Search

Item does not contain fulltext, Context Knowledge of incidence, prevalence and trends in morbidity support the diagnostic process of general practitioners (GPs). GPs use estimated probabilities of probable diagnoses to guide their policy on testing and referral. However, GPs estimations often are implicit and imprecise. The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) has the potential to incorporate the doctor and patient's perspective within a clinical encounter. The patient perspective is reflected in the Reason for encounter (RFE) which is the 'literal uttered reason' of the patient to contact the GP and comprises the patient's priority for seeking care. Previous research showed the predictive value of some RFEs in diagnosing cancer. Objective Our aim is to analyze the predictive value of the RFE for the final diagnosis, taking into account patient's age and sex. Study Design and Analysis In this cohort study, we determined the relationship between RFE, age, sex and the final diagnosis with multilevel analysis and distribution analysis. We focused on the top 10 most common RFEs. Dataset FaMe-Net database, containing coded routine health data from GP registration network (7 GP practices; 40.000 patients). GPs code the RFE and diagnosis of all contacts with patients, using the ICPC-2 within an episode of care (EoC) structure. An EoC is defined as a health problem in an individual from the first encounter until completion in the last encounter. Population Studied We used data from 1989-2020 and selected all patients with a RFE in the top 10 most common RFEs and the corresponding final diagnoses. Outcome Measures The predictive value is shown in odds risk and frequencies. Results We included 162,315 contacts from 37,194 patients. Multilevel analysis showed significant impact of the additional RFE on the final diagnosis (p<0.05). For example, patients presenting with RFE cough had a 5.6% chance of pneumonia, while it rose to 16.4%, when cough and fever were mentioned as RFE. Age and sex were

Contains fulltext : 296199.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Personal continuity - having a GP who knows their patients and keeps track of them - is an important dimension of continuity of care and is associated with lower mortality rates, higher quality of life, and reduced healthcare costs. In recent decades it has become more challenging for GPs to provide personal continuity owing to changes in society and health care. AIM: To investigate GPs' and older patients' views on personal continuity and how personal continuity can be improved. DESIGN & SETTING: Cross sectional survey study in The Netherlands. METHOD: A digital and postal survey was sent to 499 GPs and 1599 patients aged 65 years or older. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for open questions. RESULTS: In total, 249 GPs and 582 patients completed the surveys. A large majority of GPs (92-99%) and patients (91-98%) felt it was important for patients to see their own GP for life events or psychosocial issues. GPs and patients provided suggestions on how personal continuity can be improved. The thematic analysis of these suggestions identified nine themes: 1) personal connection, 2) GP accessibility and availability, 3) communication about (dis)continuity, 4) GP responsibility, 5) triage, 6) time for the patient, 7) actions by third parties, 8) team continuity, and 9) GP vocational training. CONCLUSION: Both GPs and older patients still place high value on personal continuity in the context of a changing society. GPs and patients provided a wide range of suggestions for improving personal continuity. The authors will use these suggestions to develop interventions for optimising personal continuity in general practice.

Contains fulltext : 300007.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic new collaborative-care initiatives were developed for treating and monitoring COVID-19 patients with oxygen at home. Aim was to provide a structured overview focused on differences and similarities of initiatives of acute home-based management in the Netherlands. METHODS: Initiatives were eligible for evaluation if (i) COVID-19 patients received oxygen treatment at home; (ii) patients received structured remote monitoring; (iii) it was not an 'early hospital discharge' program; (iv) at least one patient was included. Protocols were screened, and additional information was obtained from involved physicians. Design choices were categorised into: eligible patient group, organization medical care, remote monitoring, nursing care, and devices used. RESULTS: Nine initiatives were screened for eligibility; five were included. Three initiatives included low-risk patients and two were designed specifically for frail patients. Emergency department (ED) visit for an initial diagnostic work-up and evaluation was mandatory in three initiatives before starting home management. Medical responsibility was either assigned to the general practitioner or hospital specialist, most often pulmonologist or internist. Pulse-oximetry was used in all initiatives, with additional monitoring of heart rate and respiratory rate in three initiatives. Remote monitoring staff's qualification and authority varied, and organization and logistics were covered by persons with various backgrounds. All initiatives offered remote monitoring via an application, two also offered a paper diary option. CONCLUSIONS: We observed differences in the organization of interprofessional collaboration for acute home management of hypoxemic COVID-19 patients. All initiatives used pulse-oximetry and an app for remote monitoring. Our overview may be of help to healthcare providers and organizations to set up and implement similar acute home management initiatives for critical episo

Contains fulltext : 247462.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 283199.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: In primary care, a shift from a disease-oriented approach for patients with multimorbidity towards a more person-centred approach is needed. AIM: To transform a self-report questionnaire for patients with chronic conditions in primary care, the Primary Care Functioning Scale (PCFS), into an understandable, visually attractive and feasible consultation tool for patients and health care providers. The consultation tool consists of a web-based version of the PCFS, which is filled in by the patient and is processed to a feedback report that summarizes and visualizes the main findings. The feedback report can be discussed with the patient to facilitate a more person-centred conversation for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity in general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: In this qualitative study, we developed the consultation tool by using design thinking in a participatory developmental process. METHODS: In the first phase, we constructed five different feedback report templates to summarize and display the results of a completed PCFS questionnaire in a series of two expert meetings with patients and general practitioners (GPs). In the second phase, we performed an exploratory qualitative interview study involving dyads of patients with chronic conditions and their practice nurses. In an iterative process, we explored their experiences with the consultation tool. RESULTS: Patients, as well as GPs, preferred a clear manner of presenting the results of the questionnaire in a feedback report. In 18 interviews with patients and practice nurses during three different interview rounds, we adjusted the feedback report and consultation tool based on the input from patients and practice nurses. After the final interview round, patients and practice nurses consented that the consultation tool was useful for having a more in-depth consultation about functioning and patients' preferences when integrated into the regularly scheduled consultations. CONCLUSION