Search

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is closely associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. We aimed to determine whether the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) can identify patients with NAFLD at highest risk of cardiovascular events.We analyzed data from 81,108 patients with (i) a diagnosis of NAFLD, (ii) nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), or (iii) at risk (RISK) of NASH. The outcome of interest was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined by myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure, and coronary revascularization.The mean age was 62 years, and 49.6% were men. Among 67,273 patients without previous cardiovascular disease, 9,112 (13.5%) experienced MACE over median follow-up of 3 years. In univariate analysis, a FIB-4 ≥2.67 was a significant predictor of MACE overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-2.04, P0.001) and across all baseline groups. After adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors, FIB-4 ≥2.67 remained the strongest predictor of MACE overall (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.61-2.02, P0.001) and was consistently associated with myocardial infarction (aHR 1.46, 95% CI 1.25-1.70, P0.001), hospitalization for unstable angina (aHR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.49, P = 0.025), hospitalization for heart failure (aHR 2.09, 95% CI 1.86-2.35, P0.001), coronary artery bypass graft (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 1.26-2.17, P0.001), and percutaneous coronary intervention (aHR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21-2.45, P = 0.003).In a large, real-world cohort of patients with NAFLD, NASH, or at RISK of NASH, the FIB-4 score was the strongest independent predictor of MACE, beyond established cardiovascular risk factors and baseline liver diagnosis.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, and its prevalence continues to rise. Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) has been shown to be a prognostic marker of liver-related outcomes in patients with NAFLD. We analyzed data from TriNetX global federated research network, combining data on 30 million patients. Patients were categorized into three diagnostic groups: NAFLD, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and at risk of NASH. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included progression to NASH, development of cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver transplantation. A total of 442,277 subjects (1.5% of the cohort) were assessed, and 81,108 were retained for analysis. Median follow-up was 34.8 months (interquartile range 12.2). FIB-4 was1.3 in 52.3% patients and ≥ 2.67 in 11.4% patients. In multivariate analysis, FIB-4 ≥ 2.67 was significantly and independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.20-2.82, P 0.001) as well as with progression to NASH (HR 5.78, 95% CI 4.72-7.07, P 0.001), cirrhosis (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.86-2.24, P 0.001), end-stage liver disease (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.68-2.05, P 0.001), HCC (HR 3.66, 95% CI 2.71-4.94, P 0.001), and liver transplantation (HR 7.98, 95% CI 4.62-13.79, P 0.001). Conclusion: In a real-world nationwide database, FIB-4 ≥ 2.67 was a strong predictor of both all-cause mortality and liver-related adverse outcomes independently of the baseline diagnostic group and common risk factors. Our findings indicate that FIB-4 could play a role as a risk-stratification tool for a population health approach. Significant underdiagnosis of both NAFLD/NASH and NASH cirrhosis in electronic medical records was observed.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have varying potentials for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). OBJECTIVES: To (1) identify prevalence of potential DDI with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir (GLE-PIB) and sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (SOF-VEL) and (2) describe health care provider actions in response to pharmacist recommendations based on potential interactions with GLE-PIB or SOF-VEL, using 2 complementary data sources. METHODS: Possible interacting drugs were identified among adult patients in a United States electronic medical record database covering 21 health care organizations and 26 million patients in 2018. DDIs were categorized as potential weak interaction (Level 1), potential interaction (Level 2), or contraindicated (Level 3). Real-world recommendations and resultant actions regarding DDIs with GLE-PIB and SOF-VEL were obtained from a specialty pharmacy database. Categorical variable comparisons were done via chi-square analysis with subsequent z-tests of column proportions. RESULTS: DDI prevalence was higher for patients prescribed GLE-PIB (317/769 [41%]) compared with those prescribed SOF-VEL (170/633 [27%]), and the prevalence of a Level 3 (contraindicated) interaction was higher with GLE-PIB than SOF-VEL (61/769 [8%] vs 2/633 [< 1%]). Across all DDI levels, analgesics (139/317 [44%]), proton-pump inhibitors (129/317 [41%]), and lipid-lowering agents (59/317 [19%]) were the top drug classes for the GLE-PIB group with potential for DDI. For SOF-VEL prescribed patients, the top drug classes were proton-pump inhibitors (83/170 [49%]), histamine-2 blockers (42/170[25%]), and lipid-lowering agents (42/170 [25%]). In real-world care management, the overall prevalence of pharmacist recommendations regarding DDIs was significantly lower for SOF-VEL (28/419 [7%]) relative to GLE-PIB (151/1,216 [12%]). Recommended guidance from pharmacists was not followed for 39% (69/179) of patients, 36% (54/151) for GLE-PIB, and 54% (15/28) for SOF-VEL. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for DDIs with pangenotypic HCV DAAs is frequent and may be more frequent with GLE-PIB than SOF-VEL. Physician responses to pharmacist alerts regarding potential interaction can be highly variable, even in cases of contraindication. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc. Trio Health Analytics received funding from Gilead Sciences, Inc., to conduct research for this study. Tsai consults for and has received grants and honoraria from Gilead, AbbVie, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb; he has also received lecture fees from Gilead and AbbVie. Curry consults for Trio Health Analytics and Gilead and has also consulted for and received grants from Mallinckrodt. Flamm consults for and has received lecture fees from Gilead and AbbVie; he has also received grants from Gilead and AbbVie. Milligan and Wick are employed by Trio Health Analytics and have received research support from Gilead, Merck, and AbbVie. Younossi has received grants from Gilead, Intercept, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novo Nordisk. Afdhal is a paid consultant/advisory board member for Gilead, Echosens, Ligand, Shionogi, and Trio Health; owns stock in Spring-Bank and Allurion and has stock options in SpringBank; receives royalty income from UpToDate; and is on the board of directors for the nonprofit Liver Institute for Education and Research. Data from this study were presented at the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) Liver Meeting 2019; November 8-12, 2019; Boston, MA, and the European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL) International Liver Congress 2020; August 27-29, 2020; virtual.

