+ months) response to paclitaxel therapy after it was combined with ramucirumab with an acceptable toxicity profile, which allowed a patient to participate in social activities and maintain quality of life.

Background: Several studies show that the combination chemotherapy with ramucirumab allows to improve the treatment results of advanced gastric cancer (GC). Irinotecan with fluoropyrimidines is own of the second line chemotherapy options for these patients. As angiogenesis inhibitors can enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy, we investigated the combination of irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines with ramucirumab in metastatic GC.Methods: Eligible patients had advanced morphologically verified GC and disease progression during or within 4 months following first-line therapy. They received FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg on day 1) or XELIRI in combination with ramucirumab (8 mg/kg on days 1 and 8). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were disease control rate (DCR) and safety.Results: Between September 2015 and April 2019, 39 patients (pts) were enrolled and 38 were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Median number of cycles was 9 (2-20). Seven patients achieved a partial response (PR) for an overall response rate of 17.9%. A total of 29 (74.4%) patients had stable disease (SD) for a DCR of 92.3%. With a median follow up 7,5 months, median PFS was 7.58 months (95% CI 6.6-8.5) and the median OS has not yet been reached. Median duration of PR response was 8,7 months (4,11-10,94+) and median duration of SD was 4,14 months (1,84-11,99+). The main treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (7/38; 18.4%), anemia (1/38; 2.6%) and diarrhea (2/38; 4.3%).The most frequent adverse events of special interest (AESIs) any grade were hypertension (16/38; 42.1%), bleeding/hemorrhage (10/38; 26.3%), proteinuria (6/38; 15.7%) and venous thromboembolic events (10/38; 26,3%). Gastrointestinal perforation developed in two patients (2/38; 5.3%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.Conclusion: In our research ramucirumab with irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines demonstrate the high activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with pre-treated metastatic GC

To evaluate the anatomical correlation between fellow eyes for bilateral second-line anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with bilateral diabetic macular edema (DME) with incomplete response to first-line bevacizumab therapy. Seventy-four eyes (n = 37 patients) with bilateral-DME having incomplete response to first-line bevacizumab therapy that were switched for bilateral treatment with ranibizumab were retrospectively evaluated. Data collected included demographics, visual acuity and macular thickness. We evaluate the correlation for the response of both eyes in terms of macular thickness and visual acuity. The mean±SD age was 76 ± 8 years. The mean±SD number of bevacizumab injections prior the switch was 11.03 ± 5.1 in the first eye (FE) and 10.9 ± 5.2 in the second eye (SE). The central subfield thickness (CST) reduced from 472 ± 171 microns at baseline to 418 ± 161 after the last bevacizumab injection and 365 ± 74 after 3 ranibizumab injections in the FE (p =.016, p =.004, respectively), and from 463 ± 145 microns to 446 ± 123, and 421 ± 103 in the SE (p =.112, p =.001, respectively). There was strong positive correlation between the eyes for the CST reduction under bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatments in each visit. BCVA± SD at baseline was 0.41 ± 0.30 LogMAR in the FE, and 0.42 ± 0.29 in the SE (p =.44). After 3 injections of bevacizumab, the BCVA was 0.37 ± 0.26 and 0.42 ± 0.23 in FE and SE respectively (p =.013, p =.132, respectively). This study demonstrated a strong anatomical correlation responses between the eyes in patients with bilateral DME for both first-line bevacizumab therapy and second-line ranibizumab therapy. Response to second-line therapy was favorable and correlated among eyes regardless they were from the same or different individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The patient was an 80-year-old woman with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. She was diagnosed with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma in the right upper lobe, which relapsed 18 months after the operation. Computed tomography showed a mass in contact with the posterior wall of the lower part of the stomach. The patient was treated with two cycles of pembrolizumab, but the disease progressed. She was treated with S-1 as second-line therapy, resulting in tumor-shrinking after two cycles. Progression was not observed over the next twelve months. We report a rare case involving S-1 after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Background. Working out of the second line chemotherapy of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma is a promising approach to cancer therapy. Ramucirumab, an anti-angiogenic agent specifically targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). In April 2014, the FDA approved ramucirumab as a single agent or in combination with paclitaxel for treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma that has progressed on or after prior fluoropyrimidineor platinum containing chemotherapy based on data of REGARD and RAINBOW trials.Materials and Methods: From June 2016 to 15Jan 201837 pts with advanced GC were treated with ramucirumabin the second line treatment as single agent (11 pts) or in combination with paclitaxel (26 pts) in N.N.Blokhin National medical research center of oncology.Results: edian PFS (MPFS) and median OS (MOS) was 1,8 and 7,6 mons for monotherapy group. For combination group MPFS was 4,0mons, MOS -10,6 mons. Ramucirumab had an acceptable safety profileConclusions:ur data are similar to the data of international randomized trials.

Angiogenesis has become an important target in the treatment of solid tumors and anti-angiogenic agents are a promising approach to cancer therapy. Ramucirumab, an anti-angiogenic agent specifically targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). In April 2014, the FDA approved ramucirumab as a single agent or in combination with paclitaxel for treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC) that has progressed on or after prior fluoropyrimidine – or platinumcontaining chemotherapy based on data of REGARD and RAINBOW trials.We evaluated the progression free (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety of ramucirumab in patients (pts) with advanced GC in routine clinical practice From June 2016 to 20 Sep 2017 40 pts with advanced GC were treated with ramucirumab in the second line treatment as single agent (8 pts) or in combination with paclitaxel (26 pts) in N.N.Blokhin National medical research center of oncology.Median PFS (MPFS) and median OS (MOS) was 1,8 and 7,6 mons for monotherapy group. For combination group MPFS was 5,02 mons, MOS was not reached. Ramucirumab had an acceptable safety profile Our data are similar to the data of REGARD and RAINBOW trials.

