Search

BACKGROUND: Adnexal torsion is a gynecologic emergency in children and adolescents but remains a challenging diagnosis, with no consistent clinical or radiologic diagnostic criteria. Our objective was to identify risk factors associated with adnexal torsion in premenarchal and menarchal patients with surgically confirmed torsion compared with those without torsion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgery between January 2016 and December 2019 for possible adnexal torsion. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, radiologic variables, and operative findings were compared using descriptive statistics. Independent predictors of torsion were then examined in multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 291 patients who underwent surgery, 168 (57.7%) had torsion. Patients with torsion were younger than those without torsion (11.9 vs. 14.2 years, P < .01). Vomiting was significantly associated with torsion for all patients (P < .001). Large adnexal volume and absent arterial Doppler flow were associated with torsion for the total population and menarchal subgroup. A logistic regression model for the total population that controlled for age and menarchal status found that vomiting (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.87-12.22), highest adnexal volume category (aOR 4.92, 95% CI 2.25-10.75), and absent arterial Doppler flow (aOR 2.674, 95% CI 1.28-5.60) were associated with torsion. CONCLUSIONS: Vomiting, enlarged adnexal volume, and absent arterial Doppler flow were associated with adnexal torsion. However, no single risk factor accurately diagnosed torsion, and multiple factors should be interpreted together. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Study of Diagnostic Test, Level II.

PURPOSE: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective at preventing pregnancy. Levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs also have beneficial effects on menstrual bleeding and abdominal and pelvic pain. Although there are increasing data on use of IUDs for contraception in adolescents and for medical indications in adults, there are extremely limited data on LNG IUD use for medical indications in adolescents. Our objective is to describe the characteristics and experiences of LNG IUD use in nulliparous adolescents and young women using IUDs for medical indications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all nulliparous patients aged 22 years and younger who underwent LNG IUD insertion at a tertiary care children's hospital between July 1, 2004 and June 30, 2014 primarily for noncontraceptive indications. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: We identified 231 LNG IUDs placed in 219 nulliparous women for medical indications during this time period. Mean patient age was 16.8 years (±2.2). Only 41% reported ever being sexually active. IUD continuation rate at 1 year was 86%. The amenorrhea rate at 1 year was 51%. Approximately 80% of women reported improvements in menstrual bleeding and abdominal and pelvic pain. Side effects and complications were low. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that LNG IUDs are effective, well-tolerated, and safe menstrual management options in young nulliparous women, including younger adolescents and those who have never been sexually active. This method is an excellent first-line therapy option for adolescents and young women for both contraceptive and noncontraceptive indications, regardless of age, parity, or sexual activity.