1. Rubble Stone Masonry Buildings with Cement Mortar: Base Shear Seismic Demand Comparison for Selected Countries Worldwide
- Author
-
Martijn Schildkamp, Stefano Silvestri, Yoshikazu Araki, Schildkamp M., Silvestri S., and Araki Y.
- Subjects
Peak ground acceleration ,Geography, Planning and Development ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,02 engineering and technology ,peak ground acceleration ,engineering.material ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,seismic code ,01 natural sciences ,lcsh:HT165.5-169.9 ,seismic demand parameter ,Limit state design ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,021110 strategic, defence & security studies ,seismic load combination ,Critical load ,rubble stone masonry ,business.industry ,seismic load combinations ,Seismic loading ,Rubble ,Building and Construction ,Structural engineering ,Masonry ,Plinth ,lcsh:City planning ,seismic codes ,structural behavior factor ,Urban Studies ,Seismic hazard ,lcsh:TA1-2040 ,base shear formula ,seismic weight ,engineering ,seismic demand parameters ,business ,lcsh:Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) ,base shear formulas ,Geology - Abstract
Full base shear seismic demand analyses with calculated examples for heavy stone masonry buildings are not present in the literature. To address this shortcoming, analyses and calculations are performed on nominally reinforced rubble stone masonry house and school designs, as typically built in Nepal. The seismic codes are literally applied for countries where the technique is still allowed (Nepal, India, China, Tajikistan, Iran, Croatia), or should be reintroduced based on current practices (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkey). First, this paper compares the base shear formulas and the inertia forces distributions of these codes, as well as material densities, seismic weights, seismic zoning, natural periods of vibration, response spectra, importance factors and seismic load combinations. Large differences between approaches and coefficients are observed. Then, by following Equivalent Lateral Force-principles for Ultimate Limit State verifications (10%PE50y), the base shear and story shears are calculated for a design peak ground acceleration of 0.20 g, as well as the effects of critical load combinations on the forces and moments acting on the lateral-resisting elements. It is concluded that Pakistan has the most tolerant code, Nepal represents an average value, whereas India and China are most conservative toward the case study buildings. Overall, it is observed that heavy-masonry-light-floor systems with negligible diaphragm action behave different under seismic motion than most other building typologies. Given the observations in this paper, the applicability of conventional ELF, S-ELF and S-Modal methods for heavy masonry buildings is questionable. The codes however do not introduce modified approaches that address these differences. Possible implications of the exclusion of plinth masonry and large portions of seismic weight need further assessment and validation, for which different (possibly more sophisticated) concepts must be considered, such as the equivalent frame method or distributed mass system. Since Nepal allows stone masonry in areas with higher seismic hazard levels >0.40 g (opposed to India
- Published
- 2021