7 results on '"Scherbeijn S"'
Search Results
2. Humoral and cellular immune responses after COVID-19 vaccination of lung transplant recipients and patients on the waiting list: a 6-month follow-up.
- Author
-
Hoek RAS, Liu S, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Verschuuren EAM, Vonk JM, Hellemons ME, Kool M, Wijbenga N, Bogers S, Scherbeijn S, Rugebregt S, van Gemert JP, Steenhuis WN, Niesters HGM, van Baarle D, de Vries RD, and Van Leer Buter C
- Subjects
- Humans, COVID-19 Vaccines, Waiting Lists, Follow-Up Studies, Vaccination, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Immunity, Cellular, Lung, Transplant Recipients, COVID-19 prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: Data on cellular response and the decay of antibodies and T cells in time are scarce in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Additionally, the development and durability of humoral and cellular immune responses have not been investigated in patients on the waitlist for lung transplantation (WLs). Here, we report our 6-month follow-up of humoral and cellular immune responses of LTRs and WLs, compared with controls., Methods: Humoral responses to two doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccination were assessed by determining spike (S)-specific IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies. Cellular responses were investigated by interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) and IFN-γ ELISpot assay at 28 days and 6 months after the second vaccination., Results: In LTRs, the level of antibodies and T-cell responses was significantly lower at 28 days after the second vaccination. Also, WLs had lower antibody titers and lower T-cell responses compared with controls. Six months after the second vaccination, all groups showed a decrease in antibody titers and T-cell responses. In WLs, the rate of decline of neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses was significantly higher than in controls., Conclusion: Our results show that humoral and cellular responses in LTRs, if they develop, decrease at rates comparable with controls. In contrast, the inferior cellular responses and the rapid decay of both humoral and cellular responses in the WL groups imply that WLs may not be protected adequately by two vaccinations and repeat boostering may be necessary to induce protection that lasts beyond the months immediately post-transplantation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Hoek, Liu, GeurtsvanKessel, Verschuuren, Vonk, Hellemons, Kool, Wijbenga, Bogers, Scherbeijn, Rugebregt, van Gemert, Steenhuis, Niesters, van Baarle, de Vries and Van Leer Buter.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Low levels of monkeypox virus-neutralizing antibodies after MVA-BN vaccination in healthy individuals.
- Author
-
Zaeck LM, Lamers MM, Verstrepen BE, Bestebroer TM, van Royen ME, Götz H, Shamier MC, van Leeuwen LPM, Schmitz KS, Alblas K, van Efferen S, Bogers S, Scherbeijn S, Rimmelzwaan GF, van Gorp ECM, Koopmans MPG, Haagmans BL, GeurtsvanKessel CH, and de Vries RD
- Subjects
- Humans, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Monkeypox virus, Antibodies, Viral, Vaccinia virus, Vaccination, Mpox (monkeypox), Influenza Vaccines
- Abstract
In July 2022, the ongoing monkeypox (MPX) outbreak was declared a public health emergency of international concern. Modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN, also known as Imvamune, JYNNEOS or Imvanex) is a third-generation smallpox vaccine that is authorized and in use as a vaccine against MPX. To date, there are no data showing MPX virus (MPXV)-neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated individuals nor vaccine efficacy against MPX. Here we show that MPXV-neutralizing antibodies can be detected after MPXV infection and after historic smallpox vaccination. However, a two-shot MVA-BN immunization series in non-primed individuals yields relatively low levels of MPXV-neutralizing antibodies. Dose-sparing of an MVA-based influenza vaccine leads to lower MPXV-neutralizing antibody levels, whereas a third vaccination with the same MVA-based vaccine significantly boosts the antibody response. As the role of MPXV-neutralizing antibodies as a correlate of protection against disease and transmissibility is currently unclear, we conclude that cohort studies following vaccinated individuals are necessary to assess vaccine efficacy in at-risk populations., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Divergent SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-reactive T and B cell responses in COVID-19 vaccine recipients.
- Author
-
GeurtsvanKessel CH, Geers D, Schmitz KS, Mykytyn AZ, Lamers MM, Bogers S, Scherbeijn S, Gommers L, Sablerolles RSG, Nieuwkoop NN, Rijsbergen LC, van Dijk LLA, de Wilde J, Alblas K, Breugem TI, Rijnders BJA, de Jager H, Weiskopf D, van der Kuy PHM, Sette A, Koopmans MPG, Grifoni A, Haagmans BL, and de Vries RD
- Subjects
- Ad26COVS1, BNT162 Vaccine, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, COVID-19 Vaccines, Humans, COVID-19 prevention & control, SARS-CoV-2
- Abstract
The severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant is spreading rapidly, even in vaccinated individuals, raising concerns about immune escape. Here, we studied neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses targeting SARS-CoV-2 D614G [wild type (WT)] and the Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants of concern in a cohort of 60 health care workers after immunization with ChAdOx-1 S, Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273, or BNT162b2. High binding antibody levels against WT SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) were detected 28 days after vaccination with both mRNA vaccines (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2), which substantially decreased after 6 months. In contrast, antibody levels were lower after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination but did not wane. Neutralization assays showed consistent cross-neutralization of the Beta and Delta variants, but neutralization of Omicron was significantly lower or absent. BNT162b2 booster vaccination after either two mRNA-1273 immunizations or Ad26.COV2 priming partially restored neutralization of the Omicron variant, but responses were still up to 17-fold decreased compared with WT. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells were detected up to 6 months after all vaccination regimens, with more consistent detection of specific CD4
+ than CD8+ T cells. No significant differences were detected between WT- and variant-specific CD4+ or CD8+ T cell responses, including Omicron, indicating minimal escape at the T cell level. This study shows that vaccinated individuals retain T cell immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, potentially balancing the lack of neutralizing antibodies in preventing or limiting severe COVID-19. Booster vaccinations are needed to further restore Omicron cross-neutralization by antibodies.- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. An evaluation of serological methods to diagnose tick-borne encephalitis from serum and cerebrospinal fluid.
