Search

Introduction There are no guidelines or prospective studies defining the optimal surgical treatment for glioblastomas in older patients (≥70 years), for those with a limited functioning performance at presentation (Karnofsky Performance Scale ≤70) or for those with tumours in certain locations (midline, multifocal). Therefore, the decision between resection and biopsy is varied, among neurosurgeons internationally and at times even within an institution. This study aims to compare the effects of maximal tumour resection versus tissue biopsy on survival, functional, neurological and quality of life outcomes in these patient subgroups. Furthermore, it evaluates which modality would maximise the potential to undergo adjuvant treatment.Methods and analysis This study is an international, multicentre, prospective, two-arm cohort study of an observational nature. Consecutive patients with glioblastoma will be treated with resection or biopsy and matched with a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are (1) overall survival and (2) proportion of patients that have received adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints are (1) proportion of patients with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery; (2) progression-free survival (PFS); (3) quality of life at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and (4) frequency and severity of serious adverse events. The total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years; follow-up is 1 year.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (METC Zuid-West Holland/Erasmus Medical Center; MEC-2020-0812). The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.Trial registration number NCT06146725.

Objective To estimate the cost-effectiveness of craniotomy, compared with decompressive craniectomy (DC) in UK patients undergoing evacuation of acute subdural haematoma (ASDH).Design Economic evaluation undertaken using health resource use and outcome data from the 12-month multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised, Randomised Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Patients Undergoing Evacuation-ASDH trial.Setting UK secondary care.Participants 248 UK patients undergoing surgery for traumatic ASDH were randomised to craniotomy (N=126) or DC (N=122).Interventions Surgical evacuation via craniotomy (bone flap replaced) or DC (bone flap left out with a view to replace later: cranioplasty surgery).Main outcome measures In the base-case analysis, costs were estimated from a National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. Outcomes were assessed via the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) derived from the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (cost-utility analysis) and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) (cost-effectiveness analysis). Multiple imputation and regression analyses were conducted to estimate the mean incremental cost and effect of craniotomy compared with DC. The most cost-effective option was selected, irrespective of the level of statistical significance as is argued by economists.Results In the cost-utility analysis, the mean incremental cost of craniotomy compared with DC was estimated to be −£5520 (95% CI −£18 060 to £7020) with a mean QALY gain of 0.093 (95% CI 0.029 to 0.156). In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the mean incremental cost was estimated to be −£4536 (95% CI −£17 374 to £8301) with an OR of 1.682 (95% CI 0.995 to 2.842) for a favourable outcome on the GOSE.Conclusions In a UK population with traumatic ASDH, craniotomy was estimated to be cost-effective compared with DC: craniotomy was estimated to have a lower mean cost, higher mean QALY gain and higher probability of a more favourable outcome on the GOSE (though not all estimated differences between the two approaches were statistically significant).Ethics Ethical approval for the trial was obtained from the North West—Haydock Research Ethics Committee in the UK on 17 July 2014 (14/NW/1076).Trial registration number ISRCTN87370545.

BackgroundAwake craniotomy is the standard of care for treating language eloquent gliomas. However, depending on preoperative functionality, it is not feasible in each patient and selection criteria are highly heterogeneous. Thus, this study aimed to identify broadly applicable predictor variables allowing for a more systematic and objective patient selection.MethodsWe performed post-hoc analyses of preoperative language status, patient and tumor characteristics including language eloquence of 96 glioma patients treated in a single neurosurgical center between 05/2018 and 01/2021. Multinomial logistic regression and stepwise variable selection were applied to identify significant predictors of awake surgery feasibility.ResultsStepwise backward selection confirmed that a higher number of paraphasias, lower age, and high language eloquence level were suitable indicators for an awake surgery in our cohort. Subsequent descriptive and ROC-analyses indicated a cut-off at ≤54 years and a language eloquence level of at least 6 for awake surgeries, which require further validation. A high language eloquence, lower age, preexisting semantic and phonological aphasic symptoms have shown to be suitable predictors.ConclusionThe combination of these factors may act as a basis for a systematic and standardized grading of patients’ suitability for an awake craniotomy which is easily integrable into the preoperative workflow across neurosurgical centers.

