Search

Purpose: Ibrutinib is a first-in-class inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase. We previously reported the safety and short-term antitumor activity of ibrutinib in 20 patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL) or secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL)., Patients and Methods: We enrolled 26 additional patients with r/r PCNSL/SCNSL into the dose-expansion cohort of the trial into a combined cohort of 46 patients (31 with PCNSL and 15 with SCNSL). Patients received ibrutinib at 560 or 840 mg daily in the dose-escalation cohort and ibrutinib at 840 mg daily in the expansion cohort. The median follow-up was 49.9 and 62.1 months for patients with PCNSL and SCNSL, respectively. We sequenced DNA from available tumor biopsies and cerebrospinal fluid collected before and during ibrutinib therapy., Results: Tumor responses were observed in 23/31 (74%) patients with PCNSL and 9/15 (60%) patients with SCNSL, including 12 complete responses in PCNSL and 7 in SCNSL. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for PCNSL was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-9.2] with 1-year PFS at 23.7% (95% CI, 12.4%-45.1%). The median duration of response in the 23 PCNSL responders was 5.5 months. The median PFS in SCNSL was 5.3 months (95% CI, 1.3-14.5) with a median duration of response of 8.7 months for the 9 responders. Exploratory biomarker analysis suggests that mutations in TBL1XR1 may be associated with a long-term response to ibrutinib in PCNSL (P = 0.0075). Clearance of ctDNA from cerebrospinal fluid was associated with complete and long-term ibrutinib responses., Conclusions: Our study confirms single-agent activity of ibrutinib in r/r CNS lymphoma and identifies molecular determinants of response based on long-term follow-up., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Consolidation strategies for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) after induction chemoimmunotherapy include whole-brain radiotherapy (≤24Gy reduced-dose [RD], >24Gy standard-dose [SD] WBRT) and cytarabine, non-myeloablative chemotherapy (NMC), or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT); however, comparative outcomes are lacking. PCNSL outcomes from 1983-2020 were stratified by decade and MSKCC recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class. Clinicodemographic associations with consolidation were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by proportional hazards from consolidation. Of 559 patients, 385 (69%) were consolidated. Median follow-up and OS were 7.4 and 5.7 years, respectively. WBRT use declined (61% in 1990s vs. 12% in 2010s), while AHCT (4% in 1990s vs. 32% in 2010s) and NMC (27% in 1990s vs. 52% in 2010s) rose. Compared to RPA 1 (age<50), RPA 2 (age≥50, KPS≥70) was more likely to receive NMC. Those with partial response to induction were less likely to receive AHCT (OR 0.36, p=0.02). Among 351 with complete response to consolidation, only receipt of R-MPV induction was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.5, p=0.006). Among RPA 1, median PFS and OS were not reached for AHCT or RD-WBRT, vs. 2.5 and 13.0 years, respectively, after NMC. Among RPA class 3 (KPS<70), median PFS and OS post-RD-WBRT were 4.6 and 10 years, respectively, vs. 1.7 and 4.4 years post-NMC. No significant adjusted survival differences were seen across consolidation strategies. NMC is increasingly used in lieu of RD-WBRT despite a trend toward less favorable PFS. RD-WBRT can be considered in patients ineligible for AHCT., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose: High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is the backbone of curative therapy for CNS lymphoma. Because of toxicity, MTX is administered in the inpatient setting along with hyperhydration and monitoring until MTX clearance is documented (3-5 days). Frequent hospitalizations result in patient time away from work, home, and exposure to potential iatrogenic/nosocomial complications. Here, we aim to demonstrate feasibility of HD-MTX administration in the outpatient setting with low-dose glucarpidase facilitating clearance., Methods: This is a prospective nonrandomized study of outpatient HD-MTX followed by glucarpidase 2000u (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03684980). Eligible patients had CNS lymphoma, creatinine <1.3 mg/dL, and previously tolerated HD-MTX. Patients were enrolled between May 2020 December 2021 for one HD-MTX treatment. Patients could re-enroll for subsequent doses of HD-MTX as eligibility and slots permitted. MTX 3.5 g/m 2 was administered once over 2 hours, preceded by standard hydration and followed by an additional 2 hours of dextrose 5% in water with NaHCO 3 75 mEq at 150 cc/h. Glucarpidase 2000u was administered once in the clinic 24 hours later. The primary end point was MTX level 48 hours after HD-MTX., Results: Twenty doses of outpatient HD-MTX with glucarpidase were administered to seven patients. After 20 of 20 (100%) treatments, serum MTX levels were reduced to <100 nmol/L. Treatments were well-tolerated, and no admissions were required. One patient received additional outpatient hydration for elevated creatinine. Development of antiglucarpidase antibody was rare and did not affect treatment., Conclusion: Outpatient HD-MTX with glucarpidase is safe and well-tolerated and has the potential to alter standard treatment for CNS lymphoma.

