Search

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of joint, enthesis, bursa, and tendon ultrasound findings in large and medium joints of young, healthy individuals. Ultrasound assessment of large and medium joints, bursae, tendons, and entheses was performed in healthy individuals below the age of 30 years. Participants also underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis and conducted supervised weight training to determine maximum strength. The prevalence of ultrasound findings was calculated and a binary logistic regression model was applied to evaluate factors associated with the present findings. Fifty-one healthy individuals (52.9% female) with a mean age of 23.7 years were included in this study. Joint effusion in at least one joint was observed in 72.6% of the individuals (n = 37) and entheseal pathology in at least one enthesis was detected in 27.5% (n = 14). A binary logistic regression model indicated a significant association between reported hours of sports activity per week and the prevalence of effusion in the knee (p = 0.017). In addition, associations were observed between entheseal pathology in at least one entheseal site and body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.015) as well as fat mass index (p = 0.026). Joint effusion in large and medium joints, as well as entheseal hyperperfusion, bursal effusion, and tendon sheath effusion, are found in healthy individuals. Hours of sports activity per week, BMI and fat mass index showed significant associations with the findings in joints and entheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) treated with the anti-CD20 mAb rituximab (RTX) have been identified as high-risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes. Additionally, there is increased risk due to reduced humoral immune response, induced by therapeutic B cell depletion. This study sought to quantify humoral response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with IRD treated with RTX. It also sought to elucidate the influence of the time frame between the last RTX dose and the first vaccination, or the status of B cell depletion on antibody titre., Methods: In this case-control study, patients with IRDs previously treated with RTX were examined for humoral immune response after completing the first series of vaccinations with approved vaccines [BNT162b2 (Biontech/Pfizer), RNA-1273 (Moderna), AZD1222 (AstraZeneca/Oxford), Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson)]. Antibody levels were quantified using the Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 QuantiVac ELISA (EI-S1-IgG-quant). Blood samples were taken just before the next infusion with RTX after the vaccination. The interval between the last RTX infusion and the first vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and other possible factors influencing the antibody levels were evaluated., Results: A total of 102 patients were included. Of these, 65 (64%) showed a negative antibody level (<24 IU (international unit)/ml) after the vaccination. The comparative univariate analysis of the antibody levels achieved a significant result (P = 0.0008) for the time between the last RTX infusion and first vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. No CD19+ peripheral B-cells could be detected in 73 of the patients (72%)., Conclusion: The study confirms the negative impact of RTX on antibody level after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. A clear relationship exists between the antibody titre and the interval between the last RTX infusion and the first vaccination, the number of peripheral B-cells, and immunoglobulin quantity. Improved understanding of the effect of these parameters can help guide synchronization of vaccination in relation to the RTX therapy regimen., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Joint effusion and enthesitis are common ultrasound findings in rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis. However, changes of joints and entheses were not only observed in patients but also in physically active individuals and athletes., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate joint, entheseal, bursal and tendon musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) findings in large and medium joints of young healthy individuals after completing a standardised weight training., Design: This is a prospective cohort study., Methods: MSUS examinations of large- and medium-sized joints, and related entheseal sites, bursae and tendons were performed on young healthy individuals (ages 18-30 years). Before, 24 and 48 h after completing 1 h of standardised weight exercise, the subjects were evaluated by MSUS. The development of the MSUS findings and associated effects were examined using generalised linear mixed effects models., Results: In total, 51 healthy individuals (52.9% female) with a mean age of 23.7 (±2.5) years were enrolled. The results showed an increase in the number of individuals with at least one joint effusion from 37 (72.5%) before the weight training to 48 (94.1%) after 48 h. Entheses with pathologies were observed in 14 participants (27.5%) at baseline, increasing to 29 participants (56.9%) 48 h after the weight training. Biceps tendon sheath effusion was detected in 9 individuals (17.6%) prior to training, rising to 22 individuals (43.1%) after 48 h. A significant increase in the number of joints with effusion and abnormal entheses within 48 h after the weight training was indicated by the generalised linear mixed effects models., Conclusion: Within 48 h after the weight training session, a significant increase in the prevalence of joint effusion in large and medium joints and the prevalence of abnormal entheses was observed. As a result, when performing and interpreting an MSUS examination, the patient's physical activities should be taken into account., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Valentin S. Schäfer has received a research grant from Hexal AG. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Background: In 2006, our comprehensive cancer center decided to implement early integration (EI) of palliative care (PC) by (a) literally adopting the WHO definition of PC into cancer care guidelines and (b) providing a PC consulting team (PCST) to provide EI on in- and outpatient wards. The experience with this approach was assessed to identify shortcomings., Methods: A retrospective systematic chart analysis of a 2-year period was performed., Results: A total of 862 patients were treated (May 2006-April 2008). Many patients consulted by the PCST for the first time were already in a reduced performance status (ECOG 3 & 4: 40%) or experiencing burdening symptoms (i.e., dyspnoea 27%). After the first year (period A; "getting started"), the overall prevalence of symptoms identified on first PC contact decreased from seven to three, (p < 0.001) as well as surrogate measures for advanced disease (i.e., frailty: from 63% to 33%; CI: [-36%; -23%], p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Surrogate measures (symptom burden, performance status) indicate that PC was integrated earlier in the course of the disease after a 1-year phase of "getting started" with EI. Yet, the WHO recommendation alone was too vague to successfully trigger EI of PC. Therefore, the authors advocate the provision of disease specific guidelines to institutionalize EI of PC. Such guidelines have been developed for 19 different malignancies and are presented separately.