Research describing patient experience and outcomes with extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (EHL rFVIII) outside of clinical trials is limited. Real-world rFVIII consumption studies, when people with hemophilia A (PWHA) switch from standard half-life (SHL) to EHL rFVIII, may help payers and clinicians make more informed treatment choices.To conduct a retrospective, observational, U.S.-based analysis to describe clinical and demographic profiles of PWHA who switched to prophylactic rurioctocog alfa pegol.Data were obtained from PWHA treated by 38 prescribers across 21 states using specialty pharmacy database case report forms, electronic medical records, and direct communication with providers, PWHA, or their guardians. Assessments included disease severity, pain severity, number and location of target joints, prior HA therapy, reasons for switching, treatment duration, dosing frequency, adherence, and annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) before and after switching to rurioctocog alfa pegol from SHL or another EHL rFVIII.Data were collected from 56 PWHA. The mean age was 26 years (range = 5-88); median age was 24 years (interquartile range = 14-34); 20% were aged12 years; and 89% (50/56) had severe HA. All PWHA had ≥ 12 months of rFVIII treatment before switching to rurioctocog alfa pegol. The population had a mean 1.8 target joints. Baseline subjective pain assessment was mild to moderate for 68% (38/56) of respondents. Before receiving rurioctocog alfa pegol, most PWHA received antihemophilic factor (recombinant) for prophylaxis (73%, 41/56) or breakthrough bleeding (59%, 33/56). Mean dosing frequency for prior prophylaxis was 2.8 per week for SHL rFVIII and 1.8 per week for EHL rFVIII, and 2.2 per week for all PWHA after switching to rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis. The median time on rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis was 12.0 months versus 80.8 months on previous SHL rFVIII and 13.5 months on previous EHL rFVIII. Mean ABRs on prior prophylaxis were 5.9 for SHL rFVIII (n = 35) and 4.7 for EHL rFVIII (n = 3). After switching to rurioctocog alfa pegol, the overall mean ABR reduced by 71% (5.8 to 1.7,Switching from either an SHL or EHL rFVIII to rurioctocog alfa pegol is associated with fewer bleeding episodes owing to more effective prophylaxis and improved adherence. Those who switched from an SHL rFVIII reported reduced factor consumption with rurioctocog alfa pegol. This long-acting factor is an important additional option for the care of PWHA.This study was funded by Shire Development LLC, a Takeda company, Lexington, MA. Trio Health was involved in study design and acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data and was funded by Shire Development LLC, a Takeda company. Aledort serves on the data and safety monitoring boards of Baxalta U.S. Inc., a Takeda company, and Octapharma; is chair of the scientific advisory board of Kedrion; and receives consultancy fees and honoraria from Baxalta U.S. Inc., a Takeda company. Milligan is an employee of Trio Health and reports research support from AbbVie, Gilead, Merck, Sanofi, and ViiV, unrelated to this study. Watt is an employee of Shire International GmbH, a Takeda company, and owns stock in the company. Booth was an employee of Baxalta U.S. Inc., a Takeda company, at the time of this study and owns stock in the company. Data from this study were presented at the AMCP Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; April 23-28, 2018; Boston, MA; SETH (2018) Sociedad Espanola de Trombosis y Hemostasia-XXXIV Congreso Nacional; October 11-13, 2018; Grenada, Espana; and Blood 2018 Annual Scientific Meeting; October 21-24, 2018; Brisbane, Australia.