Low-grade gliomas present a formidable challenge in neuro-oncology because of the challenges imposed by the blood-brain barrier, predilection for the young adult population, and propensity for recurrence. In the past two decades, the systematic examination of genomic alterations in adults and children with primary brain tumors has uncovered profound new insights into the pathogenesis of these tumors, resulting in more accurate tumor classification and prognostication. It also identified several common recurrent genomic alterations that now define specific brain tumor subtypes and have provided a new opportunity for molecularly targeted therapeutic intervention. Adult-type diffuse low-grade gliomas are frequently associated with mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 ( IDH1 / 2 ), resulting in production of 2-hydroxyglutarate, an oncometabolite important for tumorigenesis. Recent studies of IDH inhibitors have yielded promising results in patients at early stages of disease with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and delayed time to radiation and chemotherapy. Pediatric-type gliomas have high rates of alterations in BRAF , including BRAF V600E point mutations or BRAF-KIAA1549 rearrangements. BRAF inhibitors, often combined with MEK inhibitors, have resulted in radiographic response and improved PFS in these patients. This article reviews emerging approaches to the treatment of low-grade gliomas, including a discussion of targeted therapies and how they integrate with the current treatment modalities of surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation.

Central Nervous System (CNS) Lymphomas are aggressive brain tumors with limited treatment options. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway yields promising responses across B-cell malignancies, but its therapeutic potential in CNS lymphomas remains unexplored. We present pre-clinical and clinical data on the pan-PI3K inhibitor Buparlisib in CNS lymphomas. In a primary CNS lymphoma-patient-derived cell line, we define the EC50. Four patients with recurrent CNS lymphoma were enrolled in a prospective trial. We evaluated Buparlisib plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Treatment was well tolerated. Common toxicities include hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia. The presence of Buparlisib in plasma and CSF was confirmed 2h post-treatment with a median CSF concentration below the EC50 defined in the cell line All four patients were evaluated for response and the median time to progression was 39 days. Buparlisib monotherapy did not lead to meaningful responses and the trial was prematurely stopped. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02301364.