Introduction A greater extent of resection of the contrast-enhancing (CE) tumour part has been associated with improved outcomes in glioblastoma. Recent results suggest that resection of the non-contrast-enhancing (NCE) part might yield even better survival outcomes (supramaximal resection, SMR). Therefore, this study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SMR with and without mapping techniques in high-grade glioma (HGG) patients in terms of survival, functional, neurological, cognitive and quality of life outcomes. Furthermore, it evaluates which patients benefit the most from SMR, and how they could be identified preoperatively.Methods and analysis This study is an international, multicentre, prospective, two-arm cohort study of observational nature. Consecutive glioblastoma patients will be operated with SMR or maximal resection at a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are (1) overall survival and (2) proportion of patients with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints are (1) residual CE and NCE tumour volume on postoperative T1-contrast and FLAIR (Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) MRI scans; (2) progression-free survival; (3) receipt of adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy; and (4) quality of life at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. The total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (METC Zuid-West Holland/Erasmus Medical Center; MEC-2020-0812). The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.

Introduction: Many patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG) are of older age. Research question: We hypothesize that pre- and intraoperative mapping and monitoring preserve functional status in elderly patients while gross total resection (GTR) is the aim, resulting in overall survival (OS) rates comparable to the general population with HGG. Material and methods: We subdivided a prospective cohort of 168 patients above 65 years with eloquent high-grade gliomas into four groups ([years/cases] 1: 65–69/58; 2: 70–74/47; 3: 75–79/43; 4: >79/20). All patients underwent preoperative noninvasive mapping, which was also used for decision-making, intraoperative neuromonitoring in 138 cases, direct cortical and/or subcortical motor mapping in 66 and 50 cases, and awake language mapping in 11 cases. Results: GTR and subtotal resection (STR) could be achieved in 65% and 28%, respectively. Stereotactic biopsy was performed in 8% of cases. Postoperatively, we found transient and permanent functional deficits in 13% and 11% of cases. Postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) did not differ between subgroups. Patients with long-term follow-up (51%) had a progression-free survival of 5.5 (1–47) months and an overall survival of 10.5 (0–86) months. Discussion and conclusion: The interdisciplinary glioma treatment in the elderly is less age-dependent but must be adjusted to the functional status. Function-guided surgical resections could be performed as usual, with maximal tumor resection being the primary goal. However, less network capacity in the elderly to compensate for deficits might cause higher rates of permanent deficits in this group of patients with more fast-growing malignant gliomas.

Objective: Stimulation-based language mapping relies on identifying stimulation-induced language disruptions, which preexisting speech disorders affecting the laryngeal and orofacial speech system can confound. This study ascertained the effects of preexisting stuttering on pre- and intraoperative language mapping to improve the reliability and specificity of established language mapping protocols in the context of speech fluency disorders. Method: Differentiation-ability of a speech therapist and two experienced nrTMS examiners between stuttering symptoms and stimulation-induced language errors during preoperative mappings were retrospectively compared (05/2018-01/2021). Subsequently, the impact of stuttering on intraoperative mappings was evaluated in all prospective patients (01/2021-12/2022). Results: In the first part, 4.85 % of 103 glioma patients stuttered. While both examiners had a significant agreement for misclassifying pauses in speech flow and prolongations (Κ ≥ 0.50, p ≤ 0.02, respectively), less experience resulted in more misclassified stuttering symptoms. In one awake surgery case within the second part, stuttering decreased the reliability of intraoperative language mapping.Comparison with Existing Method(s): By thoroughly differentiating speech fluency symptoms from stimulation-induced disruptions, the reliability and proportion of stuttering symptoms falsely attributed to stimulation-induced language network disruptions can be improved. This may increase the consistency and specificity of language mapping results in stuttering glioma patients. Conclusions: Preexisting stuttering negatively impacted language mapping specificity. Thus, surgical planning and the functional outcome may benefit substantially from thoroughly differentiating speech fluency symptoms from stimulation-induced disruptions by trained specialists.

