Search

Objective: Previous genetic and clinical analyses have associated lower lipoprotein(a) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) with greater risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes (NOD). However, PCSK9 inhibitors such as alirocumab lower both lipoprotein(a) and LDL-C without effect on NOD., Research Design and Methods: In a post hoc analysis of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (NCT01663402), we examined the joint prediction of NOD by baseline lipoprotein(a), LDL-C, and insulin (or HOMA-insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]) and their changes with alirocumab treatment. Analyses included 8,107 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome on optimized statin therapy, without diabetes at baseline, assigned to alirocumab or placebo with median follow-up 2.4 years. Splines were estimated from logistic regression models., Results: Lower baseline lipoprotein(a) and higher baseline insulin or HOMA-IR independently predicted 782 cases of NOD; baseline LDL-C did not predict NOD. Alirocumab reduced lipoprotein(a) and LDL-C without affecting insulin or NOD risk (odds ratio [OR] vs. placebo 0.998; 95% CI 0.860-1.158). However, in logistic regression, decreased lipoprotein(a) and LDL-C on alirocumab were independent, opposite predictors of NOD. OR for NOD for 25% and 50% lipoprotein(a) reductions on alirocumab were 1.12 (95% CI 1.01-1.23) and 1.24 (1.02-1.52). OR for NOD for 25% and 50% LDL-C reductions on alirocumab were 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.97) and 0.77 (0.64-0.94)., Conclusions: Baseline lipoprotein(a) was inversely associated with risk of NOD. Alirocumab-induced reductions of lipoprotein(a) and LDL-C were associated with increased and decreased risk of NOD, respectively, without net effect on NOD. Ongoing trials will determine the impact of larger and longer lipoprotein(a) reductions on NOD., (© 2025 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.S. reports serving as a consultant or research support (or both) from CiVi, Resverlogix, Lexicon, Baxter, Esperion, Amarin, New Amsterdam, Tourmaline, Sanofi, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E.R.: No disclosures. P.G.S. reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Sanofi; grants and personal fees from Amarin, Servier, and Bayer; personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Idorsia, Pfizer, and Novartis. J.W.J. receives research grants from The Netherlands Heart Foundation, the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands, and the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme; and research support from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Merck-Schering-Plough, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. M.Sc. is an employee of Roche and may hold shares in the company. D.L.B. discloses the following relationships: Advisory Board: Angiowave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys; Board of Directors: Angiowave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), High Enroll (stock), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, TobeSoft; Chair: Inaugural Chair, American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; Consultant: Broadview Ventures, Hims; Data Monitoring Committees: Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute; Rutgers University (for the NIH-funded MINT Trial); Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), CSL Behring (AHA lecture), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (Course Director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today's Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), Wiley (steering committee); Other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Patent: Sotagliflozin (named on a patent for sotagliflozin assigned to Brigham and Women's Hospital who assigned to Lexicon; neither I nor Brigham and Women's Hospital receive any income from this patent); Research Funding: Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Alnylam, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CinCor, Cleerly, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, Youngene, 89Bio; Royalties: Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald's Heart Disease); Site Co-Investigator: Author contributions Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, Vascular Solut.

