Search

Background: We analyzed the potential of abiraterone acetate (henceforth abiraterone) to reduce androgen levels below lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) and explored the association with changes in PSA decline in metastatic castration-resistant prostate

Persistent androgen receptor (AR) signaling despite low levels of serum androgens has been identified as a critical target for drug discovery in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). As proof of principle that the AR remains relevant in CRPC, 2 AR-targeted agents recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration-abiraterone and enzalutamide-have increased overall survival for patients with CRPC in the setting of prior chemotherapy. This review focuses on the AR and 2 direct antagonists, enzalutamide and ARN-509. These next-generation AR antagonists offer great promise for patients with advanced disease. Relative to conventional antiandrogens such as bicalutamide, they bind to the receptor with higher affinity, prevent nuclear translocation and DNA binding, and induce apoptosis without agonist activity in preclinical models. The success of these AR-targeted agents in the clinic has changed the landscape of therapy for patients with CRPC, and further therapeutic options building on this platform are currently in development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Histone deacetylase inhibitors have demonstrated anticancer activity against a range of tumors. We aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, activity, and pharmacokinetics of oral panobinostat, a pan-deacetylase inhibitor, alone and in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods: Sixteen patients were enrolled, eight in each arm. Eligible patients had CRPC and adequate organ function. In arm I, oral panobinostat (20 mg) was administered on days 1, 3, and 5 for 2 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week break. In arm II, oral panobinostat (15 mg) was administered on the same schedule in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days. Results: Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 dyspnea (arm I) and grade 3 neutropenia >7 days (arm II). In arm I, all patients developed progressive disease despite accumulation of acetylated histones in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In arm II, five of eight patients (63%) had a >or=50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), including one patient whose disease had previously progressed on docetaxel. Conclusions: Oral panobinostat with and without docetaxel is feasible, and docetaxel had no apparent effect on the pharmacokinetics of panobinostat. Since preclinical studies suggest a dose-dependent effect of panobinostat on PSA expression, and other phase I data demonstrate that intravenous panobinostat produces higher peak concentrations (>20- to 30-fold) and area under the curve (3.5x-5x), a decision was made to focus the development of panobinostat on the intravenous formulation to treat CRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phase 2 clinical trials are undertaken to provide evidence of treatment efficacy and safety. A test statistic that accounts for individual patient risk in the patient population is proposed and applied to a phase 2 clinical trial for castrate metastatic prostate cancer. The test statistic is computed to compare, for each patient, the observed 2-year survival outcome to the predicted 2-year survival probability. A logistic regression model, developed using historical data in the same patient population, is used to adjust for patient risk in predicting the 2-year survival probability. Goodness-of-fit procedures are performed to ensure that a proper model is fit to the data. The test result is compared to the score test, the binomial exact test, and Fisher's exact test, all of which use the average 2-year survival probability in the population as the parameter of interest. The results demonstrate the benefit of risk adjustment in determining treatment efficacy in a single-arm phase 2 trial. By adjusting for patient risk, this method can provide a more precise assessment of phase 2 treatment efficacy, thereby improving the decision whether to proceed to a phase 3 clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current mechanism for monitoring toxicity symptoms in cancer trials depends on a complex paper-based process. Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may be more efficient and accurate. An online PRO platform was created including a simple data entry interface, real-time report generation, and an alert system to e-mail clinicians when patients self-report serious toxicities. Feasibility assessment involving 180 chemotherapy patients demonstrated high levels of use at up to 40 follow-up clinic visits per patient over 16 months (85% of patients at any given visit), with high levels of patient and clinician acceptance and satisfaction (>95%). Alerts were used as the basis for delayed chemotherapy treatments, dose modifications, and scheduling changes. These results demonstrate that online patient-reporting is a feasible strategy for chemotherapy toxicity symptom monitoring, and may improve safety and satisfaction with