1. Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy: Technical Challenges for Surgeons and Key Prospective Refinements
- Author
-
Ferretti S, Dell'Oglio P, Ciavarella D, Galfano A, Schips L, and Marchioni M
- Subjects
radical prostatectomy ,retzius-sparing ,urinary continence ,positive surgical margins ,high-risk prostate cancer. ,Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology ,RC870-923 - Abstract
Simone Ferretti,1 Paolo Dell’Oglio,2– 4 Davide Ciavarella,1 Antonio Galfano,2 Luigi Schips,1 Michele Marchioni1 1Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti, Urology Unit, Chieti, Italy; 2Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; 3Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 4Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the NetherlandsCorrespondence: Michele Marchioni, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti, Urology Unit, Chieti, Italy, Tel +393296544866, Fax +390871357756, Email mic.marchioni@gmail.comAbstract: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the gold standard for localized prostate cancer. Several RARP approaches were developed and described over the years, aimed at improving oncological and functional outcomes. In 2010, Galfano et al described a new RARP technique, known as Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP), a posterior approach through the Douglas space that spares the anterior support structures involved with urinary continence and sexual potency. This approach has been used increasingly in many centers around the world comparing its results with those of the most used standard anterior approach. Several randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrated an important advantage relative to standard anterior RARP in terms of early urinary continence recovery, with comparable perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. Several surgeons are concerned regarding RS-RARP because it appears to increase the risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs). However, this statement is based on low-certainty evidence. Indeed, the available studies compared the results of surgeons who had an initial experience with posterior RARP with those who had a solid experience with anterior RARP. Recent evidence strongly suggests that RS-RARP is feasible and safe not only in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patient but also in challenging scenario such as high-risk setting, salvage prostatectomy and after transurethral resection of the prostate.Keywords: radical prostatectomy, Retzius-sparing, urinary continence, positive surgical margins, high-risk prostate cancer
- Published
- 2023