ObjectiveTreatment strategies of patients suffering from pyogenic spondylodiscitis are a controverse topic. Percutaneous dorsal instrumentation followed by surgical debridement and fusion of the infectious vertebral disc spaces is a common approach for surgical treatment. Technical advances enable spinal navigation for dorsal and lateral instrumentation. This report investigates combined navigated dorsal and lateral instrumentation in a single surgery and positioning for lumbar spondylodiscitis in a pilot series.MethodsPatients diagnosed with 1- or 2-level discitis were prospectively enrolled. To enable posterior navigated pedicle screw placement and lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) patients were positioned semi-prone in 45-degree fashion. For spinal referencing, a registration array was attached to the pelvic or spinal process. 3D scans were acquired intraoperatively for registration and implant control.Results27 patients suffering from 1- or 2-level spondylodiscitis with a median ASA of 3 (1–4) and a mean BMI of 27.9 ± 4.9 kg/m2 were included. Mean duration of surgery was 146 ± 49 min. Mean blood loss was 367 ± 307 ml. A median of 4 (4–8) pedicle screws were placed for dorsal percutaneous instrumentation with an intraoperative revision rate of 4.0%. LLIF was performed on 31 levels with an intraoperative cage revision rate of 9.7%.ConclusionsNavigated lumbar dorsal and lateral instrumentation in a single operation and positioning is feasible and safe. It enables rapid 360-degree instrumentation in these critically ill patients and potentially reduces overall intraoperative radiation exposure for patient and staff. Compared to purely dorsal approaches it allows for optimal discectomy and fusion while overall incisions and wound size are minimized. Compared to prone LLIF procedures, semi-prone in 45-degree positioning allows for a steep learning curve due to minor changes of familiar anatomy.

Introduction: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) of motor/somatosensory evoked potentials is a well-established approach for reducing ischemic complications after aneurysm clipping. Research question: To determine the predictive validity of IOM for postoperative functional outcome and its perceived added value for intraoperative real-time feedback of functional impairment in the surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). Material and methods: Prospective study of patients scheduled for elective clipping of UIAs between 02/2019–02/2021. Transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) were used in all cases, a significant decline was defined as loss of ≥50% in amplitude or 50% latency increase. Clinical data were correlated to postoperative deficits. A surgeon's questionnaire was conceived. Results: 47 patients were included, median age 57 years (range 26–76). IOM was successful in all cases. In 87.2%, IOM was stable throughout surgery, although 1 patient (2.4%) demonstrated a permanent postoperative neurological deficit. All patients with an intraoperatively reversible tcMEP-decline (12.7%) showed no surgery-related deficit, regardless of the decline duration (range 0.5–40.0 ​min; mean: 13.8). Temporary clipping (TC) was performed in 12 cases (25.5%), with a decline in amplitude in 4 patients. After clip-removal, all amplitudes returned to baseline. IOM provided the surgeon with a higher sense of security in 63.8%. Discussion and conclusion: IOM remains invaluable during elective microsurgical clipping, particularly during TC of MCA and AcomA-aneurysms. It alerts the surgeon of impending ischemic injury and offers a way of maximizing the time frame for TC. IOM has highly increased surgeons’ subjective feeling of security during the procedure.

Introduction: The resection of brainstem cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) harbors the risk of damaging the corticospinal tract (CST) and other major tracts. Hence, visualization of eloquent fiber tracts supports pre- and intraoperative planning. However, diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking at brainstem level suffers from distortion due to field inhomogeneities and eddy currents by steep diffusion gradients. Research question: This study aims to analyze the effect of distortion correction for CST tractography in brainstem CCM patients. Material and methods: 25 patients who underwent resection of brainstem CCM were enrolled, 24 suffered from hemorrhage. We performed an anatomically based tractography of the CST with a mean minimal fractional anisotropy of 0.22 ± 0.04 before and after cranial distortion correction (CDC). Accuracy was measured by anatomical plausibility and aberrant fibers. Results: CDC led to a more precise CST tractography, further approximating its assumed anatomical localization in all cases. CDC resulted in a significantly more ventral location of the CST of 1.5 ± 0.6 mm (6.1 ± 2.7 mm before CDC vs. 4.6 ± 2.1 mm after CDC; p