Background and aims: Achieving sustained virological response (SVR; cure) in hepatitis C patients using a simple regimen is key to making elimination by 2030 possible. In the largest real-world analysis to date, the effectiveness of pangenotypic, panfibrotic, single-tablet, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) once-daily for 12weeks was assessed in 12 clinical real-world cohorts from various geographical areas, settings and treatment practices. Factors affecting risk of not achieving SVR were assessed. Methods: Adults treated with SOF/VEL 400/100mg, without ribavirin, were included. All HCV patients reaching Week 12 or 24 post-treatment were assessed for SVR12/24. Factors associated with not achieving SVR12/24 for virological reasons were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 5552 patients were included: 13.3% treatment-experienced; 20.7% compensated cirrhotic; 30.2% genotype 1; 29.5% genotype 2; 32.9% genotype 3; 4.7% genotype 4; 3.7% HIV coinfection; 13.4% current/former intravenous drug use. Of the 5196 patients evaluated for effectiveness, 98.9% achieved SVR12/24. High SVR12/24 rates occurred in all genotypes including genotype 3 (98.3%; 1649/1677) and in those with compensated cirrhosis (97.9; 1055/1078). Only 55 patients did not achieve SVR12/24 due to a virological reason; the only factor statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of not achieving SVR12/24 was compensated cirrhosis (P=.002). Overall, 6% (332/5552) of patients did not achieve SVR12/24 for non-virological reasons (67% lost to follow-up; 26.5% early treatment discontinuation). Conclusions: In this large cohort, representative of clinical practice, a simple 12-week regimen of SOF/VEL without ribavirin resulted in high SVR12/24 rates in diverse patient populations, even among those with compensated cirrhosis.

peer-reviewed The use of individual patient data (IPD) in network meta-analysis (NMA) is becoming increasingly popular. However, as most studies do not report IPD, most NMAs are performed using aggregate data for at least some, if not all, of the studies. We investigate the benefits of including varying proportions of IPD studies in an NMA. Several models have previously been developed for including both aggregate data and IPD in the same NMA.We performed a simulation study based on these models to examine the impact of additional IPD studies on the accuracy and precision of the estimates of both the treatment effect and the covariate effect. We also compared the deviance information criterion (DIC) between models to assess model fit. An increased proportion of IPD resulted in more accurate and precise estimates for most models and datasets. However, the coverage probability sometimes decreased when the model was misspecified. The use of IPD leads to greater differences in DIC, which allows us choose the correct model more often. We analysed a Hepatitis C network consisting of 3 IPD observational studies. The ranking of treatments remained the same for all models and datasets. We observed similar results to the simulation study: The use of IPD leads to differences in DIC and more precise estimates for the covariate effect. However, IPD sometimes increased the posterior SD of the treatment effect estimate, which may indicate between study heterogeneity. We recommend that IPD should be used where possible, especially for assessing model fit.

Background Elbasvir-grazoprevir is indicated for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1 and 4. Aim To evaluate the utilization and outcomes of chronic HCV patients treated with elbasvir-grazoprevir in the United States. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults treated with elbasvir-grazoprevir with or without ribavirin for chronic HCV genotypes 1 or 4 infection. Data were collected from healthcare providers and specialty pharmacies through Innervation Platform, a proprietary, cloud-based disease management program from Trio Health. The primary endpoint was per protocol sustained virological response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Results Among 470 patients treated in 2016, 95% had HCV genotype 1 infection, 80% (373/468) were HCV treatment naive and 70% (327/468) had non-cirrhotic disease. Almost 3 quarters (73%) of patients received care in community practices. The majority (89%) of patients received elbasvir-grazoprevir for 12 weeks. Per protocol SVR12 rates were 99% (396/402) for HCV genotype 1 and 95% (21/22) for HCV genotype 4. Among patients with Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney diseases, 99% (113/114) achieved SVR12. In univariate analyses, variables significantly associated with per protocol SVR12 for the entire sample were therapy duration (P = 0.001), treatment experience (P = 0.016), and cirrhosis status (P = 0.001). However, among HCV genotype 1 patients, no variables were significant. Intent-to-treat SVR12 rates were 89% (396/447) for HCV genotype 1 and 91% (21/23) for HCV genotype 4. Conclusion Elbasvir-grazoprevir is highly effective, and in this 2016 cohort, its use was predominantly in patients with HCV genotype 1 and as a 12-week therapy without ribavirin.

