378 results on '"Schroter, Sara"'
Search Results
2. Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study
3. Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version
4. Assessment of gender and geographical bias in the editorial decision-making process of biomedical journals: A Case-Control study
5. Research on peer review and biomedical publication
6. Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living : observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time
7. A randomized trial of an editorial intervention to reduce spin in the abstract’s conclusion of manuscripts showed no significant effect
8. Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
9. Authors’ reply to Xu
10. Guidance needed: where should randomized studies which do not assess a health outcome be registered?
11. Analysis of peer reviewers’ response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 21 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic
12. Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles
13. Systematic review search strategies are poorly described and not reproducible: a cross-sectional meta-research study
14. Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses
15. Development and validation of a patient-based measure of outcome for coronary revascularisation
16. Search Reproduction Screenshots
17. Reproducibility of Systematic Review Searches
18. Search Reproduction Notes
19. Evaluation of editors’ abilities to predict the citation potential of research manuscripts submitted to The BMJ : a cohort study
20. Logging The BMJ ’s “patient journey”
21. Evaluating an editorial intervention to reduce spin in the abstract conclusion of manuscripts: a randomized controlled trial
22. Translation and validation study of the Hindi versions of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ-H)
23. Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial
24. Abstracts from the NIHR INVOLVE Conference 2017: London, UK. 28 November 2017
25. BMJ pico for original research in the print BMJ
26. What Happens to Papers Rejected by the "BMJ" on Ethical Grounds
27. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey
28. Evidence based publishing
29. Responsiveness of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire Compared with the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire
30. Female authorship of covid-19 research in manuscripts submitted to 11 biomedical journals: cross sectional study
31. Importance Of Free Access To Research Articles On Decision To Submit To The Bmj: Survey Of Authors
32. Perceptions Of Open Access Publishing: Interviews With Journal Authors
33. The BMJ editors respond
34. Qualitative research and The BMJ
35. Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing: two cross sectional surveys
36. Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial
37. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial
38. BMJ training for peer reviewers: We are offering free courses in London and a training pack on bmj.com
39. Recruitment Of Doctors To Non-Standard Grades In The Nhs: Analysis Of Job Advertisements And Survey Of Advertisers
40. Competing Interests
41. Does Declaration Of Competing Interests Affect Readers' Perceptions? A Randomised Trial
42. Logging The BMJʼs “patient journey”
43. Reproducibility of systematic review search strategies: a descriptive study
44. Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
45. Consistency of causal claims in observational studies: a review of papers published in a general medical journal
46. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors
47. Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes
48. Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: Stratified medicine research
49. From Submission to Publication: A Retrospective Review of the Tables and Figures in a Cohort of Randomized Controlled Trials Submitted to the British Medical Journal
50. How statistical expertise is used in medical research. (Quality Issues and Standards)
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.