Search

Confronted with two faculty vacancies to fill and a desire to minimize burnout among the remaining library staff throughout the search process, the Eccles Health Sciences Library at the University of Utah employed an interview method seldom utilized in academic libraries. The library's search committee arranged on-site group interviews that hosted multiple candidates simultaneously. Careful scheduling ensured that each candidate received sufficient individual attention and assessment, while also enabling the committee to evaluate the group dynamics and interpersonal skills of the applicants.

While LibGuides are widely used in libraries to curate resources for users, there are a number of common problems, including maintenance, design and layout, and curating relevant and concise content. One health sciences library sought to improve our LibGuides, consulting usage statistics, user feedback, and recommendations from the literature to inform decision making. Our team recommended a number of changes to make LibGuides more usable, including creating robust maintenance and content guidelines, scheduling regular updates, and various changes to the format of the guides themselves to make them more user-friendly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While information evaluation is an essential component of evidence based practice, it remains unclear how nurses perceive their own source evaluation skills and what evaluation criteria they typically apply. Objectives: This study aims to determine nurses' self‐reported confidence in their evaluation skills and their actual source evaluation ability. The findings will guide information literacy instruction. Methods: A questionnaire asked recently graduated nurses from four institutions in the Intermountain West (USA) to rate their confidence in evaluating information and to provide examples of evaluation criteria they typically applied. The quality of these criteria was rated by nursing librarians, then compared with reported confidence in evaluation, years employed as a nurse and highest degree level. Results: While nurses' self‐reported confidence levels about source evaluation largely matched their ability, their evaluation criteria showed a low level of sophistication and did not match the recommended criteria by professional organizations. Graduate education, not years of work experience, was predictive of the quality of criteria used by nurses, suggesting the importance of more instruction on source evaluation for nursing students. Conclusions: Nursing educators, including librarians, need to teach evaluation skills at the undergraduate level. Further investigation into building evaluation skills in nurses is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The prescribing practices of dental professionals may play an important role in the opioid epidemic. The authors performed a scoping review of the current original research literature on dental professionals' prescribing practices for opioid analgesics published from 2000 through 2017. Types of Studies Reviewed. With the use of a modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, the inclusion criteria entailed published articles written in English that had an opioid focus, had a dental health care professional prescriber, entailed a US setting, were peer reviewed, had an identified data source, were not review articles, and were not opinion articles. Five databases were searched to identify relevant literature. Results. Of 221 articles, 18 met the inclusion criteria. Eight distinct and mutually exclusive themes emerged from these studies: impact of patient demographic characteristics on opioid prescribing, comparison of opioid prescribing by different provider type, quantity of opioids prescribed and consumed, types of opioids prescribed by dental professionals, assessment of self-reported opioid prescribing, opioid prescriptions by procedure, impact of pharmacy integration into dental practice, and implementation of risk mitigation strategies. Conclusions and Practical Implications. There is a surprising paucity of research that investigated the prescribing patterns of dentists. Available research suggests that dental practice does not always align with proposed guidelines for opioid prescribing. Some studies that explored interventions found changes in prescribing, suggesting the potential benefit of developing practical strategies targeted to dental providers who prescribed opioids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]