Background: Lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events and modifies the benefit of PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitors. Lipoprotein(a) concentration can be measured with immunoassays reporting mass or molar concentration or a reference measurement system using mass spectrometry. Whether the relationships between lipoprotein(a) concentrations and cardiovascular events in a high-risk cohort differ across lipoprotein(a) methods is unknown. We compared the prognostic and predictive value of these types of lipoprotein(a) tests for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)., Methods: The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab) compared the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab with placebo in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome. We compared risk of a MACE in the placebo group and MACE risk reduction with alirocumab according to baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration measured by Siemens N-latex nephelometric immunoassay (IA-mass; mg/dL), Roche Tina-Quant turbidimetric immunoassay (IA-molar; nmol/L), and a noncommercial mass spectrometry-based test (MS; nmol/L). Lipoprotein(a) values were transformed into percentiles for comparative modeling. Natural cubic splines estimated continuous relationships between baseline lipoprotein(a) and outcomes in each treatment group. Event rates were also determined across baseline lipoprotein(a) quartiles defined by each assay., Results: Among 11 970 trial participants with results from all 3 tests, baseline median (Q1, Q3) lipoprotein(a) concentrations were 21.8 (6.9, 60.0) mg/dL, 45.0 (13.2, 153.8) nmol/L, and 42.2 (14.3, 143.1) nmol/L for IA-mass, IA-molar, and MS, respectively. The strongest correlation was between IA-molar and MS (r=0.990), with nominally weaker correlations between IA-mass and MS (r=0.967) and IA-mass and IA-molar (r=0.972). Relationships of lipoprotein(a) with MACE risk in the placebo group were nearly identical with each test, with estimated cumulative incidences differing by ≤0.4% across lipoprotein(a) percentiles, and all were incrementally prognostic after accounting for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (all spline P ≤0.0003). Predicted alirocumab treatment effects were also nearly identical for each of the 3 tests, with estimated treatment hazard ratios differing by ≤0.07 between tests across percentiles and nominally less relative risk reduction by alirocumab at lower percentiles for all 3 tests. Absolute risk reduction with alirocumab increased with increasing lipoprotein(a) measured by each test, with significant linear trends across quartiles., Conclusions: In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, 3 lipoprotein(a) tests were similarly prognostic for MACE in the placebo group and predictive of MACE reductions with alirocumab at the cohort level., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01663402., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Szarek reports serving as a consultant or receiving research support, or both, from CiVi, Resverlogix, Lexicon, Baxter, Esperion, Amarin, NewAmsterdam, Sanofi, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E. Reijnders reports no disclosures. Dr Jukema reports research grants from the Netherlands Heart Foundation, the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, and the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme, and research support from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, Merck-Schering-Plough, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. Dr Bhatt was on advisory boards of Angiowave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys; was on boards of directors of Angiowave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), High Enroll (stock), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, and TobeSoft; was inaugural chair of the American Heart Association quality oversight committee; was a consultant for Broadview Ventures and Hims; was on data monitoring committees of Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; and for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute, and Rutgers University (for the National Institutes of Health–funded MINT Trial); received honoraria from American College of Cardiology (senior associate editor, “Clinical Trials and News,” ACC.org; chair, ACC accreditation oversight committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee, funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee, funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (editor-in-chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), CSL Behring (American Heart Association lecture), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (editor-in-chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (guest editor and associate editor), K2P (co-chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (course director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (chief medical editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (secretary/treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), and Wiley (steering committee); additional disclosures: Clinical Cardiology (deputy editor), NCDR-ACTION registry steering committee (chair), and VA CART research and publications committee (chair); patent: sotagliflozin (named on a patent for sotagliflozin assigned to Brigham and Women’s Hospital, assigned to Lexicon; Dr Bhatt nor Brigham and Women’s Hospital receives any income from this patent); research funding: Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Alnylam, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CinCor, Cleerly, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, Youngene, and 