Search

Background: Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in the male population. To determine the aggressiveness of suspected lesions precisely, predictive models are increasingly being developed using quantitative MRI measurements, and particularly the ADC value. This study aimed to determine whether ADC values could be used to establish the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Methods: A retrospective single-center study included 398 patients with prostate cancer who underwent a multiparametric MRI prior to radical prostatectomy. DWI ADC values were measured (µm2/s) using b values of 50 and 1000. The dominant lesion best visualized on MRI was analyzed. The ADC values of the index lesion and reference tissue were compared to tumor aggressivity according to the Gleason grade groups based on radical prostatectomy results. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis H test, Spearman's rank correlation, and ROC curves. Results: A very strong negative correlation (rs = −0.846, p < 0.001) between ADC and GS was found. ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.958 and an ADC threshold value of 758 µm2/s in clinically significant prostate cancer diagnoses using the absolute ADC value, with no advantage of using the ADC ratio over the absolute ADC value being identified. Conclusion: DWI ADC values and the calculated ADC ratio have a significant inverse correlation with GS. The findings indicate a strong capability in determining prostate cancer aggressiveness, as well as the possibility of assisting with assigning PI-RADS categories using ADC as quantitative metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Unstable atherosclerotic plaque in the arteries is one of the main risk factors for cerebral ischemia. Duplex ultrasound is a frequently used diagnostic method, but it has some limitations for microvascularization and neovascularization evaluation. The aim of this review was to evaluate the role of the new multiparametric US method—contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)—in atherosclerotic plaque instability verification. Materials and Methods: Original studies, reviews, and meta-analyses were included in this article. A total of 53 studies were retrieved; 29 were included in this study. Results: Carotid artery CEUS as a part of the multiparametric ultrasound method shows promising results and provides additional characteristics of soft- and high-risk atherosclerotic plaques; it can be advised in clinical practice for patients with carotid artery soft- and high-risk plaques. However, there are some limitations, such as extensive calcinosis with important acoustic shadows in carotid atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization diagnostics by CEUS. The added value of CEUS in the characterization of atherosclerotic plaque is that it indicates regions with high neovascularization and visualizes ulcerations on plaque surfaces, suggestive of increased instability risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer is a cornerstone for further adequate therapy planning. Therefore, clinical practice and research still focuses on diagnostic tools that can detect prostate cancer in early recurrence when it is undetectable in conventional diagnostic imaging. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is a novel method to evaluate patients with biochemical recurrent PCa. The aim of this review was to evaluate the role of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in prostate cancer local recurrence, lymph node metastases and bone metastases detection. Methods: Original studies, reviews and five meta-analyses were included in this article. A total of 70 studies were retrieved, 31 were included in the study. Results: All patients described in the studies underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. The administered 18F-PSMA-1007 individual dose ranged from 159 ± 31 MBq to 363.93 ± 69.40 MBq. Results showed that 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT demonstrates a good detection rate in recurrent prostate cancer. Conclusions: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT appears to achieve reliable performance in detecting recurrent prostate cancer. The high detection rate of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer was confirmed, especially in local recurrence and small lymph nodes with non-specific characteristics on conventional diagnostic imaging methods. However, several authors emphasize some limitations for this tracer—for example, non-specific uptake in bone lesions that can mimic bone metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic tools- 18 F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET/CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy for the evaluation of local recurrence, regional lymph nodes and bone metastases of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). 28 PCa patients after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy and with biochemical relapse were enrolled in this study. The evaluation of local recurrence and regional lymph node metastases was based on results of PET/CT and MRI. Local recurrent disease in 28 patients was detected by PET/CT in 36% (10/28) and by MRI in 32% (9/28) with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of 90.9%, 100%, 96.4% and 81.8%, 100%, 92.9%, respectively (kappa 0.92, P<0.001). Nodal involvement was confirmed by PET/CT and MRI in 46% (13/28) and 25% (7/28) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for PET/CT 92.3%, 93.3%, 92.9% and for MRI-53.8%, 100%, 78.6%, respectively (kappa 0.57, P<0.001). The evaluation of skeletal metastases was based on PET/CT and bone scintigraphy. Bone metastases were seen on PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in 21% (6/28) and 20% (5/25) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%; 91.7%; 92.9% and 50.0%; 85.7%; 80.0%, respectively (kappa 0.41, P<0.01). In conclusion, our comparative study demonstrates advantages of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT compared to MRI and scintigraphy for the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. Both methods, 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI, detect local recurrence with high accuracy and excellent agreement, which may be attributed to the low urinary background clearance of 18 F-PSMA-1007., Competing Interests: None., (AJNMMI Copyright © 2021.)