care. Ongoing multi-center research will evaluate the impact of this approach on clinical and administrative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite high response rates and palliative clinical benefits, androgen ablation does not cure advanced prostate cancer because of the inevitable emergence of resistant cells. Many new therapies under development for prostate cancer target pathways and molecules that contribute to the growth and survival of these cells. The rational and effective use of targeted therapies to eradicate resistant populations of tumour cells should be grounded on the premise that prostate cancer is a dynamic disease that evolves as it progresses, and that specific molecular determinants mediating sensitivity and resistance may be relevant only during specific states of the disease. Directed approaches must account for this changing dynamic so that clinical outcomes may be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: An open-label, dose-escalating phase Ib/IIa trial was performed to establish a safety profile of ascending doses of cetuximab (IMC C225) in combination with doxorubicin administered weekly for 6 treatments in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The secondary endpoint was to assess the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with doxorubicin as well as to determine the optimal biologic dose and the maximum tolerated dose. Patients and Methods: Patients in 8 groups received escalating doses of cetuximab 20-300 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 15 or 20 mg/m2 given intravenously weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week observation period. A treatment response was defined as a > 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or regression of radiographically measurable disease. Results: Of the 36 treated patients, 25% had grade 2 neutropenia, 39% had leukopenia, and 44% had stomatitis at doxorubicin 20 mg/m2. Erythematous skin exanthema was seen in 38% of the patients. There was no significant regression of bone or soft tissue disease, but stable disease was observed in 20 (65%) of the 31 patients with bone disease and 14 (61%) of the 23 patients with lymph node disease. Declines in PSA were modest in the 36 patients, with 1 (2.7%) with an 80% decline from baseline, 2 (5.6%) with > 50% to < 80% declines, and 14 (39%) with progression. Median survival was approximately 18 months. Conclusion: In a heavily pretreated population of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, this study of cetuximab/doxorubicin was associated with minimal PSA declines posttherapy, though median survival was longer compared to historical control groups. Further studies with cetuximab combined with more contemporary chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer might be warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Survival for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer is highly variable. We assessed the effectiveness of a whole-blood RNA transcript-based model as a prognostic biomarker in castration-resistant prostate cancer.Methods: Peripheral blood was prospectively collected from 62 men with castration-resistant prostate cancer on various treatment regimens who were enrolled in a training set at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA, USA) from August, 2006, to June, 2008, and from 140 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer in a validation set from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY, USA) from August, 2006, to February, 2009. A panel of 168 inflammation-related and prostate cancer-related genes was assessed with optimised quantitative PCR to assess biomarkers predictive of survival.Findings: A six-gene model (consisting of ABL2, SEMA4D, ITGAL, and C1QA, TIMP1, CDKN1A) separated patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer into two risk groups: a low-risk group with a median survival of more than 34·9 months (median survival was not reached) and a high-risk group with a median survival of 7·8 months (95% CI 1·8-13·9; p<0·0001). The prognostic utility of the six-gene model was validated in an independent cohort. This model was associated with a significantly higher area under the curve compared with a clinicopathological model (0·90 [95% CI 0·78-0·96] vs 0·65 [0·52-0·78]; p=0·0067).Interpretation: Transcriptional profiling of whole blood yields crucial prognostic information about men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. The six-gene model suggests possible dysregulation of the immune system, a finding that warrants further study.Funding: Source MDX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Abiraterone acetate potently disrupts intracrine androgen receptor signalling pathways implicated in the progression of the disease, including bone metastases. We assessed data for pain control and skeletal-related events prospectively collected as part of the randomised, phase 3 COU-AA-301 trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel chemotherapy.Methods: The COU-AA-301 trial enrolled patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in whom one or two lines of chemotherapy (one docetaxel based) had been unsuccessful and who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses of 2 or less. Pain intensity and interference of pain with daily activities were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form questionnaire at baseline, day 15 of cycle 1, and day 1 of each treatment cycle thereafter until discontinuation. We assessed, with prospectively defined response criteria that incorporated analgesic use, clinically meaningful changes in pain intensity and interference with daily living. We measured time to first occurrence of skeletal-related events, which we defined as pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, palliative radiation to bone, or bone surgery, and regularly assessed them throughout the study. Pain palliation was assessed in patients who had clinically significant baseline pain, whereas all other analyses were done in the overall intention-to-treat population. COU-AA-301 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00638690.Findings: Median follow-up was 20·2 months (IQR 18·4-22·1). In patients with clinically significant pain at baseline, abiraterone acetate and prednisone resulted in significantly more palliation (157 of 349 [45·0%] patients vs 47 of 163 [28·8%]; p=0·0005) and faster palliation (median time to palliation 5·6 months [95% CI 3·7-9·2] vs 13·7 months [5·4-not estimable]; p=0·0018) of pain intensity than did prednisone only. Palliation of pain interference (134 of 223 [60·1%] vs 38 of 100 [38·0%], p=0·0002; median time to palliation of pain interference 1·0 months [95% CI 0·9-1·9] vs 3·7 months [2·7-not estimable], p=0·0004) and median duration of palliation of pain intensity (4·2 months [95% CI 3·0-4·9] vs 2·1 months [1·4-3·7]; p=0·0056) were significantly better with abiraterone acetate and prednisone than with prednisone only. In the overall population, median time to occurrence of first skeletal-related event was significantly longer with abiraterone acetate and prednisone than with prednisone only (25·0 months [95% CI 25·0-not estimable] vs 20·3 months [16·9-not estimable]; p=0·0001).Interpretation: In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel, abiraterone acetate and prednisone offer significant benefits compared with prednisone alone in terms of pain relief, delayed pain progression, and prevention of skeletal-related events.Funding: Janssen Research & Development and Janssen Global Services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) are used as standard practice in trials of cancer treatments by clinicians to elicit and report toxic effects. Alternatively, patients could report this information directly as patient-reported outcomes, but the accuracy of these reports compared with clinician reports remains unclear. We aimed to compare the reporting of symptom severity reported by patients and clinicians.Methods: Between March and May, 2005, a questionnaire with 11 common CTCAE symptoms was given to consecutive outpatients and their clinicians (physicians and nurses) in lung and genitourinary cancer clinics in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Patients completed a version that used language adapted from the CTCAE for patient self-reporting. The results from the questionnaire were compared with clinician reporting of the same symptoms.Findings: Of 435 patients and their clinicians asked to take part in the study, 400 paired surveys were completed. For most symptoms, agreement between patient and clinician was high, and most discrepancies were within a grade difference of one point. Agreement was higher for symptoms that could be observable directly, such as vomiting and diarrhoea, than for more subjective symptoms, such as fatigue and dyspnoea. Differences in symptom reporting rarely would have changed treatment decisions or dosing, and patients assigned greater severity to symptoms more than did clinicians. No significant differences were recorded between the results when the questionnaire was completed by the patient before or after the clinician.Interpretation: Patient reporting of symptoms could add to the current approach to symptom monitoring in cancer treatment trials. Future research should assess the effect of self reporting on clinical outcomes and efficiency, and the use of real-time collection of patient-reported outcomes for early detection of potentially serious adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: No definitive answers currently exist regarding optimal first-line therapy for HER2-mutant NSCLC. Access to rapid tissue sequencing is a major barrier to precision drug development in the first-line setting. ctDNA analysis has the potential to overcome these obstacles and guide treatment., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic HER2-mutant NSCLC who underwent prospective clinical ctDNA sequencing and received systemic therapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) from January 2016 to September 2022. HER2 mutations were identified by next-generation sequencing through MSK-IMPACT, MSK-ACCESS or Resolution ctDx LungTM assay. Primary endpoints were time to the next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the primary analysis. Chemoimmunotherapy (33/63, 52.4 %) was the predominant first-line treatment with a median TTNT of 5.1 months (95 %CI 4.1 - 6.1) whereas 55.0 % (22/40) of patients who received second-line T-DXd obtained a median TTNT of 9.2 m (95 % CI, 0-22.2). Plasma ctDNA was tested before first-line therapy in 40 patients with a median OS of 28.0 months (95 % CI 21-34), in whom 31 patients (78.0 %) had detectable ctDNA. HER2 mutations were detected on ctDNA with a median turnaround time of 13 days, occasionally co-occurred with EGFR and MET alterations and were tracked longitudinally correlating with treatment response. Patients with detectable baseline ctDNA had significantly shorter OS (hazard ratio (HR), 5.25; 95 % CI, 1.2-23.9; p = 0.019)., Conclusion: Chemoimmunotherapy remains a major treatment option for metastatic HER2-mutant NSCLC. ctDNA can rapidly detect HER2 and co-mutations, and it has the potential to guide and monitor optimal first-line therapy. As a negative prognostic biomarker, detectable ctDNA at baseline would need to be taken into account for patient selection in future studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Bob T. Li has served as an uncompensated advisor and consultant to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, and Lilly. He has received research grants to his institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Nuvalent, and Revolution Medicines. He has received academic travel support from Amgen. He is an inventor on three institutional patents at MSK (US62/685,057, US62/514,661, US63/424,813) and has intellectual property rights as a book author at Karger Publishers and Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press. Alexander Drilon declared as follows: Honoraria: 14ner/Elevation Oncology, Amgen, Abbvie, ArcherDX, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BergenBio, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, EcoR1, EMD Serono, Entos, Exelixis, Helsinn, Hengrui Therapeutics, Ignyta/Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Loxo/Bayer/Lilly, Merus, Monopteros, MonteRosa, Novartis, Nuvalent, Pfizer, Prelude, Regeneron, Repare RX, Springer Healthcare, Takeda/Ariad/Millenium, Treeline Bio, TP Therapeutics, Tyra Biosciences, Verastem. Advisory Boards: Bayer, MonteRosa, Abbvie, EcoR1 Capital, LLC, Amgen, Helsinn, Novartis, Lilly, AnHeart Therapeutics. Consulting: MonteRosa, Innocare, Boundless Bio, Treeline Bio, Nuvalent, 14ner/Elevation Oncology, Entos, Prelude. Associated Research Paid to Institution: Foundatin Medicine, GlaxoSmithKlein, Teva, Taiho, PharmaMar. Equity: mBrace. Copyright: Selpercatinib-Osimertinib (filed/pending). Royalties: Wolters Kluwer; Other (Food/Beverage): Merck, Puma, Merus, Boehringer Ingelheim; CME Honoraria: Answers in CME, Applied Pharmaceutical Science, Inc, AXIS, Clinical Care Options, Doc Congress, EPG Health, Harborside Nexus, I3 Health, Imedex, Liberum, Medendi, Medscape, Med Learning, MedTalks, MJH Life Sciences, MORE Health, Ology, OncLive, Paradigm, Peerview Institute, PeerVoice, Physicians Education, Projects in Knowledge, Resources, Remedica Ltd, Research to Practice, RV More, Targeted Oncology, TouchIME, WebMD. Sarat Chandarlapaty has received institutional grant/funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and Lilly, Shares/Ownership interests in Odyssey Biosciences, Effector Therapeutics, and Totus Medicines, and consultation/Ad board/Honoraria from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Neogenomics, Nuvalent, Blueprint, SAGA Diagnostics, and Effector Therapeutics. Jiannan Guo is a former employee of Resolution Bioscience. Eric Gagne, Kavita Garg and Frederick Baehner are employees of Exact Sciences. All remaining authors have declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone of prostate cancer treatment. Beyond suppression of testosterone and tumor cell growth, emerging evidence suggests ADT also modulates the immune tumor microenvironment (TME). However, a more precise understanding of the timing and intricacies of these immunological shifts is needed., Experimental Design: Here we analyzed 49 primary prostate cancers, comparing those surgically removed either without treatment or following treatment with degarelix at 4, 7, and 14 days pre-surgery. Utilizing next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing, and multiplexed immunofluorescence, we examined alterations in immune phenotypes in the presence or absence of ADT., Results: Our findings reveal that ADT rapidly transforms the typically bland prostate TME into an inflamed environment within days. Notably, we observed an increase in activated CD8 T-cells along with an increase in suppressive regulatory T-cells (Tregs). We also found an expansion of the myeloid compartment, particularly pro-inflammatory M1-like tumor-associated macrophages. Intriguingly, discernable changes which have not previously been described also occurred in tumor cells, including upregulation of antigen presentation by MHC class I and II and, unexpectedly, a decrease in the "don't eat me" signal CD47., Conclusions: These observations underscore the critical role of timing and disease context in order to optimize the therapeutic efficacy of immune modulators combined with androgen ablation, for which the presurgical neoadjuvant setting may be ideal. Our findings warrant future prospective validation, which is currently underway.