Background and Objectives: Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), a rare CNS malignancy, is usually treated with high-dose methotrexate in the first-line setting, typically followed by consolidation therapy. Due to the broad range of currently available treatments for PCNSL, comparability in long-term follow-up studies is limited, and data are scattered across small studies., Methods: In this study, we report the long-term survival of patients with newly diagnosed immunocompetent PCNSL, enrolled in a phase II trial from June 2005 to September 2011. Patients were treated using rituximab, methotrexate, vincristine, and procarbazine (R-MVP) chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in those with partial or complete response to R-MVP. In a post hoc analysis, clinical and imaging features were evaluated in those still alive., Results: 26 of 32 patients underwent HDC-ASCT consolidation. Of them, 3 patients died of treatment-related toxicity and 2 due to disease progression within 1 year of ASCT. None of the remaining 21 patients had disease progression with a median follow-up of 12.1 years and were included in the analysis. Compared with the post-HDC-ASCT assessment, at the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the median Karnofsky Performance Status (80 [range: 60-100] vs 90 [range: 70-100]), the median Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology score (1 [range: 0-4] vs 1 [range: 0-5]), and leukoencephalopathy score (1 [range: 0-3] vs 1 [range: 1-4])., Discussion: Long-term follow-up demonstrated that treatment was well tolerated in most patients enrolled in this study, with stable leukoencephalopathy on imaging and stable clinical performance status. Disease recurrence was not observed beyond 2 years after HDC-ASCT consolidation., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Importance: Malignant primary brain tumors cause more than 15 000 deaths per year in the United States. The annual incidence of primary malignant brain tumors is approximately 7 per 100 000 individuals and increases with age. Five-year survival is approximately 36%., Observations: Approximately 49% of malignant brain tumors are glioblastomas, and 30% are diffusely infiltrating lower-grade gliomas. Other malignant brain tumors include primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (7%) and malignant forms of ependymomas (3%) and meningiomas (2%). Symptoms of malignant brain tumors include headache (50%), seizures (20%-50%), neurocognitive impairment (30%-40%), and focal neurologic deficits (10%-40%). Magnetic resonance imaging before and after a gadolinium-based contrast agent is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating brain tumors. Diagnosis requires tumor biopsy with consideration of histopathological and molecular characteristics. Treatment varies by tumor type and often includes a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. For patients with glioblastoma, the combination of temozolomide with radiotherapy improved survival when compared with radiotherapy alone (2-year survival, 27.2% vs 10.9%; 5-year survival, 9.8% vs 1.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5-0.7]; P < .001). In patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors with 1p/19q codeletion, probable 20-year overall survival following radiotherapy without vs with the combination of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine was 13.6% vs 37.1% (80 patients; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.35-1.03]; P = .06) in the EORTC 26951 trial and 14.9% vs 37% in the RTOG 9402 trial (125 patients; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40-0.94]; P = .02). Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma includes high-dose methotrexate-containing regimens, followed by consolidation therapy with myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue, nonmyeloablative chemotherapy regimens, or whole brain radiation., Conclusions and Relevance: The incidence of primary malignant brain tumors is approximately 7 per 100 000 individuals, and approximately 49% of primary malignant brain tumors are glioblastomas. Most patients die from progressive disease. First-line therapy for glioblastoma is surgery followed by radiation and the alkylating chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide.

Background and Objectives: To report the tolerability and efficacy of olaparib with temozolomide (TMZ) for glioma., Methods: Single-center retrospective series of patients with glioma treated with olaparib/TMZ from September 2018 to December 2021., Results: Twenty patients (median age: 42 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status: 90) received olaparib/TMZ for diagnoses of IDH -mutant oligodendroglioma (n = 5), IDH- mutant astrocytoma grade 2-3 (n = 4), IDH -mutant astrocytoma grade 4 (n = 7), or IDH- wildtype glioma (n = 4). One patient was treated upfront and 19 at recurrence (median = 3). Olaparib 150 mg was administered 3 times/week concurrent with TMZ 50-75 mg/m 2 daily. Fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, and hematologic toxicity were common. Six of 20 patients required dose reduction (n = 4) or discontinuation (n = 2) due to toxicity. Radiographic response was evaluable in 16 and observed (complete + partial) in 4/8 with IDH -mutant grade 2-3 glioma. No responses were seen in patients with grade 4 IDH -mutant astrocytomas (0/5) or IDH -wildtype gliomas (0/3). Progression-free survival was 7.8, 1.3, and 2.0 months, respectively., Discussion: Olaparib/TMZ resulted in objective radiographic response in 50% of evaluable patients with recurrent IDH -mutant grade 2-3 gliomas with encouraging progression-free survival and manageable toxicity. This supports a prospective trial of olaparib/TMZ for this population., Classification of Evidence: This case series provides Class IV evidence that treatment with olaparib/TMZ may result in radiographic response in patients with glioma., (© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.)