Background: Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) is effective therapy for stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation could be supported by low-frequency stimulation of the non-damaged hemisphere to reduce transcallosal inhibition. Objective: The present study examines the effect of postoperative nrTMS therapy of the unaffected hemisphere in glioma patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the upper extremity (UE) due to subcortical ischemia. Methods: We performed a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial on patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the UE after glioma resection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either low frequency nrTMS (1 Hz, 15 min) or sham stimulation directly before physical therapy for 7 consecutive days. We performed primary and secondary outcome measures on day 1, on day 7, and at a 3-month follow-up (FU). The primary endpoint was the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) at FU compared to day 1 after surgery. Results: Compared to the sham stimulation, nrTMS significantly improved outcomes between day 1 and FU based on the FMA (mean [95% CI] +31.9 [22.6, 41.3] vs. +4.2 [-4.1, 12.5]; P = .001) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (−5.6 [-7.5, −3.6] vs. −2.4 [-3.6, −1.2]; P = .02). To achieve a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points on the FMA scale, the number needed to treat is 2.19. Conclusion: The present results show that patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the UE due to subcortical ischemia after glioma resection significantly benefit from low-frequency nrTMS stimulation therapy of the unaffected hemisphere. Clinical trial registration: Local institutional registration: 12/15; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03982329

The neural representation of language can be identified cortically using navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and subcortically using the fiber tracking of diffusion tensor imaging. We investigated how cortical locations of language and language-eloquent white matter pathways differ in 40 brain lesion patients speaking various languages. Error rates related to stimulations at single sites in the frontal and parietal lobe differed significantly between Balto-Slavic and Indo-European languages. Error rates related to stimulations at single sites in the temporal lobe differed significantly between bilingual individuals. No differences were found in the white matter language pathway volumes between Balto-Slavic and Indo-European languages nor between bilingual patients. These original and exploratory data indicate that the underlying subcortical structure might be similar across languages, with initially observed differences in the cortical location of language depending on the semantic processing, but these could not be confirmed using detailed statistical analyses pointing at a similar cortical and subcortical network.

BackgroundPerioperative assessment of language function in brain tumor patients commonly relies on administration of object naming during stimulation mapping. Ample research, however, points to the benefit of adding verb tasks to the testing paradigm in order to delineate and preserve postoperative language function more comprehensively. This research uses a case series approach to explore the feasibility and added value of a dual-task protocol that includes both a noun task (object naming) and a verb task (action naming) in perioperative delineation of language functions.Materials and MethodsSeven neurosurgical cases underwent perioperative language assessment with both object and action naming. This entailed preoperative baseline testing, preoperative stimulation mapping with navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nTMS) with subsequent white matter visualization, intraoperative mapping with Direct Electrical Stimulation (DES) in 4 cases, and postoperative imaging and examination of language change.ResultsWe observed a divergent pattern of language organization and decline between cases who showed lesions close to the delineated language network and hence underwent DES mapping, and those that did not. The latter displayed no new impairment postoperatively consistent with an unharmed network for the neural circuits of both object and action naming. For the cases who underwent DES, on the other hand, a higher sensitivity was found for action naming over object naming. Firstly, action naming preferentially predicted the overall language state compared to aphasia batteries. Secondly, it more accurately predicted intraoperative positive language areas as revealed by DES. Thirdly, double dissociations between postoperatively unimpaired object naming and impaired action naming and vice versa indicate segregated skills and neural representation for noun versus verb processing, especially in the ventral stream. Overlaying postoperative imaging with object and action naming networks revealed that dual-task nTMS mapping can explain the drop in performance in those cases where the network appeared in proximity to the resection cavity.ConclusionUsing a dual-task protocol for visualization of cortical and subcortical language areas through nTMS mapping proved to be able to capture network-to-deficit relations in our case series. Ultimately, adding action naming to clinical nTMS and DES mapping may help prevent postoperative deficits of this seemingly segregated skill.

Introduction: To achieve a maximum extent of resection, intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) scan is frequently performed. Intraoperative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is not standardly performed and has been described to be inferior to early postoperative MRI regarding the detection of ischemia. Research question: This feasibility study evaluates the detection of ischemia by ioMRI and its clinical relevance in patients with motor-eloquent gliomas. Material and methods: Of 262 glioma patients, eight patients (3.1%) showed an amplitude loss of continuous motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring during resection before the ioMRI scan (group loss of MEP ​= ​LOM). In these patients and a matched-pair cohort (MPC) of glioma resections without MEP loss, we performed additional ioMRI sequences including turbo-spin-echo (TSE)- and echo-planar-imaging (EPI)-DWI and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI). The clinical outcome was measured 5 days and 3 months after surgery. Results: The mean ​± ​standard time between loss of MEPs and ioMRI was 63.0 ​± ​8.7 ​min (range: 40–84). Ischemia within the motor system could be detected by ioMRI in group LOM in 100% EPI-DWIs, 75% TSE-DWIs, and 66.7% PWIs. No sequence showed motor ischemia in the MPC group. All patients of group LOM and no patient of group MPC suffered from permanent motor deficit. Discussion and conclusion: The current results provide data on the time sequence of ischemia apparent in MRI sequences which is superior to previous data on symptomatic stroke patients on this topic. The early detection of ischemia adds an additional predictor for the long-term outcome of patients and shows the reason of an intraoperative loss of MEPs. Thereby the performance of intraoperative EPI-DWI might be justified after confirmation of the present data in a larger cohort.Subcortical ischemia can be detected by ioMRI after MEP loss during the resection of motor-eloquent gliomas and was clinically relevant in all cases.

Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nTMS) is used to understand the cortical organization of language in preparation for the surgical removal of a brain tumor. Action naming with finite verbs can be employed for that purpose, providing additional information to object naming. However, little research has focused on the properties of the verbs that are used in action naming tasks, such as their status as transitive (taking an object; e.g., to read) or intransitive (not taking an object; e.g., to wink). Previous neuroimaging data show higher activation for transitive compared to intransitive verbs in posterior perisylvian regions bilaterally. In the present study, we employed nTMS and production of finite verbs to investigate the cortical underpinnings of transitivity. Twenty neurologically healthy native speakers of German participated in the study. They underwent language mapping in both hemispheres with nTMS. The action naming task with finite verbs consisted of transitive (e.g., The man reads the book) and intransitive verbs (e.g., The woman winks) and was controlled for relevant psycholinguistic variables. Errors were classified in four different error categories (i.e., non-linguistic errors, grammatical errors, lexico-semantic errors and, errors at the sound level) and were analyzed quantitatively. We found more nTMS-positive points in the left hemisphere, particularly in the left parietal lobe for the production of transitive compared to intransitive verbs. These positive points most commonly corresponded to lexico-semantic errors. Our findings are in line with previous aphasia and neuroimaging studies, suggesting that a more widespread network is used for the production of verbs with a larger number of arguments (i.e., transitives). The higher number of lexico-semantic errors with transitive compared to intransitive verbs in the left parietal lobe supports previous claims for the role of left posterior areas in the retrieval of argument structure information.

Background: Functional reorganization (FR) was shown in glioma patients by direct electrical stimulation (DES) during awake craniotomy. This option for repeated mapping is available in cases of tumor recurrence and after decision for a second surgery. Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) has shown a high correlation with results of DES during awake craniotomy for language-negative sites (LNS) and allows for a non-invasive evaluation of language function. This preliminary study aims to examine FR in glioma patients by nrTMS.Methods: A cohort of eighteen patients with left-sided perisylvian gliomas underwent preoperative nrTMS language mapping twice. The mean time between mappings was 17 ± 12 months. The cortex was separated into anterior and posterior language-eloquent regions. We defined a tumor area and an area without tumor (WOT). Error rates (ER = number of errors per number of stimulations) and hemispheric dominance ratios (HDR) were calculated as the quotient of the left- and right-sided ER.Results: In cases in which most language function was located near the tumor during the first mapping, we found significantly more LNS in the tumor area during the second mapping as compared to cases in which function was not located near the tumor (p = 0.049). Patients with seizures showed fewer LNS during the second mapping. We found more changes of cortical language function in patients with a follow-up time of more than 13 months and lower WHO-graded tumors.Conclusion: Present results confirm that nrTMS can show FR of LNS in glioma patients. Its extent, clinical impact and correlation with DES requires further evaluation but could have a considerable impact in neuro-oncology.

