Search

Your search keyword '"Schroter, Sara"' showing total 378 results
Start Over Author "Schroter, Sara"
378 results on '"Schroter, Sara"'

4. Assessment of gender and geographical bias in the editorial decision-making process of biomedical journals: A Case-Control study

Author

Gayet-Ageron, Angèle, primary, Messaoud, Khaoula Ben, additional, Richards, Mark, additional, Jaksic, Cyril, additional, Gobeill, Julien, additional, Liyanapathirana, Jeevanthi, additional, Mottin, Luc, additional, Naderi, Nona, additional, Ruch, Patrick, additional, Mariot, Zoé, additional, Calmy, Alexandra, additional, Friedman, Julia, additional, Leibovici, Leonard, additional, and Schroter, Sara, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Authors’ reply to Xu

Author

Ben Messaoud, Khaoula, primary, Schroter, Sara, additional, Richards, Mark, additional, and Gayet-Ageron, Angèle, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles

Author

Speich, Benjamin, primary, Mann, Erika, additional, Schönenberger, Christof M., additional, Mellor, Katie, additional, Griessbach, Alexandra N., additional, Dhiman, Paula, additional, Gandhi, Pooja, additional, Lohner, Szimonetta, additional, Agarwal, Arnav, additional, Odutayo, Ayodele, additional, Puebla, Iratxe, additional, Clark, Alejandra, additional, Chan, An-Wen, additional, Schlussel, Michael M., additional, Ravaud, Philippe, additional, Moher, David, additional, Briel, Matthias, additional, Boutron, Isabelle, additional, Schroter, Sara, additional, and Hopewell, Sally, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. Development and validation of a patient-based measure of outcome for coronary revascularisation

Author

Schroter, Sara Alexandra Beryl and Lamping, D.

Subjects
616, Health-related quality of life
Abstract

Background: Disease-specific patient-based questionnaires are being used increasingly to evaluate treatment outcomes in coronary heart disease (CHD) from the patient's perspective. However, most have been developed to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in medically rather than surgically treated patients and many have not been rigorously evaluated against required standards. There are currently no validated questionnaires to measure patient- based outcomes after coronary revascularisation, the surgical treatment for CHD. Objectives: To develop a new patient-based instrument, the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ), to measure health outcomes and HRQoL before and after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). To evaluate the psychometric properties of the CROQ using classical psychometric methods. Design: Psychometric study. Subjects: A total of 725 (79% male) patients undergoing CABG and 643 (71% male) patients undergoing PTCA at three hospitals in the UK. Methods: Qualitative methods (literature review, review of existing instruments, patient interviews, and expert opinion) were used to develop two versions of the eROQ (CROQ-CABG and CROQ-PTCA). Two field tests were then conducted by postal survey to patients before and 3-months after revascularisation firstly, to identify possible items for elimination (item reduction) and secondly, to evaluate the psychometric properties (reliability, validity, responsiveness) of the item- reduced CROa in independent samples. Results: The CROQ was acceptable to patients, satisfied tests of scaling assumptions, showed good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, and responsiveness. 4 Conclusions: The CROQ is a new l psychometrically rigorous patient-based measure of outcome for coronary revascularisation. The CROQ has many potential uses in evaluative research l such as in clinical trials of effectiveness I and as a routine clinical audit tool to assist providers of CABG and PTCA in monitoring the outcomes of care

Published
2001
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Reproducibility of Systematic Review Searches

Author

Bouter, Lex, Brigham, Tara, Schroter, Sara, Price, Carrie, Zeegers, Maurice, Rethlefsen, Melissa, Kirkham, Jamie, and Moher, David

Subjects
search, research waste, search strategies, librarians, systematic reviews, replicability, reproducibility
Abstract

The Reproducibility of Systematic Review Searches project site has a section of main files (described below) and two components, Search Reproduction Notes and Search Reproduction Screenshots.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Search Reproduction Notes

Author

Rethlefsen, Melissa, Zeegers, Maurice, Brigham, Tara, Price, Carrie, Reynolds, John, Moher, David, Kirkham, Jamie, Schroter, Sara, and Bouter, Lex

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. Abstracts from the NIHR INVOLVE Conference 2017: London, UK. 28 November 2017