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal lymphomatous malignancy that affects the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges, or vitreoretinal space, without evidence of systemic involvement. The diagnosis of PCNSL requires a high level of suspicion because clinical presentation varies depending upon involved structures. Initiation of treatment is time sensitive for optimal neurologic recovery and disease control. In general, the prognosis of PCNSL has improved significantly over the past few decades, largely as a result of the introduction and widespread use of high-dose methotrexate (MTX) chemotherapy, which is considered the backbone of first-line polychemotherapy treatment. Upon completion of MTX-based treatment, a consolidation strategy is often required to prolong duration of response. Consolidation can consist of radiation, maintenance therapy, nonmyeloablative chemotherapy, or myeloablative treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplant. Unfortunately, even with consolidation, relapse is common, and 5-year survival rates stand at only 30% to 40%. Novel insights into the pathophysiology of PCNSL have identified key mechanisms in tumor pathogenesis, including activation of the B-cell receptor pathway, immune evasion, and a suppressed tumor immune microenvironment. These insights have led to the identification of novel small molecules targeting these aberrant pathways. The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib and immunomodulatory drugs (lenalidomide or pomalidomide) have shown promising clinical response rates for relapsed/refractory PCNSL and are increasingly used for the treatment of recurrent disease. This review provides a discussion of the clinical presentation of PCNSL, the approach to work-up and staging, and an overview of recent advancements in the understanding of the pathophysiology and current treatment strategies for immunocompetent patients., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) has broad use in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) malignancies but confers significant toxicity without inpatient hydration and monitoring. Glucarpidase is a bacterial recombinant enzyme dosed at 50 units (u)/kg, resulting in rapid systemic MTX clearance. The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of low-dose glucarpidase to facilitate MTX clearance in patients with CNS lymphoma (CNSL)., Methods: Eight CNSL patients received HD-MTX 3 or 6 g/m 2 and glucarpidase 2000 or 1000u 24 h later. Treatments repeated every 2 weeks up to 8 cycles., Results: Fifty-five treatments were administered. Glucarpidase 2000u yielded > 95% reduction in plasma MTX within 15 min following 33/34 doses (97.1%) and glucarpidase 1000u yielded > 95% reduction following 15/20 doses (75%). Anti-glucarpidase antibodies developed in 4 patients and were associated with MTX rebound. In CSF, glucarpidase was not detected and MTX levels remained cytotoxic after 1 (3299.5 nmol/L, n = 8) and 6 h (1254.7 nmol/L, n = 7). Treatment was safe and well-tolerated. Radiographic responses in 6 of 8 patients (75%) were as expected following MTX-based therapy., Conclusions: This study demonstrates feasibility of planned-use low-dose glucarpidase for MTX clearance and supports the hypothesis that glucarpidase does not impact MTX efficacy in the CNS., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03684980 (Registration date 26/09/2018)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Current clinical and imaging tools remain suboptimal for predicting treatment response and prognosis in CNS lymphomas. We investigated the prognostic value of baseline [ 18 F]FDG PET in patients with CNS lymphoma receiving ibrutinib-based treatments., Methods: Fifty-three patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial and underwent brain PET before receiving single-agent ibrutinib or ibrutinib in combination with methotrexate with or without rituximab. [ 18 F]FDG uptake in these lesions was quantified by drawing PET volumes of interest around up to five [ 18 F]FDG-avid lesions per patient (with uptake greater than surrounding brain). We measured standardized uptake values (SUV max ), metabolic tumor volumes, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and the sum thereof in these lesions. We analyzed the relationship between PET parameters and mutation status, overall response rates, and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent single-agent therapy and 15 received combination therapy. On PET, 15/53 patients had no measurable disease. In the other 38 patients, a total of 71 lesions were identified on PET. High-intensity [ 18 F]FDG uptake and a larger volume of [ 18 F]FDG-avid disease were inversely related to treatment outcome (p ≤ 0.005). In univariable analysis, PFS was linearly correlated with all PET parameters, with stronger association when sum-values were used. A multivariable model showed that risk of progression increased by 9% for every 5-unit increase in sumSUV max (hazard ratio = 1.09 [95% CI: 1.04 to 1.14])., Conclusion: Higher lesional metabolic parameters are inversely related to outcome in patients undergoing ibrutinib-based therapies, and sumSUV max emerged as a strong independent prognostic factor., Trial Registration: NCT02315326; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02315326?term=NCT02315326&draw=2&rank=1., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare lymphoma isolated to the central nervous system or vitreoretinal space. Standard treatment consists of cytotoxic methotrexate-based chemotherapy, with or without radiation. Despite high rates of response, relapse is common, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic approaches. Recent advances in the understanding of PCNSL have elucidated mechanisms of pathogenesis and resistance including activation of the B-cell receptor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways. Novel treatment strategies such as the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs are promising. Increasingly, evidence suggests immune evasion plays a role in PCNSL pathogenesis and several immunotherapeutic strategies including checkpoint inhibition and targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells are under investigation. This review provides a discussion on the challenges in development of targeted therapeutic strategies, an update on recent treatment advances, and offers a look toward ongoing clinical studies.