Frostbite causes tissue damage through five major mechanisms, out of which two are amenable to treatment. The first-line treatment is rapid rewarming therapy using water at 40°C to 42°C, which addresses the formation of ice crystals in the intra and extra cellular compartments. The second mechanism is progressive tissue ischemia after rewarming and is only accessible to a second-line therapy represented by thrombolysis. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of thrombolysis. This is a single-center retrospective cohort study, where it was aimed to evaluate two groups of patients. A total of 18 patients were included in this study. Mean times between injury to thrombolytic therapy and admission to thrombolytic therapy was 26.04 hours (SD 13.6) and 9.65 hours (SD 9.89), respectively. All patients suffered injuries ranging from second-degree deep to third degree. The rate of patients having complete, partial, and no angiographic responses were 55.6%, 11.1%, and 33.3%, respectively. The main outcome of interest showed that 11 (61.1%) patients in total had amputations at different levels. Results showed that in the intervention group, five (55.6%) of the patients had amputations compared with six (66.7%) from the control group (P = .6) at comparable levels of amputation. The literature supports that the use of intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator might be beneficial for severe cases of frostbites; however, it lacks of studies of major significance and results are often controversial. Our study has not shown statistically significant results on amputation levels and cannot support the hypothesis of efficacy of thrombolytic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Whether extending the treatment length and the use of high-dose esomeprazole may optimize the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication remains unknown.Objectives: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of optimized 14 day sequential therapy and 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy containing high-dose esomeprazole in first-line therapy.Methods: We recruited 620 adult patients (≥20 years of age) with H. pylori infection naive to treatment in this multicentre, open-label, randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 14 day sequential therapy or 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy, both containing esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily. Those who failed after 14 day sequential therapy received rescue therapy with 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy and vice versa. Our primary outcome was the eradication rate in the first-line therapy. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03156855.Results: The eradication rates of 14 day sequential therapy and 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy were 91.3% (283 of 310, 95% CI 87.4%-94.1%) and 91.6% (284 of 310, 95% CI 87.8%-94.3%) in the ITT analysis, respectively (difference -0.3%, 95% CI -4.7% to 4.4%, P = 0.886). However, the frequencies of adverse effects were significantly higher in patients treated with 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy than those treated with 14 day sequential therapy (74.4% versus 36.7% P < 0.0001). The eradication rate of 14 day sequential therapy in strains with and without 23S ribosomal RNA mutation was 80% (24 of 30) and 99% (193 of 195), respectively (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: Optimized 14 day sequential therapy was non-inferior to, but better tolerated than 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy and both may be used in first-line treatment in populations with low to intermediate clarithromycin resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Platinum-based chemotherapy plus the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) cetuximab is used to treat recurrent/metastatic (RM) head-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Recently, we defined Cluster3 gene-expression signature as a potential predictor of favorable progression-free survival (PFS) in cetuximab-treated RM-HNSCC patients and predictor of partial metabolic FDG-PET response in an afatinib window-of-opportunity trial. Another anti-EGFR-mAb (panitumumab) was used as the treatment agent in RM-HNSCC patients in the phase II PANI01trial. PANI01 tumor samples were analyzed using functional genomics to explore response predictors to anti-EGFR therapy.Materials and Methods: Whole-gene expression and real-time PCR analyses were applied to pre-treatment samples from 25 PANI01 patients. Three gene signatures (Cluster3 score, RAS onco-signature, microenvironment score) and seven selected miRNAs were separately analyzed for association with panitumumab efficacy.Results: Cluster3 expression levels had a profile with a significant bimodal separation of samples (P =  3.08 E-13). Higher RAS activation, microenvironment score, and miRNA expression were associated with low-Cluster3 patients. The same biomarkers were separately associated with PFS. Patients with high-Cluster3 had significantly longer PFS than patients with low-Cluster3 (median PFS: 174 versus 51 days; log-rank P = 0.0021). ROC analysis demonstrated accuracy in predicting PFS (AUC = 0.877).Conclusions: Despite differences in clinical settings and anti-EGFR inhibitors used for treatment, response prediction by the Cluster3 signature and selected miRNAs was essentially the same. Translation into a useful clinical assay requires validation in a broader setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: This prospective, observational study enrolled 150 adult patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) treated with nilotinib as second‐line after imatinib, in a real life setting in France. Two‐thirds of patients switched to nilotinib treatment due to lack of imatinib efficacy. Of 146 evaluable patients, 16 (11·0%) (95% confidence interval: 6·4–17·2%) achieved uMR4, defined as undetectable molecular disease in cDNA with MR4 sensitivity (≥10 000 ABL1 transcripts) at 18 months and confirmed at 24 months (primary endpoint). Among patients without major molecular response (MMR) or deep molecular response (DMR) at study entry, 66·3% achieved MMR and 44·2% DMR within a median of 5·7 and 6·24 months, respectively. Fifty‐three patients (36·3%) have prematurely terminated the study before 24 months of follow‐up, primarily due to nilotinib treatment discontinuation (n = 43; 29·5%), mainly motivated by treatment intolerance (n = 27; 18·5%) and inefficacy (n = 10; 6·8%). The most frequent extra‐haematological adverse events (AEs) reported as related to treatment with nilotinib were pruritus (16·4%), asthenia (13·7%) and dry skin (13·0%). Ischaemic cardiovascular AEs were reported in 18 patients (12·3%). This French nationwide large cohort adds valuable information to the body of evidence on the efficiency and safety of nilotinib in the treatment of patients with CP‐CML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]