89Bio; royalties: Elsevier (editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); site coinvestigator: Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, and Vascular Solutions; trustee: American College of Cardiology; unfunded research: FlowCo and Takeda. Dr Bittner reports grant support from Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, DalCor, Esperion, and Novartis; consulting fees from Pfizer; honoraria from Medscape; and fees for participating on data safety monitoring boards for the National Institutes of Health and for Verve Therapeutics. Dr Diaz reports research grants from Sanofi, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Population Health Research Institute, Duke Clinical Research Institute, the TIMI group, Amgen, Cirius, Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, and Lepetit; and personal fees, as a member of the Executive Steering Committee, from Amgen and Cirius. Dr Fazio is an employee of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc and may hold shares in the company. G. Garon is an employee of Sanofi and may hold shares in the company. Dr Goodman reports research grant support (eg, steering committee or data and safety monitoring committee) or speaker/consulting honoraria (eg, advisory boards) from Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo/American Regent, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, HLS Therapeutics, JAMP Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/C, Pendopharm/Pharmascience, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, and Valeo Pharma; and salary support/honoraria from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario/University of Toronto (Polo) chair, Canadian Heart Research Centre and MD Primer, Canadian VIGOUR Centre, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Centre for Clinical Research, Duke Clinical Research Institute, New York University Clinical Coordinating Centre, PERFUSE Research Institute, and the TIMI Study Group (Brigham Health). Dr Harrington reports research grants from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, CSL, and Janssen; consulting for Atropos Health, Bitterroot Bio, Bridge Bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Foresight, and Element Science; and served on the boards of directors for the American Heart Association (unpaid) and Cytokinetics. Dr Ruhaak reports no disclosures. Dr Schwertfeger is an employee of Roche and may hold shares in the company. Dr Tsimikas is a coinventor and receives royalties from patents owned by University of California San Diego and is a cofounder and has an equity interest in Oxitope, LLC, and its affiliates, Kleanthi Diagnostics, LLC, and has a dual appointment at the University of California San Diego and Ionis Pharmaceuticals. Dr White reports grant support paid to the institution for serving on a steering committee for the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab) from Sanofi-Aventis and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, for ACCELERATE (A Study of Evacetrapib in High-Risk Vascular Disease) from Eli Lilly and Company, for STRENGTH (Outcomes Study to Assess Statin Residual Risk Reduction With EpaNova in High CV Risk Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia) from Omthera Pharmaceuticals, for CAMELLIA-TIMI (A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Long-term Treatment With BELVIQ [Lorcaserin HC] on the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Conversion to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese and Overweight Subjects With Cardiovascular Disease or Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors) from Eisai Inc, for HEART-FID (Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of FCM as Treatment for Heart Failure With Iron Deficiency) from American Regent, and for ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) and the MINT Trial (Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion) from the National Institutes of Health; received grants to the institution and personal fees as a steering committee member for the Dal-Gene study (Effect of Dalcetrapib versus Placebo on CV Risk in a Genetically Defined Population With a Recent ACS) from DalCor Pharma UK Inc, for the AEGIS-II study (The Safety and Tolerability of CSL112, a Reconstituted, Infusible, Plasma-Derived Human ApoA-I, After Acute Myocardial Infarction: The ApoA-I Event Reducing in Ischemic Syndromes I) from CSL Behring, for the SCORED trial (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk) and the SOLOIST-WHF trial (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Post Worsening Heart Failure) from Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd, and for the CLEAR Outcomes Study (Evaluation of Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With, or at High Risk for, Cardiovascular Disease Who Are Statin Intolerant Treated With Bempedoic Acid [ETC-1002] or Placebo) from Esperion Therapeutics Inc; and was on advisory boards for CSL Behring and Genentech, Inc (an affiliate of F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, “Roche”; Lytics Post-PCI advisory board at European Society of Cardiology). Dr Steg reports grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Sanofi; grants and personal fees from Amarin, Servier, and Bayer; and personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Idorsia, Pfizer, and Novartis. Dr Cobbaert reports research collaboration with Roche Diagnostics. Dr Schwartz reports research grants to the University of Colorado from AstraZeneca, Resverlogix, Sanofi, Silence Therapeutics, and The Medicines Company; and is coinventor of pending US patent 62/806,313 (“Methods for Reducing Cardiovascular Risk”) assigned in full to the University of Colorado.

