Search

Abstract Background Current research focuses on three variables in evaluating the impact of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) on daily living: severity of incontinence, distress or bother resulting from incontinence, and effect on health related quality of life (HRQoL). Understanding the impact of these variables is important as they are the driving force behind women seeking surgical treatment. Given the importance of HRQoL in determining need for treatment, as well as evaluating treatment success, this review provides an assessment of the degree to which HRQoL is impaired in women seeking surgical treatment. Methods PubMed searches for the terms "quality of life and distress and urinary incontinence" and "quality of life and bother and urinary incontinence" were performed with limits of English, human and female subjects through May 2008. All studies using validated instruments were included. No time limit was placed on the search. Results Of 178 articles retrieved, 21 met the inclusion criteria, and 17 reported methods of scoring. The studies used the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ). Wide ranges of mean and individual levels of severity of symptoms, UDI and IIQ scores were seen among women seeking surgical treatment. Fourteen studies reported baseline and post-surgical treatment distress and QoL data. Statistically significant improvements between baseline and post-surgical UDI and IIQ scores were reported in 12 studies. Reported cure rates ranged from 46% to 97%. Satisfaction with the procedure was reported in 4 studies and ranged from 84% to 91%. A minority of studies reported the relationship between reduction in symptoms and change in HRQoL. Conclusion HRQoL is the main reason women seek surgical treatment for incontinence and surgical treatment leads to a significant improvement in mean HRQoL scores. Assessment of HRQoL has proved less useful in identifying why individual women seek treatment for incontinence. Preliminary work has begun to characterize the interaction between severity of symptoms, distress or bother resulting from these urinary symptoms, impact on HRQoL, and treatment seeking behavior, but further research is needed. Greater standardization in the reporting of results of distress or bother and HRQoL would allow for comparison across studies.

Objective: To investigate whether a new preoperative education and discharge planning protocol reduced unexpected discharge delays for patients undergoing reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer., Methods: A quality improvement (QI) intervention was implemented in January 2021 with several components to address historically prolonged observed lengths of stay (LOS) with head and neck cancer patients. The intervention added a preoperative educational visit with a head and neck cancer advanced practice provider, a standardized preoperative speech and swallow assessment, a personalized patient care plan document, discussion of inpatient hospital stay expectations, and early discharge planning. The intervention group included patients who underwent the preoperative education protocol from February to December 2021. For comparison, an age and sex-matched control group was constructed from inpatients who had been admitted for similar procedures in the 2 years prior to the QI intervention (2019-2020) and received standard of care counseling., Results: Our study demonstrated a significant reduction in observed to expected LOS ratio after implementation of the intervention (1.24 ± 0.74 control, 0.95 ± 0.52 intervention; P = .012)., Discussion: We discuss a preoperative education QI intervention at our institution. Our findings demonstrate that our intervention was associated with decreased LOS for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries., Implications for Practice: This QI study shows the benefit of a new standardized preoperative education and discharge planning protocol for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries., (© 2024 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.)

Objectives: To evaluate the safety of elective induction (EI) at or beyond 39 weeks gestation in the setting of a regional tertiary obstetric care centre., Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort feasibility study of low-risk pregnant women who delivered at a regional tertiary obstetric care centre. We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes of low-risk pregnant women who opted for EI at or beyond 39 weeks gestation (n = 112) to a comparison group who opted for expectant management (n = 116). All deliveries occurred between May 1, 2019, and November 30, 2019, and February 15, 2020, and August 15, 2020., Results: There were no significant differences in the rates of cesarean deliveries or hypertensive disorders between women who underwent EI and those who chose expectant management. There were also no differences in neonatal outcomes. Women in the EI group received significantly more cervical ripening agents (P < 0.0001) and had significantly longer stays on the antepartum (P < 0.0001) and labour and delivery units (P = 0.0015) but experienced significantly shorter stays on the postpartum unit (P = 0.0368). There was no difference in the total length of hospital stay between groups., Conclusions: EI protocols can be safely implemented in our regional tertiary obstetric care centre without increased risk of maternal complications or neonatal morbidity. Women considering EI should be adequately counselled on the use of cervical ripening agents and length of stay on antepartum and labour and delivery units., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the incidence of transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) before and after the implementation of a Baby-Friendly protocol and to determine changes in the rates of TTN symptoms, interventions, completion of skin-to-skin contact., Design: Retrospective