Search

Aim: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have demonstrated improved glycaemic outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), yet limited data exist on these systems in very young children and their impact on caregivers. We evaluated psychosocial outcomes following use of the tubeless Omnipod® 5 AID System in caregivers of very young children. Materials and Methods: This 3‐month single‐arm, multicentre, pivotal clinical trial enrolled 80 children aged 2.0–5.9 years with T1D to use the Omnipod 5 AID System. Caregivers completed questionnaires assessing psychosocial outcomes—diabetes distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes), hypoglycaemia confidence (Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale), well‐being (World Health Organization 5 Well‐Being Index), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), insulin delivery satisfaction (Insulin Delivery Satisfaction Survey) and system usability (System Usability Scale) at baseline with standard therapy and after 3 months of AID use. Results: Following 3 months of Omnipod 5 use, caregivers experienced significant improvements across all measures, including diabetes‐related psychosocial outcomes (Problem Areas in Diabetes; p < 0.0001, Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale; p < 0.01), well‐being (World Health Organization 5 Well‐Being Index; p < 0.0001) and perceived system usability (System Usability Scale; p < 0.0001). Significant improvements were seen in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score and the overall sleep quality, sleep duration and efficiency subscales (all p < 0.05). Insulin Delivery Satisfaction Survey scores improved on all subscales (greater satisfaction, reduced burden and reduced inconvenience; all p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Caregivers face unique challenges when managing T1D in very young children. While glycaemic metrics have unquestioned importance, these results evaluating psychosocial outcomes reveal additional meaningful benefits and suggest that the Omnipod 5 AID System alleviates some of the burdens caregivers face with diabetes management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Very young children with type 1 diabetes often struggle to achieve glycemic targets, putting them at risk for long-term complications and creating an immense management burden for caregivers. We conducted the first evaluation of the Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in this population.Research Design and Methods: A total of 80 children aged 2.0-5.9 years used the investigational system in a single-arm study for 13 weeks following 14 days of baseline data collection with their usual therapy.Results: There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. By study end, HbA1c decreased by 0.55% (6.0 mmol/mol) (P < 0.0001). Time with sensor glucose levels in target range 70-180 mg/dL increased by 10.9%, or 2.6 h/day (P < 0.0001), while time with levels <70 mg/dL declined by median 0.27% (P = 0.0204).Conclusions: Use of the automated insulin delivery system was safe, and participants experienced improved glycemic measures and reduced hypoglycemia during the study phase compared with baseline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies of closed-loop control (CLC) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) consistently demonstrate improvements in glycemic control as measured by increased time-in-range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL. However, clinical predictors of TIR in users of CLC systems are needed. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 100 children aged 6-13 years with T1D using the Tandem Control-IQ CLC system during a randomized trial or subsequent extension phase. Continuous glucose monitor data were collected at baseline and during 12-16 weeks of CLC use. Participants were stratified into quartiles of TIR on CLC to compare clinical characteristics. Results: TIR for those in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles was 54%, 65%, 71%, and 78%, respectively. Lower baseline TIR was associated with lower TIR on CLC (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). However, lower baseline TIR was also associated with greater improvement in TIR on CLC (r = -0.81, P < 0.001). During CLC, participants in the highest versus lowest TIR-quartile administered more user-initiated boluses daily (8.5 ± 2.8 vs. 5.8 ± 2.6, P < 0.001) and received fewer automated boluses (3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 6.0 ± 1.6, P < 0.001). Participants in the lowest (vs. the highest) TIR-quartile received more insulin per body weight (1.13 ± 0.27 vs. 0.87 ± 0.20 U/kg/d, P = 0.008). However, in a multivariate model adjusting for baseline TIR, user-initiated boluses and insulin-per-body-weight were no longer significant. Conclusions: Higher baseline TIR is the strongest predictor of TIR on CLC in children with T1D. However, lower baseline TIR is associated with the greatest improvement in TIR. As with open-loop systems, user engagement is important for optimal glycemic control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data on the use of Control‐IQ, the latest FDA‐approved automated insulin delivery (AID) system for people with T1D 6 years of age or older is still scarce, particularly regarding nonglycemic outcomes. Children with T1D and their parents are at higher risk for sleep disturbances. This study assesses sleep, psycho‐behavioral and glycemic outcomes of AID compared to sensor‐augmented pump therapy (SAP) therapy in young children with T1D and their parents. Methods: Thirteen parents and their young children (ages 7–10) on insulin pump therapy were enrolled. Children completed an initial 4‐week study with SAP using their own pump and a study CGM followed by a 4‐week phase of AID. Sleep outcomes for parents and children were evaluated through actigraphy watches. Several questionnaires were administered at baseline and at the end of each study phase. CGM data were used to assess glycemic outcomes. Results: Actigraphy data did not show any significant change from SAP to AID, except a reduction of number of parental awakenings during the night (p = 0.036). Parents reported statistically significant improvements in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score (p = 0.009), Hypoglycemia Fear Survey total score (p = 0.011), diabetes‐related distress (p = 0.032), and depression (p = 0.023). While on AID, time in range (70–180 mg/dL) significantly increased compared to SAP (p < 0.001), accompanied by a reduction in hyperglycemia (p = 0.001). Conclusions: These results suggest that use of AID has a positive impact on glycemic outcomes in young children as well as sleep and diabetes‐specific quality of life outcomes in their parents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adult studies have shown that iodine-123 (123I) is as effective as 131I in detecting metastatic disease in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. However, the type and administered activity of radioiodine used for diagnostic imaging of metastatic thyroid cancer has not been well studied in children. Here we describe our institution's experience with using 123I in diagnostic radioiodine scans in children with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Methods: Every patient with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who completed diagnostic scanning followed by radioiodine therapy at our institution over the past 8 years was included in this retrospective chart review. Patient age, sex, presentation of thyroid disease, past medical history, thyrotropin, thyroglobulin, and antithyroglobulin antibodies were recorded. A single nuclear medicine radiologist evaluated all scans. Results: Thirty-three subjects completed 37 pairs of scans at a mean age of 13.4 years (range 6-17 years). The majority of subjects were female (81%) and had papillary thyroid cancer (91%). For diagnostic scanning, 5 received 2 mCi of 131I, 21 received 2 mCi of 123I, and 11 received 3 mCi of 123I. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of discordant scan pairs when comparing 131I and 123I (20% and 23% respectively, p=0.9). The detection of metastatic pulmonary disease on diagnostic scanning was not improved by increasing the dose of 123I from 2 mCi to 3 mCi (10% rate of missed lung detection with 2 mCi 123I vs. 20% with 3 mCi 123I). Conclusions: 123I is effective for use in diagnostic radioactive iodine scans in children with differentiated thyroid cancer. The primary advantages of using 123I include decreased radiation exposure and avoidance of stunning. However, in children there is a possibility of missed detection of metastatic pulmonary disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]