Author

Muir, Delia, Vat, Lidewij Eva, Keller, Malori, Bell, Tim, Jørgensen, Clara R., Eskildsen, Nanna B., Johnsen, Anna T., Pandya-Wood, Raksha, Blackburn, Steven, Day, Ruth, Ingram, Carol, Hapeshi, Julie, Khan, Samaira, Muir, Delia, Baird, Wendy, Pavitt, Sue H., Boards, Richard, Briggs, Janet, Loughhead, Ellen, Patel, Mariya, Khalil, Rameesa, Cooper, David, Day, Peter, Boards, Jenny, Wu, Jianhua, Zoltie, Timothy, Barber, Sophy, Thompson, Wendy, Kenny, Kate, Owen, Jenny, Ramsdale, Martin, Grey-Borrows, Kara, Townsend, Nigel, Johnston, Judith, Maddison, Katie, Duff-Walker, Harry, Mahon, Katie, Craig, Lily, Collins, Rebecca, O’Grady, Alice, Wadd, Sarah, Kelly, Adrian, Dutton, Maureen, McCann, Michelle, Jones, Rebecca, Mathie, Elspeth, Wythe, Helena, Munday, Diane, Millac, Paul, Rhodes, Graham, Roberts, Nick, Simpson, Jean, Barden, Nat, Vicary, Penny, Wellings, Amander, Poland, Fiona, Jones, Julia, Miah, Jahanara, Bamforth, Howard, Charalambous, Anna, Dawes, Piers, Edwards, Steven, Leroi, Iracema, Manera, Valeria, Parsons, Suzanne, Sayers, Ruth, Pinfold, Vanessa, Dawson, Paul, Gibbons, Bliss, Gibson, John, Hobson-Merrett, Charley, McCabe, Catherine, Rawcliffe, Tim, Frith, Lucy, Gudgin, Bernard, Wellings, Amander, Horobin, Adele, Ewart, Colleen, Higton, Fred, Vanhegan, Stevie, Pandya-Wood, Raksha, Stewart, Jane, Wragg, Andy, Wray, Paula, Widdowson, Kirsty, Brighton, Lisa Jane, Pask, Sophie, Benalia, Hamid, Bailey, Sylvia, Sumerfield, Marion, Etkind, Simon, Murtagh, Fliss E. M., Koffman, Jonathan, Evans, Catherine J., Hrisos, Susan, Marshall, Julie, Yarde, Lyndsay, Riley, Bren, Whitlock, Paul, Jobson, Jacqui, Ahmed, Safia, Rankin, Judith, Michie, Lydia, Scott, Jason, Barker, Caroline R., Barlow-Pay, Megan, Kekere-Ekun, Aisha, Mazumder, Aniqa, Nishat, Aniqa, Petley, Rebecca, Brady, Louca-Mai, Templeton, Lorna, Walker, Erin, Moore, Darren, Shaw, Liz, Nunns, Michael, Thompson Coon, Jo, Blomquist, Paula, Cochrane, Sarah, Edelman, Natalie, Calliste, Josina, Cassell, Jackie, Mader, Laura B., Kläger, Sabine, Wilkinson, Ian B., Hiemstra, Thomas F., Hughes, Mel, Warren, Angela, Atkins, Peter, Eaton, Hazel, Keenan, Julia, Poland, Fiona, Wythe, Helena, Wellings, Amander, Vicary, Penny, Rhodes, Carol, Skrybrant, Magdalena, Blackburn, Steven, Chatwin, Lucy, Darby, Mary-Anne, Entwistle, Andrew, Hull, Diana, Quann, Naimh, Hickey, Gary, Dziedzic, Krysia, Eltringham, Sabrina A., Gordon, Jim, Franklin, Sue, Jackson, Joni, Leggett, Nick, Davies, Philippa, Nugawela, Manjula, Scott, Lauren, Leach, Verity, Richards, Alison, Blacker, Anthony, Abrams, Paul, Sharma, Jitin, Donovan, Jenny, Whiting, Penny, Stones, Simon R., Wright, Catherine, Boddy, Kate, Irvine, Jenny, Harris, Jim, Joseph, Neil, Kok, Michele, Gibson, Andy, Evans, David, Grier, Sally, MacGowan, Alasdair, Matthews, Rachel, Papoulias, Constantina, Augustine, Cherelle, Hoffman, Maurice, Doughty, Mark, Surridge, Heidi, Tembo, Doreen, Roberts, Amanda, Chambers, Eleni, Beever, Daniel, Wildman, Martin, Davies, Rosemary L., Staniszewska, Sophie, Stephens, Richard, Schroter, Sara, Price, Amy, Richards, Tessa, Demaine, Andrew, Harmston, Rebecca, Elliot, Jim, Flemyng, Ella, Sproson, Lise, Pryde, Liz, Reed, Heath, Squire, Gill, Stanton, Andy, Langley, Joe, Briggs, Moya, Brindle, Philip, Sanders, Rod, McDermott, Christopher, David, Coyle, Nicola, Heron, Simon, Davies, Martin, Wilkie, Coldham, Tina, Ballinger, Claire, Kerridge, Lynn, Mullee, Mark, Eyles, Caroline, Barlow-Pay, Megan, Hickey, Gary, Johns, Tracey, Paylor, Jon, Turner, Katie, Whiting, Lisa, Roberts, Sheila, Petty, Julia, Meager, Gary, Grinbergs-Saull, Anna, Morgan, Natasha, Turner, Kati, Collins, Flavia, Gibson, Sarah, Passmore, Siobhan, Evans, Liz, Green, Stuart A., Trite, Jenny, Matthews, Rachel, Hrisos, Susan, Thomson, Richard, Green, Dave, Atkinson, Helen, Mitchell, Alex, Corner, Lynne, AM, Anne Mc Kenzie, Nguyen, Rebecca, Frank, Belinda, McNeil, Ngaire, and Harrison, Hayley

