Search

BACKGROUND Before the availability of mRNA vaccines, many transplant centers chose to significantly reduce maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The extent to which this increases the risk of allosensitization is unclear. METHODS In this observational cohort study, we analyzed 47 KTRs from March 2020 to February 2021 who underwent substantial reduction of maintenance immunosuppression during SARS-CoV-2 infection. KTRs were followed at 6 and 18 months concerning the development of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA (human leukocyte antigen) antibodies (DSA). The HLA-derived epitope mismatches were calculated using the predicted indirectly recognizable HLA-epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithm. RESULTS In total, 14 of 47 KTRs (30%) developed de novo HLA antibodies after the reduction of maintenance immunosuppression. KTRs with higher total PIRCHE-II scores and higher PIRCHE-II scores for the HLA-DR locus were more likely to develop de novo HLA antibodies (p = .023, p = .009). Furthermore, 4 of the 47 KTRs (9%) developed de novo DSA after reduction of maintenance immunosuppression, which were exclusively directed against HLA-class II antigens and also showed higher PIRCHE-II scores for HLA-class II. The cumulative mean fluorescence intensity of 40 KTRs with preexisting anti-HLA antibodies and 13 KTRs with preexisting DSA at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection remained stable after the reduction of maintenance immunosuppression (p = .141; p = .529). CONCLUSIONS Our data show that the HLA-derived epitope mismatch load between donor and recipient influences the risk of de novo DSA development when immunosuppression is temporarily reduced. Our data further suggest that reduction in immunosuppression should be made more cautiously in KTRs with high PIRCHE-II scores for HLA-class II antigens.

BACKGROUND Despite substantial improvements in short-term kidney allograft survival, median long-term survival remains at a standstill. It is unclear whether and to what extent a transplant centre's post-transplant care influences long-term outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 501 single kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who underwent transplantation between 2009 and 2018 and did not develop rejection or de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) within the first post-transplant year. After that, KTRs were either followed exclusively every 3 months by the transplant centre (n = 197) or every 3 months by local nephrologists (n = 304) with only yearly follow-up by the transplant centre. We analysed kidney allograft outcomes regarding estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, proteinuria, development of dnDSA and rejection. RESULTS No differences between the two groups were observed in the baseline characteristics and the characteristics at the end of the first post-transplant year (P > .05). KTRs followed by local nephrologists were comparable to KTRs followed by the transplant centre concerning patient survival (P = .541), kidney allograft survival (P = .385), eGFR decline (P = .488), progression of proteinuria (P > .05), the development of dnDSA (P = .335) and T-cell-mediated rejection (P = .480). KTRs followed by the transplant centre were more likely to undergo indication biopsies in case of allograft dysfunction and dnDSA (P < .001). Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed earlier and more frequently (P = .059), recurrent glomerulonephritis was diagnosed earlier and more frequently (P = .026) and immunosuppression was modified earlier and more frequently in response to histological findings (P = .038). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that close collaboration between local nephrologists and the transplant centre ensures good allograft outcomes independent of the caregiver. Greater biopsy activity in the transplant centre allows for earlier

Introduction The type of donation may affect how susceptible a donor kidney is to injury from pre-existing alloimmunity. Many centers are, therefore, reluctant to perform donor specific antibody (DSA) positive transplantations in the setting of donation after circulatory death (DCD). There are, however, no large studies comparing the impact of pre-transplant DSA stratified on donation type in a cohort with a complete virtual cross-match and long-term follow-up of transplant outcome. Methods We investigated the effect of pre-transplant DSA on the risk of rejection, graft loss, and the rate of eGFR decline in 1282 donation after brain death (DBD) transplants and compared it to 130 (DCD) and 803 living donor (LD) transplants. Results There was a significant worse outcome associated with pre-transplant DSA in all of the studied donation types. DSA directed against Class II HLA antigens as well as a high cumulative mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the detected DSA showed the strongest association with worse transplant outcome. We could not detect a significant additive negative effect of DSA in DCD transplantations in our cohort. Conversely, DSA positive DCD transplants appeared to have a slightly better outcome, possibly in part due to the lower mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the pre-transplant DSA. Indeed when DCD transplants were compared to DBD transplants with similar MFI (<6.5k), graft survival was not significantly different. Discussion Our results suggest that the negative impact of pre-transplant DSA on graft outcome could be similar between all donation types. This suggests that immunological risk assessment could be performed in a similar way regardless of the type of donor kidney transplantation.