BACKGROUND: To comply with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, our institution's administrative directives were adopted to advocate the provision of palliative care (PC) early in the disease trajectory of breast cancer (BC). To assess the outcome of this recommendation, this study evaluated the effects of this approach. METHODS: A retrospective systematic chart analysis of a 2-year period was performed. The first PC consultation of patients was analyzed according to (a) physical condition, (b) symptom burden of the patients, and (c) reasons for PC consultation. RESULTS: Many patients were already in a reduced physical state and experienced burdening symptoms when first counselled by PC. After a 1-year experience with PC consultations, the number of burdening symptoms identified at first PC consultation decreased and senologists increasingly requested PC support also for non-somatic issues. CONCLUSIONS: A development towards a better understanding of PC competencies after a 1-year initiation period could be demonstrated, but BC patients continued to be in late stages of the disease at the time of first PC contact. Disease-specific guidelines may facilitate and optimize the integration of PC into breast cancer therapy.

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) explicitly recommends the integration of palliative care (PC) early in the disease trajectory as part of the WHO definition of PC. Our comprehensive cancer centre decided to include this recommendation in the administrative directives for principles of cancer care. The aim of this study was to assess, for patients with lung cancer, (a) at what point in the disease trajectory the patients were first provided PC and (b) whether - over one year - an earlier integration of PC could be achieved., Objective: A retrospective systematic chart analysis of a two year period was performed. We assumed that seeing patients relatively early during the course of the illness would be reflected by seeing patients that would be not already (i) in a reduced performance status, (ii) experiencing symptoms that are indicators for advanced disease (e.g., dyspnoea and pain) and (iii) close to death. Therefore, the first PC consultation for every lung cancer patient was analyzed to assess in what physical condition patients receive first PC consultation, what burdening symptoms they already experienced and how long the patients lived after their first consultations., Results: Most patients were already in a reduced physical state, were experiencing burdening symptoms and many died shortly after the first PC consultation. After a one year period, the number of burdening symptoms identified at first PC consultation and the admissions to the in-patient PC was decreased while non-PC physicians increasingly requested PC support for psychosocial interventions., Conclusion: Though some degree of development towards a better understanding of PC competencies and the "early integration" approach could be demonstrated, the adoption of the WHO recommendation alone did not suffice to integrate PC into routine cancer care early in the course of the illness. Therefore, the development of disease specific guidelines is advocated by our working group.