Object: As various recent studies show, damage to white matter pathways leads to permanent functional deficits in a high percentage of patients. Particularly the subcortical language network is complex, and its visualization has a tremendous relevance for neurosurgeons. This pilot study aims to correlate language-eloquent white matter pathways with the course of language function after the resection of left-sided perisylvian gliomas.Methods: We included 10 patients who underwent resection of highly language-eloquent high- (9 pts) and low-grade gliomas (1 pts). We performed navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS)-based tractography via diffusion tensor imaging fiber trackings (DTI FT) preoperatively (PRE-1), postoperatively (POST-1), and at long-term follow up or tumor recurrence (PRE-2). We separately tracked the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle (IFOF), the frontal aslant tract (FAT), and the superior longitudinal (SLF), and arcuate fascicle (AF), and correlated the amount of visualized fibers to the patients' language function at each date.Results: The changes of nrTMS-based DTI FTs of single white matter pathways correlated with the according status of language function for any of the pathways in 80% of patients and in 19 of 30 (63%) single pathway comparisons between PRE-1 and POST-1. Between POST-1 and PRE-2 the nrTMS-based DTI FTs correlated with the status of language function for any of the pathways in all patients and in 24 of 30 (80%) single pathway comparisons. Single FT results correlated with the according status of language function at POST-1 in 60, 70, and 60% of cases, and with the according status of language function at PRE-2 in 60, 90, and 90% of cases for the tracking of the IFOF, FAT, and SLF/AF, respectively.Conclusion: By the present results we were able to show that nrTMS-based DTI FT of the IFOF, FAT, and SLF/AF mainly correlates with the according status of language function preoperatively, postoperatively, and at long-term follow up after the resection of left-sided perisylvian gliomas.

BackgroundDuring awake craniotomy for tumor resection, a neuropsychologist (NP) is regarded as a highly valuable partner for neurosurgeons. However, some centers do not routinely involve an NP, and data to support the high influence of the NP on the perioperative course of patients are mostly lacking.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes between patients who underwent awake craniotomy with and without the attendance of an NP.MethodsOur analysis included 61 patients, all operated on for resection of a presumably language-eloquent glioma during an awake procedure. Of these 61 cases, 47 surgeries were done with neuropsychological support (NP group), whereas 14 surgeries were performed without an NP (non-NP group) due to a language barrier between the NP and the patient. For these patients, neuropsychological assessment was provided by a bilingual resident.ResultsBoth groups were highly comparable regarding age, gender, preoperative language function, and tumor grades (glioma WHO grades 1–4). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved more frequently in the NP group (NP vs. non-NP: 61.7 vs. 28.6%, P = 0.04), which also had shorter durations of surgery (NP vs. non-NP: 240.7 ± 45.7 vs. 286.6 ± 54.8 min, P

Recent repetitive TMS (rTMS) mapping protocols for language mapping revealed deficits of this method, mainly in posterior brain regions. Therefore this study analyzed the impact of different language tasks on the localization of language-positive brain regions and compared their effectiveness, especially with regard to posterior brain regions.Nineteen healthy, right-handed subjects performed object naming, pseudoword reading, verb generation, and action naming during rTMS language mapping of the left hemisphere. Synchronically, 5 Hz/10 pulses were applied with a 0 ms delay.The object naming task evoked the highest error rate (14%), followed by verb generation (13%) and action naming (11%). The latter revealed more errors in posterior than in anterior areas. Pseudoword reading barely generated errors, except for phonological paraphasias.In general, among the evaluated language tasks, object naming is the most discriminative task to detect language-positive regions via rTMS. However, other tasks might be used for more specific questions.

ObjectivesLanguage function is mainly located within the left hemisphere of the brain, especially in right-handed subjects. However, functional MRI (fMRI) has demonstrated changes of language organization in patients with left-sided perisylvian lesions to the right hemisphere. Because intracerebral lesions can impair fMRI, this study was designed to investigate human language plasticity with a virtual lesion model using repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).Experimental designFifteen patients with lesions of left-sided language-eloquent brain areas and 50 healthy and purely right-handed participants underwent bilateral rTMS language mapping via an object-naming task. All patients were proven to have left-sided language function during awake surgery. The rTMS-induced language errors were categorized into 6 different error types. The error ratio (induced errors/number of stimulations) was determined for each brain region on both hemispheres. A hemispheric dominance ratio was then defined for each region as the quotient of the error ratio (left/right) of the corresponding area of both hemispheres (ratio >1 = left dominant; ratio ResultsPatients with language-eloquent lesions showed a statistically significantly lower ratio than healthy participants concerning "all errors" and "all errors without hesitations", which indicates a higher participation of the right hemisphere in language function. Yet, there was no cortical region with pronounced difference in language dominance compared to the whole hemisphere.ConclusionsThis is the first study that shows by means of an anatomically accurate virtual lesion model that a shift of language function to the non-dominant hemisphere can occur.