cohort study using data in the electronic medical record., Setting: Community-based tertiary obstetric facility., Participants: We reviewed 934 charts of neonates born at or greater than 34 weeks gestation to women ages 18 years or older and included 790 neonates: 491 in the preimplementation group and 299 in the postimplementation group. Group assignment was based on time of Baby-Friendly protocol implementation. The preimplementation group included neonates born in April, August, and December of 2014, and the postimplementation group included neonates born during these months in 2018., Methods: The primary outcome was incidence of TTN. Secondary outcomes were rates of the following: tachypnea symptoms, hypoglycemia, antibiotic administration, and completion of skin-to-skin contact., Results: The incidence of TTN was 2% (n = 8/491) in the preimplementation group and 1% (n = 4/299) in the postimplementation group (p = 1.000). The rate of tachypnea symptoms decreased from 5% (n = 25/491) to 1% (n = 3/299, p = .003), the rate of hypoglycemia decreased from 11% (n = 54/491) to 3% (n = 10/299, p < .001), and the rate of antibiotic administration decreased from 13% (n = 66/491) to 4% (n = 11/299, p < .001). The skin-to-skin completion rate increased from 16% (n = 79/491) to 61% (n = 183/299, p < .001)., Conclusion: Although skin-to-skin contact facilitates physiologic transition to extrauterine life, incidence of TTN was not significantly reduced after the implementation of the Baby-Friendly protocol. However, increased practice of skin-to-skin contact was an improvement in care with implications for the transition to extrauterine life., (Copyright © 2021 AWHONN, the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) experience painful, debilitating symptoms and functional limitations that can interrupt cancer treatment, and decrease their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) for head and neck is a web-based mHealth patient-reported measure that asks questions about 21 categories of symptoms and functional limitations common to HNC. This article presents the development and usefulness of the ePVA as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions for patient-reported symptoms and functional limitations in HNC., Methods: Between January 2018 and August 2019, 75 participants were enrolled in a clinical usefulness study of the ePVA. Upon signing informed consent, participants completed the ePVA and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) general (C30) questionnaire v3.0 (scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 representing best HRQoL). Clinical usefulness of the ePVA was defined as demonstration of reliability, convergent validity with HRQoL, and acceptability of the ePVA (i.e., >70% of eligible participants complete the ePVA at two or more visits and >70% of ePVA reports are read by providers). Formal focus group discussions with the interdisciplinary team that cared for patients with HNC guided the development of the ePVA as a clinical support tool. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used throughout the study. Descriptive statistics consisting of means and frequencies, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Student's t-tests were calculated using SAS 9.4 and STATA., Results: The participants were primarily male (71%), White (76%), diagnosed with oropharyngeal or oral cavity cancers (53%), and undergoing treatment for HNC (69%). Data analyses supported the reliability (alpha =0.85), convergent validity with HRQoL scores, and acceptability of the ePVA. Participants with the highest number of symptoms and functional limitations reported significantly worse HRQoL (sum of symptoms: r=-0.50, P<0.0001; sum of function limitations: r=-0.56, P<0.0001). Ninety-two percent of participants (59 of 64) who had follow-up visits within the 6-month study period completed the ePVA at two or more visits and providers read 89% (169 of 189) of automated ePVA reports. The use of the ePVA as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions for symptoms and functional limitations reported by patients is described in a clinical exemplar., Conclusions: This research indicates that the ePVA may be a useful mHealth tool as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions for patient-reported symptoms and functional limitations in HNC. The study findings support future translational research to enhance the usefulness of the ePVA in real world settings for early interventions that decrease symptom burden and improve the QoL of patients with HNC., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-19-250). The series “Real-Time Detection and Management of Chronic Illnesses” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. MRF serves as an unpaid Guest Editor of the series and serves as an unpaid editorial board member of mHealth from Aug 2018 to Jul 2020. MRF reports grants from Louis and Rachel Rudin Foundation Interdisciplinary Pilot Project Award, from NIH/2017 Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group Investigator Development Pilot Award (funded by National Institute of Nursing Research U24NR014637); from New York University Research Challenge Fund, and from John A. Harford Foundation Change AGEnts Action Award, during the conduct of the study. BLE reports grants from USA. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (P30CA006927 Fox Chase Cancer Center Support Grant), during the conduct of the study. JHVC reports grants from Louis and Rachel Rudin Foundation Interdisciplinary Pilot Project, from 2017 Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group Investigator Development Pilot (funded by National Institute of Nursing Research U24NR014637), grants from NYU University Research Challenge Fund, grants from John A. Harford Foundation Change AGEnts Action Award, during the conduct of the study. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 mHealth. All rights reserved.)