The Eurotransplant Senior Program allocates kidneys to elderly transplant patients. The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the use of computed tomography (CT) body composition using artificial intelligence (AI)-based tissue segmentation to predict patient and kidney transplant survival. Body composition at the third lumbar vertebra level was analyzed in 42 kidney transplant recipients. Cox regression analysis of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year patient survival, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year censored kidney transplant survival, and 1-year, 3-year and 5-year uncensored kidney transplant survival was performed. First, the body mass index (BMI), psoas muscle index (PMI), skeletal muscle index (SMI), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) served as independent variates. Second, the cut-off values for sarcopenia and obesity served as independent variates. The 1-year uncensored and censored kidney transplant survival was influenced by reduced PMI (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively) and reduced SMI (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively); 3-year uncensored kidney transplant survival was influenced by increased VAT (p = 0.04); and 3-year censored kidney transplant survival was influenced by reduced SMI (p = 0.05). Additionally, sarcopenia influenced 1-year uncensored kidney transplant survival (p = 0.05), whereas obesity influenced 3-year and 5-year uncensored kidney transplant survival. In summary, AI-based body composition analysis may aid in predicting short- and long-term kidney transplant survival.

In this study, we investigated the clinical impact of different urinary tract infection (UTI) phenotypes occurring within the first year after renal transplantation. The population included 2368 transplantations having 2363 UTI events. Patients were categorized into four groups based on their compiled UTI events observed within the first year after transplantation: (i) no colonization or UTI (n = 1404; 59%), (ii) colonization only (n = 353; 15%), (iii) occasional UTI with 1-2 episodes (n = 456; 19%), and (iv) recurrent UTI with ≥3 episodes (n = 155; 7%). One-year mortality and graft loss rate were not different among the four groups, but patients with recurrent UTI had a 7-10 ml/min lower eGFR at year one (44 ml/min vs. 54, 53, and 51 ml/min; p < .001). UTI phenotypes had no impact on long-term patient survival (p = .33). However, patients with recurrent UTI demonstrated a 10% lower long-term death-censored allograft survival (p < .001). Furthermore, recurrent UTI was a strong and independent risk factor for reduced death-censored allograft survival in a multivariable analysis (HR 4.41, 95% CI 2.53-7.68, p < .001). We conclude that colonization and occasional UTI have no impact on pertinent outcomes, but recurrent UTI are associated with lower one-year eGFR and lower long-term death-censored allograft survival. Better strategies to prevent and treat recurrent UTI are needed.

BACKGROUND: Cancer risk is increased by 2- to 4-fold in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared with the general population. Little attention, however, has been given to KTRs with ultra long-term survival >20 years. METHODS: We studied 293 of 1241 KTRs (23.6%), transplanted between 1981 and 1999, who showed kidney allograft survival >20 years. These long-term survivors were analysed for cancer development, cancer type, cancer-associated risk factors and patient and allograft outcomes. RESULTS: By 10, 20 and 30 years post-transplantation, these long-term KTRs showed a cancer rate of 4.4%, 14.6% and 33.2%, and a non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) rate of 10.3%, 33.5% and 76.8%, respectively. By recipients' ages of 40, 60 and 80 years, KTRs showed a cancer rate of 3.4%, 14.5% 55.2%, and a NMSC rate of 1.7%, 31.6% and 85.2%, respectively. By 30 years post-transplantation, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) showed the highest incidence of 8.5%, followed by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with 5.1%. Risk factors associated with the development of cancer were only recipient age (P = 0.016). Smoking history was associated with the risk of lung cancer (P = 0.018). Risk factors related to the development of NMSC included recipient age (P = 0.001) and thiazide diuretics (P = 0.001). Cancer increased the risk of death by 2.4-fold (P = 0.002), and PTLD increased the risk of kidney allograft loss by 6.5-fold (P = 0.001). No differences were observed concerning the development of donor-specific antibodies (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In long-term KTRs, cancer is a leading cause of death. PTLD remains the most common cancer type followed by RCC. These results emphasize the need for focused long-term cancer surveillance protocols.

