Search

Introduction: Classically, surgical approach for palpable undescended testis (pUDT) consists is an inguinal orchidopexy. In fact, a double incision allows an adequate mobilization of the spermatic cord and an easy dissection of a patent processus vaginalis and also to perform a subdartos pouch. For reduce potential mobility of the inguinal approach, in 1989 Bianchi and Squire proposed a transcrotal orchidopexy, using a high scrotal incision. We report our experiences and retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and postoperative success of the transcrotal approach for treatment of pUDT. Patients and Methods: From January 2012 to June 2014, 217 patients, affected by pUDT were treated at our Institution, for a total of 231 orchidopexies (203 monolateral pUDT, 14 bilateral pUDT). Patients, in whom, under anesthesia, the testis could be moved to the neck of the scrotum, have been treated with a transcrotal approach using a high scrotal incision. All patients have been clinically followed up at 1 week and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, at 1 year, and then annually and using scrotal sonography with color-Doppler at 2, 3, and 6 months. Results: A total of 205 pUDT (88.7%) were considered eligible for transcrotal. Eight (3.9%) pUDT, that were first approached transcrotally, have been converted to inguinal approach. At follow-up, two moderate scrotal hematomas and one inguinal hernia were noted. No recurrence or testicular atrophy was showed in transcrotal approached testes, while 2 recurrences out of 26 procedures (7.7%) were displayed after inguinal orchidopexy. Conclusions: In our experience, transcrotal approach is possible in almost 90% of pUDT. No major complication, such as recurrence or testicular atrophy, has been complained. Just 3 out of the 205 cases (1.5%) reported minor complications and 1 of which required a successful day-case procedure. Our data confirm that transcrotal orchidopexy can be considered effective, safe, and with a success rate being equivalent or better to classical inguinal approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The thoracoscopic approach to esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TOF) represents a challenging procedure whose real benefits remains unclear. Our purpose is to identify, through a meta-analysis, clinical evidence of the reliability of the thoracoscopic repair (TR) for EA/TOF compared with the open repair. Materials and Methods Defined PubMed search, with analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications after open or thoracoscopic primary anastomosis for EA/TOF. Results Five articles met the criteria of meta-analysis, being comparative studies betweenTR and conventional open repair (COR), although they were retrospective. One article was excluded because it was available only in Japanese. We observed a slight prevalence, statistically insignificant, of the intraoperative and postoperative complication rate for TR: odds ratio (OR) 1.29. Excluding the conversion rate, the meta-analysis between the complication rate for TR and COR did not show a significant difference (OR 0.64). Anastomosis's leaks and strictures considered together did not show a significant difference between the two techniques, p = not significant and OR of 0.56. Similar results were observed analyzing the single outcome of leaks and strictures; the metaanalysis did not show any significant differences with an OR, respectively, of 1.05 and 0.43. Conclusions The effectiveness of the endoscopic technique for EA/TOF repair is indicated with outcomes not different from open surgery. A randomized controlled trial is needed in this field to indicate which procedure is superior, open or TR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction is presented to the article "Surgical Stress after Open and Transumbilical Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy in Children" published in February 26, 2013 issue in which author's name is wrongly printed.

Although the outcome of newborns with surgical congenital diseases (e.g., diaphragmatic hernia; esophageal atresia; omphalocele; gastroschisis) has improved rapidly with recent advances in perinatal intensive care and surgery, infant survivors often require intensive treatment after birth, have prolonged hospitalizations, and, after discharge, may have long-term sequelae including gastro-intestinal comorbidities, above all, gastroesophageal reflux (GER). This condition involves the involuntary retrograde passage of gastric contents into the esophagus, with or without regurgitation or vomiting. It is a well-recognized condition, typical of infants, with an incidence of 85%, which usually resolves after physiological maturation of the lower esophageal sphincter and lengthening of the intra-abdominal esophagus, in the first few months after birth. Although the exact cause of abnormal esophageal function in congenital defects is not clearly understood, it has been hypothesized that common (increased intra-abdominal pressure after closure of the abdominal defect) and/or specific (e.g., motility disturbance of the upper gastrointestinal tract, damage of esophageal peristaltic pump) pathological mechanisms may play a role in the etiology of GER in patients with birth defects. Improvement of knowledge could positively impact the long-term prognosis of patients with surgical congenital diseases. The present manuscript provides a literature review focused on pathological and clinical characteristics of GER in patients who have undergone surgical treatment for congenital abdominal malformations.