Despite the clinical success in the real-world of all oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy with response rates approaching that seen in the clinical trials, access has been limited by many payers with discussion of prioritization of treatment based upon AASLD guidelines. We evaluated patients in the TRIO network who were prescribed sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens to determine reasons for not starting treatment. Trio Health is a disease management company that works in partnership with academic medical centres, community physicians and specialty pharmacies in the United States to optimize care for HCV. Data for 3841 patients prescribed a sofosbuvir-containing regimen between December 2013 and September 2014 were obtained through this programme. Of the entire group, 315 (8%) patients did not start the prescribed sofosbuvir-containing therapy. A total of 141 (45%) of the nonstart patients had a commercial plan as their primary insurance, 137 (44%) were primarily covered by Medicaid, 17 (5%) were primarily covered by Medicare, and 20 (6%) were either without coverage or coverage was not specified. Reasons for nonstarts were varied and overlapping. Only 15 patients (5% of nonstarts) did not start because they were unreachable or failed to complete required testing. Another 39 patients who did not start (12%) were following their physicians' direction to either wait for new treatment options or to hold treatment for an unspecified reason. Insurance-related processes and financial reasons accounted for 254 (81%) of the 315 nonstarts. The remaining 7 (2%) patients did not have a specified reason for not starting treatment. Nonstart rates were highest in the Medicaid-covered population at 35%. Medicare and Commercial nonstart rates were 2% and 6%, respectively. In a matched comparison, patients with commercial coverage were 6.5 times as likely to start SOF-based therapy compared to patients with Medicaid. Despite high SVR rates of SOF-based regimens in clinical practice, there are still barriers to access to care. In fact, almost half of the nonstart patients had advanced fibrosis scores (F3 or F4) and should have been prioritized to start treatment. As better treatment for HCV with high efficacy and low side effect rates become available, the disparity in access to treatment, as evidenced by the high nonstart rate in the Medicaid-covered group, must be resolved.

Introduction: The safety and efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol (BAX 855, SHP-660, TAK-660; Adynovate®; Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA) in patients with severe hemophilia A has been reported previously (Konkle BA et al., Blood 2015, 126:1078-85; Brand B et al., Haemophilia 2016, 22:e251-8; Mullins ES et al., Haemophilia 2017, 23:238-46); however, research describing patient experience with extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) products outside clinical trials is limited. The objective of this study was to assess real-world utilization of TAK-660 in patients with hemophilia A and describe their clinical profiles before and after switching to TAK-660. Factor consumption and bleed outcomes stratified by age ( Methods: This was a retrospective, observational database study of patient data from US specialty pharmacies. Pharmacy data sources included patient records, prescriptions, and patient-reported bleed logs. Informed consent was obtained for all analyzed patient data. Eligible patients with hemophilia A were treated with prophylactic TAK-660 with on-label dosing from November 2015 to September 2018, and had received ≥90 days of FVIII (standard half-life [SHL] or EHL) therapy before switching to TAK-660. Main exclusion criteria were participation in a TAK-660 clinical trial before/during this study, only on-demand treatment before switching to TAK-660, or presence of active FVIII inhibitor requiring treatment and/or use of immune tolerance induction during the study period. Assessments included prior hemophilia therapy, FVIII administration frequency and consumption, and annualized bleeding rate (ABR) before and after switching to TAK-660. Results: Data was collected from 82 patients (of 61 providers in 44 practices across 25 states in the United States): 44% of the patients (36/82) were Conclusions: In patients with hemophilia A previously treated with SHL- or EHL-FVIII products, switching to TAK-660 prophylaxis resulted in a significant decrease in ABR of 40-50% in both age groups analyzed. The adult population (ie, ≥18 years old) showed a tendency for reduced weekly FVIII consumption. These findings from real-world data are in agreement with TAK-660 clinical trial results. The observed differences in FVIII consumption between patients Disclosures Watt: Shire International GmbH, a Takeda company: Employment, Other: a Takeda stock owner. Milligan:Sanofi: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Trio Health: Employment; Viiv: Research Funding.