Background: Annually, over 65,000 persons are diagnosed with head and neck cancer in the United States. During treatment, up to 50% of patients become severely symptomatic with pain, fatigue, mouth sores, and inability to eat. Long term complications are lymphedema, fibrosis, dysphagia, and musculoskeletal impairment. Patients' ability to perform daily activities and to interact socially may be impaired, resulting in poor quality of life. A pragmatic, clinically useful assessment is needed to ensure early detection and intervention for patients to report symptoms and functional limitations over time. We developed the Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) that enables patients to report 42 symptoms related to head and neck cancer and 17 limitations of functional status. This manuscript reports (I) the development of the ePVA, (II) the content validity of the ePVA, and (III) the usability and reliability of the ePVA., Methods: Usability was evaluated using the "Think Aloud" technique to guide the iterative process to refine the ePVA based on participants' evaluations. After signing the informed consent, 30 participants with head and neck cancer completed the ePVA using digital tablet devices while thinking aloud about ease of use. All patient conversations were recorded and professionally transcribed. Reliability of the ePVA symptom and functional limitation measures was estimated using the Kuder-Richardson test. Convergent validity of the ePVA was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 global QoL/health scale. Transcribed qualitative data were analyzed using directed content analysis approach. Quantitative analyses consisted of descriptive statistics and correlation analyses., Results: Among participants, 90% strongly agreed or agreed that the ePVA system was easy to use and 80% were very satisfied. Only minor usability problems were reported due to formatting and software "bugs". Reporting of usability problems decreased in frequency over the study period and no usability problems were reported by the last 3 participants who completed the ePVA. Based on participants' suggestions during the iterative process, refinement of the ePVA included increased touch sensitivity of the touch screen technology and customized error messages to improve ease of use. The ePVA also recorded patient reported symptoms (mouth symptoms: 93%, fibrosis: 60%, fatigue: 60%). The ePVA demonstrated acceptable reliability (alpha =0.82-0.85) and convergent validity (ePVA total number of reported symptoms and function limitations was negatively correlated with EORTC QLQ-C30 global QOL/health scale: r=-0.55038, P<0.01)., Conclusions: The ePVA was rigorously developed, accepted by patients with satisfaction, and demonstrated acceptable reliability and convergent validity. Future research will use data generated by the ePVA to determine the impact of symptom trajectories on functional status, treatment interruptions and terminations, and health resource use in head and neck cancer., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: We assessed the impact of resident teaching in medical students' overall assessment of an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship., Methods: Between September 2007 and March 2010, third-year medical students completed a questionnaire at the end of their clerkship. Questions covered the number of topics they recalled learning about from residents, perceptions of the quality of education received from residents, perceptions of the experience with the residents as teachers, and overall rating of the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship., Results: Questionnaires were completed by all medical students (N  =  74), with 63 students returning complete surveys. There was a small correlation between the number of topics students recalled learning about from residents and ratings of quality of education (r  =  0.249, P  =  .03), a small correlation between the number of topics students recalled learning about from residents and level of satisfaction with the clerkship (r  =  0.262, P  =  .04), and a larger correlation between assessment of the overall experience with residents as teachers and ratings of quality of education received from residents (r  =  0.687, P < .001). Overall experience with residents as teachers and perceived quality of education from residents were both associated with satisfaction with the clerkship (r  =  0.756, P < .001 and r  =  0.603, P < .001, respectively). A regression model with these variables accounted for 58% of the variability in students' ratings of the clerkship (F  =  27.103, P < .001, R  =  .761, R(2)  =  .579). The only significant independent variable was assessment of the overall experience with residents as teachers (t  =  5.350, P < .001)., Conclusion: Quality of interactions between residents and medical students is a key factor in medical students' assessment of their clerkship.