Objective: We aimed to investigate whether the post-exercise ankle brachial index (ABI) performed by primary care physicians offers useful information for the prediction of death or cardiovascular events, beyond the traditional resting ABI. An additional focus was on patients with intermittent claudication and normal resting ABI., Methods: Using data from the 5-year follow-up of 6468 elderly patients in the primary care setting in Germany (getABI study) we used multivariate Cox regression models adjusted for age, gender and conventional risk factors to determine the association of resting ABI and/or post-exercise ABI and all-cause mortality/morbidity., Results: Mean post-exercise ABI in the total cohort was 0.977 and resting ABI was 1.034. For post-exercise ABI, a threshold value of 0.825 had nearly the same sensitivity (28.6%) and specificity (85.7%) as the conventionally used resting ABI with a cut-off value of 0.9 to predict death. Compared to patients with normal post-exercise ABI, a low post-exercise ABI was associated with an almost identical risk increase for mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.86) as a low resting ABI (HR 1.65; CI 1.39-1.97) and/or myocardial infarction/stroke. Slight differences were observed for coronary/carotid revascularisation and peripheral revascularisation/amputation. In combined models it could not be shown that post-exercise ABI yielded relevant additional information for the prognosis of mortality and/or myocardial infarction/stroke, not even in the subgroup analysis of patients with intermittent claudication and normal resting ABI., Conclusions: It could not be shown that the post-exercise ABI is a useful tool for the prognosis of mortality and/or myocardial infarction/stroke beyond the resting ABI., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is controversial evidence with regard to the significance of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) as an indicator for future stroke risk. We aimed to quantify the risk increase for mortality and morbidity associated with PAD., Methods: In an open, prospective, noninterventional cohort study in the primary care setting, a total of 6,880 unselected patients > or =65 years were categorized according to the presence or absence of PAD and followed up for vascular events or deaths over 5 years. PAD was defined as ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.9 or history of previous peripheral revascularization and/or limb amputation and/or intermittent claudication. Associations between known cardiovascular risk factors including PAD and cerebrovascular mortality/events were analyzed in a multivariate Cox regression model., Results: During the 5-year follow-up [29,915 patient-years (PY)], 183 patients had a stroke (incidence per 1,000 PY: 6.1 cases). In patients with PAD (n = 1,429) compared to those without PAD (n = 5,392), the incidence of all stroke types standardized per 1,000 PY, with the exception of hemorrhagic stroke, was about doubled (for fatal stroke tripled). The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios were 1.6 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.1-2.2) for total stroke, 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.5) for ischemic stroke, 0.7 (95% CI 0.2-2.2) for hemorrhagic stroke, 2.5 (95% CI 1.2-5.2) for fatal stroke and 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.1) for nonfatal stroke. Lower ABI categories were associated with higher stroke rates. Besides high age, previous stroke and diabetes mellitus, PAD was a significant independent predictor for ischemic stroke., Conclusions: The risk of stroke is substantially increased in PAD patients, and PAD is a strong independent predictor for stroke., (Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Atherothrombosis can present as coronary artery disease (CAD) cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unknown whether diabetics with CAD differ from those with other manifestations of atherothrombosis such as CVD or PAD regarding clinical characteristics, biochemical parameters, or medications., Material and Methods: The REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) registry evaluated 67 888 patients with established atherothrombosis or risk factors. Of 5 646 recruited German patients, 2 381 (42%) are diabetic. Of these 1 438 (60%) have CAD (either only CAD or in combination with CVD and/or PAD - CAD group) and 520 (22%) have other manifestations of atherothrombosis (either CVD or PAD or both - other manifestation group) and 18% have only risk factors. Differences between diabetics with CAD and diabetics with other manifestations of atherothrombosis were evaluated with multivariate models (79% male, 69+/-9 years, BMI 29+/-5 kg/m (2)) (SAS9.1)., Results: After correcting for age, sex and BMI, CAD patients receive (OR; 95% CI) more aspirin (1.5; 1.2-1.9; p=0.0002), statins (3.1; 2.6-3.7), beta-blockers (4.0; 3.8-4.8), diuretics (1.4; 1.2-1.6), ACE-inhibitors/ARBs (1.4; 1.2-1.7) and nitrates (8.8; 6.7-11.7) and significantly less often metformin (0.75; 0.61-0.93; p=0.01) with no differences concerning other antidiabetics. This resulted in significantly (p<0.05) lower blood-pressure (CAD 142/81 mmHg, other manifestations 145/82 mmHg) and LDL-cholesterol levels (CAD 108+/-37 mg/dl, other manifestations 123+/-37 mg/dl). Therefore more CAD patients reach LDL and blood-pressure-goals (CAD 47%/33%; other manifestations 30%/24%, respectively). Only few patients (CAD 7.1%, other manifestations 4.1%) reach all treatment goals. Furthermore, less CAD patients than patients with other manifestations of atherothrombosis are current smokers (11% vs. 22%)., Discussion: These data indicate considerable treatment differences between diabetics with CAD and those with other manifestations of atherothrombosis such as CVD or PAD. CAD patients are treated more intensively and therefore reach lower lipid and blood-pressure values., (J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart, New York.)