Men with high-risk localized prostate cancer exhibit high rates of post-surgical recurrence. In these patients, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is immunomodulatory, however increased infiltration of regulatory T cells (Tregs) may limit the antitumor immune effects of ADT. We designed a neoadjuvant clinical trial to test whether BMS-986218 - a next-generation non-fucosylated anti-CTLA-4 antibody engineered for enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity or phagocytosis (ADCC/P) - depletes intratumoral Tregs and augments the response to ADT. In this single-center, two-arm, open-label study, 24 men with high-risk localized prostate cancer were randomized to receive a single dose of ADT with or without two pre-operative doses of BMS-986218 (anti-CTLA4-NF) prior to radical prostatectomy. Treatment was well tolerated and feasible in the neoadjuvant setting. A secondary clinical outcome was the rate of disease recurrence, which was lower than predicted in both arms. Mechanistically, anti-CTLA4-NF reduced ADT-induced Treg accumulation through engagement of CD16a/ FCGR3A on tumor macrophages, and depth of Treg depletion was quantitatively associated with clinical outcome. Increased intratumoral dendritic cell (DC) frequencies also associated with lack of recurrence, and pre-clinical data suggest ADCC/P-competent anti-CTLA-4 antibodies elicit activation and expansion of tumor DCs. Patients receiving anti-CTLA4-NF also exhibited phenotypic signatures of enhanced antitumor T cell priming. In total, this study provides the first-in-human evidence of Treg depletion by glycoengineered antibodies targeting CTLA-4 in humans and their potential in combination with ADT in prostate cancer patients with high-risk of recurrence., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: C.G.D is a co-inventor on patents licensed from Johns Hopkins University to BMS and Janssen. He is currently a paid employee of JnJ Innovative Medicine. A.C. is founder, equity holder, consultant, and director of DarwinHealth Inc., which has licensed IP related to these algorithms from Columbia University. Columbia University is an equity holder in DarwinHealth Inc.

Purpose: Patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) and high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) prostate cancers are candidates for pembrolizumab. We define the genomic features, clinical course, and response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in patients with MSI-H/dMMR and TMB-H prostate cancers without MSI [TMB-H/microsatellite stable (MSS)]., Experimental Design: We sequenced 3,244 tumors from 2,257 patients with prostate cancer. MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer was defined as an MSIsensor score ≥10 or MSIsensor score ≥3 and <10 with a deleterious MMR alteration. TMB-H was defined as ≥10 mutations/megabase. PSA50 and RECIST responses were assigned. Overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were compared using log-rank test., Results: Sixty-three (2.8%) men had MSI-H/dMMR, and 33 (1.5%) had TMB-H/MSS prostate cancers. Patients with MSI-H/dMMR and TMB-H/MSS tumors more commonly presented with grade group 5 and metastatic disease at diagnosis. MSI-H/dMMR tumors had higher TMB, indel, and neoantigen burden compared with TMB-H/MSS. Twenty-seven patients with MSI-H/dMMR and 8 patients with TMB-H/MSS tumors received ICB, none of whom harbored polymerase epsilon (polE) catalytic subunit mutations. About 45% of patients with MSI-H/dMMR had a RECIST response, and 65% had a PSA50 response. No patient with TMB-H/MSS had a RECIST response, and 50% had a PSA50 response. rPFS tended to be longer in patients with MSI-H/dMMR than in patients with TMB-H/MSS who received immunotherapy. Pronounced differences in genomics, TMB, or MSIsensor score were not detected between MSI-H/dMMR responders and nonresponders., Conclusions: MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancers have greater TMB, indel, and neoantigen burden than TMB-H/MSS prostate cancers, and these differences may contribute to profound and durable responses to ICB., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)