BackgroundThe diagnosis of borderline rejection (BLR) ranges from mild inflammation to clinically significant TCMR and is associated with an increased risk of allograft dysfunction. Currently, there is no consensus regarding its treatment due in part to a lack of biomarkers to identify cases with increased risk for immune-mediated injury.MethodsWe identified 60 of 924 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with isolated and untreated BLR. We analyzed the impact of predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE) score on future rejection, de novo DSA development, and recovery to baseline allograft function. Additionally, we compared the outcomes of different Banff rejection phenotypes.ResultsTotal PIRCHE scores were significantly higher in KTRs with BLR compared to the entire study population (p=0.016). Among KTRs with BLR total PIRCHE scores were significantly higher in KTRs who developed TCMR/ABMR in follow-up biopsies (p=0.029). Notably, the most significant difference was found in PIRCHE scores for the HLA-A locus (p=0.010). PIRCHE scores were not associated with the development of de novo DSA or recovery to baseline allograft function among KTRs with BLR (p>0.05). However, KTRs under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were more likely to develop de novo DSA (p=0.033) than those with tacrolimus, whereas KTRs undergoing retransplantation were less likely to recover to baseline allograft function (p=0.003).ConclusionsHigh PIRCHE scores put KTRs with BLR at an increased risk for future TCMR/ABMR and contribute to improved immunological risk stratification. The benefit of anti-rejection treatment, however, needs to be evaluated in future studies.

BackgroundIndication biopsies for deterioration of kidney allograft function often require follow-up biopsies to assess treatment response or lack of improvement. Immune-mediated injury, namely borderline rejection (BLR), T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), results from preformed or de novo alloreactivity due to donor and recipient HLA-mismatches. The impact of HLA-mismatches on alloreactivity is determined by highly immunogenic HLA-epitopes.MethodsWe analyzed 123 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from 2009 to 2019 who underwent a first indication and a follow-up biopsy. KTRs were divided into three groups according to the first biopsy: No rejection (NR)/BLR (n=68); TCMR (n=21); ABMR (n=34). The HLA-derived epitope-mismatches were calculated using the Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA-Epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithm.ResultsGroup NR/BLR: KTRs with higher total PIRCHE-II scores were more likely to develop TCMR in the follow-up biopsy (p=0.031). Interestingly, these differences were significant for both HLA-class I- (p=0.017) and HLA-class II-derived (p=0.017) PIRCHE-II scores. Group TCMR: KTRs with ongoing TCMR in the follow-up biopsy were more likely to show higher total PIRCHE-II scores (median 101.50 vs. 74.00). Group ABMR: KTRs with higher total PIRCHE-II scores were more likely to show an increase in the microvascular inflammation score in the follow-up biopsy. This difference was more pronounced for the HLA-class II-derived PIRCHE-II scores (median 70.00 vs. 31.76; p=0.086).ConclusionsPIRCHE-II scores may prove useful as a biomarker to predict the histopathological changes of immune-related injury from a first indication to a follow-up biopsy. This immunological risk stratification may contribute to individualized treatment strategies.

Background Pre-transplant donor specific antibodies (DSA), directed at non-self human leukocyte antigen (HLA) protein variants present in the donor organ, have been associated with worse outcomes in kidney transplantation. The impact of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and the target HLA antigen of the detected DSA has, however, not been conclusively studied in a large cohort with a complete virtual cross-match (vXM). Methods We investigated the effect of pre-transplant DSA on the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), graft loss, and the rate of eGFR decline in 411 DSA positive transplants and 1804 DSA negative controls. Results Pre-transplant DSA were associated with a significantly increased risk of ABMR, graft loss, and accelerated eGFR decline. DSA directed at Class I and Class II HLA antigens were strongly associated with increased risk of ABMR, but only DSA directed at Class II associated with graft loss. DSA MFI markedly affected outcome, and Class II DSA were associated with ABMR already at 500-1000 MFI, whereas Class I DSA did not affect outcome at similar low MFI values. Furthermore, isolated DSA against HLA-DP carried comparable risks for ABMR, accelerated eGFR decline, and graft loss as DSA against HLA-DR. Conclusion Our results have important implications for the construction and optimization of vXM algorithms used within organ allocation systems. Our data suggest that both the HLA antigen target of the detected DSA as well as the cumulative MFI should be considered and that different MFI cut-offs could be considered for Class I and Class II directed DSA.