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

40. Competing Interests

Author

Senn, Stephen J., Kristiansen, Ivar S., Hourihane, Jonathan O'B, Smith, Richard, and Schroter, Sara

Published
2003

43. Reproducibility of systematic review search strategies: a descriptive study

Author

Bouter, Lex, Moher, David, McCall-Junkin, Patti, Zeegers, Maurice, Kirkham, Jamie, Rethlefsen, Melissa, and Schroter, Sara

Subjects
fungi, Medicine and Health Sciences, food and beverages, Other Medicine and Health Sciences
Abstract

The primary outcome of this study is the percentage of systematic reviews for which all database searches can be fully reproduced. The associated OSF Project is: http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UGNCT

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

46. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors

Author

Schroter, Sara, Tite, Leanne, Hutchings, Andrew, and Black, Nick

Subjects
Company business management, Medical publishing -- Management, Peer review -- Analysis, Medical care -- Quality management, Medical care -- Management
Abstract

Author-and editor-suggested reviewers to investigate differences in review quality and recommendations for publication are compared. It is concluded that author-and editor-suggested reviewers did not differ in the quality of their reviews, but author-suggested reviewers tend to make more favorable recommendations for publication.

Published
2006

50. How statistical expertise is used in medical research. (Quality Issues and Standards)

Author

Altman, Douglas G., Goodman, Steven N., and Schroter, Sara

Subjects
Report writing -- Research, Statisticians -- Research
Abstract

Some authors of scientific papers do not allow a person who specializes in statistics to review their paper, according to a survey of 704 authors. Even when they do, they may not include the name of the statistician in the list of authors and contributors., Context: Investigation of the nature and frequency of statistician involvement in medical research and its relation to the final editorial decision. Methods: Authors of original research articles who submitted to BMJ and Annals of Internal Medicine from May through August 2001 were sent a short questionnaire at the time of manuscript submission. Authors were asked if they received assistance from a person with statistical expertise, the nature of any such contribution, and reasons why, if no statistical input was received. Results: The response rate was 75% (704/943); methodological input was reported for 514(73%) of these papers. In 435 papers (85%), such input was provided by biostatisticians or epidemiologists and, if deemed significant, was typically associated with authorship. A total of 33 of 122 methodologists (27%) whose main contribution started at the analysis stage received neither acknowledgment nor authorship. Research without methodological assistance was more likely to be rejected without review (71% vs 57%; [chi square]=10.6; P=.001) and possibly less likely to be accepted for publication (7% vs 11%; [chi square]=2.37; P=.12). Conclusions: Statistical input to medical research is widely recommended but inconsistently obtained. Individuals providing such expertise are often not involved until the analysis of data and many go unrecognized by either authorship or acknowledgment.

Published
2002

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results