Introduction The efficacy of rasburicase vs allopurinol for the prevention of hyperuricemia (HU) of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) has been demonstrated in clinical trials, yet studies evaluating these therapies in real-world clinical practice are lacking. Here, we evaluate the real-world use and clinical impact of rasburicase and allopurinol for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced HU. Methods Data were collected from a proprietary aggregated Electronic Medical Records database containing data from 21 healthcare organizations and 26 million patients in the US. Inclusion criteria included patients at high risk (HR) of TLS (Table 1) and diagnosed with acute lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, Burkitt's Lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and receiving chemotherapy between 01/01/2017 and 06/30/2018. Baseline measures were those within 6 months but closest to and before the start of chemotherapy. Patients were followed until death or 6 months from the start of chemotherapy. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test for continuous variables and Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, or McNemar's test for categorical variables. Multivariate analyses were conducted to assess association of variables and to generate scores for propensity score matching (PSM). Results Of the patients who qualified for the study, 74% (991) received allopurinol, 7% (92 patients) rasburicase, and 19% (248) did not receive a urate-lowering therapy. Patients receiving rasburicase were more likely to be male, with pre-existing TLS at chemotherapy drug initiation, and previously treated with rasburicase or both urate-lowering therapies. The TLS risk population receiving rasburicase presented with higher mean baseline uric acid level (9.0 mg/dL) compared with patients receiving allopurinol (6.9 mg/dL), and over half had baseline uric acid levels >7.5 mg/dL (56% vs 35% for allopurinol). Multivariate analysis further indicated that a greater fraction of patients receiving rasburicase had renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] Conclusions Patients at HR of TLS and receiving rasburicase had higher uric acid levels at baseline, more renal impairment, and were more likely to have experienced TLS previously compared with those receiving allopurinol. Both rasburicase and allopurinol significantly decreased levels of uric acid post-treatment though the mean decrease was significantly higher in rasburicase patients. These data support previous clinical findings that rasburicase is highly effective in reducing uric acid, though observed use in the real-world setting is restricted to patients with increased sickness. These findings support the need for continued research of the outcomes associated with early recognition and prophylaxis with rasburicase for patients with moderate risk and HR features for HU of TLS. Disclosures Radtchenko: Sanofi: Research Funding. Lyons:Sanofi: Employment. Barnes:Sanofi: Employment. Milligan:Trio Health: Employment; AbbVie: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Viiv: Research Funding. Drea:Sanofi-Genzyme: Employment.

Faculty constitutes one of the most important elements of Higher Education institutions. Their role is key in curriculum development, as well as in guiding students´ learning and driving their engagement, in conducting research and in the overall success of their institutions. This paper presents the results of a number of faculty interviews, and a focus group carried out in nine different Laureate institutions, operating in eight different countries. Faculty were asked about professional recognition, its importance and how it should occur. The results of the study show a lot of consistency, starting with the conviction of its importance, and then the differentiation between an environment of recognition and appreciation, and the need for formal recognition opportunities. Some other interesting ideas and aspirations were shared, providing good guidance for institutions that are interested in enhancing faculty recognition as part of their continuous improvement process. SIN FINANCIACIÓN No data 2018 UEM

Scholars disagree over whether Islam hinders the development of liberal democracy in Muslim-majority countries. We contribute to this debate by assessing the influence of Islam at the individual and national levels on ethnic, racial, and religious tolerance in 23 countries. Our analyses are based on a set of multilevel models fitted to World Values Survey data and national-level contextual information from various sources. Our findings suggest that people living in Muslim-majority countries tend to be less tolerant than are those living in Western countries. Although a significant part of this difference is attributable to variation in level of economic development and income inequality, Muslim countries remain less tolerant even after controlling for these factors. On the other hand, controlling for other individual-level factors, nonpracticing Muslims in Western countries are more tolerant than are all others in both Muslim-majority and Western countries. This finding challenges common claims about the effects of Islam as a religion on tolerance, suggesting that it is Islamic political regimes--not Islam itself--that pose problems for social tolerance.

SummaryBackground Treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with combination direct acting anti-virals is associated with very high rates of sustained virological response (SVR). Daily combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks is approved for the treatment of genotype 1 HCV patients, though noncirrhotic patients who are naive to treatment with a baseline HCV RNA