Search

ObjectiveTo provide guidance on the management of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C), a condition characterized by fever, inflammation, and multiorgan dysfunction that manifests late in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recommendations are also provided for children with hyperinflammation during COVID-19, the acute, infectious phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection.MethodsThe Task Force is composed of 9 pediatric rheumatologists and 2 adult rheumatologists, 2 pediatric cardiologists, 2 pediatric infectious disease specialists, and 1 pediatric critical care physician. Preliminary statements addressing clinical questions related to MIS-C and hyperinflammation in COVID-19 were developed based on evidence reports. Consensus was built through a modified Delphi process that involved anonymous voting and webinar discussion. A 9-point scale was used to determine the appropriateness of each statement (median scores of 1-3 for inappropriate, 4-6 for uncertain, and 7-9 for appropriate). Consensus was rated as low, moderate, or high based on dispersion of the votes. Approved guidance statements were those that were classified as appropriate with moderate or high levels of consensus, which were prespecified before voting.ResultsThe guidance was approved in June 2020 and updated in November 2020 and October 2021, and consists of 41 final guidance statements accompanied by flow diagrams depicting the diagnostic pathway for MIS-C and recommendations for initial immunomodulatory treatment of MIS-C.ConclusionOur understanding of SARS-CoV-2-related syndromes in the pediatric population continues to evolve. This guidance document reflects currently available evidence coupled with expert opinion, and will be revised as further evidence becomes available.

ObjectiveTo provide guidance on the management of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C), a condition characterized by fever, inflammation, and multiorgan dysfunction that manifests late in the course of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Recommendations are also provided for children with hyperinflammation during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the acute, infectious phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection.MethodsThe Task Force was composed of 9 pediatric rheumatologists and 2 adult rheumatologists, 2 pediatric cardiologists, 2 pediatric infectious disease specialists, and 1 pediatric critical care physician. Preliminary statements addressing clinical questions related to MIS-C and hyperinflammation in COVID-19 were developed based on evidence reports. Consensus was built through a modified Delphi process that involved anonymous voting and webinar discussion. A 9-point scale was used to determine the appropriateness of each statement (median scores of 1-3 for inappropriate, 4-6 for uncertain, and 7-9 for appropriate). Consensus was rated as low, moderate, or high based on dispersion of the votes. Approved guidance statements were those that were classified as appropriate with moderate or high levels of consensus, which were prespecified before voting.ResultsThe first version of the guidance was approved in June 2020, and consisted of 40 final guidance statements accompanied by a flow diagram depicting the diagnostic pathway for MIS-C. The document was revised in November 2020, and a new flow diagram with recommendations for initial immunomodulatory treatment of MIS-C was added.ConclusionOur understanding of SARS-CoV-2-related syndromes in the pediatric population continues to evolve. This guidance document reflects currently available evidence coupled with expert opinion, and will be revised as further evidence becomes available.

ObjectiveTo provide guidance on the management of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a condition characterized by fever, inflammation, and multiorgan dysfunction that manifests late in the course of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and to provide recommendations for children with hyperinflammation during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the acute, infectious phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection.MethodsA multidisciplinary task force was convened by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) to provide guidance on the management of MIS-C associated with SARS-CoV-2 and hyperinflammation in COVID-19. The task force was composed of 9 pediatric rheumatologists, 2 adult rheumatologists, 2 pediatric cardiologists, 2 pediatric infectious disease specialists, and 1 pediatric critical care physician. Preliminary statements addressing clinical questions related to MIS-C and hyperinflammation in COVID-19 were developed based on evidence reports. Consensus was built through a modified Delphi process that involved 2 rounds of anonymous voting and 2 webinars. A 9-point scale was used to determine the appropriateness of each statement (median scores of 1-3 for inappropriate, 4-6 for uncertain, and 7-9 for appropriate), and consensus was rated as low, moderate, or high based on dispersion of the votes along the numeric scale. Approved guidance statements were those that were classified as appropriate with moderate or high levels of consensus, as prespecified prior to voting.ResultsThe ACR task force approved a total of 128 guidance statements addressing the management of MIS-C and hyperinflammation in pediatric COVID-19. These statements were refined into 40 final clinical guidance statements, accompanied by a flow diagram depicting the diagnostic pathway for MIS-C.ConclusionOur understanding of SARS-CoV-2-related syndromes in the pediatric population continues to evolve. The guidance provided in this "living document" reflects currently available evidence, coupled with expert opinion, and will be revised as further evidence becomes available.

Systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases are characterized by genetic and cellular heterogeneity. While current single-cell genomics methods provide insights into known disease subtypes, these analysis methods do not readily reveal novel cell-type perturbation programs shared among distinct patient subsets. Here, we performed singlecell RNA-Seq of PBMCs of patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) with diverse clinical manifestations, including macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and lung disease (LD). We introduced two new computational frameworks called UDON and SATAY-UDON, which define patient subtypes based on their underlying disrupted cellular programs as well as associated biomarkers or clinical features. Among twelve independently identified subtypes, this analysis uncovered what we believe to be a novel complement and interferon activation program identified in SJIA-LD monocytes. Extending these analyses to adult and pediatric lupus patients found new but also shared disease programs with SJIA, including interferon and complement activation. Finally, supervised comparison of these programs in a compiled single-cell pan-immune atlas of over 1,000 healthy donors found a handful of normal healthy donors with evidence of early inflammatory activation in subsets of monocytes and platelets, nominating possible biomarkers for early disease detection. Thus, integrative pan-immune single-cell analysis resolved what we believe to be new conserved gene programs underlying inflammatory disease pathogenesis and associated complications., Introduction Diseases of the immune system associated with systemic autoimmunity and autoinflammation can result in significant health burdens, which, in many disorders, include a high risk for life-threatening complications. Inflammatory [...]

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a severe inflammatory condition with onset in childhood. It is sporadic, but elements of its stereotypical innate immune responses are likely genetically encoded by both common variants with small effect sizes and rare variants with larger effects. Genomic investigations have defined the unique genetic architecture of sJIA. Identification of the class II HLA locus as the strongest sJIA risk factor for the first time brought attention to T lymphocytes and adaptive immune mechanisms in sJIA. The importance of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus was reinforced by recognition that HLA-DRB1*15 alleles are strongly associated with development of drug reactions and sJIA-associated lung disease (sJIA-LD). At the IL1RN locus, genetic variation relates to both risk of sJIA and may also predict non-response to anakinra. Finally, rare genetic variants may have critical roles in disease complications, such as homozygous LACC1 mutations in families with an sJIA-like illness, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) gene variants in some children with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Genetic and genomic analysis of sJIA holds great promise for both basic discovery of the course and complications of sJIA, and may help guide personalized medicine and therapeutic decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)‐DRB1*15:01 has been recently associated with interstitial lung disease (LD), eosinophilia, and drug reactions in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Additionally, genetic variants in IL1RN have been linked to poor response to anakinra. We sought to reproduce these findings in a prospective cohort study of patients with new‐onset sJIA treated with anakinra as first‐line therapy. Methods: HLA and IL1RN risk alleles were identified via whole‐genome sequencing. Treatment responses and complications were compared between carriers versus noncarriers. Results: Seventeen of 65 patients (26%) carried HLA‐DRB1*15:01, comparable with the general population, and there was enrichment for HLA‐DRB1*11:01, a known risk locus for sJIA. The rates of clinical inactive disease (CID) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were generally high, irrespective of HLA‐DRB1 or IL1RN variants, but significantly lower in carriers of an HLA‐DRB1*11:01 allele. One patient, an HLA‐DRB1*15:01 carrier, developed sJIA‐LD. Of the three patients with severe drug reactions to biologics, one carried HLA‐DRB1*15:01. The prevalence of eosinophilia did not significantly differ between HLA‐DRB1*15:01 carriers and noncarriers at disease onset (6.2% vs 14.9%, P = 0.67) nor after the start of anakinra (35.3% vs 37.5% in the first 2 years of disease). Conclusion: We observed high rates of CID using anakinra as first‐line treatment irrespective of HLA‐DRB1 or IL1RN variants. Only one of the 17 HLA‐DRB1*15:01 carriers developed sJIA‐LD, and of the three patients with drug reactions to biologics, only one carried HLA‐DRB1*15:01. Although thorough monitoring for the development of drug hypersensitivity and refractory disease courses in sJIA, including sJIA‐LD, remains important, our data support the early start of biologic therapy in patients with new‐onset sJIA irrespective of HLA‐DRB1 background or IL1RN variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]