BACKGROUND: The Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) may overcome histology shortcomings. Previous studies have simply examined discrepant findings but have not attempted to determine clinical endpoints. To measure performance, clinical outcomes are strongly required. METHODS: This single-center cohort study described discrepancies between MMDx and histology from 51 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and analyzed 72 indication biopsies, including 21 follow-up biopsies. Clinical performance was assessed by a combined endpoint of graft failure, rejection on follow-up biopsy, de novo donor-specific antibody, and improvement of kidney allograft function upon antirejection treatment. RESULTS: MMDx agreed in 33 (65%) and differed in 18 (35%) of 51 KTRs. Most discrepancies occurred in biopsies called no rejection by MMDx and rejection by histology (15/24, 63%). In contrast, in biopsies called rejection by MMDx, 3 were classified as no rejection by histology (3/27, 11%). Discrepant findings between MMDx and histology occurred following delayed graft function and MMDx from biopsies with a low percentage of cortex. Among 15 biopsies classified as no rejection by MMDx but rejection by histology, the clinical course suggested no rejection in 9 cases. Six KTRs reached the endpoint, showing predominant t ≥ 2 lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The most often occurring discrepancy is rejection by histology but no rejection by MMDx. As more KTRs do not meet the combined endpoint for rejection, MMDx might be clinically useful in these discrepant cases. Although strong histological findings have priority in indicating the treatment, clinical implementation of MMDx could strengthen treatment strategies.

Background Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) represents up to 40% of used kidney grafts. While studies have shown similar outcome compared to donation after brain death (DBD) on the short- and mid-term, no data on long-term outcomes exist. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients transplanted at our institution between January 1985 and March 2000. All DCD recipients were matched one-to-one with patients transplanted with DBD grafts during this period according to sex, age, and year of transplantation, and followed-up until December 2020. During this period, 1133 kidney transplantations were performed, 122 of which with a DCD graft. Results Median graft survival after 35-years follow-up was 23 years (277 months; CI 182 -372) in DBD, and 24.5 years (289 months; CI 245 - 333) in DCD (P = 0.65; HR = 0.91). Delayed graft function occurred in 47 patients in the DCD group compared to 23 in the DBD group (P < 0.001), albeit without significant long-term outcome difference in graft or patient survival. We could not show any difference in graft function, in terms of creatinine levels (133 µmol/l vs. 119 µmol/l), proteinuria (370 mg/24h vs. 240 mg/24h), nor GFR slope (-0.6 ml/min/year vs. -0.3 ml/min/year) between the two groups for grafts surviving more than 20 years. Conclusions This is the first study to show similar graft survival and function in DCD kidneys compared to DBD after 35 years follow-up. DCD grafts are a valuable resource and can be utilized in the same way as DBD grafts.

Background: Novel mRNA-based vaccines play an important role in current vaccination campaigns against SARS-CoV-2. They are highly efficacious and generally well tolerated. Vaccination in patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases is recommended. A number of cases with de novo or relapsing glomerulonephritis shortly after vaccine application were reported, some of which presented with gross hematuria. Methods: We collected 10 cases of macrohematuria following mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at our tertiary care institution and referring centers. Additionally we pooled all 25 published cases from the literature with ours to analyse their clinical characteristics. Results: Most macrohematuria episodes (72.2%) began within 2 days after vaccination, the majority after the second dose. In some individuals, repeated episodes occured after subsequent doses of the same vaccine. 65.7% of patients never had macrohematuria before. 45.7% were known to suffer from IgAN, the rest had no prior renal diagnosis. IgAN was the most frequent new diagnosis but ANCA-associated vasculitis and anti-GBM disease were also identified. AKI occurred in 28.6% of patients, a rise in serum creatinine not meeting KDIGO AKI criteria in 28.6%. Treatment ranged from conservative management, RAAS-inhibitors, steroids and cyclophosphamide to plasmapheresis. While renal outcomes were mainly favourable in isolated IgAN, they were poor in patients with additional or isolated small vessel vasculitis. Conclusion: Awareness of gross hematuria after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is important. Close follow-up and additional work-up in particular in individuals without known underlying kidney disease or worsening renal function is essential. For patients with vaccine associated macrohematuria an alternative vaccine class might be considered for subsequent vaccinations.