Aims: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are manifestations of the same underlying condition, atherothrombosis. We compared patients with PAD only with those having PAD and concomitant documented CAD in terms of characteristics, risk factors, treatment and prognosis., Methods and Results: This is a subgroup analysis of the German cohort of the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry. It includes 483 patients with PAD only, and 479 patients with PAD plus CAD. Patients with concomitant cerebrovascular disease were excluded. Symptomatic PAD was defined as intermittent claudication (IC), confirmed by ankle brachial index <0.9, or PAD-related intervention. Patients in the total cohort were predominantly elderly (mean age 67.3 +/- 8.9 years), males (72.3%), current or previous smokers (80.18%), and had often abdominal obesity (49.6%). Atherosclerotic risk factors and comorbidities were highly prevalent. Patients with PAD + CAD compared to those with PAD only were significantly more intensively treated with regards to antihrombotic agents (97.1% vs. 88.8%), statins (80.2% vs. 51.6%), or ACE inhibitors/ARB (75.6% vs. 61.1%). After two-year follow-up, no significant differences between subgroups were noted for total mortality (4.6% vs. 5.5%), cardiovascular mortality (3.7% vs. 3.9%), non-fatal myocardial infarction (1.9% vs. 2.7%) but for non-fatal stroke (4.4% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Peripheral arterial disease patients carry a high burden of risk factors and co-morbidities, and are at high risk of death and cardiovascular events. If documented CAD is absent, PAD patients are undertreated. Thus, in PAD patients, secondary cardiovascular prevention with stringent treatment of risk factors to the same extent as in CAD patients is mandatory, in line with current guidelines.

Background: Current guidelines on stroke prevention recommend long-term antiplatelet therapy. Clopidogrel is primarily indicated in patients at higher risk. This investigation documented the current situation of patients who are treated with clopidogrel and/or acetylicsalicylic acid (ASA) following an acute ischemic cerebrovascular event (stroke or transient ischemic attack, TIA) in a primary care setting., Patients and Methods: Prospective, cross sectional study with 2095 patients in 642 physician offices., Results: Patients were 69.0 +/- 10.2 years old (58.2% were men). Ischemic stroke was reported in 57.3% and TIA in 46.0% (several events in one given patient possible). Cardiovascular risk factors were frequent (arterial hypertension 87.6%, hyperlipidaemia 75.3%, diabetes mellitus 42.5%, and smoking in 27.2%) as were atherothrombotic comorbidities (stable coronary artery disease 23.3%, unstable CAD 11.6%, peripheral arterial hypertension 26.6%). A stratification according to the Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) showed that 80.2% of the patients had a high risk of recurrent events. Patients with clopidogrel monotherapy or combination therapy (47.2% and 39.2% of the cohort) compared to ASA monotherapy (16.6%) were more frequently male, had more often a private insurance, a higher number of risk factors and comorbidities as well as a higher ESRS. Long-term antiplatelet therapy was planned by the treating physicians in 6.5% of patients on clopidogrel monotherapy in 33.6% on combination therapy and in 93.4% on ASA monotherapy., Conclusion: Patients with an acute cerebrovascular event have multiple comorbidities and are therefore relatively frequently treated with clopidogrel. It is striking that in a number of patients no long-term anti-platelet therapy was recommended by the primary care physician.

