Search

Background: The importance of achieving a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level less than 100 mg/dL in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or cerebrovascular disease (CVD) is well established. Emerging evidence supports the recognition and management of secondary lipid goals, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level greater than 40 mg/dL, and triglyceride level less than 150 mg/dL., Objective: To evaluate whether inpatient services within an academic setting were achieving/addressing primary and secondary lipid goals in patients with established CAD or CVD., Methods: Patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, myocardial revascularization procedures, and/or ischemic stroke were identified. A retrospective chart review was done to assess adherence to the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) guidelines for lipid management., Results: On average, 63% of patients with CAD or CVD had a lipid panel assessed during their hospitalization. Of the patients who had a fasting lipid panel checked, only 40% (72/178) had an LDL-C level less than 100 mg/dL. Of those patients, only 31% (22) also had an HDL-C level greater than 40 mg/dL. Even fewer patients (24%; 17) met both primary and secondary goals. Of the 287 patients included in the study, 69% (199) were prescribed a statin, 3% (9) a fibrate, and 3% (8) niacin on discharge., Conclusions: Few patients with CAD or CVD met the AHA/ACC goals for lipid management, yet a significant number were not prescribed appropriate lipid-lowering therapy at discharge. This finding strongly suggests that more awareness in this area is needed.

Objective: To report a case of successful anticoagulation using a modified dosing weight (DW) for unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy in a morbidly obese female., Case Summary: A 54-year-old morbidly obese (182.4 kg, 155 cm) white female presented to the emergency department with tachycardia, shortness of breath, and chest pain, and was diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation with UFH was initiated. A modified DW of 120 kg was obtained from the average of the actual body weight (ABW) and ideal body weight ( approximately 50 kg). We selected this modified DW to account for heparin's altered volume of distribution in an obese patient and avoid potentially supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) using ABW and subtherapeutic aPTTs using DW. Therapy was initiated with a bolus dose of 9600 units (80 units/kg x 120 kg) and continuous infusion rate of 2160 units/h (18 units/kg/h x 120 kg). This infusion rate was maintained throughout the course of heparin therapy and was successful in maintaining therapeutic aPTTs., Discussion: Proper diagnosis and rapid initiation of therapy prevent mortality in patients with PE. Although weight-based heparin nomograms provide standardization through initial bolus and continuous infusion recommendations, many do not address dosing in morbidly obese patients. Several retrospective studies have evaluated actual, dosing, and ideal body weights for heparin therapy in obese patients; however, none has evaluated modified DW. In our patient, successful anticoagulation was objectively confirmed., Conclusions: Further investigation is necessary to determine the optimal DW for UFH in morbidly obese patients presenting with acute thrombosis.