Purpose of Review: This review discusses current and investigative strategies for targeting DNA repair in the management of glioma., Recent Findings: Recent strategies in glioma treatment rely on the production of overwhelming DNA damage and inhibition of repair mechanisms, resulting in lethal cytotoxicity. Many strategies are effective in preclinical glioma models while clinical feasibility remains under investigation. The presence of glioma biomarkers, including IDH mutation and/or MGMT promoter methylation, may confer particular susceptibility to DNA damage and inhibition of repair. These biomarkers have been adopted as eligibility criteria in the design of multiple ongoing clinical trials. Targeting DNA repair mechanisms with novel agents or therapeutic combinations is a promising approach to the treatment of glioma. Further investigations are underway to optimize this approach in the clinical setting.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare disease of the brain, spine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or vitreoretinal space. PCNSL is chemo and radiosensitive but relapse is common even years after initial treatment. Outside of consensus regarding the use of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) for first line treatment, there is little uniformity in the management of newly diagnosed or relapsed PCNSL. The lack of consensus is driven by a paucity of randomized trials in this disease. Prospective studies are troubled by low enrollment, the lack of a standard induction regimen, and a varied approach to consolidation strategies. Moreover, the PCNSL patient population is heterogeneous and includes a high proportion of elderly or frail patients and consists of patients manifesting disease in varied compartments of the central nervous system (CNS). As a result, current treatment strategies vary widely and are often dictated by physician and institutional preference or regional practice. This review provides an overview of recently completed and ongoing therapeutic studies for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent or refractory PCNSL. It discusses the existing evidence behind common approaches to induction and consolidation or maintenance regimens as well as the recent data regarding management of recurrent disease. Finally, it highlights the complexity of trial design in this disease and provides a framework for the design of future studies, which are needed to identify patient populations likely to benefit from specific induction, consolidation, or maintenance therapies., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aol-20-47). The series “Central Nervous System Lymphomas” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. Dr. LRS reports the institutional NIH MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) partially supported this review; personal fees from Debiopharm, outside the submitted work. In addition, Dr. LRS has a patent related to low-dose glucarpidase pending. Dr. CG reports the institutional NIH MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) partially supported this review; personal fees from BTG, personal fees from Kite, personal fees from ONO, outside the submitted work. In addition, Dr. CG has a patent related to low-dose glucarpidase pending. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a rare form of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Central nervous system lymphoma can be primary (isolated to the central nervous space) or secondary in the setting of systemic disease. Treatment of CNSL has improved since the introduction of high-dose methotrexate and aggressive consolidation regimens. However, results after treatment are durable in only half of patients, and long-term survivors may experience late neurotoxicity, impacting quality of life. Given the rarity of this disease, few randomized prospective trials exist. This leaves many questions unanswered regarding optimal first-line and salvage treatments. Recent advances in the knowledge of pathophysiology of CNSL will hopefully help the development of future treatments. This review gives an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of immunocompetent patients with CNSL.