The renal handling of porphyrins is reported to be a sensitive marker for chronic renal failure (CRF) for two reasons: heme is synthesised in proximal tubules and porphyrins are reabsorbed in the renal proximal tubule by apical peptide transporter PEPT 2. Two different models of CRF in female Wistar rats have been used for investigation of renal porphyrin handling: (1) single administration of uranyl nitrate (UN; 0.5 mg/100 g b.wt.) and (2) 5/6 nephrectomy (5/6NX). Renal clearance experiments were performed at weeks 2 and 10 after the onset of CRF. The concentrations of porphyrin intermediates (uroporphyrin I and III, coproporphyrin I and II, heptaporphyrin, and pentaporphyrin) were measured by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Both after UN and 5/6NX a significant reduction of body weight occurred. The kidney weight was enhanced 2 weeks after UN compared to controls (+31%). After 5/6NX, the weight of the remnant kidney was 44% (2nd week) and 140% (10th week) higher compared to one control kidney. Urine volumes and GFR were significantly reduced at week 2 and 10 after 5/6NX, but at week 10 after UN values were comparable to controls. Two weeks after UN and 5/6NX the concentrations of heptaporphyrin was moderately decreased in renal tissue whereas after 10 weeks the concentrations of most porphyrins were increased in the kidney. The plasma levels of free porphyrins were only slightly enhanced (week 2). The renal excretion of porphyrins was initially slightly reduced in both models, whereas it increases 10 weeks after UN, but it remained reduced 10 weeks after 5/6NX. UN induces tubulointerstitial fibrosis including atrophic glomeruli, whereas 5/6NX was characterized by distinct proteinuria, dilated tubules containing hyaline casts. A modulation of porphyrin metabolism in the kidney seems first of all to be responsible for UN effect on renal porphyrin handling. Summing up the 5/6NX results, both reduction in intact renal tissue mass and a modification of enzymes involved in heme biosynthesis by uraemic toxins are responsible for accumulation of porphyrins in renal tissue. After 5/6NX reduced excretion of porphyrins into urine and enhanced porphyrin concentrations in the kidney indicate more a damage of renal porphyrin biosynthesis than changes in their reabsorption.

Background: Nitric oxide (NO) synthesis is inhibited by the ADMA that accumulates in the plasma of patients with renal failure; however, the concentration of SDMA also is enhanced. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that ADMA and SDMA may contribute to hypertension in these patients., Methods: We measured the concentrations of ADMA, SDMA and 21 endogenous amino acids in 257 persons by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)., Results: The plasma concentrations of both ADMA and SDMA were significantly elevated in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). The increase was more pronounced for SDMA (2.05 +/- 0.1 micromol/L vs. 0.5 +/- 0.04 micromol/L), whereas it was only moderate for ADMA (0.85 +/- 0.03 micromol/L vs. 0.73 +/- 0.06 micromol/L). In dialysis patients, the concentrations were further increased (ADMA, 1.05 +/- 0.04 micromol/L; SDMA, 2.68 +/- 0.13 micromol/L). After kidney transplantation, the concentration of SDMA returned to the baseline value (1.15 +/- 0.11 micromol/L), but that of ADMA remained enhanced (0.99 +/- 0.06 micromol/L)., Conclusions: In CRF, especially the concentration of SDMA is significantly increased. Not only ADMA, but also SDMA are likely to be responsible for hypertension. Competition for reabsorption between SDMA and arginine within the kidney has to be considered for the interpretation of changes in the ratio between dimethylarginines and arginine in renal failure. Hemodialysis is not suitable for a long-lasting removal of methylarginines. Whether the administration of arginine could have promising effects on hypertension and complications of CRF needs to be studied in prospective trials.