- Author
-
Reusken C, Boonstra M, Rugebregt S, Scherbeijn S, Chandler F, Avšič-Županc T, Vapalahti O, Koopmans M, and GeurtsvanKessel CH
- Subjects
- Antibodies, Viral blood, Antibodies, Viral cerebrospinal fluid, Encephalitis, Tick-Borne immunology, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G blood, Immunoglobulin G cerebrospinal fluid, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne immunology, Encephalitis, Tick-Borne diagnosis, Immunoglobulin M blood, Immunoglobulin M cerebrospinal fluid
- Abstract
Background: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an infectious disease endemic to large parts of Europe and Asia. Diagnosing TBE often relies on the detection of TBEV-specific antibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as viral genome is mostly not detectable once neurological symptoms occur., Objectives: We evaluated the performance of TBEV IgM and IgG ELISAs in both serum and CSF of confirmed TBEV patients and discuss the role of (CSF) serology in TBEV diagnostics., Study Design: For the assay evaluation we collected specimen from confirmed TBEV patients. Assay specificity was assessed using sera from patients with a related flavivirus infection or other acute infection. A selected ELISA assay was used to analyze TBEV-specific antibodies in CSF and to evaluate the use in confirming TBE diagnosis., Results: In this study the overall sensitivity of the IgM TBEV ELISAs was acceptable (94 -100 %). Four out of five IgM ELISA's demonstrated an excellent overall specificity from 94 -100% whereas a low overall specificity was observed for the IgG TBEV ELISAs (30-71%). Intrathecal antibody production against TBEV was demonstrated in a subset of TBE patients., Conclusions: In four out of five ELISAs, IgM testing in serum and CSF of TBE patients is specific and confirmative. The lack of IgG specificity in all ELISAs emphasizes the need of confirmatory testing by virus neutralisation, depending on the patient's background and the geographic location of exposure to TBEV. A CSF-serum IgG antibody index can support the diagnosis specifically in chronic disease or once IgM has disappeared., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The performance of the Alere HIV combo point-of-care test on stored serum samples; useful for detection of early HIV-1 infections?
- Author
-
van Tienen C, Rugebregt S, Scherbeijn S, Götz H, and Geurts van Kessel C
- Subjects
- Blood Preservation standards, HIV Infections blood, HIV Infections immunology, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Point-of-Care Systems standards, Point-of-Care Systems statistics & numerical data, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic standards, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic statistics & numerical data, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Serologic Tests instrumentation, Serologic Tests methods, Serologic Tests statistics & numerical data, HIV Antibodies blood, HIV Core Protein p24 blood, HIV Infections diagnosis, HIV-1 immunology, Point-of-Care Testing standards, Serum immunology
- Abstract
Introduction: The Alere HIV-1/2 Antigen/Antibody Combo point-of-care test is a commercially available 4th-generation rapid test for the diagnosis of HIV infection, including acute infection. We evaluated the sensitivity of this test in samples from patients with acute, recent or chronic HIV-1 infection., Methods: A validation of the test was performed using 89 HIV-positive serum samples collected in 2008-2016, that were stored at -20°C. Twenty-three samples were only p24-positive (acute infection); 49 samples were antibody-positive and p24-positive (recent infection); 17 samples were only antibody-positive (chronic infection). HIV infection was confirmed by standard-of-care assays and PCR. Samples came from patients attending an outpatient clinic for STDs at the Public Health Department and from patients within the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands., Results: The overall sensitivity of the test for diagnosing HIV infection based on detection of p24 antigen and/or antibodies was 92% (95% CI 86% to 98%) (82/89). In acute sera with only p24 antigen positivity, the sensitivity of the test decreased to 65% (95% CI 46% to 85%) (15/23). When both antibody and antigen testing were positive, the p24 sensitivity was only 24% (95% CI 12% to 36%) (12/49), but in these sera the final test result was positive in all sera (49/49) due to the positive antibody component., Conclusions: In a laboratory setting, this test has an overall sensitivity of 92% to detect any stage of HIV-1 infection using sera specimens. It performs relatively well in detecting early HIV and may be beneficial as an initial screening in patients with a recent exposure to HIV. Additional testing in a laboratory setting remains mandatory as a proportion of acute HIV-1 infections are missed with this test., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Hepatitis E virus infection among blood donors in the South Caribbean: is screening warranted?
- Author
-
Schreuder I, Limper M, Gerstenbluth I, Osterhaus AD, van Veen MG, Scherbeijn SM, van Gorp EC, and Duits AJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hepatitis E blood, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands epidemiology, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Young Adult, Blood Donors statistics & numerical data, Donor Selection, Hepatitis E epidemiology, Hepatitis E virus
- Published
- 2016
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.