Purpose: Understanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly important in the age of targeted therapy. O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and EGFR amplification are markers that may play a role in prognostication, treatment, and/or clinical trial eligibility. Quantification of MGMT and EGFR protein expression may offer an alternative strategy towards understanding GBM. Here, we quantify baseline expression of MGMT and EGFR protein in newly diagnosed GBM samples using mass spectrometry. We correlate findings with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification statuses and survival., Methods: We retrospectively identified adult patients with newly diagnosed resected GBM. MGMT and EGFR protein expression were quantified using a selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry assay. Protein levels were correlated with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification and survival data., Results: We found a statistically significant association between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation status (p = 0.02) as well as between EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification (p < 0.0001). EGFR protein expression and amplification were more tightly associated than MGMT protein expression and methylation. Only MGMT promoter methylation was statistically significantly associated with progression-free and overall survival., Conclusions: Unlike EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification which are strongly associated, only a weak association was seen between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation. Quantification of MGMT protein expression was inferior to MGMT methylation for prognostication in GBM. Discordance was observed between EGFR amplification and EGFR protein expression; additional study is warranted to determine whether EGFR protein expression is a better biomarker than EGFR amplification for clinical decisions and trial enrollment.

Purpose of Review: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive malignancy confined to the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges, and eyes. Due to its rarity, there is a paucity of randomized trials and a varied approach to its management in the oncologic community. This review summarizes recent literature guiding current clinical practice., Recent Findings: The presentation, work up, and management of PCNSL are discussed. Induction therapy incorporates a methotrexate-based chemotherapy regimen and is generally followed by a consolidation regimen including high dose chemotherapy (with or without autologous stem cell rescue). Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a potential additional consolidation strategy. Management of relapsed and refractory disease poses a special challenge due to poor outcomes. Immunotherapy and targeted treatments are promising novel strategies for recurrent/refractory patients. Currently, there is little consensus in the management of PCNSL. Treatment recommendations should be tailored to the individual patient, with consideration for risk of neurotoxicity. New, exciting strategies are in development and when feasible, enrollment in a clinical trial should be considered.

Objective: To determine whether e-mail is a useful mechanism to provide prompt, case-specific data feedback and improve door-to-needle (DTN) time for acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in the emergency department (ED) at a high-volume academic stroke center., Methods: We instituted a quality improvement project at Columbia University Medical Center where clinical details are shared via e-mail with the entire treatment team after every case of IV-tPA administration in the ED. Door-to-needle and component times were compared between the prefeedback (January 2013 to March 2015) and postfeedback intervention (April 2015 to June 2016) periods., Results: A total of 273 cases were included in this analysis, 102 (37%) in the postintervention period. Median door-to-stroke code activation (2 vs 0 minutes, P < .01), door-to-CT Scan (21 vs 18 minutes, P < .01), and DTN (54 vs 49 minutes, P = .17) times were shorter in the postintervention period, although the latter did not reach statistical significance. The proportion of cases with the fastest DTN (≤45 minutes) was higher in the postintervention period (29.2% vs 42.2%, P = .03)., Conclusion: E-mail is a simple and effective tool to provide rapid feedback and promote interdisciplinary communication to improve acute stroke care in the ED., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The treatment of newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas remains controversial. Recently published results from the long-term follow-up of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 9802 demonstrated medically meaningful and statistically significant survival prolongation by adding chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine after radiotherapy (RT) vs RT alone for "high"-risk patients (median 13.3 vs 7.8 years, hazard ratio = 0.59, P = 0.03). However, in the 17 years since that trial was launched, there have been advances in the understanding of low-grade gliomas biology and patient heterogeneity, an increased recognition of late neurocognitive injury from early RT, and the emergence of temozolomide as an alternative chemotherapy to procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine. These and other changes in the treatment landscape make the applicability of results from RTOG 9802 to all patients less clear. Moreover, in some patients, especially those at the lowest risk for early disease progression, deferred RT in favor of active surveillance or chemotherapy alone may remain a reasonable treatment approach., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)